The Pak nation that includes both the military and civil society has always followed the search for Ummah, the collective association of Muslims worldwide, as its primary goal. This obsession has spawned the most evil practices of hatred and rage that has resulted in acts of violence. This nation practices hatred as a state policy and in doing so it is willing to traverse all civilizational gains that have been made in the past centuries.

By bringing up the theme of the state of Jammu & Kashmir and the constant harping of human rights, it attempts to draw attention away from its own dark deeds, which include the acts of violence in Baluchistan, after having illegally occupied the state of Baluchistan, as it has done in parts in the occupied areas of Jammu & Kashmir.

The supposed nuclear flashpoint is the "wolf call" that has been practised for over a decade. Anything to call attention and hold others ransom to their cause. Instead of taking the first step at solving their own problems, they continuously look elsewhere for help.

Neither the US President nor the US State is there to solve Pak's problems. It is time to see the writing on the wall.

Sounds like a strongly Pakistan - obsessed Indian, notwithstanding the name, is trying to malign Pakistan. This is the traditional Indian mindset; leaving no opportunity to castigate Pakistan in total disregard to logic and facts. I thought enmity also has certain limits, but you are bent upon reinforcing the maxim that "Everything is fair in love and WAR".
Pakistan is undoubtedly one of the the most modern and enlightened Muslim countries(miniscule presence of extremeists notwithstanding, which every society has for one reason or the other) and teh fact is acknowledged by the objective analysts, including Americans, europeans and Indians. Calling names to Pakistan on this account is toal preposterous propaganda.
Pakistan's state policy is based on peaceful co-existence and peace, not hatred, as mongered in this comment.
International human watch organizations including Amnest International have brought out and highlighted the facts and figures of Indian military attrocities in the Occupied Kashmir many a times. Over 100,000 youth dead and thousands of women raped are the undisputed recorded figures. It is double standars if such massive human riights violations are ignored. A wrong should be wrong, wherever it takes place - unless, it is "realpolitk".
What is happening in FATA and Balochistan is a doing of RAW, using the Afghan soil; clear aim is to destabilize Pakistan. drawing parallel India - occupied Kashmir and Balochistan is a clear case of poor logic and historical understanding. Simply put, it is distortion of facts to mislead the people not aware with the facts.
Saying Kashmir as "nuclear flashpoint" is not a 'wolf call". No one else but the US presidents like Bill Clinton are on record to have said this. Everyone aware of the acrimonious history of Indo - Pakistan relations since 1947 knows this as a fact. If you want to downplay ths reality, you may, but the fact does not change by your perceptions.
Future US President must know the realities of South Asia and take stock of the issues like Kashmir Dispute, which continue to plague the security regime in this volatile region. obviously, immediate concern is situation in Afghanistan at the moment. Please read analyses of Christine Fair, Bruce Riedel, Lisa curtis and Philip P. Cohen to get educated on these important issues of the Region.....

I's an obsession. I'm certain.

Obama can regale us with storied of how he thwarted Putin's aggression with sharp negotiating on arms deals. Oh, that's right, he gave away the store while not requiring any concessions from the Russian government. Well, at least there's the Dalai Lama. Oops, that was awkward too because his handlers snuck the Dalai Lama in through the service entrance so as not to offend China. No matter, because he offended China anyway. And the Tibetans. And Buddhists.

And let's not even mention Israel.

You're right, perhaps Obama SHOULD aggressively tout his foreign policy accolades in the debates. Of course, he did kill Osama. Well, "he" didn't, but he gave the order after sleeping on it. So, in Obama's lingo: mad props on that one!

http://alifetoremember.info/

Romney, though not brilliant, is still sharper than Obama.auto repair austin And he would make a better president. Not to mention that he at least brings a little business knowledge with him. I'd happily trade a fan of Saul Alinsky for one of Barrons. Any day. austin used cars

I wish Huntsman had a chance...maybe next election autos usados

As if Obama was such a brilliant foreign policy tactician. His lack of foreign policy knowledge and experience is breathtaking. The man is an inner-city community organizer; his sharpest skill set is as a campaigner. That conventional wisdom portrays him as 'intelligent' simply illustrates the level of success that the left has had in spreading this non-truth through a compliant American media. The sharpest propaganda campaign this side of Pyongyang.

Romney, through not brilliant, is still sharper than Obama. And he would make a better president. Not to mention that he at least brings a little business knowledge with him. I'd happily trade a fan of Saul Alinsky for one of Barrons. Any day.

If the President is the politician you claim, then he is most certainly concerned about reelection. Anyone saying otherwise is either pompous or unrealistic.

The President is a weak incumbent surrounded by a lot of variables he doesn't fully control. He will be matched against a competent opponent with relatively broad appeal. The President's base will be less enthused than in 2008, and Romney's base will be somewhat more energized.

I think a lot of policy wonks tend to be politically inept. If you're expecting the President to waltz into a debate with Romney and clean up simply because you think the President's ideology is more compelling, you're in for a shocking election season. Not only is Romney a more formidable opponent than Sen. McCain, the inherent advantages for the President (youth energy, minority energy, media support, Bush hangover) will either be reduced or not present during this election cycle. I suspect that unlike of GOP detractors on this website, the President's advisors are well aware of the steep challenge they face.

All he did was let the SEALS do their job. The apparatus was in place due to W's programs and the intel that tracked him down had been working on this for years. He simply said yes. Credit for giving the ok, especially knowing it would cause issue with Pakistan, is due. However, he did not kill UBL any more than W. In fact, if he'd done what he said he would do in the campaign, and stopped most of W's programs/policies, UBL would be alive today. Credit where it is due, but don't give him credit for killing the slimeball. He just happened to be in the seat when it happened.