Epiphanies from Austan Goolsbee

President Obama's former economic advisor speaks out.

INTERVIEW BY BENJAMIN PAUKER | JAN/FEB 2012

As chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers and a cabinet-level aide to fellow Chicagoan Barack Obama, Austan Goolsbee had a rarefied perch in Washington for an academic trained to write about recessions, not steer the country through one. He couldn't wait to leave. "There was a lot of yelling," Goolsbee says. Now safely back at the University of Chicago, he talks to Foreign Policy about the inside-the-administration fights, tired Republican trickle-down economics, and what he would do if he woke up one day as China's central bank chief.

We had the most successful financial system rescue ever. It didn't end up costing any money. Normally, a financial rescue of that magnitude costs about 5 to 10 percent of GDP, an astoundingly big number. But in the U.S. they paid the money back. That hasn't stopped it from being massively unpopular, and it hasn't prevented the worst recession in our lifetimes for the real economy.


The U.S. is still in a pretty good spot, especially relative to other advanced countries. The aging of our population is not as pronounced as almost anyone else's. We start from a debt-to-GDP ratio that's below most other advanced countries. Our tax and spending levels are pretty low. And we continue to be a highly entrepreneurial culture with a great deal of innovation. It's not to say everything is perfect, but I'm pretty optimistic. Cautious but, medium to long run, heavily optimistic.


The primary reason it's been such hard, slow, tough work to get out of this recession is that we fundamentally can't go back to what we were doing before the recession began. There's 6 million vacant homes now, so we're not going to go back to massive construction rates driving economic growth. In several quarters in the 2000s, if you added up all the private savings of everyone in the United States, it was less than nothing. You can't sustain that as a driver of growth.


You can understand why people are pissed off. The Occupy Wall Street crowd put on the table an issue, which is a pretty glaring one in the data, that hadn't really been on the agenda: income inequality, tax policy, and whether the focus of our policies should only be saving corporations. And if you look at the Romney or Perry economic plans, they're just in the same old trickle-down playbook.


Would I dump the dollar [if I were China's central banker]? I don't know. Look, if you accumulate $2 or $3 trillion of foreign reserves, you're in a tough spot. George Stigler, a Nobel laureate here at the University at Chicago, used to wake up every day and give himself a D. But that made him feel good because he gave everyone else an F. For every criticism of the U.S. economy, whenever people go into a panic, they look around and say, "That's the cleanest shirt I have. So I'm putting it on."


I'm pretty happy not to be an insider anymore. There's just no common ground. I don't know if it's distrust or that the politics is substantially more partisan than the public. But there's no pressure to make a grand bargain on fiscal matters, on growth, on anything. The Republicans were like the East German judge at the Olympics: The president lands a triple flip, but they've already given him a 2.

Joe Ciardiello

 SUBJECTS: ECONOMICS
 

Austan Goolsbee is Robert P. Gwinn professor of economics at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business.

Benjamin Pauker is senior editor at Foreign Policy.

WALTSWRONGWITHTHISPICTURE

12:32 AM ET

January 3, 2012

 

JIMDOZE

8:52 AM ET

January 3, 2012

Epiphanies??

The level of re-distribution relative to the size of the economy, coupled with the threat of yet more re-distribution and more regulation, is already a massive drag on economic activity in this country. Unrecognized by knuckleheads like Goolsbee is that worldwide transportation, communications and financial systems have given everyone in the world a chance to compete. The flip side of that is that almost every skilled American worker is now in competition with everyone else in the world while they are at the same time subsidizing vast numbers of unskilled and retired workers. Capital, which always seeks its best risk/return level, is finding that elsewhere because regulatory disincentives and threats of confiscation through taxation have tilted the risk/return comparison away from the U.S.

 

XTIANGODLOKI

10:10 AM ET

January 3, 2012

LOL, so true

"The Republicans were like the East German judge at the Olympics: The president lands a triple flip, but they've already given him a 2. "

Okay, I wouldn't say that Obama landed the triple flip. Maybe the score should be more like a 4 or 5, but the republicans already gave Obama a 1.

 

NATET

6:10 PM ET

January 3, 2012

Come on.

How reasonable is it to expect the competition to give one kudos? I do not remember Democrats singing the praises on any Republican administration.

Plus the president has made it easy for them. Look at it this way:

The Administration said something about unemployment not getting above 8% if the stimulus passed

a wasted year talking about health care when people were without jobs

a jobs program that would put about 2,000,000 people back to work when we have 20,000,000 unemployed

A bank bailout that helped bankers but did not seem to help out regular folks too much

How could anyone say that this president has not been a big disappointment? Goolsbee must have his head in the sand if he does not see this.

 

CAMUS10

4:29 PM ET

January 3, 2012

savings rate

great insight from a part-time insider

why no comment on what needs to be done to increase individual savings rates and HOW to increase wages and income parity . Why no comment on the ghosts of past failures, the central reason why the US lost its economic edge - referring to all the outsourcing of manufacturing technology to regions with poor environmental and labor records. Who allowed globalization of western manufacturing assets to China and India with pathetic human rights records and even bleaker policies today.

And lastly, name to shame the academics who lost the West and who still believe the BRIC can actually be called fair trade partners

 

PER KUROWSKI

7:50 PM ET

January 3, 2012

Your entrepreneurial culture is in danger

@Benjamin Pauker “we continue to be a highly entrepreneurial culture with a great deal of innovation”

If that’s so, then with capital requirements for banks that are much much higher when lending to entrepreneurs than when lending to the government, you are certainly trying to end that culture.

PS. If the moderator allows it here is a video that explains part of the ongoing bank regulatory terrorism http://bit.ly/dFRiMs

 

FARHA

9:26 AM ET

January 10, 2012

Epiphanies

Un article qui sort des sentiers battus, merci pour votre site.

 

DR. PITCHFORK

10:18 AM ET

January 10, 2012

TARP has NOT been "paid back"

Goolsbee writes: "We had the most successful financial system rescue ever. It didn't end up costing any money....[T]hey paid the money back."

This is just flat-out wrong.

$413B was actually disbursed through TARP. Of that total, $121B remains outstanding (as of December 2011). In other words, nearly 30% of the TARP funds disbursed have NOT been paid back. AIG, alone, still owes us $50B -- and AIG was used as a direct conduit for bailing out the banks who "paid us back" with our own money.

Even leaving aside the auto bailouts, $313B in TARP funds were disbursed to AIG and the banks. $67B remains outstanding just on the Wall St. bailout. That $67B also happens to be DOUBLE the $33B the Treasury received in interest on the TARP loans and from the sale of warrants. Made money? I don't think so.

And surely Goolsbee knows this, in which case he is lying. The Treasury even has a "Daily TARP Update." See here: http://www.treasury.gov/initiatives/financial-stability/briefing-room/reports/tarp-daily-summary-report/TARP%20Cash%20Summary/Daily%20TARP%20Update%20-%2012.09.2011.pdf See more here: http://dailybail.com/home/corporate-media-fails-again-ap-fact-check-repeats-zombie-lie.html