The Complete Obama

A pre-State of the Union guide to Barack Obama's favorite foreign-policy themes -- and how they've evolved over time.

BY URI FRIEDMAN | JANUARY 24, 2012

NUCLEAR WEAPONS

"This is the moment when we must renew the goal of a world without nuclear weapons. The two superpowers that faced each other across the wall of this city came too close too often to destroying all we have built and all that we love. With that wall gone, we need not stand idly by and watch the further spread of the deadly atom."

- Berlin speech, 2008

"I understand those who protest that some countries have weapons that others do not. No single nation should pick and choose which nations hold nuclear weapons. That is why I strongly reaffirmed America's commitment to seek a world in which no nations hold nuclear weapons."

- Cairo speech, 2009

"We must stop the spread of nuclear weapons and seek the goal of a world without them.... America intends to keep our end of the bargain. We will pursue a new agreement with Russia to substantially reduce our strategic warheads and launchers."

- U.N. General Assembly address, 2009

"In the middle of the last century, nations agreed to be bound by a treaty whose bargain is clear: All will have access to peaceful nuclear power; those without nuclear weapons will forsake them; and those with nuclear weapons will work towards disarmament. I am committed to upholding this treaty. It is a centerpiece of my foreign policy. And I'm working with President Medvedev to reduce America and Russia's nuclear stockpiles." 

- Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech, 2009

"Even as we prosecute two wars, we are also confronting perhaps the greatest danger to the American people -- the threat of nuclear weapons. I have embraced the vision of John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan through a strategy that reverses the spread of these weapons, and seeks a world without them."

- State of the Union address, 2010

"As we pursue the world's most dangerous extremists, we're also denying them the world's most dangerous weapons, and pursuing the peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons."

- U.N. General Assembly address, 2010

"American leadership can also be seen in the effort to secure the worst weapons of war. Because Republicans and Democrats approved the new START treaty, far fewer nuclear weapons and launchers will be deployed. Because we rallied the world, nuclear materials are being locked down on every continent so they never fall into the hands of terrorists."

- State of the Union address, 2011

"To lift the specter of mass destruction, we must come together to pursue the peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons. Over the last two years, we've begun to walk down that path. Since our Nuclear Security Summit in Washington, nearly 50 nations have taken steps to secure nuclear materials from terrorists and smugglers. Next March, a summit in Seoul will advance our efforts to lock down all of them. The new START treaty between the United States and Russia will cut our deployed arsenals to the lowest level in half a century, and our nations are pursuing talks on how to achieve even deeper reductions. America will continue to work for a ban on the testing of nuclear weapons, and the production of fissile material needed to make them."

- U.N. General Assembly address, 2011

Joe Klamar/AFP/Getty Images

 

Uri Friedman is an associate editor at Foreign Policy.

TIMING

10:09 PM ET

January 23, 2012

failed president

join jimmy carter and go stand in the corner with your oil sheik buddies...

 

JEHUDAH BEN-ISRAEL

12:54 AM ET

January 24, 2012

Arab Israeli conflict and the fundamental that must be addressed

Clearly, in reviewing the development of the Arab Israeli conflict during the past two to three decades, the strategic intent of the Muslim-Arabs, local and regional, has been to veil the international legal underpinning of the questions at hand and the way to resolve them. And, some, overly eager to reach a "solution" to this intractable conflict, opted to be manipulated into the make-belief "new paradigm" created by some Muslim-Arab leaders.

Obviously, the "new paradigm" has been only part of the imagination of those eager to achieve peace, thus it has proven unsustainable and two decades since the Madrid Peace Conference we are still dealing with the same fundamental questions that refuse to disappear.

Thus, why don't we all return to international law, the most objective method of dealing with disputes and conflicts, and set out to bring about an accommodation of peaceful coexistence (if indeed this what we hope to achieve...!!) between Arab and Jew, between the Muslim-Arab world and the nation-state of the Jewish people, Israel. A very good place to start is the following document:

http://www.mythsandfacts.org/Conflict/mandate_for_palestine/MandateN2%20-%2010-29-07-English.pdf

 

DONKISSOTES

9:37 PM ET

January 24, 2012

the views or ideas and the

the views or ideas and the policy pursued by President Obama as seen by its people and other countries is the result. Obama policy on Iran's nuclear North Korea is also the policy carefully. On the other hand the murder of Iranian nuclear experts whether anyone was enumerated by the United States also made a bit of relief, especially if all Iranian and Korean nuclear experts can be killed,,, wowwww the United States no longer has a rival

 

MARTY24

1:12 PM ET

January 25, 2012

JOHNODONOGHUE16 writes: "and

JOHNODONOGHUE16 writes: "and I really did voted for, contributed large amounts of money and time for your election, you have done very little in the agenda you have highlighted over the last 3 years."

Some questions:
1. Are you an American? Even with the current school system, it is hard to believe a native speaker of English would write this way.

2. We have seen no progress in the Middle East because Obama really doesn't understand the dynamics there. He takes advice, not from AIPAC, but from Turkish PM Erdogan, who is turning increasingly Islamist. The Islamist worldview is disconnected from reality, and pursuing goals that are based simply on ideology is a formula for failure, one that Obama has pursued. The notion that Ron Paul has a grasp of reality is equally far-fetched.

3. That Secretary Clinton was even willing to listen to the OIC's case for making discussion of Islam illegal demonstrates who is really in charge in Washington. As a law school graduate, certainly she is aware that the proposal is unconstitutional. That, by itself, should have led her to reject the issue, but instead she endorsed it.

Obama's foreign policy is a direct result of his narcissistic personality. He sees himself in everything he does, and not what is really going on. The sooner he is out of the White House, the better it will be for the rest of the world as well as for America.

 

JAN STUHR

2:30 PM ET

February 21, 2012

The most objective method of

The most objective method of dealing with disputes and conflicts, and set out to bring unibet about an accommodation of peaceful coexistence (if indeed this what we hope to achieve...!!) between Arab and Jew, between the Muslim-Arab world and the nation-state of the Jewish people, Israel. A very good place to start is the following document: