He's Not Sorry

So why is Barack Obama so worried about Mitt Romney and being called the Apologist-in-Chief?

BY MICHAEL A. COHEN | DECEMBER 8, 2011

There are political lies; and then there are charges that fall squarely in the realm of pants-on-fire untruths. The repeated assertion by conservative politicians, commentators, and pundits that President Barack Obama has consistently apologized for America during his global travels -- the "American Apology Tour" as Mitt Romney calls it -- falls squarely into the latter category.

It is a lie that has been reiterated so often that it has become conventional wisdom on the right. The fact that Obama has never directly apologized for America; that he has never expressed direct sorrow or regret for U.S. actions; that alleged charges of contrition have been repeatedly and comprehensively debunked appears not to matter much at all -- particularly to those such as Romney, who in last month's CNN national security debate repeated the charge again. It's worth mentioning that Romney is so enamored with the topic of presidential apologizing that he titled his recent foreign policy book, you guessed it, No Apologies. And piling on was Rick Santorum, who on Wednesday, Dec. 7, called Obama's policy toward Islamist radicals "nothing but appeasement."

The apology canard has been disproven practically as often as it has been made. Politifact assessed the claims and determined that "While Obama's speeches contained some criticisms of past U.S. actions, those passages were typically leavened by praise for the United States and its ideals, and he frequently mentioned how other countries have erred as well. We found not a single, full-throated apology in the bunch." The Washington Post "Fact-checker" said of the charge, "The claim that Obama repeatedly has apologized for the United States is not borne out by the facts, especially if his full quotes are viewed in context." They gave it four Pinocchios.

All of this might sound like the inevitable back and forth of American politics. After all, politicians exaggerate the faults of their opponents all the time -- and it's hard to imagine that the Obama administration would take any of these obvious untruths seriously. But even the most mundane and misleading of political attacks can shape foreign policy decision-making. If, as Clausewitz suggested, "war is the expression of politics by other means," then foreign policy is often the expression of domestic politics by other means -- with often unsettling consequences.

For starters, the apology charge -- and general claims of a lack of exceptionalist fervor by Obama -- actually appears to resonate with a surprising number of Americans. According to a December 2010 Gallup poll, only 58 percent of Americans agreed that Obama believes the United States has a "unique character" that "makes it the greatest country in the world." It's not a bad number, but far less than Ronald Reagan (86 percent), Clinton (77 percent) and George W. Bush (74 percent). In all, a stunning 61 percent of Republicans believe that Obama doesn't view America as an exceptional country. Nearly four in ten independent voters feel the same. So, it's legitimate to ask how much this actually matters -- and how many votes are actually swayed by the belief that Obama doesn't love America with every fiber of his being. In fact, according to a recent Pew survey, only a bare majority of Americans believes that the "culture" of the United States "is superior to others" -- an approximately 20 percent decline from just a decade ago.

Still, the White House appears disinclined to take any chances. Case in point, in the wake of a U.S. attack into Pakistani territory that killed 24 soldiers, the U.S. Department of State had been urging Obama to offer public condolences or some sign of remorse in order to salvage America's increasingly precarious relationship with Pakistan. According to media reports, the U.S. Ambassador to Pakistan, Cameron Munter was pushing Obama for a video statement or even apology on the incident. But none will be forthcoming -- and one of the reasons is instructive. Writes the New York Times, "some administration aides also worried that if Mr. Obama were to overrule the military and apologize to Pakistan, such a step could become fodder for his Republican opponents in the presidential campaign."

Win McNamee/Getty Images

 

Michael A. Cohen is a regular columnist for Foreign Policy's Election 2012 Channel.

QUADROPLAY

11:47 PM ET

December 8, 2011

I guess if Romney will be

I guess if Romney will be elected as a president of USA your country will lose even more soldiers cuz he want to start a wars with all asian countries (including Iran, Syria, China and Russia)

 

NLHENDER

6:12 AM ET

December 9, 2011

American Arrogance

As a proud American I feel that a majority of my fellow citizen are ignorant to the painful past of our country's foreign policy. Alot of it has created the discontent other nations have for us today, it is a product of history, not ideology. With that said, Obama has endured much unfounded criticism, both over-opinionated and misinformed.

 

DELTA22

6:25 AM ET

December 9, 2011

m

Obama shouldn't have to prove that he's patriotic or tough on terrorists. Instead, our country should be asking why Republicans are promoting fascism as a positive ideal.

 

KUNINO

4:10 PM ET

December 11, 2011

Treading a well-worn low road

Republicans learned in 2000 that lying can win you the presidency of the United States, and they would be damned fools to forget than 11 years later. The big lie that year was that Mr Gore claimed to have invented the internet. He never made the claim, and that this was a Republican lie was widely known within a day or two of its appearance. Nevertheless ... in his quest to be liar-in-chief, Mr Bush kept repeating it anyway. Doubtless many votes in November 2000 were shaped by trust in Bush's lie, and detestation of Gore's non-lie.

Why rely on truth for political advantage?

 

SAABRIAN

11:45 AM ET

December 9, 2011

Militarists never shut up

Judging from their comments, most of these Republican candidates believe Israel, not America, is the greatest country in the world and would seem more comfortable running for leader of the Israeli state than the American one.

But to the barbarians, not bombing or invading every country that disagrees with you constitutes appeasement.

 

JOSSEFPERL

3:16 PM ET

December 9, 2011

Michael Cohen Makes Some Convenient Omissions

No one can deny, that the "appeasement" accusations of Obama by Romney and other Republican candidates are wrong when it comes to Al Quaida, Afganistan and Iraq, all clearly stated in the article. However, Mr. Choen conveniently ignored Obama's landmark speech in Cairo that included quiet a few appologies, as well as his early attempts to open negotiations with Iran, that were rebuffed. This and the later brutal repression after the Iranian election showed that Obama's views on Iran were rather naive. Obama's also did not support the Iranian Green Party very strongly. As to Mr. Cohen's claim that Obama did not press Israel strongly enough on settlements, this is a ridiculous claim; Obama was the only US president who humiliated an Israeli PM publicly; he reacted to the settlements as strongly and publicly as he could. When asked why he handled his conflict with Netanyahu so publicly, his response was that he got the advice from Ram Emanuael. It is no surprise that Obama has difficulties with many Jewish voters (apprantely not with Michael Cohen.).

 

SCOOP

3:41 PM ET

December 9, 2011

Top 10 Obama Apologies

by Human Events, 06/17/2009

Excerpted from article by Niles Gardiner, director of the Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom at the Heritage Foundation.

1. Apology to Europe: Speech in Strasbourg, France, April 3. “In America, there’s a failure to appreciate Europe‘s leading role in the world. Instead of celebrating your dynamic union and seeking to partner with you to meet common challenges, there have been times where America has shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive.”

2. Apology to the Muslim world: Interview with Al Arabiya, January 27. “My job to the Muslim world is to communicate that the Americans are not your enemy. We sometimes make mistakes. We have not been perfect.”

3. Apology to the Summit of the Americas: Address to the Summit of the Americas, Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago, April 17. “While the United States has done much to promote peace and prosperity in the hemisphere, we have at times been disengaged, and at times we sought to dictate our terms.”

4. Apology at the G-20 Summit of World Leaders: News conference in London, April 2. “I just think in a world that is as complex as it is, that it is very important for us to be able to forge partnerships as opposed to simply dictating solutions.”

5. Apology for the War on Terror: Speech in Washington, D.C., May 21. “Unfortunately, faced with an uncertain threat, our government made a series of hasty decisions. I believe that many of these decisions were motivated by a sincere desire to protect the American people. But I also believe that all too often our government made decisions based on fear rather than foresight, that all too often our government trimmed facts and evidence to fit ideological predispositions.”

6. Apology for Guantanamo in France: Speech in Strasbourg, France, April 3. “In dealing with terrorism, we can’t lose sight of our values and who we are. That’s why I closed Guantanamo. That’s why I made very clear that we will not engage in certain interrogation practices. I don’t believe that there is a contradiction between our security and our values. And when you start sacrificing your values, when you lose yourself, then over the long term that will make you less secure.”

7. Apology for America before the Turkish Parliament: Speech to the Turkish Parliament, Ankara, Turkey, April 6. “The United States is still working through some of our own darker periods in our history. Facing the Washington Monument that I spoke of is a memorial of Abraham Lincoln, the man who freed those who were enslaved even after Washington led our Revolution. Our country still struggles with the legacies of slavery and segregation, the past treatment of Native Americans.”

8. Apology for U.S. Policy toward the Americas: Editorial “Choosing a Better Future in the Americas,” April 16. “Too often, the United States has not pursued and sustained engagement with our neighbors. We have been too easily distracted by other priorities, and have failed to see that our own progress is tied directly to progress throughout the Americas.”

9. Apology for the Mistakes of the CIA: Remarks to CIA employees at Langley, Va., April 29. “Don’t be discouraged that we have to acknowledge potentially we’ve made some mistakes.”

10. Apology for Guantanamo: Speech in Washington, D.C., May 21. “There is also no question that Guantanamo set back the moral authority that is America’s strongest currency in the world.”

 

DR. SARDONICUS

10:00 PM ET

December 9, 2011

Since when has America been perfect?

Where I come from, there is a difference between admitting to a collective error and apologizing for one, either personally or as the leader of a collective. "Something went wrong" does not mean "I apologize for something having gone wrong."

Then again, Republicans are never wrong. I have yet to hear a Republican apologize for that idiot Bush's election and re-election, for crashing the economy, for two useless wars or for any other blunder or swindle for which Republicans have been directly responsible. Dead silence implies perfect past performance.

Democrats tend to act circumspectly and spend more time justifying their decisions and/or apologizing for mistakes. Republicans don’t care how stupid, unjust or self-serving their actions are or have been, and whether or not they are caught lying. On the contrary, they think getting away with lies, blackmail and larceny is a mark of power. They spend much more time blaming others for everything, whether it goes wrong or not.

Sort of like dealing with someone who is conscience-driven (conscientious?) or a sociopath, don’t you think?

 

BLUE13326

4:02 PM ET

December 11, 2011

And the notion from this

And the notion from this article that you can trust the same old biased sources just because they've rebrnded themselves politifact or fact checkers just makes me laugh...

 

LILIAMTIO

7:10 PM ET

December 9, 2011

I hope that he's not sorry !

I hope that he's not sorry ! Our president is the best since clinton, i'm sure he's doing he's best. It's not like he was doing shopping most of the time with his daughter...

 

GJS

12:37 AM ET

December 10, 2011

Romney

We should ALL be scared if Romney or anyone for that matter feels the US has nothing to apologise for, there have been some horrid "accidents" in others countries.

 

KAULITS

6:16 AM ET

December 10, 2011

The Roma and Slavic Muslims

The Roma and Slavic Muslims are in an even worse position. NATO has done virtually nothing to help make Kosovo safe for its minorities and now it wants to impose the rule of Kosovo's racist regime on the Northern Serbs

 

SHAHEEENARASHID

9:22 AM ET

December 10, 2011

Why he should sorry ?

He should not be sorry,
Republicans on a private Republican National Committee conference call with allies warned Tuesday that party surrogates should refrain from personal attacks against President Barack Obama, because such a strategy is too hazardous for the GOP.

“We’re hesitant to jump on board with heavy attacks” personally against President Obama, Nicholas Thompson, the vice president of polling firm the Tarrance Group, said on the call. “There’s a lot of people who feel sorry for him.”

Recent polling data indicates that while the president suffers from significantly low job approval ratings, voters still give “high approval” to Obama personally, Thompson said.

Voters “don’t think he’s an evil man who’s out to change the United States” for the worse–even though many of the same survey respondents agree that his policies have harmed the country, Thompson said. The upshot, Thompson stressed, is that Republicans should “exercise some caution” when talking about the president personally.

What’s personal?

Chalk me up as one of those guys who thought that despite his obvious liberalism, Obama might be a good and decent man outside of the political realm. But now three years of his presidency suggests he does have some serious character flaws. Part of me marvels that so many still find him so likeable, and I can’t help but get the feeling that a lot of people are wedded to the notion that the first African-American President of the United States would be a healing, wise, visionary statesman, like the second coming of Martin Luther King Jr, instead of a over-promising, under-delivering, self-pitying narcissist.

Republicans on a private Republican National Committee conference call with allies warned Tuesday that party surrogates should refrain from personal attacks against President Barack Obama, because such a strategy is too hazardous for the GOP.

“We’re hesitant to jump on board with heavy attacks” personally against President Obama, Nicholas Thompson, the vice president of polling firm the Tarrance Group, said on the call. “There’s a lot of people who feel sorry for him.”

Recent polling data indicates that while the president suffers from significantly low job approval ratings, voters still give “high approval” to Obama personally, Thompson said.

Voters “don’t think he’s an evil man who’s out to change the United States” for the worse–even though many of the same survey respondents agree that his policies have harmed the country, Thompson said. The upshot, Thompson stressed, is that Republicans should “exercise some caution” when talking about the president personally.

What’s personal?

Chalk me up as one of those guys who thought that despite his obvious liberalism, Obama might be a good and decent man outside of the political realm. But now three years of his presidency suggests he does have some serious character flaws. Part of me marvels that so many still find him so likeable, and I can’t help but get the feeling that a lot of people are wedded to the notion that the first African-American President of the United States would be a healing, wise, visionary statesman, like the second coming of Martin Luther King Jr, instead of a over-promising, under-delivering, self-pitying narcissist.

Republicans on a private Republican National Committee conference call with allies warned Tuesday that party surrogates should refrain from personal attacks against President Barack Obama, because such a strategy is too hazardous for the GOP.

“We’re hesitant to jump on board with heavy attacks” personally against President Obama, Nicholas Thompson, the vice president of polling firm the Tarrance Group, said on the call. “There’s a lot of people who feel sorry for him.”

Recent polling data indicates that while the president suffers from significantly low job approval ratings, voters still give “high approval” to Obama personally, Thompson said.

Voters “don’t think he’s an evil man who’s out to change the United States” for the worse–even though many of the same survey respondents agree that his policies have harmed the country, Thompson said. The upshot, Thompson stressed, is that Republicans should “exercise some caution” when talking about the president personally.

What’s personal?

Chalk me up as one of those guys who thought that despite his obvious liberalism, Obama might be a good and decent man outside of the political realm. But now three years of his presidency suggests he does have some serious character flaws. Part of me marvels that so many still find him so likeable, and I can’t help but get the feeling that a lot of people are wedded to the notion that the first African-American President of the United States would be a healing, wise, visionary statesman, like the second coming of Martin Luther King Jr, instead of a over-promising, under-delivering, self-pitying narcissist.

Republicans on a private Republican National Committee conference call with allies warned Tuesday that party surrogates should refrain from personal attacks against President Barack Obama, because such a strategy is too hazardous for the GOP.

“We’re hesitant to jump on board with heavy attacks” personally against President Obama, Nicholas Thompson, the vice president of polling firm the Tarrance Group, said on the call. “There’s a lot of people who feel sorry for him.”

Recent polling data indicates that while the president suffers from significantly low job approval ratings, voters still give “high approval” to Obama personally, Thompson said.

Voters “don’t think he’s an evil man who’s out to change the United States” for the worse–even though many of the same survey respondents agree that his policies have harmed the country, Thompson said. The upshot, Thompson stressed, is that Republicans should “exercise some caution” when talking about the president personally.

What’s personal?

Chalk me up as one of those guys who thought that despite his obvious liberalism, Obama might be a good and decent man outside of the political realm. But now three years of his presidency suggests he does have some serious character flaws. Part of me marvels that so many still find him so likeable, and I can’t help but get the feeling that a lot of people are wedded to the notion that the first African-American President of the United States would be a healing, wise, visionary statesman, like the second coming of Martin Luther King Jr, instead of a over-promising, under-delivering, self-pitying narcissist.

Republicans on a private Republican National Committee conference call with allies warned Tuesday that party surrogates should refrain from personal attacks against President Barack Obama, because such a strategy is too hazardous for the GOP.

“We’re hesitant to jump on board with heavy attacks” personally against President Obama, Nicholas Thompson, the vice president of polling firm the Tarrance Group, said on the call. “There’s a lot of people who feel sorry for him.”

Recent polling data indicates that while the president suffers from significantly low job approval ratings, voters still give “high approval” to Obama personally, Thompson said.

Voters “don’t think he’s an evil man who’s out to change the United States” for the worse–even though many of the same survey respondents agree that his policies have harmed the country, Thompson said. The upshot, Thompson stressed, is that Republicans should “exercise some caution” when talking about the president personally.

What’s personal?

Chalk me up as one of those guys who thought that despite his obvious liberalism, Obama might be a good and decent man outside of the political realm. But now three years of his presidency suggests he does have some serious character flaws. Part of me marvels that so many still find him so likeable, and I can’t help but get the feeling that a lot of people are wedded to the notion that the first African-American President of the United States would be a healing, wise, visionary statesman, like the second coming of Martin Luther King Jr, instead of a over-promising, under-delivering, self-pitying narcissist.

Republicans on a private Republican National Committee conference call with allies warned Tuesday that party surrogates should refrain from personal attacks against President Barack Obama, because such a strategy is too hazardous for the GOP.

“We’re hesitant to jump on board with heavy attacks” personally against President Obama, Nicholas Thompson, the vice president of polling firm the Tarrance Group, said on the call. “There’s a lot of people who feel sorry for him.”

Recent polling data indicates that while the president suffers from significantly low job approval ratings, voters still give “high approval” to Obama personally, Thompson said.

Voters “don’t think he’s an evil man who’s out to change the United States” for the worse–even though many of the same survey respondents agree that his policies have harmed the country, Thompson said. The upshot, Thompson stressed, is that Republicans should “exercise some caution” when talking about the president personally.

What’s personal?

Chalk me up as one of those guys who thought that despite his obvious liberalism, Obama might be a good and decent man outside of the political realm. But now three years of his presidency suggests he does have some serious character flaws. Part of me marvels that so many still find him so likeable, and I can’t help but get the feeling that a lot of people are wedded to the notion that the first African-American President of the United States would be a healing, wise, visionary statesman, like the second coming of Martin Luther King Jr, instead of a over-promising, under-delivering, self-pitying narcissist.

Thanks

Cruise agency

 

JACOB84

7:31 PM ET

December 10, 2011

Seems like theh system is broken

There is so much arguing back and forth on every political issue and it seems like those that are not in charge are reveling when those that ARE have setbacks. Watching the news these days almost makes me nauseous.

 

DOMINOES

12:24 AM ET

January 5, 2012

totally agree

The system is so broken, that is what happens when you just focus on winning an election and not making the country better, as most of the politicians do. It is a shame that they operate like that and put themselves over their country, but it is what it is, I am going to take my car to auto repair so I do not have to worry about this happening to me.

 

GRAZIELLE

10:43 AM ET

December 12, 2011

Roma and Slavic Muslims

i Agree in Roma and Slavic Muslims are in an even worse position.... has done virtually nothing to help make Kosovo safe for its minorities and now it wants to impose the rule of Kosovo's racist regime on the Northern Serbs...massagistas