The Iranian Connection

What's the link between the plot to bomb the Saudi ambassador and the Gilad Shalit release deal? Iran's looking weak -- and that's scary.

BY MARTIN INDYK | OCTOBER 12, 2011

While it may not be immediately obvious, there is an important connection between the two big Middle East stories that broke Tuesday, Oct. 11 -- the negotiated prisoner transfer agreement between Hamas and Israel for the release of Gilad Shalit and the arrest of Iranian Quds Force agent Manssor Arbabsiar -- a connection that demonstrates Iran's fading influence since the emergence of the Arab Spring.

Seldom is the Iranian hand in terrorism revealed as clearly as it was Tuesday in the careful details provided by the U.S. Justice Department. The Iranian regime, operating through the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), does its best to operate without fingerprints as it deploys terrorism as a tool of its own brand of statecraft. But here in phone transcripts and wire transfers is evidence that "elements of the Iranian government" -- specifically senior officers of the IRGC's Quds Force -- were responsible for ordering and orchestrating a brazen terrorist assassination against the Saudi ambassador to the United States, Adel al-Jubeir, in a downtown Washington restaurant.

The Iranian hand in Hamas's terrorist activity has also been revealed in the past, particularly in arms shipments bound for Gaza that were intercepted by the Israeli Navy. But Iran's role in Hamas's holding of Shalit has been less obvious and little remarked. The negotiations for his release have been tortuous and long-winded, mediated by German and Egyptian intelligence officials. At critical moments in the past, Iran intervened via Khaled Meshaal, Hamas's external leader, to scotch the deal. Tehran's motives were fairly obvious: The best way for Iran to spread its influence into the Arab heartland is to stoke the flames of conflict with Israel. Any prisoner swap deal between Hamas and Israel would take fuel off the fire.

But Iran's influence over Hamas's external leadership has been slipping lately. Based in Damascus, Syria, Meshaal and his colleagues have found themselves in an awkward position as the Syrian awakening has raged around them. As kinsmen of the Sunni Muslim Brotherhood whose Syrian branch has become a target of President Bashar al-Assad's Alawite thugs, they could not support the regime, even though their Iranian masters demanded they do so. Instead, as the going got tough, Meshaal got going, opening talks with the Egyptian interim military government about relocating from Damascus to Cairo (where, as a result of the revolution, the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood had gained new influence). The price: reconciliation with Abu Mazen (Palestinian Prime Minister Mahmoud Abbas) and acquiescence in a prisoner swap deal with Israel.

The Fatah-Hamas reconciliation deal was announced in Cairo in May. In mid-July, Egyptian mediators conveyed a new, more reasonable Hamas offer to Israel that triggered negotiations that culminated in Tuesday's prisoner swap announcement. In short, the Hamas-Israel deal may be a victory for Hamas, for Egypt-Israel relations -- and for the Shalit family, of course -- but it's also a blow to Iran. It indicates that the Iranians have lost control of one of their key Arab terrorist proxies to Egypt, their archrival for influence in the Arab world.

Iran's other Arab archrival is Saudi Arabia. Americans tend to view Tuesday's revelation of an Iranian terrorist plot through the prism of a brazen attempt to promote an attack on American soil. But the IRGC clearly designed it as a twofer, assassinating a symbol of the Saudi regime at the same time as it murdered American diners in downtown Washington. We've seen Iran do this before: The 1996 Khobar Towers bombing by Saudi Hezbollah killed 19 U.S. soldiers on Saudi soil.

What can we conclude from the byzantine connections between Tuesday's two events? Contrary to the confident predictions that Iran would be the beneficiary of the Arab Spring, its efforts to spread its influence into the Arab heartland are now in trouble. It is losing its Hamas proxy to Egypt. Its Syrian ally is reeling. Turkey has turned against it. When the Iranian regime finds itself in a corner, it typically lashes out. Perhaps that explains why Arbabsiar's Iranian handlers told him to "just do it quickly. It's late...."

BEHROUZ MEHRI/AFP/Getty Images

 

Martin Indyk is vice president and director of the Foreign Policy Program at the Brookings Institution.

BRUCKOII

7:26 PM ET

October 12, 2011

Interesting Response

I noticed Arbabsiar has been added to the people on Adopt a Terrorist For Prayer (ATFP.org). That's an interesting response. Some Iranian leaders are listed there as well.

 

BOBBYBROWN

8:52 PM ET

October 12, 2011

Wow

Wow, that's pretty scary.... I didnt think things went this far since Iraq war.... well, i think i'm gonna drink a cafe and go to bed... sad !

 

JOHNBOY4546

1:08 AM ET

October 13, 2011

A couple of points.....

Manssor Arbabsiar is so obviously an amateur that you can not take his confessions at face value.

After all, if he couldn't tell a Mexican drug lord from a DEA undercover cop then you really have to wonder if he can tell a member of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps from, well, a hole in the ground.

Amongst the "evidence" linking Arbabsiar to Iran is his claim that his cousin is a Very Senior General in the IRGC, and that claim is being paraded by the USA as a self-evident truth, which it simply isn't.

Or, put another way: does the USA have any evidence that Manssor Arbabsiar is indeed the cousin of General Abdul Reza Shahlai?

And this phrase "Gholam Shakuri, a member of the Quds force," is being recited as
a mantra...
a mantra....
a mantra.....

Now, don't get me wrong: there appears to be very considerable evidence pointing to Manssor Arbabsiar and Gholam Shakuri being co-conspirators, but even so the claim that "Gholam Shakuri is a member of the Quds force" is NOT a self-evident fact; it is an allegation that has to be substantiated.

And the US officials have not made not the slightest attempt to susbstantiate that allegation.

Here is the amateur.
He is in US custody.

Here is the "professional" spook.
He AIN'T in US custody.

And because the USA doesn't have the (alleged) Iranian spook in custody then it has to provide *other* evidence to substantiate its allegation that the chain of command goes from a used-car lot in Corpus Christi to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps HQ in Tehran.

And on the basis of the evidence that has currently been presented the USA can't bridge that gap.

 

HASSAN KESUR

4:54 AM ET

October 13, 2011

chaos

To change the balance of power may be more of a game cosmo disk What happens

 

HASSAN KESUR

4:58 AM ET

October 13, 2011

hassan cesur

To change the balance of power may be more of a game cosmo disk: What happens

 

ALLTHINGSGOOD

11:21 AM ET

October 13, 2011

Hamas vs Israel

I know people in Israel and I can tell you that trhough our news networks such as CNN, ect., we sure don

 

ALLTHINGSGOOD

11:21 AM ET

October 13, 2011

Hamas vs Israel

I know people in Israel and I can tell you that trhough our news networks such as CNN, ect., we sure don

 

ALLTHINGSGOOD

11:40 AM ET

October 13, 2011

Hamas vs Israel

I know people in Israel and I can tell you that through our news networks such as CNN, ect., oh no no we sure don`t get the full story of whats going on there. This is a snippet from an Israel news source "Hamas also coerced other terrorist organizations into accepting its policies through agreements meant to preserve the lull. Its enforcement apparatuses reduced rocket fire and showcase attacks from the Gaza Strip and at the same time tried to channel the rogue organizations into accepting the ground rules deemed suitable by hamas." source: http://www.mfa.gov.il/

 

TARQUINIS

2:59 PM ET

October 13, 2011

Martin Indyk; one more Zionist

Hey folks, this whole story about Iran plotting to blast the Saudi ambassador is rapidly falling apart. Big time.

How we could have EVER taken it at face value is a matter of significant embarrassment. Like, just what interest to their advantage at all would Iran have in blowing up the Saudi ambassador in DC? Think that could backfire, maybe just a little bit?

Posters put up links but I usually do not go there. But if you can take a recommendation, check this one out.

“Wagging the Dog with Iran’s Maxwell Smart” (10/13/11) http://www.juancole.com/

I hope to God we can have the elemental sense to back off and not let this become a cassus belli. It turns out to be more farcically false than the Gulf of Tonkin incident.

Only our usual Zionist posters can make a case for war out of what now appears to be a stupid joke.

 

YARINSIZ

6:20 AM ET

November 7, 2011

I hope to God we can have the

I hope to God we can have the elemental sense to back off and not let this become a cassus belli. It turns out to be seslichat more farcically false than the Gulf of Tonkin incident.

 

BOLE1

7:39 PM ET

November 10, 2011

Wherever I look I can only

Wherever I look I can only see wars and fights. Too bad...
lpn to rn
medical assistant schools
cna courses

 

LOCOROCO

2:09 PM ET

November 14, 2011

israel created hamas

Israel has been using hamas as a way to crack down on the palestinians.

The best way to see that, is that israel actually created hamas. Rabin said that to the Jerusalem press