Fine Words

Sure, Obama talks the talk. But now what?

BY DOV S. ZAKHEIM | JANUARY 25, 2012

The president did not surprise. He is a powerful speaker, and he showed it yet again in his State of the Union address. His voice was at its most resonant when he wrapped himself in the flag and milked the Bin Laden operation for all it was worth. But there really wasn't very much behind the high flown rhetoric.

President Obama bashed the Chinese on trade, but said nary a word about their military buildup. He claimed that America's commitment to Israel's security was "ironclad" -- he repeated the term -- but made no reference to how his less-than-amicable relationship with Israel's prime minister would foster that security, nor why his standing with the people of that country is lower than that of every president since Jimmy Carter. He claimed that our alliances were stronger than ever, but glossed over the fact that there is deep unease in Europe over the administration's much ballyhooed "pivot" to Asia. As for that pivot, to which the president did refer, it currently amounts to the redeployment, on a rotating basis, of a grand total of 2,500 Marines to Australia. 

President Obama asserted that America's influence worldwide was greater than ever, overlooking negative opinion polls throughout the Arab world and South Asia. He made only a passing reference to Latin America (counting Rio among other world capitals -- did he or his speechwriters forget Brasilia?). And he made none at all to Canada, whose pipeline he undermined only the other week.

The president said very little about his defense budget cuts. He did not explain how America would retain all its commitments worldwide with a shrunken force that his own secretary of defense has lamented. He did not, of course, note that defense is paying for half the deficit reduction while its budget constitutes a fifth of all federal spending each year, when off-budget entitlements are counted, as they should be. 

The mark of a great speaker and of a great debater is the ability to gloss over uncomfortable facts while blowing more favorable ones out of proportion. But great speakers and great debaters are not necessarily great presidents. President Obama is certainly a great speaker and a great debater; on national security in particular, however, he has thus far into his term of office fallen far short of being a great president, or, for that matter, even a particularly good one.

Win McNamee/Getty Images

 

Dov S. Zakheim is a vice president at Booz Allen Hamilton, a global strategy and technology consulting firm, and an adjunct professor at the National War College, Yeshiva University, Columbia University, and Trinity College.

TIMING

10:27 AM ET

January 26, 2012

and lets not forget the broken russian reset button..or...

or the failed arab spring, or syria where he has done next to nothing...

and what of that reset button? it was supposed to be emblematic of his new gentler kinder anti bush multilateralism...supposed to win over "folks" like the russians to help on iran, but so far, russia is abusing the process to isolate iran, russia is supporting iran and shipping arms to syria! can you believe that?? arms to syria! and obama has said SFA.

this article is quite right....obama is all words...but is he an effective president? I say not at all...he ought to be back in academia.

oh, and by the way, obama's taxes are 25%, LESS than what he himself says is a "fair share"....and that's while he's president...imagine what his and michelle's taxes were before he was president when he didnt have to disclose them? im sure it was far less the the "fair share". can you say hypocrite?

go figure...

 

KUNINO

2:58 PM ET

January 26, 2012

More Zakheim nonsense

Keep that great British orator Winston Churchill in mind while looking through the longwinded way above of saying "I spit on Barack Obama:"

"The mark of a great speaker and of a great debater is the ability to gloss over uncomfortable facts while blowing more favorable ones out of proportion. But great speakers ... has thus far into his term of office fallen far short of being a great president, or, for that matter, even a particularly good one."

Slimy. Now I briefly quote a real orator, the late Mr Churchill, showing his caliber by glossing over uncomfortable facts and blowing more favorable ones out of proportion: "I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and sweat. We have before us an ordeal of the most grievous kind. We have before us many, many long months of struggle and of suffering.

"You ask, what is our aim? I can answer in one word: Victory. Victory at all costs — Victory in spite of all terror — Victory, however long and hard the road may be, for without victory there is no survival."

Mr Churchill was speaking in his first address to the parliament in London after taking over leadership of the government charged with fighting off Hitler and his allies. His view of oratory evidently differed greatly from the fairy dust offered by the busy busy busy Mr Zakheim of Booz Allen Hamilton, the National War College, Yeshiva University, Columbia University, and Trinity College. I wish his lucky widespread students the good fortune of also hearing from somebody else more sensible, honest and well read.

 

INDIGESTIBLEDIGEST

9:29 PM ET

January 26, 2012

Wow, someone's a Debbie Downer.

Speaking of the difference between speech and action, is there a single constructive thing in this article? It's apparent that you aren't the biggest BHO fan, but as a response to the State of the Union this is next to useless. Do you want to respond to any of the things he did say, or is it best to just lambaste him for not having the same criticisms of himself that you do of him?

As for the criticisms themselves, you scraped the bottom of the barrel at points. Do you really feel that Israel's relationship with the US at the moment should be laid at Obama's feet? Do you really think that a foreign policy pivot to anywhere must necessarily be accompanied by a major troop buildup? Can you go into a bit more detail as to why we need to continue funding our defense budget at the levels we have been?

You make criticisms of Obama's policies without really explaining them, which means either you think they are self-evident (which seems a bit delusional) or you are writing only for yourself and people who agree with you precisely. And that makes your criticism of Barack Obama's omissions a little hard to accept without a sizable grain of salt.