The Skeletons in Deng's Closet

The new biography of the man who really transformed China is the most complete and ambitious ever. But does it leave out some black spots?

BY CHRISTIAN CARYL | SEPTEMBER 13, 2011

Deng Xiaoping is the most important 20th-century leader you know almost nothing about -- unless you're Chinese. While most people in the People's Republic are perfectly aware that Deng deserves most of the credit for lifting them out of poverty and heaving China into the ranks of the world's leading industrial nations, in the rest of the world Chairman Mao is the one on the t-shirt. No question about it: Outside of his homeland, Deng, who died in 1997, has to be the least celebrated of the modern era's most successful statesmen.

There are many reasons for this. Mao became a global icon because the rhetoric of his Cultural Revolution dovetailed perfectly with a contemporary worldwide youth rebellion against authority, lending him an aura of outlaw chic that endured even after the world gained a much clearer understanding of the epic nature of his crimes. (In some circles, Mao's frank enthusiasm for mass violence may have actually contributed to his appeal.) Deng's market-oriented reforms, by contrast, were subtle and cumulative, the stuff of Davos speeches rather than rousing marches. It took a while for their full impact to become apparent, and the results, while astonishing, were not exactly calculated to appeal to the higher emotions.

And yet Deng led a long and remarkable life, packed with drama and global significance, one that deserves to be dissected in detail. So we must be thankful to Harvard professor Ezra Vogel for devoting a large chunk of his academic career to compiling a prodigious biography, Deng Xiaoping and the Transformation of China, the most ambitious account of the man so far. In writing this volume, Vogel has done an enormous amount of work. He appears to have absorbed the documents from every single Chinese Communist Party plenum since 1921. (I can't say I envy him the task, but hey, someone's got to do it.)

There have been several Deng biographies before this -- from the curmudgeonly Benjamin Yang, the suave ex-diplomat Richard Evans, the meticulous analyst Michael Marti -- but Vogel's can be regarded as the most comprehensive and informative of the lot. (Maurice Meisner wrote a book of marvelous verve about Deng and his era, but it doesn't actually contain that much in the way of biography.) Vogel has left no stone unturned, and this is mostly a good thing. But sometimes -- in a 928-page book with chapter titles like "Economic Readjustment and Rural Reform, 1978-1982" -- it wears. If you want to know the particulars of Deng's career, you'll be well-served here; if you want to know his life, you might find this book a bit frustrating. Vogel would probably object that it is the career that matters most, and of course that's true -- up to a point. But a biography, by the very nature of the beast, should also be a story -- preferably one that doesn't pull its punches. Brutal candor is a vital literary device. William Taubman set the standard with his fantastically well-researched yet bracingly sarcastic portrait of Khrushchev. Vogel, by contrast, is a bit too quick to skip over the rougher, blacker sides of his hero's past. The massive ambiguities, the jaw-dropping plot twists, the spicy Sichuanese reek of an unlikely life never quite filter through.

Vogel has been traveling to China since the 1960s, and over the years he has cultivated close relationships with Deng's relatives and leading members of the Chinese Communist Party, a level of access that has unquestionably enriched the book. When Vogel reveals something truly fresh about his subject, it's usually not because of a document, but rather because insiders have shared their views. My favorite quote comes from Deng's youngest son: "My father thinks Gorbachev is an idiot."

You could argue, in fact, that this casual remark is the keystone of the whole Deng story -- and of the remarkably different paths taken by China and the Soviet Union. In 1956, already 30 years into an eventful career, Deng was the head of the Chinese delegation that traveled to Moscow for the 20th Party Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, the one where Nikita Khrushchev gave his fateful "secret speech" on Stalin's personality cult. Like the other foreigners, the Chinese weren't actually in the hall when Khrushchev gave his epochal reckoning of Stalin's crimes and personal failures, but they learned the contents soon enough.  

XINHUA/AFP/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS: CHINA, HISTORY
 

Christian Caryl is the Washington chief editor of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. He is also a contributing editor to Foreign Policy and a senior fellow at the MIT Center for International Studies.

HITOMI

9:15 PM ET

September 13, 2011

An excellent review

of necessary reading. It is perfectly understandable that an author (Vogel) who has spent 1000s of hours researching another's life will start to see things in the manner of his subject. However, the lines cited on the Anti-Rightist campaign, CCP definitions of "Chinese Tradition" and the Democracy Wall are disturbing--if not satirical, they are impassibly banal and "politically" autistic.

I'm afraid I'm still uncertain whether Vogel meticulously assesses how much of a "strategy" for reform was actually crafted by Deng or at his behest, which after all is Deng's only claim to being a significant statesman. Trying to utilize statistical shock and awe would not be an acceptable substitute for this, and Deng should not be unduly credited merely for supporting the half-measure of Special Economic Zones (Deng's Southern Tour may not have been as significant to China's "strategy" as his tour of the US) over the intransigency of his political opponents. That, after all, would make him little more than a bureaucrat throwing his weight behind his pet projects. In fact, Deng's articulated assessment of China's growth prospects reads almost as a parody of the many vapid comments made on Chinese leaders' "long-view", unless one believes nebulous catch-phrases equivalent to vision.

It would also be important to know whether Deng's severe criticism of the PLA receives adequate attention in this text.

I appreciate the reviewer's awareness that is very difficult to ignore the personal failings of this leader. In almost every instance in which he could have dismantled some of the crippling mental constraints put upon the Chinese people during Mao's reign and in his wake, Deng singularly failed to do so. We know he believed Gorbachev was "an idiot", but did he feel the same way about Khrushchev (as Mao, in fact, did)? Considering his continuance of Mao's benighted and frequently vindictive (Wei jingsheng) authoritarianism, the mark of "pragmatism" Deng introduced to Chinese governance is not sufficient to warrant reverence. Further, some of his declarations on foreign policy (toward Vietnam, toward the US post-Tiananmen) are atrocious and indicative of a mind as limited in stature as his body.

 

MONICOO

6:10 AM ET

September 14, 2011

ok

Thanks for the head up Juegos

 

CHECK_THIS

7:34 AM ET

September 16, 2011

dating

Find your perfect match! Dating at http://www.searchmelive.com

 

MARCUS_HOLCOM

10:45 AM ET

September 14, 2011

Deng Xiaoping Great leader!!!!!!

Good leaders make people feel that they're at the very heart of things, not at the periphery. Everyone feels that he or she makes a difference to the success of the organization. When that happens people feel centered and that gives their work meaning.
Affiliate Programs Review
The most dangerous leadership myth is that leaders are born - that there is a genetic factor to leadership. This myth asserts that people simply either have certain charismatic qualities or not. That's nonsense; in fact, the opposite is true. Leaders are made rather than born. Failing organizations are usually over-managed and under-led.

 

CHECK_THIS

7:35 AM ET

September 16, 2011

Franchise document

Find information about Franchise Document and franchise online at http://www.franchisedocumentsonline.com

 

XTREMENO

7:23 AM ET

September 15, 2011

Reply

Hello, I like your page. I’m glad Google pointed me to it. I was able to get the know-how I was searching so badly for days now. Thanks for the post! I'll definitely be back. Good luck! XtremeNo

 

CHECK_THIS

3:53 PM ET

September 15, 2011

relkama

Zamiesc Darmowe ogloszenia. Darmowa reklama Cie nie zawiedzie http://www.reklamagratis.pl

 

CHECK_THIS

3:55 PM ET

September 15, 2011

Singles

Find your perfect match! Singles at http://www.searchmelive.com

 

AJUY

2:22 PM ET

September 28, 2011

RE: Singles

Most people think of somebody building a forensic psychologist salary to associated with the police because legal profilers, yet accusation in court the tv screen sophisticated style component. In fact you might find yourself working in family court docket looking at directly into statements associated with youngster abuse, learning the danger factors in people’s houses and also providing hypnotherapy providers to people in extended households.

Few people can easily truly spend the money for actual funds necessary to provide your hair and also face salon using the correct equipment. The beauty salon equipment could be the superb remedy instead of credit cash from your bank as well as getting Chinese fakes. To save lots of money when buying beauty salon gear, you must take into consideration obtaining a hair salon products bundle.

 

BRUNAMASSAGEM

9:06 PM ET

September 20, 2011

Xiaoping Great leader

Good leaders make people feel that they're at the very heart of things, not at the periphery. Everyone feels that he or she makes a difference to the success of the organization. When that happens people feel centered and that gives their work meaning. The most dangerous leadership myth is that leaders are born...
Ar Condicionado
Imoveis
Acompanhantes
Massagistas

 

YARINSIZ

2:55 PM ET

October 6, 2011

The most dangerous leadership

The most dangerous leadership myth is that leaders are born - that there is a genetic factor to leadership. This myth asserts that people simply either have certain charismatic qualities or not. That's nonsense; in fact, the opposite is true. Leaders are seslichat made rather than born. Failing organizations are usually over-managed and under-led.

 

DEBTDUE

12:54 PM ET

October 10, 2011

Better than Mao

Although Deng was not the perfect leader, he was much better than Mao who killed more people than the Holocaust with his many failures of programs. The Great Leap Forward was a huge step back. Deng had his faults, but what he did for China was impressive and in turn for the world. He help champion in globalization and turned the world on its head. The rules were rewritten by Deng when he opened the flood gates of China and he did this all in such a short amount of time and now China has improved drastically in terms of wealth, but just like in America, the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. China has some of the worst inequality of wealth, with a large population of migrant workers. All in all, Deng did good things, but there is still a lot of good work to be done to even things out in China. There few who can ride on an austin party bus, but there are many others who ride bikes to work that are 30 years old. China is the ultimate dichotomy of old and new, with Ferraris and rickshaws next to each other. This country is a mystery to everyone who was not born there. I do love globalization and what Deng did for the world, because now I sleep on a silk comforter, which is so very comfortable and there was no way to get one before Deng came in. China is very productive and I hope that they ease up on censorship soon and let their citizens express themselves.