The End of Putin

Alexey Navalny on why the Russian protest movement will win.

INTERVIEW BY JULIA IOFFE | DECEMBER 28, 2011

MOSCOW – On the night of Monday, Dec. 5, blogger, anti-corruption activist, and budding politician Alexey Navalny was one of 500 people arrested at a protest denouncing fraud in the previous day's parliamentary elections. Surrounded by some 6,000 people -- an unheard-of number for a protest in the center of Moscow, a dozen years into the apathetic Putin era -- Navalny had delivered an angry, guttural, less-than-diplomatic speech. "We will cut their throats!" he proclaimed, then tried to lead a march down the street to the headquarters of the Federal Security Service, the powerful successor to the KGB known by its Russian initials FSB. This had not been permitted in advance, so he was bundled up, stuffed into a police van, and shuttled around nighttime Moscow to keep his supporters from picketing his detention. The next day, he was given a 15-day sentence for disobeying police orders.

By the time Navalny came out in the early morning hours of December 21, he was received with a hero's welcome. "I went to jail in one country and came out in another," he told the cheering journalists and supporters who had braved a blizzard to catch a glimpse of him.

It was true: Russia had changed while Navalny was in jail. He had missed the huge rally on December 10 on Bolotnaya Square, when the numbers who came out in peaceful, euphoric protest -- an estimated 50,000 to 60,000 -- made the original demonstration at Chystie Prudy look like a civic sneeze. Navalny had missed Vladimir Putin's stuttering, insulting response, and the energetic, often fractious and messy planning for the next protest, which took place -- with Navalny front and center among the 100,000-plus who turned out -- on Dec. 24.

It was particularly ironic that Navalny had missed the first mass demonstration in recent Russian political history.

Navalny has been in opposition politics for nearly a decade, but in the last two years, he has become the man to watch, becoming the first of his opposition colleagues to turn rhetoric and abstract principles into concrete action. First, Navalny (trained as a lawyer) started taking corrupt state corporations to court and blogging about it. Then he created a site called RosPil that crowdsourced the work of exposing questionable government deals. When he asked his supporters to donate money for the cause -- and for hiring lawyers to work on the project -- the Russian web responded, delivering double the amount he asked for. "People donating money is extremely significant, given Russians' cynicism," Aleh Tsyvinski, a Yale economist who has become a sort of mentor to Navalny, told me when I profiled Navalny for The New Yorker in the spring. "Writing to Navalny is, in some ways, a way of exercising power. He is tapping into a huge demand for a grassroots movement."

In effect, Navalny trained a set of thousands of Russian Internet dwellers to do something concrete with their disaffection. And by the time the election season kicked off, in March, Navalny's mantra of "vote, and vote for anyone but United Russia" found a deep resonance among his following, and quickly spread. His alternative title for Putin's ruling United Russia party -- the Party of Crooks and Thieves -- became a sticky meme, with one-third of Russians now identifying the party in this way, just three months after the phrase flew out of Navalny's mouth on a radio show.

So when the huge crowd gathered in Bolotnaya on Dec. 10, it was his crowd -- a largely white-collar crowd, and the crowd that his campaign had driven first to vote (an unusual activity for this set), then to come out and protest. (When I asked him, a year ago, if he was scared, given the fates of previous dissidents like jailed oligarch Mikhail Khodorkovsky and dead lawyer Sergei Magnitsky, in taking on the regime, Navalny trotted out his trademark pluck. "If tomorrow ten businessmen spoke up directly and openly, we'd live in a different country," he said. "Starting tomorrow.") The protest was a game-changer, and it was, to a large extent, the fruit of his political labors.

And yet, it was a crowd whose size and support he -- and everyone else -- had underestimated. Most of the people I spoke to at the protests have come to see Navalny as not only the most viable opposition politician, as well as the one most representative of their views. But there's one big caveat: his nationalistic views. Navalny had joined the scarily nationalistic "Russian March" in November, alienating many in his core constituency of the urban bourgeois, who fear Russian skinheads -- the most violent in Europe -- almost as much as they worry about Putin's plans to return to the presidency for another 12 years.

Now that he is out of prison and back in the game, what is his plan? How does he view the most recent Kremlin attempts at placating the street? How does he visualize his own political future? We spoke as the euphoria of December's protests fades into exhaustion. "I hope to go somewhere for a week in January, and not have to answer emails," he said. He paused and added, "Not that I've been answering them for the last three weeks anyway."  

Konstantin Zavrazhin/Getty Images

 

Julia Ioffe is Foreign Policy's Moscow correspondent.

SAINTIGEL

10:41 AM ET

December 29, 2011

Explain it then

"every person with whom I am able to discuss this subject in depth, they agree that my views on this are correct, reasonable, and appropriate. So I guess I'll just have to keep explaining. "

So, what's his logical explanation? Russian skinheads are really just big teddy bears? Non-Russians actually are genetically inferior? This is really important for people to hear and it gets completely side-stepped. Interviews are traditionally a great place to give an in-depth explanation of your point of view.

 

LARUSSOPHOBE

2:10 PM ET

December 29, 2011

This isn't Reporting, it's Cheerleading

It is very misleading to refer to Ms. Ioffe as a correspondent. A more accurate term would be "cheerleader."

http://pjmedia.com/blog/occupy-pravda-msm-pretends-putin-faces-revolution/

It is utterly ridiculous to report as a fact that Russia "changed" in December 2011. It simply didn't, and accepting Mr. Navalny's claims to that effect unquestioningly is the opposite of journalism. The protesters showed absolutely no ability to galvanize support beyond the city of Moscow, and even in Moscow the level of support was significant only by the pathetic standards of Russian citizenship. Ms. Ioffe's "reporting" totally ignores the elsewhere in Russia the protest activity disappeared, and polls showed Putin's popularity beginning to rise. Protest events that did not involve Navalny have proven total failures.

It is also ridiculous to paint Mr. Navalny as some sort of statesman. He is a cult figure no different than Joel Osteen or Howard Stern, and he has refused so far to throw his hat into the presidential ring or even to create or support any specific political party or agenda. His "strategy" is to encourage Russians to vote for Communists and psychotic nationalists, in the bizarre hope that this will bring the Kremlin to its knees. His scary-crazy statements about storming the Kremlin, bringing two million people to the streets, and his racist nationalist comments, all indicate he is not a leader who offers Russia a bright future.

As someone who follows Ms. Ioffe's Twitter feed, I know that throughout this process she has shouted encouragement to the protesters from the sidelines in a shameless partisan manner wholly detached from any semblance of reality, much less objectivity.

 

ATIMOSHENKO

3:59 PM ET

December 29, 2011

The process is always gradual

Abuse a citizenry and pillage a nation to the extent that Putin has abused Russians and pillaged Russia, and any initial attempts to through off this yoke will be limited and imperfect. An avalanche does not spontaneously materialise at full strength – it builds up gradually... and sometimes fails.

But the choice is becoming increasingly stark – either the current regime collapses soon, or Russia eventually does. The most unfortunate thing is not that Putin is a tyrant, but that he is a common tyrant. A common tyrant always puts his own ego above national interests. A common tyrant always wants to rule his nation rather than to serve it.

 

ATIMOSHENKO

4:01 PM ET

December 29, 2011

Damn autocorrect

"throw" not "through"

How about an ability to edit comments, FP?

 

KOSOVAAIRLINES

5:23 PM ET

December 30, 2011

yeap

so yes the game he played on last elections by putting his business partner on top as a president and stepping down to a prime minister position has been very childish and everyone knew and understood what was going on and what is even more interesting is that everyone was able to say that on next elections he is coming back

so what happens when you play Chess and your opponent knows your moves? you loose that obvious and this is happening there, people are tired with the Russian crazy politics they are one of the poorest nations a lot of people hardly surviving on the other hand Moscow is one of the most expensive cities on earth, Russia has a large number of millionaires and billionaires.

and yes their foreign politics is even worse the are opposing every move US does e.g Palestine, Iraq, Iran, Kosova Airlines , Afghanistan, Pakistan, Europe moves

 

NAVALNY_EN

6:06 PM ET

December 30, 2011

Partly bullshit

Navalny had never say nothing like "cut their throats".
The translation of his speech on recent rally (translated to English) is available here http://navalny-en.livejournal.com/4410.html . This speech was dramatically more angry compared to first one.

One of the main goals of joining "Russian march" - is to make it more civilized, without skinheads, fascists and other demented people.

 

ANTTRO

7:42 PM ET

December 30, 2011

"minor" corrections

About "blogger, anti-corruption activist, and budding politician Alexey Navalny".
He's a blogger indeed.
"anti-corruption activist" - not quite correct. The guy has completed no cases about corruption. Created a web site, made lots of noise, but nothing else.
"budding politician" - one has to have some constructive basis to be a politician. The guy was dealing to democratic "Yabloko" party, then was participating in Russian nazi activities ("Russian March"), he's playing around nearly anyone.
He's noisy, but pretty much useless. He gained some glory as "political prisoner" after being grounded for 15 days for disobeying police and trying to lead a large crowd into very tight traffic area. I live in Moscow and know what does that traffic look like. Thank God and local police for stopping this. He wanted to make more noise.. But it looks like someone wants him to become a hero. Which means that chances are he will be silenced for good soon.

 

LOWELL

7:19 AM ET

January 2, 2012

He wasn't blocking any

He wasn't blocking any traffic - merely standing there as you can see for yourself on YouTube. If you are standing on the sidewalk surrounded by the police (who incidentally yell "stop blocking the pedestrian traffic" at you though they won't move or let you move) that's not blocking anything.

 

BILLSWEET

10:47 AM ET

January 1, 2012

Navalny

what specifically are his nationalist views? are they like Zhirinovsky"s?

 

KINGFISHER

6:20 PM ET

January 3, 2012

The End of Putin

I would not be so certain as the heading of the article as is written "The End of Putin" it means, either he is finished or would likely to be finished. but i would like to differ to the fact that he is neither is finished nor so easily would likely to be finished.

As per my assumption he is waiting till march 2012 till the election date and once the result is out then the real game will start. Putin should not be underestimated for the fact is he is a product of Intelligence over and above he physically used to implement the intelligence secret top secret and make it successful. I presume it is not that he could not understand how the Russians suddenly raise their head against Putin. Though the protest was well staged but the sudden behavioral culture was the difference that convinced that the mass rising was orchestrated.

However, one thing is certain that in Russia illegal arrests, tortures and illegal jail would likely to stop with the view to avoid such mass uprising against the government.

It is expected that after election if Putin comes out successful then the persons those led the demonstrations may be hunted down.

 

YARINSIZ

7:30 AM ET

January 21, 2012

so what happens when you play

so what happens when you play Chess and your opponent knows your moves? you loose that obvious and this is happening there, people are tired with the Russian crazy politics they are seslichat one of the poorest nations a lot of people hardly surviving on the other hand Moscow is one of the most expensive cities on earth, Russia has a large number of millionaires and billionaires.