Twilight of the Wise Man

The 2012 election may well mark the last gasp of the Republican foreign-policy establishment. But what’s more remarkable is that it lasted as long as it did.

BY JACOB HEILBRUNN | OCTOBER 12, 2011

In September 2005, two U.S. senators walked into a Soviet-era weapons factory in Donetsk, Ukraine. The elder of the two, Indiana Republican Richard Lugar, was such a familiar face in the world of international disarmament that he was waved past security at even top-secret Russian nuclear weapons facilities, according to a Chicago Tribune reporter who accompanied the lawmakers' weeklong tour of the remnants of Cold War arsenals in the former Soviet Union. But his traveling companion, a Democrat 29 years his junior and not even a full year into his first term, was in much less practiced terrain. "All of the workers have masks on," Barack Obama asked Lugar. "Why don't we?"

The white-haired Lugar, august enough to have briefed Dwight Eisenhower as a young Navy officer, was a shrewd choice of a mentor for Obama, then a rising star with presidential prospects but little international experience. Lugar had devoted his career to working on such unglamorous but significant issues as the Cooperative Threat Reduction program, passed by Congress in 1992, which reduced the swollen American and Soviet nuclear arsenals and kept dangerous materials from ending up in the hands of terrorists. Lugar's measured approach, which prompted Time to name him in 2006 as one of America's 10 best senators, necessarily involved crossing the aisle: "Even while you remain a strong advocate for your personal worldview, as President you must maximize bipartisan support and frequently seek bipartisan consensus on foreign policy issues," he cautioned in his 1988 book Letters to the Next President. "Lugar still refers to this chapter as a basic primer to the domestic politics of foreign policy," Lugar aide Andy Fisher told me via email.

This kind of above-politics deal-making on matters of global importance was once the hallmark of a whole caste of Republican policymakers, the so-called "wise men": avatars of the establishment who always maintained that foreign affairs is a lofty sphere to be left untainted by partisan bickering. So Lugar, who was enthusiastic about his apprentice as well, did not object when, during the 2008 presidential debates, Obama repeatedly invoked his name. Obama also aired advertisements in Indiana stating that Lugar belonged to a small group that has "shaped my ideas and will be surrounding me in the White House." The message was clear: Obama was anything but a radical and would compensate for his foreign-policy inexperience by seeking the counsel of elder statesmen. When Obama ran into Republican opposition in his efforts to get New START -- which continued nuclear arms-control reductions with Moscow -- ratified late last year, Lugar worked with his fellow nonproliferationists across the aisle to move it forward. The treaty passed and relations with Moscow improved.

But the same willingness to compromise and work with members of the opposition -- be they Russians or Democrats -- that made Lugar a venerated figure in the Senate has marked him for destruction by some in his own party. Indiana State Treasurer Richard Mourdock, incensed by Lugar's failure to repudiate the 2008 Obama advertisements and his support for the Supreme Court nominations of Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, formally launched the insurrection in February, announcing his Tea Party-backed primary campaign against Lugar: "It is bipartisanship," he said, "that has brought us to the brink of bankruptcy."

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

 

Jacob Heilbrunn is a senior fellow in U.S. foreign policy at the Center for the National Interest.

DARREN ROGERS

10:27 PM ET

October 12, 2011

Thank You Jacob Heilbrunn

Mr. Heilbrunn has provided the most succinct and accurate historical account of the American saga in the shortest passage of any I have perused. The boys at MI6 and S1 will be smiling after I forward this piece to them.

If anyone has ever wondered about transformational powers, the Woodrow "wilderland", and basically, how we got here, this is a very good read.

 

COMETLINEAR

12:58 AM ET

October 13, 2011

About the Iranian nuclear program

Let us bear in mind that that the Manhattan Project was the most expensive endeavor in American history, and the VPOTUS was not even aware of it.

I think it's fair to conjecture that the Iranian program may be more advanced than is generally known.

 

NICOLAS19

3:20 AM ET

October 14, 2011

putting Obama on a picture written "wise" on it...

I know it didn't refer to Obama, of course, but it made me chuckle, as the US has one of the most incompetent and weak presidents in its history.

He got his presidency by posing as someone he isn't by endorsing the likes of Lugar&Co, whom he never followed by actions only by words. I doubt he ever understood them.

He got his early political capital by promising so much (Arab Spring, Nobel-prize) in words and fulfilling nothing in action.

He is getting his political capital by claiming credit for feats he didn't initiate (Arab Spring, Libya), he probably made up (Iranian plot, OBL killing) and for what he should be ashamed (Wikileaks, Awlaki killing).

Now he is repeating those very same scenarios to win re-election. He is really good at manipulation and self-promotion, one has to give it to him, but once the happenings are gaining momentum, it becomes apparent how he is trailing behind, unable to lead and shape things. Heck, he even invented a phrase for it, "leading from behind". For somebody who campaigns with American exceptionalism, global role and commitment, he seems very proud to make America a second-grade power. Again, claiming positive credit for his own failure.

 

PHILBEST

11:00 PM ET

October 14, 2011

Agree

Agree; whatever was the writer of this article thinking by talking solely about REPUBLICAN foreign policy shortcomings?

 

BUFFALO09

4:19 PM ET

October 14, 2011

Failure to Acknowledge-Carter Admin Brilliance

Is there a reason aside from ideological convenience that Carter's decision to relinquish support for the Shah of Iran that destabilized the entire Middle East; led to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, Iran-Iraq war, Iranian hostage crisis, & the uprising of the late 70’s Islamic Revolutions (Abdullah Yusuf Azzaam/Laden Collaboration Evolves). As an independent attempting to appeal to the fair-minded members attending this post; there are no wise men when attempting to make decisions, influence policy, or appease one own political ideological ego. History has proven that there have been good decisions made by members of both parties while also decisions such as the one above; we would conveniently choose to forget as Heilbrunn has done in this instance. Please note that I do acknowledge that the Shah was quite brutal, however a decision that involved relinquishing support from the United States which was made in the name of human rights that resulted in the fore mentioned consequences and whose occurrence continues to provide repercussions over thirty years later. Reasoning as to why the author has been selective while offering praise/criticism from a perspective that could only be described as “ideological”. Discussing foreign policy, an area where a decision that was made over a lengthy time frame can be identified as both positive and negative as changes that occur over time provide opportunity for individuals that offer allegiance to political ideological aspirations as opposed to individuals that thirst for discussions involving Foreign Policy where intellectual honesty and literal facts are characteristics/methods utilized while engaging in discourse of this nature. Through the omission of United States Foreign policy during the latter part of the 1970’s, the author not only appears to be engaging in behavior that would be categorized as dishonest, he has conducted an indirect assault on the institution of free thought. Is there any publication left that is dedicated towards educating and informing readers by sourcing literal facts instead of appeasing right & left wing allegiances, I ask?

 

PHILBEST

11:07 PM ET

October 14, 2011

"Brilliance" - I love the irony

Agree; whatever was the writer of this article thinking by talking solely about REPUBLICAN foreign policy shortcomings?

 

BYTECOMPASS

10:36 AM ET

November 4, 2011

He Makes Case for a Good Topic

Polls show Lugar is vulnerable and the record, dotted with votes for that Troubled Asset Relief Program along with other government spending, is ripe for conservative critique, despite decades among the Senate's foreign policy experts. Though the tea party candidate challenging him within the GOP primary, state treasurer Richard Mourdock, lacks Lugar's heft and name recognition.

It sought out an occasion likesomanabolicmusclemaximizerthree longtime Senate moderates - Orrin Hatch of Utah, Olympia Snowe of Maine and Lugar - were vulnerable to being removed by primary challenges in the right. Nevertheless the upstart campaigns in Utah and Maine have fizzled as Hatch and Snowe made concerted efforts to woo right-wing voters inside their states.

 

OLSON46

6:45 AM ET

November 6, 2011

Twilight of the Wise Man

"The first decade of the twenty-first century witnessed the FINAL decline and virtual extinctions of moderates' power and representation in the Republican Party."
"Final" is a very powerful statement. Keep in mind that history is still in the making.

Regards,
Lisa O.

 

MAKI1

6:09 PM ET

November 10, 2011

It will be interesting to see

It will be interesting to see results of the elections...
lpn training
medical assisting
cna certification programs