The Rise of Boko Haram

Why the Christmas Day bombings in Nigeria could be the harbinger of much worse to come.

BY DAVID FRANCIS | DECEMBER 28, 2011

On Christmas day, a bomb was detonated at St. Theresa's Catholic Church on the outskirts of the Nigerian capital, Abuja, killing at least 35. Two other bombs exploded at Christmas ceremonies across Nigeria, killing five more. Soon after the bombings, a spokesman for Boko Haram, a radical Islamic group based in northern Nigeria, claimed responsibility.

"By the grace of God, we are responsible for all the attacks," a man known as Abul-Qaqa, who claims to be a spokesman for the group, told a Nigerian newspaper. "There will never be peace until our demands are met. We want all our brothers who have been incarcerated to be released; we want full implementation of the sharia system and we want democracy and the constitution to be suspended."

The Christmas attacks by the group, whose name translates to "Western education is a sin," are the latest in a yearlong campaign of violence against Nigerian Christians and the Nigerian government. Just days before the holiday, more than 80 people were killed in clashes between Boko Haram and Nigerian security forces. In November, in a city called Damaturu, members of the group exploded a car bomb outside of military barracks, burned down five churches, and mounted attacks against police stations. At the same time, in a city to the east called Maiduguri, Boko Haram members detonated a suicide bomb outside of the headquarters of the military unit tasked with fighting the group. Three other bombs exploded soon after. In August, the group detonated a bomb at the United Nations compound in Abuja that killed 24 people. And last Christmas, Boko Haram bombed five churches, claiming 32 lives.

In 2011, the group is responsible for 504 deaths, according to the Associated Press.

Even as the bloodshed has escalated, President Goodluck Jonathan has repeatedly downplayed the Boko Haram threat. "We have challenges as a nation; even this morning, a very ugly incident happened in a Catholic Church," Jonathan said after the Christmas attack. "The issue of bombing is one of the burdens we must live with. It will not last forever; I believe that it will surely be over."

Despite Jonathan's assurances, Nigeria's growing turmoil has drawn the attention of the international community. Pope Benedict immediately condemned the Christmas attacks, as did U.S. President Barack Obama. The United States has reportedly begun training Nigerian troops in counterterrorism techniques and providing Nigerian defense forces with weapons and other equipment. French Foreign Affairs Minister Alain Juppe has also offered military support and intelligence sharing in the fight against Boko Haram.

Of course, these measures aren't just to protect Nigeria's internal stability. Western governments' interest has been piqued by links between Boko Haram and larger, international terrorist networks. Abul-Qaqa has asserted the group has ties to al Qaeda, but did not offer proof. His claims was bolstered by Algeria's Deputy Foreign Minister Abdelkader Messahel,who announced in November that Algeria had discovered links between Boko Haram and al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), an offshoot of the global terror network that operates throughout North Africa. "We have no doubts that coordination exists between Boko Haram and al Qaeda," he said. "The way both groups operate and intelligence reports show that there is cooperation."

But other than the group's own proclamations, which connect their ideology to broader radical Islam, and the assertion of the Algerian government in which no hard proof was offered, there is little evidence to support the claim that the Boko Haram movement is connected to a larger terrorist networks. And a close examination of radical Islam in Nigeria shows that the group's resentment toward the government has simmered for three decades and has little to do with a broader Islamic agenda.

Boko Haram's story began in the 1970s, when a young Cameroonian preacher known as Marwa arrived in Kano, the largest city in northern Nigeria. He quickly gained a sizable following among the city's poor by preaching against Nigeria's secular government, institutional political corruption, and the moderate religious establishment. His movement was known as Maitatsine.

Sunday Aghaeze/AFP/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS: TERRORISM, AFRICA
 

David Francis is a freelance journalist who reported from Nigeria as an International Reporting Project fellow.

MICHAELGERALDPDEALINO

8:22 PM ET

December 27, 2011

Islamic fascism

The Nigerian government and the international community should wake up and defend the freedom of religion and other human rights from these islamic fascists.

 

MAIGARI

5:37 AM ET

December 28, 2011

BOKO HARAM

The writer seems to believe that Boko Haram is somehow an offshoot of Maitatsine, this is not ture.
Boko Haram from all indications started with the sharp polarity of Nigerian politics when the elites somehow come to their leader for consultatoions, that explains how the deceased leader of the Sect became a billionaire.
Along the line, the group fel out with their patrons and things started to go wromg to the point the Military were "ordereed" to deal with the Est. That marked the departure point because the Poice recklessly killed many innoceny people in Born and, Bauchi states. That and the cold blooded killing of the captured leader gave the Sect an underdog status.
Boko Haram was a misnomer because Boko basically means EDUCATION and that is not the exclsusive preserve of any Region.
It is the attitude of the elites that came to be characterside as Boko and that was the massive Corrution and Inefficiency of the Public Sector in NIgeria. Add to this, the lack of transparency and internal democracy and you have a ready recipe for disaster.
That was provided by the vicious polarity and/of the Ruling PDP's presidential campaign and whoever or whatever the BOKO Haram represents capitalised on this and the blatant rigging of elections. One thing led to another and now Nigeria is in real danger of a Religious conflict on what has very little to do with Religion, that is the danger of Boko haram more than anything else.
The solution lies in open and credible lections that the people see and accept as being FREE and FAIR, to be followed by an ACCOUNTABLE Executive at Local, State and Federal levels no more no less .

 

VON GRIM

8:41 AM ET

December 28, 2011

the group killing christians

dear mr francis

your article gets some things right - the cluelessness and dishonesty of the nigerian government, the heavy handedness of the nigerian military and the ethno-religious divide of the country (this divide is not clear-cut by the way).

however, there is much that is wrong in your article. many of these errors could have been avoided with just a visit to wikipedia.

1. the north is not mostly desert. most of the agriculture in the country is in the north and the middle belt.

2. the north has not been historically marginalized in favor of the south. it is the other way round. you see, due to the frequent military coups, the government of nigeria is very centralized and the president is exceedingly powerful. most of the military regimes in the country were headed by northern generals. thus, what little development there was in the country favored the north and the west. the east and the niger delta (south south) were marginalized. it is only with the return to civilan rule in 1999 that the niger delta began to get a fairer deal.

3. you assert that the southern militia are well trained in traditiional military techniques. does that mean they have artillery and tanks? do they work with close air support? are they organized in regular military units? i seriously doubt it. the southern militants are a mix of political thugs and disaffected citizens. yes, they have vocal leaders, but many are poorly organized, despite some audacious attacks. furthermore, your labelling of some militant spokespersons as "general" is misleading. generals are not self acclaimed.

4. other than polio in the north, the other problems of lack of electricity, water etc are endemic all over the country.

5. it is correct that some muslims support the insurgency. however, this support is not so much spiritual as temporal. whenever there is a crisis, the funds allocated to security increase. these funds are not accounted for. and like so much in nigeria, the funds are misappropriated. thus, the support of government elements for boko haram is not to see boko haram succeed, but to increase the appearance of insecurity so that they can loot more money. this point ties in with the dissatisfaction of northerners with jonathan's election. nigerian politics is a kleptocracy. access to government is a sure avenue to wealth. those who are mad at jonathan could not care less about his tribe or his religion. they are more concerned with the fact that he controls the purse strings while they do not.

6. my final point is about the threat of civil war and the threats of boko haram against the south. those threats are credible because of the failure of the security agencies. whether they will materialize or not is debatable. as for the threat of civil war, the military is still the strongest institution in Nigeria and they can quash any insurgency if given a free hand. collateral damage will be ignored as usual. there is tension between tribes and religions, but it is not so pervasive nor are the lines of conflict so clear as to make civil war a near threat. who will fight whom in a civil war? the north is about 70% muslim and the muslims are concentrated in the northeast and northwest. these areas are close to 95% muslim. so who will go there to fight? the middle belt which bisects the country but is considered part of the north is about 50% muslim. it is also the most ethnically diverse. within the tribes, some are evenly split, even down to families. do you think husbands will kill wives due to religion? the west is the most advanced part of the country, most educated and richest. they are also about 50% muslim and there is much mixture of religion. historically, they have identified with tribe more than religion. it is the east and south south that are the most heavily christian and frankly, i do not see them moving up north to fight. the reason is this: they subscribe to the western christian ethos that life is always good. they are afraid to die. muslims in the north are fatalistic. some have even embraced the nihilistic ideology of suicide bombing. now who do you think will be more willing to do damage?

 

MARKJALSA

11:12 AM ET

December 28, 2011

OMG who have done this bomb

OMG who have done this bomb blast???

This is really bad condition. :(

 

TADAS2

2:39 PM ET

December 28, 2011

Terror attacks across Nigeria

Terror attacks across Nigeria by a radical Muslim sect killed at least 39 people, with the majority dying on the steps of a Catholic church after celebrating Christmas Mass as blood pooled in dust from a massive explosion. Authorities on Sunday acknowledged they could not bring enough emergency medical personnel to care for the wounded outside St Theresa Catholic Church in Madalla near Nigeria's capital. Next country will be Nigeria ......... it has lot's of oil. kompiuteriu remontas

 

BRYANKHAN

4:36 PM ET

December 28, 2011

Very Sad

It is really very sad news. Actually since last few years the condition of Nigeria is going worst to worst. I think UN should play its role for the peace in Nigeria otherwise the Govt is unable to handle such incidents.

 

BRYANKHAN

4:37 PM ET

December 28, 2011

Sad News

It is really very sad news. Actually since last few years the condition of Nigeria is going worst to worst. I think UN should play its role for the peace in Nigeria otherwise the Govt is unable to handle such incidents. brother ink

 

YARINSIZ

7:06 AM ET

January 21, 2012

The Nigerian government and

The Nigerian government and the international community should wake up and defend the freedom of religion and other human seslichat rights from these islamic fascists