City of the Future

Karachi is violent, unhealthy, and unequal. Is that so bad?

BY STEVE INSKEEP | OCTOBER 17, 2011

KARACHI, Pakistan — Karachi may be a city in crisis, on the shore of a country in crisis, but people find ways to make money. If religious conservatism is spreading, that's no problem; new ads outside the airport promote "Pakistan's First Shariah Compliant Credit Card."

Related

Portrait of a Megalopolis
A closer look at Karachi from its slums to its skyscrapers

Karachi's political parties intensified their war for power this summer, killing well over 300 people in gun battles and assassinations -- but that's no problem either. The red flags of one ethnic party, which adorned light poles on a highway into the city's center, were recently replaced by banners promoting cell phones.

Along the seashore, where skyscrapers and a shopping mall are under construction even in this time of war, I went for dinner on a pier known since British colonial times as the Native Jetty. It was recently remade as "Port Grand," a row of upscale restaurants and stores on the water, like a Disneyland vision of Pakistan. I sat with friends outside Shaikh Abdul Ghaffar Kabab House, where smoke from the grill drifted across the jetty, and loudspeakers played a Muzak version of the theme from The Godfather. The kabab was excellent.

Karachi is the economic heart of Pakistan, its main port and financial capital, and an industrial center for everything from textiles to steel. Home to about 400,000 people upon Pakistan's independence in 1947, the city has since expanded to more than 13 million souls by the most conservative estimate, having taken in migrants from every corner of Pakistan and beyond.

The city has grown so swiftly that it evades all efforts to control it. Millions live in illegal neighborhoods, where developers seize and subdivide government land, bribing police not to notice as they sell tiny homes to the poor. Many residents get electricity by tapping power lines, adding stress to a grid that's already overwhelmed, with hours of blackouts every day. Karachi's Lyari River, which used to be a seasonal stream, now flows year-round with untreated sewage. Ultimately, the waste reaches fishing grounds in the Arabian Sea. "Thirty years ago you could drop a coin in the water and see it below the surface," a Karachi fisherman told me this month. "Now the sea is like a gutter." Local politics encourage even harsher metaphors. The city faces a political crisis so severe that it has gone more than a year and a half without an elected mayor or city council.

RIZWAN TABASSUM/AFP/Getty Images

 

Steve Inskeep is co-host of NPR's Morning Edition and author of the new book Instant City: Life and Death in Karachi.

VODKA

4:10 PM ET

October 17, 2011

Thanx Steve

Been listening to you on NPR forever.....you have written a wonderful account on a troubled city

 

REMO2301

3:19 AM ET

November 16, 2011

Wonderful information.

This post will be very useful for all the people. Thank you for sharing this informative and knowledgeable information. Waiting for more articles related to this......
Freshersworld and IT jobs

 

FERRARI333SP

10:19 PM ET

October 17, 2011

Excellent insight into life

Excellent insight into life in Karachi, Pakistan. It's a city we don't hear very much of in the West, but it sounds like a city I'd love to visit one day.

 

SYED ARBAB AHMED

12:26 AM ET

October 18, 2011

Karachi is far bigger and complex than this article

Karachi is far bigger and complex than this article, the ethnic tension is due to our so called political parties, the unhealthy environment, the education system etc is due to ineligible and corrupt government, but even then the potential of Karachi makes it earner of about 70% of Pakistan economy.

Target Killings, Violence, Bloodshed in Karachi & its responsible!
http://bit.ly/oGwQRE

If environment in Karachi become good then not only Karachi but Pakistan will progress by leaps and bounds.

 

BIGBROTHER

12:35 AM ET

October 18, 2011

Racism - alive and well.

A modern day Rudyard Kipling.

Racism?

Karachi is good enough .... for those stinky brown people.
Sounds like a city I would love to visit. I also like watching monkeys at the zoo...they remind me of humans. It's so fascinating to throw breadcrumbs on the ground and watch pigeons scramble for scraps...it reminds me of Karachi.

Being a Westerner with an open and curious mind is so much fun. I love traveling and watching homo sapiens wallow in sewage. I once wondered if the discrepancy in the human condition is a legacy of the exploitation of colonialism. But I quickly decided that it is because the brownies are inferior. Now, I enjoy traveling to exotic places again.

Thank you, Steve Inskeep and the pseudo-intellectuals at NPR.

 

SMCI60652

12:51 PM ET

October 18, 2011

Qua?

What the hell are you talking about?

 

BIGBROTHER

12:04 AM ET

October 19, 2011

Its called sacrcasm.

The first sign of dementia is the inability to recognize sarcasm on neurocognitive testing.

For the concrete thinkers:
This article sounds like a throwback to the old colonial days. The author knows well that most of Karachi is a wretched, violent place where human dignity is violated daily. Yet, he spins a curious tale and creates the illusion that the condition of the millions of exploited human beings is acceptable. He spends time with the disconnected elites who represent a small minority of privileged parasites.

It's amusing to see comments from people who seem sincerely moved to say, "sounds like a city I would love to visit." KEY WORD: visit - not live in. They intuitively know that it is hell on earth, but also seem comfortable in their belief that it is good enough for the brown subhumans in Pakistan. If white, Europeans were living in similar conditions, Steve Inskeep would write a very different article for the NPR crowd. And nobody would say "sounds like a place I'd like to visit".

Is that more clear?

 

BIGBROTHER

2:49 PM ET

October 19, 2011

Racism, supremacism, exceptionalism...whatever

Was Rudyard Kipling a racist? Yes. It was the social norm back then. Just like Jefferson wrote eloquently about freedom and equality while owning slaves is difficult to reconcile today. It was not difficult, subtle or complex for the the black slaves, even back then.

Similarly, British supremacism was so prevalent, that we hesitate to call it like we see it. This allows a gentler but prevalent residual racism to persist today as we see in Mr. Inskeep's article and the comments about how quaint and exotic and fun these wretched places would be to visit. Go visit and see and smell.

It may be difficult or subtle to detect the racism in the article or the comments for the "Western" readers (aka white), but its pretty obvious to everyone else, like Jefferson's slaves. Many educated elite today receive their education with a hefty dose of "Western Civ" classes, and this education institutionalizes today's racism and supremacism. This is evident not just in conservative, but also in the liberal, Americans.

Just cuz you meant no harm, doesn't mean you didn't do no harm.

 

TERRY BRENNAN

5:19 PM ET

October 20, 2011

Agree and disagree

I agree that racism was deeply woven into the consciousness of many of our heroes. British racism, American slave-holding...

Yet Thomas Jefferson did free all his slaves on his death. He did have some consciousness of his racism.

It is easy to condemn those of the past for not living up to our standards of ethical behavior. I remember whispering in a religion class in college that Aristotle was a slave-owner.

I didn't actually find Inskeep's article racist, though the comment about it being an interesting place to visit was pretty weird. Some people don't write well (though Big Brother writes well when he doesn't write sarcastically) so I tend to forgive.

I like your rage at hypocrites, but I think you might be spreading your rage around too much. Inskeep doesn't deserve it, nor does Vodka (?!). But keep writing; rage is a good companion for a writer.