The Muddle Kingdom

China has a serious PR problem.

BY ISAAC STONE FISH | FEBRUARY 8, 2012

Wang Xuming is different. Unlike other Chinese officials, he actually enjoys communicating with the world outside of the Communist Party. As a spokesman for the Ministry of Education, he released his cell phone number to the media. "I was available 24 hours a day," he told me in November. "There are some journalists with mental disorders who would call me at 10 or 11 at night. Of course I don't mean you," he added with a smile. He peppers his speech with flowery expressions and blunt asides, unlike his counterparts, who often sound like Karl Marx audiobooks. Remarkably, he would actually admit when he didn't know anything. Chinese reporters saw him as a rare light in Beijing's darkness, which is why he was fired in 2008 for being too outspoken.

Both domestically and internationally, the Chinese Communist Party has a public-relations problem: Its officials do not know how to communicate with the media. Decision making is highly centralized, and the relatively low-ranking officials tasked with speaking to reporters don't want to offend their superiors by saying the wrong thing. Although Reporters Without Borders ranks China's media as 174th in its latest Press Freedom Index, just slightly better than Iran and worse than Sudan, news is transmitted through Twitter-like micro-blogging services, of which roughly 250 million Chinese use. Though few expect China's stilted state-run media to be crusaders for change, there are more independent newspapers, like the business magazine Caixin and the newspaper the Southern Metropolis Daily, and journalists there increasingly ask difficult questions about everything from pollution cover-ups to low-level official corruption.

Spokesmen, though, hide from the domestic and international press. Besides Wang, all of the half-dozen current and former spokespeople I've met have declined to give me their contact information besides a general office phone number. Wringing a comment from a government ministry more often than not involves the request to fax a list of questions, which are rarely answered.

And when poorly trained spokesmen and officials do speak, PR disasters often ensue. On Tuesday, rumors swirled online that a vice mayor named Wang Lijun in the city of Chongqing attempted to defect to the United States (the State Department on Wednesday confirmed only that he had met officials at the consulate and left "of his own volition"). Wang shot to fame for overseeing Chongqing's highly publicized fight against organized crime, and a scandal involving Wang could hurt Chongqing Party Secretary Bo Xilai's chance of promotion. The Chongqing government's official microblog responded that Wang was taking a "vacation-style leave." This ridiculous response drew 21,000 comments and has been re-tweeted an astonishing 60,000 times, blowing up the story domestically. "This style of PR really makes me disappointed by the government," wrote one Weibo user. "What a sense of humor!" wrote another.

After a high-speed train crashed in Wenzhou last year, killing 40 people, the railway ministry tried to clean up the accident before an official investigation could take place. The railways spokesman claimed, unconvincingly, that this was done to aid rescuers. He told reporters, "Whether you believe it or not, I believe it anyway." The ministry sacked the spokesmen, the fourth ministry official to be fired after the crash, but his remarks only added to public anger and added to grassroots pressure for the government to reform the ministry.

China faces a worse PR problem internationally. After the Nobel Committee awarded imprisoned dissident Liu Xiaobo the Peace Prize in 2010, China's Foreign Ministry spokesman called the decision "blasphemy," a response that immediately fueled comparisons between China's response and that of Nazi Germany, when the Nobel Committee awarded the prize to a German dissident. The Western world perceives the Chinese government as unreasonable toward the Tibetans in part because of its officials' tendency to issue tin-eared statements calling the Dalai Lama names like a "wolf in monk's robes."

Guang Niu/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS: CHINA, EAST ASIA
 

Isaac Stone Fish is an associate editor at Foreign Policy.

MITTAL

8:46 PM ET

February 8, 2012

No No No China does not have a PR problem

the fact of matter -

- may be chinese did not care whether they are liked or not - NOT like as if in living someone else Hollywood fanatsy; life is comprised of harsh reality and difficult as it is always

- so what if pandering to western media get you?? invitation to some western frivilous cocktail party and more media circus/feeding frenzy; there is no such career path in China

- China governance is way below world standard, and tons of gross negligence/incompetance/corruption need to be hidden from world at large, why inviting more western media scrutiny anyway

 

BING520

12:02 PM ET

February 9, 2012

MITTAL

Average Chinese do care. They are enormously embarrassed and ashamed of their government officials in the press conference. They are simply powerless. One day, I hope much sooner the real Chinese will get rid of their CCP officials.

 

TMLUTAS

12:54 PM ET

February 12, 2012

Pandering is not the problem

The problem is in accurate information transmittal to all the stakeholders in the society governed by the PRC. The PRC closed itself off because it did not think that this sort of information transmittal was important because in the Mao era it grossly underestimated the number of people who matter.

Spokesmen are key players in providing the raw material in creating this information transmittal system. The PRC senses that it is missing something but it has the hangover of communist ideology which still maintains that such interchanges are not needed. The planning committee can solve it all.

 

XTIANGODLOKI

12:36 AM ET

February 9, 2012

Western media does have an anti-China bias

Yes the Chinese media is heavily censored but that doesn't mean that the Western reporters are not anti-China in general. The lack of direct interviews should not prevent Western reporters from reporting on Chinese government's reasoning behind its stance on controversial matters such as Tibet. Western reporters tend to ignore what the Chinese officials say anyway because they think it's all propaganda.

The other reality is that most of the reporters for Western media can't speak Chinese well. Most of their sources are thus from English language sites, which hardly represents the views of the ordinary Chinese people.

 

MICHAELGERALDPDEALINO

1:42 AM ET

February 9, 2012

F@3k the CCP

China, stop trying to bully other countries. Freedom and Independence for Tibet! Down with the CCP!

 

NEILH1UK

2:24 AM ET

February 9, 2012

China and The West

Having lived in Asia for the last 10 years in Hong Kong, I can honestly say that the way that the west operate is very different from the east. In fundamental ways of things and operating. Without wishing to pass judgement I think if the west believes the east will 'adopt it's value system' and 'see the ligh't they may be waiting a very long time.....China will do what China wants to do...not what the west tells it...and with the current global economic shift to the east, they just might get their way....

Neil
Tinnitus Magazine

 

PSANDS

10:49 AM ET

February 9, 2012

The Middle Kingdom

In light of my own Chinese studies, I believe your assesment of the Chinese government mind set is quite accurate. And also your thoughts on what America expects. However, we have a new Independent presidential candidate in Barbara Lacy. Her platform is both forward looking and outward looking, not just for America but for the world in which China is a large and integral part. It neither requires or expects China to adopt America's "value system" which is sadly sometimes questionalble in itself I admit. Go to www.barbaralacy.org for more on a whole new way of looking at things!

 

GODFREE

10:09 AM ET

February 9, 2012

Why?

Why should the Chinese Government communicate with "the media"?
The media are held in contempt in the West and act as cheerleaders for government oppression and aggression.
The Western media has, at best, a 17% trust/approval rating--and that's the New York Times.
The Chinese Government's trust/approval rating is 85%, because their actions speak far more eloquently than any words.
We could try their approach: every 5 years announce what we're going to do for the country, then 5 years later announce that it's done.
Save newsprint.

 

KEYBASHER

10:16 AM ET

February 9, 2012

Wang Xuming should update his CV asap

His CCP bosses will be out of work soon enough. No one-party state survives the ten years after hosting an Olympics as Berlin (1936), Moscow (1980) and Sarajevo (1984) attest.

Let's hope they make it a smooth regime change, for once in their history.

 

BING520

11:59 AM ET

February 9, 2012

China's PR problem

PR is part of the problem. CCP does not have truth and facts to tell. All they have is the official story. No spokespersons are allowed to deviate from the official story. Every time I listen to Chinese official; spokepersons or watch the news, they always read from a piece of paper in monotone. It is so unnature you know it is a robot talking. No Chinese spokesperson ever answered a difficult question with ease or intelligence.

 

BRAVEHEARTNJU

12:52 PM ET

February 9, 2012

Reporters Without Borders ranks ? oh dear

does anyone here knows what is the 'Reporters Without Borders ranks' origin?
laughable

 

BARBIEBEARDEN

3:33 PM ET

February 9, 2012

Enlighten us

Enlighten us!

 

MASINI

2:11 AM ET

February 17, 2012

I myself do not understand

I myself do not understand why we wonder these things. China is a communist state, and like other countries such as trying to hide why does not like. Communism is not essentially evil, but communism in all countries to remove a lot of basic doctrine. Now we can speak of communism in china, but a kind of totalitarianism. And this kind of policy is the oppression of the population.cum sa recoltam propolis