Egypt's Salafi Surge

These guys make the Muslim Brotherhood look like latte liberals.

BY SARAH A. TOPOL | JANUARY 4, 2012

MANSOURA, Egypt — It's the morning of the third and final round of Egypt's parliamentary elections and Ammar Fayed, an activist for the Muslim Brotherhood's political party, is nervous as hell.

The 28-year-old marketing manager, who sits on the executive board of the youth branch of the Brotherhood's Freedom and Justice Party (FJP) in the governorate of Dakahlia, sports a tiny FJP pin on the lapel of his gray blazer and a thumb stained blue from voting. He explains the situation: Thirty-six seats are up for grabs in this province in the fertile Nile Delta. The conservative region is in the Brotherhood's heartland -- it should have been a cakewalk.

There's just one problem, Fayed admits: "We made a fundamental miscalculation."

The Brotherhood has found itself outflanked on the right by the Salafi al-Nour Party, which has challenged the movement's religious credentials and gained a surprising degree of traction in the process. The Salafis appear poised to claim between 25 and 30 percent of the vote, though the Brotherhood could still win an outright majority and will certainly become the largest party in the new parliament.

Who could have predicted that the Salafis -- adherents to a fundamentalist version of Islam that until Egypt's revolution eschewed politics as un-Islamic -- would morph into an electoral powerhouse? Even the Brotherhood, whose vote-counting abilities would impress the likes of Karl Rove, never saw it coming, and the Salafis' success threatens to upend the movement's carefully laid plans for dominating Egypt's post-revolutionary political scene.

After decades of trying to convince Egypt's liberals, leftists, and other activists of their seriousness in solving the country's titanic economic problems, the Brothers suddenly find themselves forced to talk about how and when they will implement Islamic law. Not only do their efforts to bolster the movement's religious credentials promise to cause tensions with the other parliamentary blocs, but conflicts with the al-Nour Party will also provide useful fodder for Egypt's calculating military rulers, who could exploit the rivalry to keep themselves in power and above scrutiny.

The Brotherhood can't afford to ignore the Salafis' rise. Nour is "directly attacking our core," Fayed complains, "saying the Brotherhood is a party like any other, that it is playing politics instead of being a guardian of Islam."

The two Islamist factions are already trading barbs over the most divisive issue: legislating Islamic law. To get the Salafis' perspective, I met Ibrahim AbdulRahman, the bushy-bearded Nour spokesman in Dakahlia governorate. He names the place: an upscale coffee shop in the center of the city of Mansoura.

It was a difficult interview: The Salafis don't seem particularly keen on explaining themselves to foreign reporters. AbdulRahman slumped in his chair and spent most of his time averting any attempt at a genuine conversation, at first denying Nour was a religious party and feigning confusion as to why Christians weren't running on its ticket, despite public statements by its leaders that their party would never support a Christian president.

After about 20 minutes of useless chatter, AbdulRahman finally stuck the knife into his competitors. "I would say that Salafis and the Nour Party are more aware of the religious sciences and know religion more than the Muslim Brotherhood," he said.

The parties' disagreement over how quickly to implement sharia law, AbdulRahman explained, is at the center of their conflict. "For the Nour Party, one of the primary major goals is to implement sharia at the nearest possible opportunity," he said.

If AbdulRahman was unconcerned with explaining himself to the Western media, Mohammed Yousef, the FJP spokesman in the same governorate, was much more anxious that the world not misunderstand his party. I met him at the FJP headquarters in Mansoura -- a prim office with white walls, flat-screen TVs, and computers. A map that showed the percentage of Muslims in African countries, coded in varying shades of green, adorned the wall. Over his shoulder, an FJP banner with a rising white dove had "Freedom, we protect it. Justice, we build it" written across the bird's wings.

Nour is "very fundamentalist," Yousef said -- a stark contrast with the FJP, which "sees the state as a civil state with an Islamic background. All rights to all citizens would be preserved, guarded by the law and the constitution, not by religious beliefs of citizens."

Yes, Yousef admits, the Brotherhood also wants to implement Islamic law -- but only gradually, with a horizon measured in decades, so that society is prepared. "Nour sees it as a hammerhead action of total transformation to a sharia system," he told me.

In the quiet hum of the office, Yousef described the coming conflict between the two movements. "If the Nour Party or a Salafi party in parliament pressures to implement the hudud [punishments stipulated in the Quran that include stoning adulterers or cutting off the hands of thieves] swiftly, the Muslim Brotherhood will stand firmly against them to prevent that from happening," he said.

That's not the only issue putting the two groups on a collision course. While the Brotherhood wants to talk about its plans to create new jobs, the Salafis will try to focus the debate in parliament on public social virtues, like headscarves, religious idolatry, and banning alcohol. The Brotherhood is also far more concerned with increasing the powers of parliament and sending the Egyptian military back to barracks, while Nour's red-meat issue remains the promotion of its conservative social agenda.

Some are even speculating that the ruling Supreme Council of the Armed Forces could turn to the al-Nour Party, the second-most powerful force in parliament, to undercut the Brotherhood -- after all, it was a tried-and-true tactic that served Mubarak well.

"Basically, the military would encourage the Salafis' agenda of legislating public morality in exchange for their support in allowing the military to retain its Mubarak-era prerogatives," said Omar Ashour of the University of Exeter's Institute of Arab and Islamic Studies, who is in Cairo to observe the elections.

The thoughts of most voters in Mansoura, however, are a long way from future power struggles. Rather, Egyptians are looking to elect a government that represents a clean break from the past -- and what could be cleaner than a party that has never sought power?

Mosaab Talaat, a 21-year-old veterinary student drinking tea in a small mobile-phone shop with his two friends, said he voted for the al-Nour Party, but seemed abashedly shocked when asked whether he considered himself a Salafi. He maintained that he voted for Nour because he thought the party would be less corrupt than Egypt's old ruling class.

"They're different than what we had before, because of their religion. Because they are Muslim, they'll take care of Egypt," Talaat explained. At the campaign events Talaat attended, he saw a famous Salafi sheikh who campaigned for the al-Nour Party in Mansoura. It made him think that perhaps Islam combined with politics would breed less corruption.

Ultimately, Talaat thought competition between the Brotherhood and the Salafis would be good for Egypt. "This should be normal. In any parliament there's opposition," he said. "Now, both will be working for the betterment of Egypt."

Whether that's true remains to be seen. If "competition" means brandishing Islamic credentials and providing the military with another tool to divide and rule, Egypt's turbulent transition to democracy and badly stalled economy will remain just that -- and the Egyptian people will pay the price.

KHALED DESOUKI/AFP/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS:
 

Sarah A. Topol is a Cairo-based journalist. Follow her on Twitter: @satopol.

WALTSWRONGWITHTHISPICTURE

8:37 PM ET

January 4, 2012

but tom friedman said it couldnt happen! what happened tom?

lol...

you see tom any where on the media cocktail circuit making his mea culpa?

nope...tom's conveniently MIA.

 

KBC

9:17 PM ET

January 4, 2012

Arab spring or Islamic spring

Arab spring was for democracy and if this was the case, then Arab spring is a failure. The reason for this whole Arabian tale 2011 was to change the status quo. It was against the tyrants who ruled and it was never for democracy.

Look how good Islamic spring has turned out to be. Tunisians have their lesser democratic and more Islamic government. Attacks have started on universities for Islamization of curriculum.

Libya is soon going to be the Sharia country. Don't worry about Muslim brotherhood and fear the Salafists. Welcome to the Political Islam era....

 

RYAN66

10:22 AM ET

January 5, 2012

 

CRAIG CALVIN JONES

9:22 PM ET

January 4, 2012

html house keeping...sorry

Just a boring code comment, FP please feel free to delete this. The article includes that box, "The Beards of January " with link to

http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/01/04/salafi_photos

 

CRAIG CALVIN JONES

9:52 PM ET

January 4, 2012

as I was saying

For some reason, my post was incomplete. There was an partial tag after the /salafi_photos, the end tag, it leads to a dead page. Remove the tag end and the page loads up, it the the end link tag,

 

BING520

2:03 PM ET

January 5, 2012

Arab Spring

All the regimes toppled in Arab Spring are not Islamic fundamntalistic. Even the most brutal Libya government was more socially modern than Saud Arabia or Iran. Now it seems to be evident that people wanted a regime change, not necessarily democracy.. The Turkey model may not apply.

I was misled by the buoyant optimism our media fed us on a daily basis. I can't recall reading an in-depth news analysis suggesting that the majority of people might want is the return to Islamic fundamentalism, not a Western-style democracy. Yes Muslim Brotherhood might gain more power, as it was reported, but nobody came out to say that people might want only Islamic Fundamentalism. I should have dwelled deeper on the issue myself.

 

B3050612

8:53 PM ET

January 9, 2012

Always use caution when

Always use caution when giving out any personally identifying information about yourself or your children in any Communication Service. Deep River Sporting Clays and Shooting School does not control or endorse the content, messages or information found in any Communication Service and, therefore, Deep River Sporting Clays and Shooting School specifically disclaims any liability with mkv converterMKV ConverterYouTube Converter for MacYouTube To MP4 ConverterPdf Converter for Macregard to the Communication Services and any actions resulting from your participation in any Communication Service. Managers and hosts are not authorized Deep River Sporting Clays and Shooting School spokespersons, and their views do not necessarily reflect those of Deep River Sporting Clays and Shooting School.

 

INTERNETMILIJUNAS

2:55 PM ET

January 5, 2012

Very good

These guys make the Muslim Brotherhood look like latte liberals.
internet milijunas

 

YUSEF101

11:25 AM ET

January 6, 2012

REsult of Dictatorship

This is what happens in US backed Dictatorships

all the main stream parties get killed off, and only the extreme can survive underground

if the Muslim Brotherhood had been allowed to be a legal party in the 90s, the salafist would never be born

 

EFFEMINATE

3:04 PM ET

January 6, 2012

I fear the worst for Egypt

I think that bad days are awaiting Egypt's liberals, secularists and non-Muslims. Women's rights will suffer badly too.

There is even a chance that democracy might be shelved in the near future. Islamists might build a strictly Islamist regime and do away with democratic parliamentary elections.

It is a sad fact that full human rights and full democracy are 'foreign' to almost all Muslim-majority countries. Bosnia and Turkey might be considered as two exceptions but even in those two counties, human rights and democracy situation is not that good ; and even in Turkey, Islamist domination is a threat (although of course not in the scale of Egypt).

 

BGFNDPA98FSA

7:45 PM ET

January 6, 2012

very good web: ===

very good web: === http://www.plzzshop.com

The website wholesale for many kinds of fashion shoes, like the nike, jordan, prada, also including the jeans, shirts, bags, hat and the decorations.

All the products are free shipping, and the the price is competitive, and also can accept the paypal payment., After the payment, can ship within short time.

We will give you a discount

WE ACCEPT PYAPAL PAYMENT

YOU MUST NOT MISS IT!!!

=== http://www.plzzshop.com

thank you!!!

Believe you will love it.

We have good reputation, fashion products,

come here quickly== http://www.plzzshop.com

Opportunity knocks but once