Asia's New Great Game

China and India are both hungry for Burma's vast natural riches. But will Burma's people pay the price or can this Southeast Asian backwater finally enter the 21st century?

BY THANT MYINT-U | SEPTEMBER 12, 2011

Slide Show: Asia's New Silk Road

When geography changes -- as when the Suez Canal joined Europe to the Indian Ocean, or when the railroads transformed the American West and the Russian East -- old patterns of contact disappear and new ones take hold, turning strangers into neighbors and transforming backwaters into zones of new strategic significance. Entire groups decline or vanish; others rise in importance.

Over these next few years, Asia's geography will see a fundamental reorientation, bringing China and India together as never before across what was once a vast and neglected frontier stretching over a thousand miles from Kolkata to the Yangtze River basin. And Burma, long seen in Western policy circles as little more than an intractable human rights conundrum, may soon sit astride one of the world's newest and most strategically significant crossroads. Mammoth infrastructure projects are taming a once inhospitable landscape. More importantly, Burma and adjacent areas, which had long acted as a barrier between the two ancient civilizations, are reaching demographic and environmental as well as political watersheds. Ancient barriers are being broken, and the map of Asia is being redone.

For millennia, India and China have been separated by near impenetrable jungle, deadly malaria, and fearsome animals, as well as the Himalayas and the high wastelands of the Tibetan plateau. They have taken shape as entirely distinct civilizations, strikingly dissimilar in race, language, and customs. To reach India from China or vice versa, monks, missionaries, traders, and diplomats had to travel by camel and horse thousands of miles across the oasis towns and deserts of Central Asia and Afghanistan, or by ship over the Bay of Bengal and then through the Strait of Malacca to the South China Sea.  

But as global economic power shifts to the East, the configuration of the East is changing, too. The continent's last great frontier is disappearing, and Asia will soon be woven together as never before.

At the heart of the changes is Burma. Burma is not a small country; it is as big in size as France and Britain combined, but its population of 60 million is tiny compared with the 2.5 billion combined populations of its two massive neighbors. It is the missing link between China and India.

It is an unlikely 21st-century nexus. Burma is one of the world's poorest countries, wracked by a series of seemingly unending armed conflicts, and ruled for nearly five decades by one military or military-dominated regime after another. In 1988, following the brutal suppression of a pro-democracy uprising, a new junta took power, agreeing to cease fires with former communist and ethnic insurgents and seeking to unwind years of self-imposed isolation. But its repressive policies soon led to Western sanctions and this, together with growing corruption and continued mismanagement, meant that any hope of even economic improvement quickly dimmed.

By the mid-1990s the view of Burma in the West became fairly set -- a timeless backwater, brutal and bankrupt, the realm of juntas and drug lords, as well as courageous pro-democracy activists, led by Aung San Suu Kyi. A place worthy of humanitarian attention, but unconnected to the much bigger story of Asia's global rise. China, however, viewed things differently. Where the West saw a problem and offered mainly platitudes and a little aid, China recognized an opportunity and began changing facts on the ground.  

Beginning in the mid-1990s, China began unveiling plans to join its interior to the shores of the Indian Ocean. By the mid-2000s, these plans were being turned into reality. New highways are starting to slice through the highlands of Burma, linking the Chinese hinterland directly to both India and the warm waters of the Bay of Bengal. One highway will lead to a brand-new, multi-billion-dollar port, facilitating the export of manufactured goods from China's western provinces while bringing in Persian Gulf and African oil, oil that will be transported along a new 1,000-mile-long pipeline to refineries in China's hitherto landlocked Yunnan province. Another, parallel pipeline will carry Burma's newfound offshore natural gas to light up the fast-growing cities of Kunming and Chongqing. And more than $20 billion will be invested in a high-speed rail line. Soon, journeys that once took months to make may soon be completed in less than a day. By 2016, Chinese planners have declared, it will be possible to travel by train all the way from Rangoon to Beijing, part of a grand route they say will one day extend to Delhi and from there to Europe.

Burma could become China's California. Chinese authorities have long been vexed by the soaring gap in income between its prosperous eastern cities and provinces and the many poor and backward areas to the west. What China is lacking is another coast to provide its remote interior with an outlet to the sea and to its growing markets around the world. Chinese academics have written about a "Two Oceans" policy. The first is the Pacific. The second would be the Indian Ocean. In this vision, Burma becomes a new bridge to the Bay of Bengal and the seas beyond.

China's leadership has also written about its "Malacca dilemma." China is heavily dependent on foreign oil, and approximately 80 percent of these oil imports currently pass through the Strait of Malacca, near Singapore, one of the world's busiest shipping lanes and just 1.7 miles across at its narrowest point. For Chinese strategists, the strait is a natural choke point where future enemies could cut off foreign energy supplies. An alternative route needed to be found. Again, access across Burma would be advantageous, lessening dependence on the strait and at the same time dramatically reducing the distance from China's factories to markets in Europe and around the Indian Ocean. That Burma itself is rich in the raw materials needed to power industrial development in China's southwest is an added plus.

Meanwhile, India has its own ambitions. With the "Look East" policy, successive Indian governments since the 1990s have sought to revive and strengthen age-old ties to the Far East, across the sea and overland across Burma, creating new connections over once impassable mountains and jungle barriers. Just north of where China is building its pipeline, along the Burmese coast, India is starting work to revive another seaport with a special road and waterway to link to Assam and India's other isolated and conflict-ridden northeastern states. There is even a proposal to reopen the Stilwell Road, built by the Allies at epic cost during World War II and then abandoned, a road that would tie the easternmost reaches of India with China's Yunnan province. Indian government officials speak of Burma's importance for the security and future development of their country's northeast -- while also keeping a cautious eye on China's dynamic push into and across Burma.

Watching these developments, some have warned of a new Great Game, leading to conflict between the world's largest emerging powers. But others predict instead the making of a new Silk Road, like the one in ancient and medieval times that coupled China to Central Asia and Europe. It's important to remember that this geographic shift comes at a very special moment in Asia's history: a moment of growing peace and prosperity at the conclusion of a century of tremendous violence and armed conflict and centuries more of Western colonial domination. The happier scenario is far from impossible.

The generation now coming of age is the first to grow up in an Asia that is both post-colonial and (with a few small exceptions) postwar. New rivalries may yet fuel 21st-century nationalisms and lead to a new Great Game, but there is great optimism nearly everywhere, at least among the middle classes and the elites that drive policy: a sense that history is on Asia's side and a desire to focus on future wealth, not hark back to the dark times that have only recently been left behind.

And a crossroads through Burma would not be a simple joining up of countries. The parts of China and India that are being drawn together over Burma are among the most far-flung parts of the two giant states, regions of unparalleled ethnic and linguistic diversity where people speak literally hundreds of mutually unintelligible languages, of forgotten kingdoms like Manipur and Dali, and of isolated upland societies that were, until recently, beyond the control of Delhi or Beijing. They are also places where ballooning populations have only now filled out a once very sparsely peopled and densely forested landscape. New countries are finding new neighbors. Whereas the fall of the Berlin Wall reopened contacts that had only temporarily been suspended, the transformations under way are enabling entirely new encounters. There is the possibility of a cosmopolitan nexus at the heart of Asia.

But is a modern-day Silk Road really in the making? Until earlier this year, it was difficult to be optimistic, with Burma at the heart of the transformations and the news from Burma remaining so bad. Ordinary people were as poor as ever, political repression was the order of the day, and the Chinese projects under way seemed to be doing more to fuel corruption and devastate the environment than anything else. Fresh elections were held late last year, but they were widely condemned as fraudulent.

Over the past several months, however, there have been increasing signs that better days might lie ahead.

This March, the junta was formally dissolved and power handed over to a quasi-civilian government headed by a retired general, U Thein Sein. President Thein Sein quickly began to exceed (admittedly low) expectations, speaking out against graft, stressing the need for political reconciliation, appointing technocrats and businessmen to key positions, inviting exiles to return home, announcing fresh peace talks with rebel groups, and even reaching out to Aung San Suu Kyi, not long before released from house arrest. Poverty reduction strategies have been formulated, taxes lowered, trade liberalized, and a slew of new laws on everything from banking reform to environmental regulation prepared for legislative approval. Parliament, after a shaky start, began to take on a life of its own. Media censorship has been significantly relaxed, and opposition parties and Burma's burgeoning NGO community have been allowed a degree of freedom not seen in half a century.

It's a fragile opening. The president seems determined to push ahead, but his is not the only voice. There are other powerful ex-generals in parliament and in the cabinet, and the structures of repression remain intact. Burma is at a critical turning point.

And now, for the first time, Burma's politics matter beyond its immediate borders. If this opportunity for positive change is lost, Burma may remain a miserably run place -- but it will no longer be an isolated backwater. The great infrastructure projects under way will continue, as will the much longer-term processes of change. Asia's frontier will close and a new but dangerous crossroads will be the result.

But if Burma indeed takes a turn for the better and we see an end to decades of armed conflict, a lifting of Western sanctions, democratic government, and broad-based economic growth, the impact could be dramatic. China's hinterland will suddenly border a vibrant and young democracy, and India's northeast will be transformed from a dead end into its bridge to the Far East. What happens next in Burma could be a game-changer for all Asia.

Drn/Getty Images

 

Thant Myint-U has served on three U.N. peacekeeping operations, as well as with the U.N. Department of Political Affairs, and is a former fellow at Cambridge University, where he taught history. He is the author of Where China Meets India: Burma and the New Crossroads of Asia, from which this essay is adapted.

ARYABHAT

5:04 AM ET

September 13, 2011

Interesting and thoughtful article

Thank you FP for this article - very well thought out and incisive.

With all respect to Democracy and human rights, I think it is time for USA and India to realise that more immidiate task is to contain Chinese controlling Burma completely. In such a scenario, China will not only have "Two Oceans" but also siphone off Burmese Gas (one of the biggest reserve), grow even more capable and so more thratening, perhaps sooner then world thought. And no chance for Democracy in Burma for a long long time to come.

Rather, if US and India engage Burma openly and remove sanctions, Burma can get richer by better technology on Oil & Gas, so can USA and India too, and limit chinese influence in long run. It also increases long run chance of improving human rights in Burma.

IF we can live with Saudis and Bahrain, why no Burma?

 

CELOND

11:44 PM ET

September 13, 2011

Agreet it's a game

Burma is certainly big factor on world political balance. At this game Burma will become everyday more important.

 

XTIANGODLOKI

10:14 AM ET

September 13, 2011

It's Myanmar, not Burma

You figured that the author who used to work for UN would recognize this, since UN is among the first to endorse the name change .

 

TC1

11:32 PM ET

September 13, 2011

Myanmar

I think all the talk above about India and the various states in and on its border area say enough to show that Myanmar can be the 'foil' between India and China.

And for now that a 'foil' is needed!

 

TROY C

9:54 AM ET

September 14, 2011

I think as China and India

I think as China and India become closer politically and economically, it will be in the best interests of both of them to help Burma become stable and to prosper. At the moment, both China and India are focussing on work from home so that they can take advantage of their rapid growth and improving quality of life. The closer China and India become, the more willing and motivated they will be to steer their troubled common neighbour in the right direction.

 

MALKHAZ

5:18 PM ET

September 16, 2011

Great game, but China has an advantage

China and India are indeed the future economies to play a huge role in world development trends, however China has an advantage and is about few decades ahead to India and can accumulate more resources and get better control then India in shorter period. so it is the Greater Game for China then for India I believe.

 

JENS8912

12:35 PM ET

September 14, 2011

great game

I think we are all understand game that is power. we should leave all game and help each other for prevent poverty and prosperous. As a inhabitant of asia we have able to doing good any for human.

Gesund Abnehmen

 

MADCLIVE

2:04 PM ET

September 14, 2011

Great game indeed

A very interesting article. I've had a good read through and feel like I have learned things , never knew before, and I agree with many good points above. Thanks for posting these engaging articles. Best regards, Mad DJ Clive

 

SITEPECAS

8:17 PM ET

September 14, 2011

Betwixt Civilizations.

Nepal is another one though geography is not on its side. So is the case with Sikkim and Nathu la. Or for that matter, Laddakh, HP, Uttarakhand, Assam and Arunachal Pradesh. Burma can be host the Silk route if it remains under a strong military junta.... This is the only way to avoid another Nepal between the civilizations.
Thanks !!!
Massagista
Acompanhantes
Ar Condicionado

 

ARYABHAT

6:05 AM ET

September 15, 2011

Renamed YHWH?

Interesting to note that SITEPECAS is repeating verbatim what YHWH wrote.

I am afraid truth wasn't clear to him in my first response, so I repeat it here.

Please do not compare Ladakh or HP or Uttarakhand or Sikkim or Assam or Arunachal Pradesh with Myanmmar.

Ladakh or HP or Uttarakhand or Sikkim or Assam or Arunachal Pradesh are integral parts of India. Each one except Ladakh being a state of Union of India. Nathu La is a PASS - a transit point - a location, NOT even a state or region!

Interesting to notice that you forgot Tibet, while remembering all Himalayan states of India! Do I smell a Chinese trap here?

Myanmmar can host silk route irrespective of it is a Democracy or Military rule, as long as economics of trade route work out ! Am I paranoid when I see a subtle Chinese influence in suggestion that Myanmmar must be Military ruled to host Silk route?

BTW, your title should have been spelled as "Between Civilisations", not Betwixt! Time and again I have suggested that Chinese schools should teach better English, but no results yet! :-)

 

GEORGE1

11:52 PM ET

September 25, 2011

Will Burma be a cause for tussle?

Things have started changing in Burma, from it’s hitherto status of neglected and forgotten land to a resource-rich country with advantageous geographical location that has the goodness of antiinflammatory herbs

 

CORTES

6:22 PM ET

October 11, 2011

If Burma indeed consumes a

If Burma indeed consumes a turn for the more desirable as well as we meet a dregs to decades of armed conflict, a lifting of Western sanctions, democratic government, and broad-based monetary development, the impact might be simply dramatic.

 

GEORGE1

12:15 AM ET

September 26, 2011

Will Burma be a cause for tussle?

Things have started changing in Burma, from it’s hitherto status of neglected and forgotten land to a resource-rich country with advantageous geographical location that has the goodness of anti inflammatory herbs. It has gained the interest of its neighbors in the recent years and the countries like India and China have slowly started making foray into this poverty-ridden country for their selfish motives. Each of these countries has been eyeing Burma to extend their mercantile operations and this is likely to create a rift between China and India in the near future. Whatever the consequence of this rivalry might be, one thing is for sure it’s time to redraw the Asian map!

 

TAYFA34

5:42 AM ET

October 6, 2011

Interesting

And Palestinian land will shrink, suicide bombers will respond, rockets will be launched and Israelis killed. Now Hezbollah and Sunnis have started up again in Lebanon. And Iran is powering up its nuclear capacity. Israel may feel impelled to react at some point if it calculates either Lebanon or Iran needs to be nipped in the bud. Add Syria to the toxic mix in Lebanon; and if things boil over there then Palestine will be left to sit and stew on the perennial international back burner. Hope, at this point, is not even a diamond in the rough. porno porno porno porno web tasarım evlilik teklifi

 

RESZKA

3:52 AM ET

October 12, 2011

Let us in no way fail to

Let us in no way fail to remember that this geographic shift amounts on a pretty special moment in Asia's history. A moment of growing unity as well as prosperity on the conclusion of a century of tremendous violence and armed conflict as well as centuries more of Western colonial domination.