The Apathy Curve

The world's unhappiest and most content are on the move. What about those stuck in the middle?

BY JOSHUA E. KEATING | JAN/FEB 2012

Intelligent people might disagree on the right response to immigration, but the cause of it seems pretty clear. People move abroad to improve living conditions -- whether economic or political -- for themselves and their families. But what about those who are only somewhat dissatisfied with their lot in life? Apparently they stay home.

In a paper for the Journal of Happiness Studies, economists Nicole Simpson of Colgate University and Linnea Polgreen of the University of Iowa compared the emigration rates of 58 countries with their national happiness scores, as measured by the World Values Survey. What they found is that there's a roughly U-shaped relationship between happiness and emigration: The least happy countries, like Albania and Ukraine, have high emigration rates, but so do the world's happiest countries, like Colombia and El Salvador. Why? Extremely happy countries produce optimistic, confident people more likely to risk relocating overseas to improve their prospects. The rest, it seems, are stuck in the middle.

Nicole Simpson and Linnea Polgreen

 SUBJECTS:
 

Joshua E. Keating is an associate editor at Foreign Policy.

HECTORGREG11

11:23 AM ET

January 27, 2012

climbing out

I am climbing out of the middle and moving out. Great piece here on what makes a happy nation. It is interesting to see what effects national happiness. The best part of this all was this line "Extremely happy countries produce optimistic, confident people more likely to risk relocating overseas to improve their prospects," without this, then it seems like people are stuck with no place to go. I work in Austin insurance and if I had to do this for the rest of my life, I would bail ship as quickly as possible, probably to sell Nicaragua property or something exotic and exciting like that.