View from the Top

Nine of the world's top international relations scholars weigh in on the Ivory Tower survey.

JAN/FEB 2012

2. What is the most important region of the world for U.S. security, and why?

Francis Fukuyama: East Asia, due to the China challenge above.  We have been overextended and over-involved in the Middle East for the past decade; the terrorist threat was greatly overestimated.

Joseph S. Nye: Asia. As I argue in The Future of Power, the shift from West to East is one of the great power shifts in this century.

Kenneth Waltz: China.  China is the emerging great power, and great powers always eye each other warily.

John Mearsheimer: Asia, because there is a danger China will continue its rise and try to dominate that region the way the United States dominates the Western Hemisphere. America cannot allow China to become a peer competitor.

James Fearon: North Africa and the Middle East (extending the notion as far east as Pakistan and Iran), because this is probably where the greatest danger of WMD terrorism or nuclear weapons use comes from in the medium term.  But neither of these threats is particularly likely and it's not clear that our current approach of intervention and heavy counterterrorism is making things better rather than worse.  It's important to note that overall and taking a longer term view, the U.S. is in great shape in terms of national security. We are in a position where spending significantly less on defense could help us with security in the long run by improving our economic situation.

Alexander Wendt: The Mideast, because a) of our dependence on foreign oil and b) the threat of transnational terrorism emanating from the area.

Robert Keohane: East Asia, because it is a site of increasing economic and potentially military power and the locale of the only viable potential rival to the United States.

Martha Finnemore: In the short to medium term, the Middle East. Managing post-withdrawal Iraq and the Pakistan/Afghanistan situation as well as Iran and the continuing developments of the Arab Spring will be a huge challenge. Long term, the shift of power toward Asia, particularly China, will probably be more important.

Bruce Bueno de Mesquita:  I do not believe the U.S. is likely to face a major national security challenge in the next year or so but I imagine if there is a national security challenge it is most likely to come from the Middle East or Latin America.

The Middle East is facing substantial leadership change. New leaders are at the greatest risk of being deposed and so tend to engage in riskier policies if they find themselves with little downside. This could manifest itself, for instance, in aggression by Egypt (unlikely as I said at the beginning of this question) against Israel which will call for a U.S. response. Almost as unlikely this could be manifested as aggression by Israel against Iran or Iran's closing of the Gulf of Hormuz and a forceful effort to open it by the U.S. and allies.

 SUBJECTS:
 

PAULIO655

5:42 PM ET

January 3, 2012

The End of History

Please visit my blog for an analysis of Fukuyama's famous essay http://irblogger.weebly.com/

 

HECTORGREG11

11:41 AM ET

January 27, 2012

seems pretty clear

The biggest problem is the rise of China. They are a force to be reckoned with and are growing quickly, so now is the time to learn how to deal with them and not create another cold war, that has the potential to heat up. China is scary because they are so unpredictable. They have been kept down for so long. I have a friend who works for sourcing companies and he loves China. He recently sourced silk comforters from China and enjoys the cultures too. I will just keep on keeping on at my job selling austin insurance for the time being.

 

SAVANNAHBOB

7:53 AM ET

February 1, 2012

No, the biggest problem is not China, or the US, or the EU

, but rather it is understanding why we have arrived into this century with these confrontational postures. Just as we have observed in certain social insect populations the tendancy for them to self destroy, human society has the same tendencies. I understand that this observation is politically incorrect, but like it or not , where world society is at this moment in time can not be seen from within a particular culture, as in "the problem is China, or the US, or Pakistan," but must be seen from a space platform outside of any individual society to be understood. What is going on in today's world is the result of predictable human behavior patterns that remain undocumented and are essentually primal . We must, if we are to succeed as a species, begin to understand that we do not have the correct tools to end the need for conflict, and that we are flawed. All the posturing we see today is repeated behavior and once understood as not logical, can be defined as deviant and dealt with so that it will not take us back to the dark ages.