The Last Prisoner

The fate of a senior Hezbollah commander captured in Iraq raises questions about what the United States accomplished in Mesopotamia -- and the future of its shadow war with Iran.

BY MITCHELL PROTHERO | DECEMBER 16, 2011

On a blustery winter afternoon last year, a colleague and I were driving around southeastern Lebanon, trying to imagine how the next round of fighting between Hezbollah and Israel would play out. We had the good fortune to have a mutual source -- a midlevel Hezbollah commander -- along with us on the trip, so we could pump him for insight into this seemingly inevitable conflict.

It was an interesting day, but our road-trip partner was hardly a source of pithy quotes. Keeping with Hezbollah's reputation for taciturn observation, he told us almost nothing about the group. He did, however, help us understand the terrain and possible tactics both sides would use in another round of fighting, which everyone in the car assumed would be more widespread and nastier than the destructive monthlong war in the summer of 2006.

As we drove through the eastern Beqaa Valley, through the low mountain passes and craggy valleys, we eventually turned north to head back to Beirut and passed the tiny village of Majdal Anjar.

To close observers of Lebanon's occasionally goofy, if deadly, sectarian violence, the rural outpost of Majdal Anjar is a famous emblem of something fairly rare in Lebanon: serious Sunni jihadists. Close to the main commercial crossing with Syria, it's a noted smuggling center for everything from weapons to cheap diesel fuel as the local families and tribes cross back and forth over the border with near impunity, either bribing local officials or following smuggler tracks that have been in use since the time of the Ottoman Empire.

Majdal Anjar mixed smuggling and Sunni extremism to become one of Lebanon's main thoroughfares for sending foreign fighters to fight U.S. soldiers in Iraq during the heyday of al Qaeda's insurgency there. The village sent numerous young men to fight alongside al Qaeda commander Abu Musab al-Zarqawi from 2003 to 2006 and helped send scores more from other Lebanese Sunni enclaves such as Tripoli and the Palestinian refugee camp Ain al-Hilweh.

As we passed the village, frustrated by the little news I was getting out of sitting in a car for hours with a guy who knows enough for me to write a book or two on Hezbollah, I baited him with a loaded question.

"So, who sent more people to Iraq?" I playfully asked. "Dahiyeh [Hezbollah's southern Beirut stronghold] or Majdal Anjar?"

"Majdal Anjar, of course," he responded with a glint of minor irritation at the stupidity of the question. "We didn't send boys to Iraq."

Maybe not, but the Americans would beg to differ. The case of Ali Musa Daqduq -- who was the last prisoner in U.S. custody in Iraq before being transferred to Baghdad's control on Dec. 16 -- has been a prime example used by the United States of Hezbollah's influence in Iraq, and a major headache for President Barack Obama.

The U.S. military has accused Daqduq, a Shiite Lebanese national, of being a Hezbollah operative sent to Iraq by Iran to help run a cell of insurgents dubbed the "Special Groups." These insurgents, American military officials claim, conducted very professional attacks on U.S. forces on behalf of Shiite groups and orchestrated mayhem directly on behalf of handlers in Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

As the United States prepares to wrap up its nightmarish experience in Iraq by the end of the year, Daqduq's fate has posed a particularly nasty problem for the White House. National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor said that the United States has held discussions about his fate "at the highest levels," and received assurances that he will be tried for his crimes.

Chris Hondros/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS: IRAQ, IRAN, MIDDLE EAST
 

Mitchell Prothero is a writer and photographer in Beirut.

DANSMITH17

3:48 AM ET

December 17, 2011

Hypocrisy

America seems to be totally hypocritical about these issues.

The same people who argue that we are at War and unlimited detention without trial, including of US citizens on US soil is the answer. Any use of criminal sanctions is pre 9/11 thinking.

We then go to Iraq and we are at war, people are detained, for their actions in fighting and killing US uniformed armed forces, presumably a legitimate activity during a war, the war ends, and the US talks about crimes and holding criminal terrorists forever!

If the war in Iraq is over then the POW's get to go home, get over it!

 

YARINSIZ

1:32 PM ET

January 10, 2012

Very informative and

Very informative and trustworthy blog. Please keep updating with great posts like this one. seslichat I have booked marked your site and am about to email it to a few friends of mine that I know would enjoy reading