Want to grow the economy? Shrink your city's emissions.

In tough times, some of us see protecting the climate as a luxury, but that's an outdated 20th-century worldview from a time when we thought industrialization was the end goal, waste was growth, and wealth meant a thick haze of air pollution.

Cities and urbanization are the story of the 21st century. Already, most of us live in cities. Over the next 40 years, though, we'll ride a building boom unlike anything humanity has ever seen, or may ever see again, as the world's cities swell by billions. Cities at the center of this demographic revolution will be utterly changed.

All that growth means opportunity -- at a time when we badly need it. In all sorts of ways, how we build our cities determines how we use energy within them. Denser, more walkable communities use much less energy than car-dependent ones. Multifamily homes use much less than homes on big lots. Compact urban infrastructure beats sprawling systems. Even consumer choices change in compact communities: How many condo owners, after all, have home gyms? Climate-focused city planning can lead to massive reductions in per capita energy use. That, in turn, can spur rapid economic growth.

Cities at the cutting edge of this kind of development, like Copenhagen and Amsterdam, aim to be carbon-neutral within 20 years. Change at that speed means not just doing things differently but doing different things and starting now. Top of the list: avoiding big investments in outdated projects such as highway construction in favor of concentrating resources on transforming key neighborhoods, extending transit systems, and upgrading infrastructure.

Carbon-neutral cities will also help uncage urban innovation, given that making them carbon-zero will involve a million opportunities to do things better in nearly every industry. I suggest new innovation zones: specific parts of cities (perhaps currently underutilized or abandoned) that can be turned over to small- and mid-scale experiments in carbon-zero work, commerce, and living. Think of them as seedbeds for new urban ways of life. Guided by clear, basic rules and fast-tracked permitting, and encouraged by connections with local industry and universities, such zones could quickly become hothouses for growing the kinds of city-building businesses that will feed the global economy as it surges into this urban century. If they bloom, they will draw the kind of creative young people every city is fighting for; what many of the brightest of the next generation want most of all is to participate in making a better future.

With good climate-focused city planning and a commitment to urban innovation, cities will begin to revitalize neighborhoods, prepare local businesses for global competition and rising energy costs, and become magnets for talent and new thinking. A hundred cities committed to carbon-zero futures would be a hundred cities on their way back to prosperity -- and a brighter future for the planet.

Spencer Platt/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS:
 

Alex Steffen is a writer, public speaker, and editor of Worldchanging: A User's Guide for the 21st Century.

THEBULLSS

4:56 AM ET

January 5, 2012

Taxes,regulations, legislations are in favor of the Supper Rich

Please stop supporting non-sense polices that would only benefits the Rich.
You cannot fix the problem by STOP SPENDING. It is a BS of starving the beast cowards...sorry crowds and you know it.
As long as we have the supper rich corporation, have the rich Representatives and Senators write one-sided legislation to enslave the masses we will not break out of this recession. We need something really big and out of box quickly. I suggest:
1) Reverse the Bush Tax Cut and then some, for the TOP Rich 5%.
2) Eliminate FICA payroll tax for Corp. and employees (at lease for a few years) for the people who are making under $30K of income.
3) Eliminate ceiling cap for FICA taxable amount (now at $ 109K) and make ALL incomes from all sources taxable for FICA tax, so everybody pay the same percentage. That should include those bankers’ bonuses and Wall Street high rollers; I mean every conceivable income from every conceivable source must be taxable FICA tax.
4) Audit (real audit) every Gov. Agency, especially Pentagon and Federal Reserve (a Privet Bankster, and make it a real Federal Reserve Agency) for waste and corruption and so called mismanagements (playing favoritism).
5) Tax ALL Wall Street Transactions (stock, commodity, and even Derivative Instruments) say 1% on both side (Buyers & Sellers, and must be paid at the time of the transaction).
6) Close all loopholes on the tax codes for the rich and Corporations (is there any other loopholes? we have already stopped giving single Moms welfare.)
7) Create the biggest Depression-era Works Progress Administration for all kind of public infrastructure (hi-tech and low-tech.)
These simple steps would bring JOBS, stability to the Market, and slowly eliminates DEFICIT and will fix funding for Social Security Fund. I challenge any of these 13 big shot or any other economist to run the numbers with my suggestions, for at least 5 consecutive years and then tell me that these simple, yet out of the box idea will not work.

M. Hoss is a freelance journalist with a degree in Accounting and Marketing.

 

STEFANROES

11:18 AM ET

January 7, 2012

i agree that they shouldn't

i agree that they shouldn't be serving the rich and also you have to spend and not to cutback on spendings that will make the economy better in the world.
Most of the 7 above reasons are good and understandable, the rich should have greater taxes than the poor, obvious , and that the taxes for the poor under a certain income are not going to have to pay taxes or just a little bit and are not selling you out like a sexshop

 

BOG88

2:29 AM ET

January 30, 2012

With all due respect, I

With all due respect, I consider that a deeper allegiance is required of man in order to create cities that prosper. Respect towards God would impact people in away that they will understand that 'growing' green cities is a must if they desire safety for future generations inhabiting such places of human convergence.