Gaming has always been a rage among certain segment of people. Some may call this class nerds or geeks. Among them, simulation games are the most popular ones. Violence, which remains suppressed in the society, becomes cool in the virtual world. That's why we have some many war and fight games for Nintendo, PSP and XBox. It's really cool to be able to fly a fighter jet, maneuver in the sky and kill the targets. War strategy games take this passion to an entirely new level. You have an entire army at your command. Can anything else make you feel more powerful? As a last thought, are these games also preparing us for violence at a subconscious level?

If I had been an Al-Qaeda operative I would love to penetrate this particular pool of unemployed , angry young men sectors of American population.

These people are mentally killers due to their long term exposure to these violent video games and these people are supremely individualistic in nature who if need be will not accept the bonds and controls of either American society or American constitution.

I do believe if offered enough rewards many of these young men would love to work for Al-Qaeda as potenital cyber warriors or even potential drone operators if offered enough enocuragement and reward.

You mentioned how this should be sent out to the public, they might actually do that, there was a game used for tactical training in Iraq which was eventually released on Xbox. I forget its name, but it was a third person tactical shooter and had you directing squads while in fire-fights. The military version had a few extra features, like citizens who would come out during a fire fight and start badgering you. It was a great game though from my experience.

I agree that this game probably would be affective to understand all the variables at work and how un-predictable these environments can be, but not going to win any wars. Still effective in that sense of achieving understanding of the difficulties.

It would actually be very beneficial to release this to the public and use it as a crowd sourcing tool. Video games have been helpful to the scientific community for solving problems, think how this could generate valuable models for effective strategy. Assuming the coded assumptions are correct, the military would quickly and easily have solid methods to draw on that would have positive results.

Humans (including Americans) killing each other predates video games by a fair peace.

Serial killers do not play violent games. Instead, they sit down and make a master plan, on how to accomplish their demonic agenda. So that means, playing violent games does not mean that the person is likely to kill anybody who angers them or perhaps be a war freak person whenever someone pisses them off. Same thing goes to the mentality of most people that states that all video gamers are nerds and geeks, or maybe a person who has a social problem. Let us just say that these people merely enjoys the game, enjoy being a fly zapper, but not to the point of living their lives according to the game.

Where most Pentagon computer simulations look like spreadsheets and are just as fun to play, UrbanSim, which came out in 2009, resembles the kind of strategy game that many of us enjoy at home. That's probably because it was developed by the Institute for Creative Technologies, an innovative University of Southern California center funded by the Army and with deep ties to Hollywood and the video-game industry. Search for executive jobs sydney.

The idea that these video games create killers is such a ridiculous myth, crime rates are dropping in America as a whole, not growing, and even if they were growing they probably would have more connection to the economic crisis than pixels seslichat on a screen. I understand you stated 'unemployed,' perhaps saying more disadvantaged people would present themselves as more radical.