China's 'Come to Jesus' Moment

How Beijing got religion.

BY ERIC FISH | FEBRUARY 15, 2012

BEIJING – Last spring, a delegation of 11 Chinese government officials visited Nairobi, Kenya. Their mission: to seek advice on how to promote Christianity in China. Wang Zuoan, director of the State Administration for Religious Affairs, which regulates religion in China, reportedly told Kenya's Anglican archbishop that "religion is good for development."

Amid growing social tension and an ominous economic outlook, some quarters of the officially atheist Chinese Communist Party seem to be warming to Christianity. Land is being donated, churches built, and research being conducted on positive Christian contributions -- all by the Chinese government, which until recently treated religion as a harmful but unstoppable force. In 2001, Chinese President Jiang Zemin called for religion to be cautiously accommodated, but actively discouraged, and adapted to the socialist culture of atheism and materialism.

The traditional antipathy toward religion in the Communist Party stems from Karl Marx's idea that it is the "opiate of the masses" that "dulls the pain of oppression" from capitalist aristocrats. In an egalitarian socialist society, there's no need for this remnant of exploitation.

But recent moves toward religion suggest this ideological aversion is transforming along with China's socioeconomic situation -- albeit more slowly. Since Deng Xiaoping began opening China's economy in 1978, its GDP has grown 40-fold with increasingly serious side effects. Corruption, yawning wealth inequality, environmental degradation, and the threat of a major banking crisis weigh on the Communist Party's ability to maintain control. The religious opiate could be just what the doctor ordered for a nervous Communist Party.

Academic studies and think tanks devoted to studying religion's political and sociological effects have been sponsored by government organs to explore topics such as Christianity's role in developing the United States and Europe. And institutions like Fudan University's Religious Studies Department in Shanghai and the Institute for Advanced Study of the Humanities and Religion at Beijing Normal University are becoming more common in Chinese academia.

"There's a fair amount of overlap between the government agenda and the Christian agenda," says Gerda Wielander, who researches Chinese religion and politics at the University of Westminster. "When you speak to [Chinese Christians] or look at the data, they all emphasize what good citizens they are and what good citizens they want to be, so there's a lot for the government to tap into there."

Last October, in the southern city of Foshan, a van ran over a 2-year-old girl. After pausing, the driver continued to drive over her again with the back tire. The video of the incident, which went viral and incited debate on the state of Chinese society, showed 18 bystanders walking past and ignoring the fallen girl until a scrap peddler eventually came to her aid. The driver later reportedly said he'd be liable for less money with a dead girl than an injured one.

For many Chinese, the incident highlighted some of the problems that have emerged from the post-socialist jettison of morality in the pursuit of material wealth. "The old moral system doesn't work anymore, and the new one hasn't been established," says Fenggang Yang, a professor at Purdue University and author of Religion in China: Survival and Revival under Communist Rule. "Many people in society feel kind of lost and don't know what to do."

Twenty-one-year-old Nanjing college student Chu Zhen felt adrift before finding solace in Christianity. "About 30 years ago we had 'Reform and Opening Up,' and almost everything changed," he said. "But we don't know how to accept it."

Four months ago he started going to informal Christian clubs and Bible studies on his campus. "At that time I just wanted to find a belief," he says. "I feared in the future I might do something really bad that I can't undo. So I went to church and we sang songs, told stories. I found peace in my mind."

According to one estimate, around 10,000 Chinese are following suit every day. From under a million Protestant followers in 1949, there are now anywhere from 21 million Chinese Christians by official figures to 130 million by independent estimates. Within the next 30 years, that number could climb as high as 400 million -- equivalent to 20 percent of the world's Christian population. It is difficult to get an accurate estimate on the number of Chinese Christians, though, as many worship secretly in illegal house churches, which government figures don't include.

These underground gatherings attract many Christians because their sermons escape government oversight. This doesn't sit well with the Communist Party, which frequently cracks down on independent churches for fear that they might begin harboring political ambitions. A prominent house church leader recently spent six months in a labor camp, and groups like Beijing's 1,000-member evangelical Shouwang Church regularly face evictions and detentions for defying orders to disband.

If You Build It...

Across town from Chu's campus in Nanjing, the government has funded the construction of an officially sanctioned 5,000-person Protestant church, one of China's largest. And the U.S.-based Christian group International Cooperating Ministries reports to have assisted in building 292 churches across China in recent years -- with the government's blessing. While this is partly in hopes of drawing followers away from underground churches, it might also be with the understanding that Christianity could be good for China's economic development.

"Christianity is seen as useful from the official point of view because it's not just about acting morally as an individual and being a good citizen. It's about the work ethic," argues Wielander, adding that there seems to be an attraction to the argument that Protestantism curbed excesses like greed and corruption in the market economy of the West during the early stages of capitalist development.

Some have argued that the "Protestant work ethic" is beginning to have a similar impact on China as it did in the West. In the business hub of Wenzhou, which has a 20 to 30 percent Christian population, the government has begun to study the success of Christian-owned enterprises.

"Conservative Christian morality has, perhaps indirectly, contributed to Wenzhou's success by helping maintain family stability and, thus, the stability of their family businesses in the context of perceived moral decadence," says Nanlai Cao, author of Constructing China's Jerusalem: Christians, Power, and Place in Contemporary Wenzhou. "After all, the family is the basic unit of petty capitalist production for Wenzhou people." One Christian factory manager in Wenzhou in 2010 told the BBC that he prefers to hire Christian workers. "When they do things wrong, they feel guilty -- that's the difference," he said.

Over the past few months Wenzhou's economic growth has started to slow, creating what looks to be the rumblings of a severe credit crisis. Shadow lenders are aggressively calling in private loans, and some business owners have fled the city or committed suicide to escape debt. The city's Christians appear to be faring a bit better, though, thanks to a bond and sense of trust cultivated through regular interaction in churches. "In sermons, Wenzhou preachers have preached on Christian love and told the congregation not to expect full repayment on loans to church members because they are all brothers and sisters in the kingdom of God," says Cao. "By framing the debt crisis in a religious language and in the context of God's punishment for human greed, Wenzhou Christians tend not to put pressure on lenders to repay loans."

International studies suggest there might be some merit to that sentiment. A study last year in The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, titled "Mean Gods Make Good People: Different Views of God Predict Cheating Behavior," found that those who believed in a vengeful God performed more honestly on a math test designed for easy cheating. "Fear of supernatural punishment may serve as a deterrent to counternormative behavior, even in anonymous situations free from human social monitoring," the study said.

While the allure of moral and economic development accounts for some of China's new interest in religion, a quieter motive is perhaps in play as well: political control. In a 2006 interview, Reuters asked Li Junru, a high official in China's top political advisory body, why India can handle being a democracy but China can't. He replied that India has religion to control its people.

In December, when residents of Wukan expelled all officials in their small fishing village, they drew attention to a nationwide trend of corrupt officials seizing land from peasants in order to raise revenue and enjoy kickbacks from developers. China is showing many of the symptoms of the crony capitalist system Marx decried.

Under Marx's theory of development, societies transition from feudalism to capitalism before moving on to socialism. When Mao Zedong came to power, he tried to jump over the capitalist stage -- and he unleashed the "Great Leap Forward" socioeconomic campaign, which caused the deaths of as many as 40 million people.

But by initiating the Reform and Opening Up campaign in 1978, Mao's successor, Deng, tacitly acknowledged that China would first have to embrace a capitalist economy, but not necessarily some of the other tenets of a capitalist society. Although Deng ended the de facto religion ban and allowed worship in heavily controlled churches, he still advocated atheism through schools and official channels. Religion remained a "feudal superstition" in official-speak -- strongly discouraged but reluctantly accepted.

Now, however, some liberal Marxists within the party see religion as one way to pacify a public increasingly agitated over inequality. "In general, using and controlling religions is not something new in Chinese history. Almost every emperor knew the power of religion," says Peng Guoxiang, Peking University professor of Chinese philosophy, intellectual history, and religions. "For classical Marxist ideology, religion is nothing but spiritual opium. But recently, it is very possible that the authorities have started to rethink the function of religion and how to manipulate it skillfully, instead of simply trying to curb or even uproot its development."

Others support Christianity's spread for more self-interested reasons. According to Cao, religious bureaus and lower-level government organs often want more registered Christian churches in their governed regions in order to enlarge their own power base and create more opportunities for rent-seeking from constituents. China's State Administration for Religious Affairs didn't respond to requests for comment.

To be sure, there still remains much opposition to religion within the Communist Party. In December, a senior official emphasized the ban on religious belief for party members by saying, "Hostile forces home and abroad are doing what they can to use religion for their separatist activities in the areas inhabited by ethnic groups."

The organizational power of religious groups is a major concern, especially in regards to those that may harbor loyalties to figures like the pope or the Dalai Lama. The Catholic Church's role in bringing about the 1989 fall of communist rule in Poland raises worries, as does the rise of the Falun Gong spiritual movement, which staged a massive demonstration in Beijing in 1999, prompting a ferocious government crackdown. Even Protestantism is often associated with Western imperialism and aggressive missionaries of the 19th and early 20th centuries.

"There's still quite an ambivalent feeling toward Christianity," says Wielander. "Both Buddhism and Daoism are fairly otherworldly. They're more about how to escape from all this chaos and hide from this terrible world, whereas Christianity is very proactive. That can be a good thing for the government provided it manages to channel this energy into projects on the government's agenda."

That may indeed be the direction the party intends to go. A 20-year-old evangelical convert from Jiangsu province, who asked not to be identified, regularly attends services at an illegal house church that now has over 150 followers. The authorities have known of the church for years but tolerate it, she says, and she doesn't think Christian beliefs and the Communist Party's agenda are contradictory.

She adds, "The Bible says we have to follow the rules of the government."

China Photos/Getty Images

 

Eric Fish is a writer in Beijing.

KEYBASHER

10:05 AM ET

February 16, 2012

Divine punishments?

""Fear of supernatural punishment may serve as a deterrent to counternormative behavior, even in anonymous situations free from human social monitoring,""

Some call it "superstition." Others call it "guilt."

 

STUART700

12:10 PM ET

February 16, 2012

China's move to Christianity

You cannot suppress what’s in peoples hearts. China has for years tried to suppress religion and Christianity in particular, it was the oppressive government that was atheist.
The Christian church has always flourished when it's being oppressed, consider what was achieved under the Romans. If a government really wants to weaken and destroy religion they have to emancipate and liberalise it. Christian countries like the US and UK grew strong and prosperous as faith and ethical values were held as important and a subsequent decline in these values has seen a corresponding decline in these once great nations. China is on the brink, lets hope for Chinas sake it gets it right, all that glitters is not gold or even metal.

 

BETALOVER

2:31 PM ET

February 16, 2012

US not a Christian Nation

I am not a Christian and I am an American.

For the USA to be on a higher moral ground to preach to China on religious freedom:

First, erase "In God We Trust" on our currency. It is an appalling affront to the non-believers. This is an exclusionary and arrogant hubris of the majority to demonstrate its dominance. The Chinese currency has five minority languages but the greenback does not even have Spanish but the disgusting hubris from the majority to expressly slight the minority. The renminbi does not have “No God “printed on it.

Second, get rid of the expectation of invoking hypothetical aid of deity in our court of law during deposition and testimony. The so-called God does not help or do anything. This expectation on a free-thinking witness is an arrant insult.

Third, stop state sponsored prayers in Congress.

Fourth, stop invoking deity in the swear-in ceremony of elected officials. The invocation of deity on official time is an appalling insult to the non-believers, hurtful particularly to those who voted for the official.

“The Christian church has always flourished when it's being oppressed”

If this is true, religious persecution is unlikely in China or anywhere else and religion does not need state promotion to be viable. Therefore, the state should not promote religion.

 

MIKEM

5:33 PM ET

February 16, 2012

SOOO Oppressed!

Betalover, you American atheists sure are oppressed. If you turn on CSPAN, you might suffer the grave injury of hearing a prayer. My heart bleeds for you.

 

BETALOVER

1:38 PM ET

February 20, 2012

Sense of justice

If you have any sense of justice you should precisely grieve for me.

Does the "We" in "In God We Trust" include me?

This is a very basic question of inclusiveness.

Either "We" does not include me or the religious majority feel the arrogance to put words in my mouth, to stamp its hubris on me.

Would the religious resented "We do not trust God"
?

 

BETALOVER

2:10 PM ET

February 20, 2012

Renminbi

The Chinese RMB note does not have any inference to religion, it does not have "We don't believe god exist".

It has the languages of five more numerous ethnic minorities while the greenback does not even have English but the arrogant hubris of the religious majority 'In God We Trust".

Does the majority really need to stamp its hubris on the minority? Can the USA be more inclusive of the non-believers?

Symbolism matters.

 

MIKEM

5:44 PM ET

February 16, 2012

Irony

I certainly don't want to discourage China from ceasing their oppression of religious people, or from facilitating the growth of Christianity (as long as its done justly and without coercion), but it seems like they're reasons for doing these things are flawed.

The Chinese have shunned religion because it's supposedly "the opiate of the masses." Now they want to embrace it because they think that their people could use an opiate. They seem less interested in ending state oppression and more hopeful that Christianity will "dull the pain of oppression," as Marx said it does.

Unfortunately for the Chinese government, Christianity hasn't proven to be a particularly good pacifier. The CCP might look to the history of their neighbors in Korea for some lessons about what happens when Christian churches grow under a repressive regime.

 

BETALOVER

1:41 PM ET

February 20, 2012

Chinese culturally secular

The fervent "opiate of the masses" is only of historical interest.

More basic is that the Chinese culture has been predominantly secular, very much more so than all or nearly all cultures on earth.

 

LLOYDDCOLBERT

4:22 AM ET

February 17, 2012

I feel sad for China..

As a Catholic, I feel sad about what has happened to China. I witnessed that video of a little girl ran over by a van with a lot of bystanders around not giving any help to the helpless girl. They Genomma Lab need to be taught Christianity so they know the real value of life. I felt sad, really why people in China turned out to be like this! God help them!

 

BETALOVER

1:48 PM ET

February 20, 2012

cell phone mentality

may be you draw too much conclusion from this.

It was also possible that the cell phone mentality caused everyone to presume that someone else has called.

 

STLSYCLYW

10:56 AM ET

February 17, 2012

Betalover nonsense

I am a Believer in Christ Jesus. I am an American.

I agree with you that the US isn't a Christian Nation anymore. However, this does not mean we need to erase the mention of God from the public arena for your personal satisfaction. You might want to forget all about God, but many still seek him including those working in the public sector. Celebration of the freedom of religion (or no religion) is a priviledge of America. Creation of an atmosphere to remove all mention of God from the entirety of the public sphere is just as radical as proposing there be one "legal" religion in a State. Atheists or non-believers aren't the only ones who get offended on a daily basis because of their world-view.

Also, the naturalist or atheistic world-view does nothing to create an atmosphere of objective thought. Those who hold this world-view retain as much of an exclusive position as the Christian or Muslim. You are just as emphatic in your desire to denounce God, not pray nor mention his existence and live life for yourself where you presume to be in control of all things (even if you won't admit it). Perhaps one day you'll see things differently.

Have you ever wondered why you get so easily offended and frustrated by a deity you are certain does not exist? Typically if I think something is nonsense, I give it little thought.

 

BETALOVER

1:46 PM ET

February 20, 2012

Does "We" in "In God We Trust" include me?

"However, this does not mean we need to erase the mention of God from the public arena for your personal satisfaction."

No, I am not saying so.

I am saying no mention of god under government sponsorship. I am saying Separation of Church and State.

I simply as you this: does "We" in "In God We Trust" include me?

Yes or no?

 

BETALOVER

1:54 PM ET

February 20, 2012

Does god help in court of law?

Why do we still require witnesses to cite deity in testimony or deposition?

Why do we still say "so help me god"?

What is the implication? Does it take deity for testimony or deposition to be credible?

There is a very disturbing implication that belief in deity is a prerequisite to truthfulness.

This has been extremely imputative of guilt on the non-believer.

 

BETALOVER

2:02 PM ET

February 20, 2012

Upfront insult on non-believers daily

There is quite of upfront insult daily on the non-believers in the USA.

Admit it while you attemp to justify it.

I will never vote again unless for one we states that he or she will not cite deity when swearing into office.

The citing of deity on offical capacity is quite insulting to the non-believer.

Emotional consideration dictates that I am a single issue voter, or potential voter. Voting is moot for me. I will unlikely participate again; such is my statement.

 

BETALOVER

5:57 PM ET

February 20, 2012

Who persecute religious minority more

if either China or USA does?

May be one has to use a calculator to count the items of religious repression in China and the USA.

China requires churches to register, places limits on some religious practices, and seeks to limit the power of religious organizations.

The USA slights the non-believers daily, stamps the arrogant hubris of the religious majority onto the minority in "In God We Trust", put words in the non-believers' mouth by the obligatory need of use of currency. The USA legitimizes exclusionary mentality, with the proclamation that one who does not believe in god or trust god is NOT American, not among ‘US”.

The USA openly assaults the honesty and denigrates the character of the non-believers in the American court of law.

The USA deters non-believers' participation in elections by requiring elected officals to cite deity during swear- in ceremonies on official capacity, to frustrate and emotionally hurt the non-believers and induce them to not vote.

 

BETALOVER

6:00 PM ET

February 20, 2012

Don't scream god in my face with the aid of the government

if I don't scream no-god in your face with the aid of the government.

This is called separation of Church and State. Live with it if Americans want to preach to China or any other country about religious freedom.

Is this not patently obvious?

 

CRASHLANDER

2:21 PM ET

February 21, 2012

Beijing is shortsighted

Beijing is short-sighted. Just because the old moral code doesn't work, it doesn't mean that you jettison your whole cultural history and throw the baby out together with the bathwater. The thinking that Christianity led the West to modernize is flawed at best. The Enlightenment that grew out of the Reformation and the Rennaissance, allowed the West to industrialized. The Enlightenment happened in spite of religion, not because of it. Even if it were true that Christianity single handedly industrialized the West, did Beijing seriously think they can just graft an imported religion and expect the same result? If so, why isn't Russia or Ethiopia or Brazil as industrialized? A better model would be Japan - graft modern infrastructure to your existing culture.

From a real-politik calculation, I suppose they didn't think that by embracing a religion typically associated with the West, they would in fact be injecting an additional combustive religious layer to the current (secular) civil strife in the Buddhist Tibet and the Islamic Xinjiang?

Beijing should learn the real lessons of the West - clear line of separation between Church and State, freedom of speech, freedom of religion and freedom of the press if they really want a sustainable great nation.

 

BETALOVER

5:30 PM ET

February 21, 2012

Basically secular China

"Beijing is short-sighted. Just because the old moral code doesn't work, it doesn't mean that you jettison your whole cultural history and throw the baby out together with the bathwater. The thinking that Christianity led the West to modernize is flawed at best."

I think you get it wrong.

China does not regard Christianity as superior.

It is a matter of reality that some human beings have need for a sense of security that is subjectively more lasting and less earthy.

This is a sociological reality and China has to face it.

Separation of Church and State is the ideal except when there must be reaction to those who do not think so, those who act to use and viewed as likely to use organized religion to affect the state, even its definition or defined boundary, against whom no govt can refuse to react.

Plus we hound them on the religious freedom thing and they do want to have a better image worldwide, as long as they can possibly accomodate the West. Engagement works to a good extent.

 

BETALOVER

5:35 PM ET

February 21, 2012

"Beijing should learn the

"Beijing should learn the real lessons of the West - clear line of separation between Church and State, freedom of speech, freedom of religion and freedom of the press if they really want a sustainable great nation."

The West that you refer to pertains the least to the USA, the most to some parts of Europe such as Sweden.

 

KURT

10:36 AM ET

February 22, 2012

it's not possible to separate church from state in china

in china, the state, in other words, the party controls everything. it's simply impossible to separate church from state.

 

BETALOVER

1:00 PM ET

February 22, 2012

Not true

I think China currently has more separation of church and state than the USA for sure.

There is built-in separation of church and state in atheism, but China's experience is more complex because the religious people from the West behaved very badly in China wrt their religion and such is part and parcel of China's sorrow for over a century; in response there was a certain anti-religion fervor in China. Communist has been a small part of this equation.

After the dust settles, atheism is a very calm and logical approach to life and is not conducive to extremism. It is hard to get excited about nothingness unless driven by the majority's arrogant imposition of god on the atheists.

To be 100% honest, god will never be any part of my thoughts in my daily life if not because of the overt daily insult from the religious. In fact, for a long time I just ignored the insult, but more lately such insult is getting to me. Such insult has become more salient, perhaps since I started visiting China since the 1990s. The crisp and logical way of the Chinese wrt religion is refreshing and delightful.

 

BETALOVER

3:05 PM ET

February 22, 2012

Insteading of expecting

Insteading of expecting elected official to cite deity during swear-in ceremony, the USA should expect them (especially the federal branch) to swear, without citing deity, that they will divorce religion from decisions they make on behalf of the USA on issues foreign and domestic.

 

ANDYCOX

5:30 AM ET

February 24, 2012

China is state capitalist, not communist

China's warming to Christianity, if anything, underscores the very capitalistic nature of its economy. (See http://andycox1953.webs.com/)
It always amazes me that people are blithely indifferent to or unaware of the fact that any state in which there exists commodity production (the production of goods and services for sale in order to realise a profit), money, wages, profits, and private or state ownership of the means of production is, ipso facto, a capitalist state. China is clearly a capitalist country. Its decitful pretense that it is 'communist' or, indeed, a 'People's Republic', is no more than an attempt to legitimise the authoritarian regime of its bourgeois nomenklatura. True communism entails free access to all goods and services, common ownership of the means of production, genuine democracy, and the greatest possible liberty. That China should style itself as 'communist' is therefore rather like the emperors clothes, and I guess with its growing inequality, that line is beginning to wear a bit thin, which may explain why it is casting around now for a more workable ideology. Marx was absolutely right: ''Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people.'' How profoundly true of a country where millions of workers are paid a pittance, subjected to the harshest of working conditions, and sometimes compelled to live cheek by jowl in large company dormitories from which they can be summoned to the factory floor in the middle of the night when a new order arrives.

 

BETALOVER

12:28 PM ET

February 24, 2012

Give China time

"How profoundly true of a country where millions of workers are paid a pittance, subjected to the harshest of working conditions, and sometimes compelled to live cheek by jowl in large company dormitories from which they can be summoned to the factory floor in the middle of the night when a new order arrives."

This is what our great-grand parents and grand parents experienced.

Also the people of Singapore and Hong Kong just 40-50 years ago. Sweat shops were plentiful in the Asian Tigers. Now these places have first world income.

Give China time.

The masses will have greater aspirations and expectations with juxtaposed with standards of industrialized nations.

 

BETALOVER

12:36 PM ET

February 24, 2012

"Such insult has become more

"Such insult has become more salient, perhaps since I started visiting China since the 1990s. The crisp and logical way of the Chinese wrt religion is refreshing and delightful."

There is certainly another reason, in addition to visiting secular China, that caused the daily insult from the religious majority to become more salient.

It is the abject situation that we are in as a country made possible by the religosity in American politics. Our religosity induced blunder in the ME is causing American decline. The trillion spent in the wars should lhave been used for infrastructure development and renewal here. There is no reason to be so deeply involved in the ME.

 

RON PLYMEL

11:09 PM ET

March 15, 2012

China approach religious

In my opinion, religion is good for development. I am an American people, I also a christian. This is the reason why i agree and like when numbers of christian more and more develop in the China. You know the major religion in china is Buddhism. Buddhism have developed for many year. I think religion is good to create a good person and Christian also have done it well which will help you to improve yourself. Make you how to become a nice person and how to please the others

 

RON PLYMEL

11:11 PM ET

March 15, 2012

China approach religious

In my opinion, religion is good for development. I am an American people, I also a christian. This is the reason why i agree and like when numbers of christian more and more develop in the China. You know the major religion in china is Buddhism. Buddhism have developed for many year. I think religion is good to create a good person and Christian also have done it well which will help you to improve yourself. Make you how to become a nice person and how to please the others

 

BETALOVER

3:41 PM ET

March 19, 2012

Major religion in China is not Buddhism

A major religion in China does not exist.

The Chinese are predominnatly secular.

Many people automatically view blind faith as necessary to happiness and thus natural for any society....not for China.

Human beings can be happy without blind faith, such can be the natural state of a civilization.

There is nothing wrong with being unnatural, but not all cultures view faith as necessary to happiness.