Wanted: Smarter Patients

The key to improving medical care in the developing world isn't better doctors -- it's educating everyone else.

BY CHARLES KENNY | OCTOBER 3, 2011

In 2007, a team of World Bank researchers studying the quality of health care in developing countries visited a clinic in rural Tanzania. They watched as a mother brought her 9-month-old into the doctor's office, carrying the child on her back. The mother stood in front of the desk and told the doctor that her daughter had a high fever. Without moving from behind his desk, where he could not see the girl, the doctor filled a prescription for malaria medicine and sent mother and child on their way. The World Bank research team stopped the pair and asked some follow-up questions. A nurse on the team quickly found the child was suffering from pneumonia, not malaria.

The doctor was not overworked; he saw 25 patients that day, comparable to the average primary care physician in the United States. And he was trained in diagnosing both malaria and pneumonia, both common diseases in Tanzania. Moreover, the health facility had the medicine to treat both diseases. But without the intervention of the research team, the child would have died. The World Bank's research suggests the incident was hardly unique. On average, doctors in Tanzania take fewer than a quarter of the diagnostic steps needed to confirm malaria in patients showing symptoms. The average number of questions in an interaction with a public-sector doctor in India is precisely one: "What's wrong with you?" MIT economists Abhijit Banerjee and Esther Duflo surveyed health care in Udaipur, India, and found that patients were given a shot in 66 percent of visits to private medical facilities -- usually unnecessarily and usually steroids and antibiotics, which cause premature aging and exacerbate the problem of drug-resistant strains of bacteria, respectively.

A considerable proportion of deaths in the developing world -- more than a third of them, according to the World Health Organization -- are the result of just a handful of communicable conditions: pneumonia and other respiratory infections, diarrheal diseases, AIDS, malaria, and tuberculosis. There are plenty of reasons for this -- not least low vaccination rates, poor sanitation, and limited access to treatment -- but one big factor is the kind of misdiagnosis the girl in the Tanzanian clinic received: Even patients who are lucky enough to be treated are often misdiagnosed and have treatment prescribed incorrectly. That is why it is great news that a number of cheap diagnostic tools simple enough to be used by patients themselves are coming online.

There is no simple solution to the problem of getting doctors to do their job better in developing countries. Training and education alone certainly won't cut it: The World Bank researchers found that three years of additional medical training improved diagnostic performance in Tanzania by just 1 percent, because all too often the problem is not lack of knowledge but lack of application. But if the supply side of the health-care equation is daunting, what about demand? Part of the solution might be to empower patients with more knowledge -- to create better-informed consumers. And one way to do that is to provide access to cheap and simple diagnostic kits that would allow patients to test for common diseases themselves. If a doctor prescribes treatment for malaria to a sick child without proper diagnosis, and a home test has suggested that in all likelihood the child has pneumonia, then parents can demand a proper exam or go to a different doctor.

Siegfried Modola/AFP/Getty Images

 

Charles Kenny is a senior fellow at the Center for Global Development, a Schwartz fellow at the New America Foundation, and author, most recently, of Getting Better: Why Global Development Is Succeeding and How We Can Improve the World Even More. "The Optimist," his column for ForeignPolicy.com, runs weekly.

RMDUENAS

8:47 AM ET

October 4, 2011

what about implementingthe other part of the solution?

...And having these doctors face accountability in the form of fines or even prison time? The one who went to school, the one who studied, the one who has the responsibility to heal, the one who took an oath, is the doctor, not the patient. It might be well intentioned, but placing the weight of having the knowledge to receive correct treatment on the patient, or the parents of the patient, in order to have better chances of obtaining adequate medical care sounds not very realistic.

I am university educated, I ask a lot of questions to my doctors and, invariably, half of them feel threatened by what I ask and my limited knowledge. I can only imagine what it would be like for a mother in rural Tanzania to dare to ask a question, and to receive a rude answer from one of these doctors.

It is the doctor who has to determine how educated the patient is and, based on that, assume the correct approach, and not the other way around. If patients could diagnoses themselves, then they would not need doctors!

 

ONESON

11:08 AM ET

October 8, 2011

Agreed

If patients could diagnoses themselves, then they would not need doctors! We need to look for another solution for the problem.
oyunlar

 

MIAMILAWYER

10:08 AM ET

October 4, 2011

Smarter Patients

I agree that the doctors need to be held accountable for the level of service that they provide. However, the onus really is on each patient to ensure that they are receiving proper medical care. We need to focus on educate the patients in order to prevent illness, maintain wellness and ensure that the physicians are performing their duties properly.

 

URGELT

3:01 PM ET

October 5, 2011

The Monopoly of Doctors

Take a longer view, and see where we are really going. Yes, medical tests are being developed that are cheaper. Technology is beginning to deliver solutions to medical needs which can be used outside of the medical monopoly. But it's going to go much further.

In time, consumers will be able to diagnose their own ailments with probes, implants, test strips, and computerized artificial intelligence. They'll even be able to diagnose genetic vulnerabilities to diseases. And if they can diagnose these conditions, why run to a doctor to fix them? Treatment recommendation can be automated, too. So can many of the treatments.

The medical monopoly owes its existence to the huge amount of information that had to be mastered to provide adequate patient care in the early 20th Century. When that information can be mastered by computers instead, the need for the medical monopoly will plummet.

Surgery? Machines can be made which will do repetitive tasks far more reliably than any human.

Drugs? Likewise, with the added benefit that every possible drug interaction can be detected and disasters prevented automatically. Doctors don't do nearly as well with this; it's difficult to remember how all drugs interact with each other. Most doctors know some of it. They can't possibly know it all. Machines can, and computers are cheap and becoming cheaper.

Dietary advice? Doctors are horrible at dietary advice, largely because so little is understood about cellular operation and the role of nutrition, and so dogma unsupported by science is the rule, not the exception. Advancing understanding of cells and nutrition, and the tests that will follow, will allow consumers to know exactly what they should eat to correct even a minor dietary deficiency. In fact, we'll be able to return to a very old idea: treating ailments with foods.

The simple truth is that the medical monopoly is under assault by technology. There is a long way to go; many, many decades will be required to fully dispense with it. But the process by which it will happen is already visible.

Think about that when an arrogant, bored doctor fails to bother to examine a sick child. He's an anachronism. The future will strip him of his monopoly and instead empower consumers, and that's a good thing.

 

RNIELSEN

8:34 PM ET

October 19, 2011

Patient Education

Some of the responsibility lies in the hands of medical and public health editors developing more easy-to-read patient education materials in all languages.

 

YARINSIZ

8:34 PM ET

October 28, 2011

The one who went to school,

The one who went to school, the one who studied, the one who has the responsibility to heal, the one who took an oath, is the doctor, not the patient. It might be well intentioned, seslichat but placing the weight of having the knowledge to receive correct treatment on the patient, or the parents of the patient, in order to have better chances of obtaining adequate medical care sounds not very realistic

 

PRELIOCIVEDE

4:39 AM ET

November 1, 2011

Excellent outline of what

Excellent outline of what World Health Organization might be? and how our thinking about health care needs to change to build a better outlet online system.