The Sick Man of Europe Is Europe

A new study shows Europe's power waning -- and if the continent doesn't get its act together soon, it could put the global order in serious jeopardy.

BY JUSTIN VAÏSSE | FEBRUARY 16, 2012

Until recently, Europeans enjoyed a pretty comfortable position in most international organizations. At the IMF, they had an unquestioned hold on the directorship and could lecture other countries on how to govern themselves and run their economies, while each large European country had its own IMF representative. But all that changed in 2011. Now, Europeans are themselves being lectured by China and Brazil for not solving their financial crisis despite having the resources to do so. Europe managed to hang on to the directorship in June when Christine Lagarde succeeded Dominique Strauss-Kahn, but only because of divisions among emerging economies. If the euro crisis continues, Europeans will likely be forced to give up more of their voting weight -- as they started doing in 2010 during a reallocation of IMF board seats -- and ultimately lose the directorship.

The power realignment at the IMF is just one example of the way the euro crisis has undermined Europe's geopolitical clout in the past two years, transforming it from a reliable global problem-solver to a problem itself. True, the sky is not falling: Europe has had some remarkable successes in 2011, such as the successful intervention in Libya, the relatively smooth entry of Russia into the World Trade Organization, and the agreement reached at the Durban conference on climate change. But the out-of-control debt crisis has started eroding Europe's foreign-policy tools and degrading its leverage with other powers like China. The 2012 edition of the European Foreign Policy Scorecard -- the result of intensive research by 40 researchers under the auspices of the European Council on Foreign Relations and the Brookings Institution -- makes this downward trajectory abundantly clear. If the euro crisis is not solved this year, Europe could experience in the years ahead an even more dramatic loss of power, one that would have negative consequences for world order, multilateral organizations, and the United States.

Washington may be pivoting toward Asia and casting its lot with emerging powers like India and Brazil to maintain its leadership position. But a continued erosion of Europe's place in the world would bode ill for the Western liberal order Washington seeks to defend. For all their flaws, Europeans are still the largest contributors to international organizations and the largest purveyors of development aid, and they still outspend all the BRIC countries combined in defense expenditures. Additionally, Europe plays an important role in getting the cooperation of other powers for collective solutions favored by the United States.

Table 1: Europe's Foreign-Policy Performance for 2011.

The European Foreign Policy Scorecard evaluates the collective performance of Europeans -- both EU institutions and the 27 member states -- in reaching their foreign policy objectives in the world during the course of one year (see 2010 edition here). European performance is assessed on 80 policy issues, gathered in six broad themes: relations with China, Russia, the U.S., Wider Europe (comprised of Eastern Partnership countries, Balkans, and Turkey), Middle East and North Africa, and multilateral institutions). The table above presents the average performance of Europe for 2011.

Consider Europe's soft power. Some countries are still eager to join the European Union and even adopt the euro, countries such as Iceland, Croatia, Turkey -- or Poland and Hungary. But as Europe has drifted toward economic stagnation and political gridlock, the governance model for which the European Union stands -- that of an expanding and ever more effective multilateralism as a solution to the problems of a globalized world -- has been discredited in the eyes of many others. Advocates of regional integration projects in places such as Latin America and Southeast Asia are now less likely to look to Europe for inspiration. Last year, former Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva sounded this very alarm when he affirmed that "the world does not have the right to allow the EU to end" because "what Europeans achieved after [World War II] are part of the democratic heritage of humanity." Unfortunately, there's only so much the world can do. It's up to Europeans to make the idea of Europe powerful again.

Chris Ratcliffe-Pool/Getty Images

 

Justin Vaïsse is director of research at the Brookings Institution's Center on the United States and Europe. He is, with Hans Kundnani of the European Council on Foreign Relations, the lead co-author of the European Foreign Policy Scorecard 2012.

PROMOCOMO

4:33 AM ET

February 17, 2012

Europe has become too powerful and controling

If you ask most Brits about the EU they will tell you they want out. Thats why the UK government will not offer a referendum. Thank God we stayed with the GBP at least some of our heritage hasnt been stripped away!
Online Credit Card Application

 

ARSALAN

10:54 AM ET

February 17, 2012

Great post. :)

Sick man of Europe" is a nickname that has been used to describe a European country experiencing a time of economic difficulty and/or impoverishment. The term was first used in the mid-19th century to describe the Ottoman Empire, but has since been applied at one time or another to nearly every other mid-to-large-sized country in Europe.
Contents

1 Origin
2 Modern use
2.1 United Kingdom
2.2 Ireland
2.3 Portugal
2.4 Greece
2.5 Russia
2.6 Italy
2.7 Other countries
3 Cultural references
4 See also
5 References

Origin

The phrase "sick man of Europe" is commonly attributed to Czar Nicholas I of Russia, referring to the Ottoman Empire, because it was increasingly falling under the financial control of the European powers and had lost territory in a series of disastrous wars. However, it is not clear that he ever said the precise phrase. Letters from Sir George Hamilton Seymour, the British ambassador to St. Petersburg, to Lord John Russell, in 1853, in the run up to the Crimean War, quote Nicholas I of Russia as saying that the Ottoman Empire was "a sick man—a very sick man," a "man" who "has fallen into a state of decrepitude", or a "sick man ... gravely ill".[1][2][3]

It is not easy to determine the actual source of the quotation. The articles cited above refer to documents held or communicated personally. The most reliable, publicly available source appears to be a book by Harold Temperley, published in 1936.[4] Temperley gives the date for the first conversation as 9 January 1853, like Goldfrank.[2] According to Temperley, Seymour in a private conversation had to push the Czar to be more specific about the Ottoman Empire. Eventually, the czar stated, "Turkey seems to be falling to pieces, the fall will be a great misfortune. It is very important that England and Russia should come to a perfectly good understanding... and that neither should take any decisive step of which the other is not apprized." And then, closer to the attributed phrase: “We have a sick man on our hands, a man gravely ill, it will be a great misfortune if one of these days he slips through our hands, especially before the necessary arrangements are made.”[5]

It is important to add that the British Ambassador G. H. Seymour agreed with Czar Nicholas's diagnosis, but he very deferentially disagreed with the Czar's recommended treatment of the patient; he responded, "Your Majesty is so gracious that you will allow me to make one further observation. Your Majesty says the man is sick; it is very true; but your Majesty will deign to excuse me if I remark, that it is the part of the generous and strong man to treat with gentleness the sick and feeble man."[6]

Temperley then asserts, “The ‘sickliness’ of Turkey obsessed Nicholas during his whole reign. What he really said was omitted in the Blue Book from a mistaken sense of decorum. He said not the ‘sick man’ but the ‘bear dies…the bear is dying… you may give him musk but even musk will not long keep him alive.’”[7]

Neither Nicholas nor Seymour completed the phrase with the clause "of Europe," which appears to have been added later and may very well have been journalistic misquotation. Take, for example, the first appearance of the phrase "sick man of Europe" in the New York Times (12 May 1860): "The condition of Austria at the present moment is not less threatening in itself, though less alarming for the peace of the world, than was the condition of Turkey when the Czar Nicholas invited England to draw up with him the last will and testament of the 'sick man of Europe.' It is, indeed, hardly within the range of probability that another twelvemonth should pass over the House of Habsburg without bringing upon the Austrian Empire a catastrophe unmatched in modern history since the downfall of Poland." One should note not only that this is not what Nicholas was trying to do or what he said, but that the author of this article was using the term to point to a second "sick man," this one more generally accepted as a European empire, the Habsburg Monarchy.[8]

Later, this view[9] led the Allies in World War I to underestimate the Ottoman Empire, leading in part to the disastrous Gallipoli Campaign. However, the "sick man" eventually collapsed under numerous British attacks in the Middle East.

Modern use

United Kingdom

Throughout the 1960s and 1970s, the United Kingdom was sometimes known as the "sick man of Europe" because of industrial strife and poor economic performance compared to other European countries,[10] culminating with the Winter of Discontent of 1978–1979. After a painful period of reform and restructuring, Britain experienced greater economic growth during the 1980s, the 1990s and first decade of the 21st century as well.

On the 29th of October 2009 Britain was named the "sick man of Europe" on BBC Question Time because it has not yet come out of recession, whereas France, Germany and other countries had.

Ireland

The Republic of Ireland was also known by this epithet during a long period of poverty, before the beginning of a prolonged period of economic growth in the 1990s, creating thousands of jobs and raising living standards dramatically (See Celtic Tiger).

Portugal

The term was also used in describing Portugal before the Portuguese economy staged a recovery in the 1990s.

In April 2007, The Economist described Portugal as "a new sick man of Europe".[11]

Greece

In the early 1990s The Economist labelled Greece as the "sick man of Europe" in one of its articles, due to the country's then decade-old poor economic performance, and political instability.

In July 2009, the nickname was given to Greece due to the 2008 Greek riots, rising unemployment and political corruption, bureaucracy and inefficiency.[12]

Russia

During the 1990s, Russia and many fellow Eastern European countries were called "sick men of Europe" due to the severe economic hardships of the time, as well as the soaring rates of alcoholism, drug abuse, and AIDS that led to a negative population growth and falling life expectancies.

The term was applied to the Russian Federation more recently in the book "Kremlin Rising: Vladimir Putin's Russia and the End of Revolution" by Peter Baker and Susan Glasser (Scribner). In this book, chapter nine is titled "Sick Man of Europe."[citation needed]

Mark Steyn called Russia the "sick man of Europe" in the 2006 book America Alone: The End of the World as We Know It. This diagnosis is based on Russia's demographic profile, which is a main theme of the book.

Italy

In May 2005, The Economist attributed this title to Italy, covering "The real sick man of Europe". This refers to Italy's structural and political difficulties thought to inhibit economic reforms to relaunch economic growth.[13]

In 2008 the nickname was given to Italy by The Daily Telegraph.[14]

Other countries

In the late 1990s the press labeled Germany with this term[10] because of its economic problems, especially due to the costs of German reunification after 1990, which are estimated to amount to over €1.5 trillion (statement of Freie Universität Berlin).

In 2007, a report by Morgan Stanley referred to France as the "new sick man of Europe".[15]

Cultural references

On the 2009 Cheap Trick album "The Latest" there is the song "Sick Man of Europe". It was also the name of an early line-up of the band.[citation needed]

See also
Look up sick man of europe in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

PIGS (economics)
Sick man of Asia

References

? de Bellaigue, Christopher. "Turkey's Hidden Past". New York Review of Books, 48:4, 2001-03-08.
? 2.0 2.1 de Bellaigue, Christopher. "The Sick Man of Europe". New York Review of Books, 48:11, 2001-07-05.
? "Ottoman Empire." Britannica Student Encyclopedia. 2007. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. 19 Apr. 2007.
? Harold Temperley, England and the Near East (London: Longmans, Greens and Co., 1936), p. 272.
? Harold Temperley, England and the Near East (London: Longmans, Greens and Co., 1936), p. 272. Temperley's translation of the Emperor's comment [spoken in French] is quite accurate. An alternative translation from the original published document follows: "We have on our hands a sick man -- a very sick man: it will be, I tell you frankly, a great misfortune if, one of these days, he should slip away from us, especially before all necessary arrangements were made." Source: Parliamentary Papers. Accounts and Papers: Thirty-Six Volumes: Eastern Papers, V. Session 31 January-12 August 1854, Vol. LXXI (London: Harrison and Son, 1854), doc. 1, p. 2.
? Parliamentary Papers. Accounts and Papers: Thirty-Six Volumes: Eastern Papers, V. Session 31 January-12 August 1854, Vol. LXXI (London: Harrison and Son, 1854), doc. 1, p. 2.
? Harold Temperley, England and the Near East (London: Longmans, Greens and Co., 1936), p. 272; cites: F.O. 65/424. From Seymour, No. 87 of February 21, 1853.
? "Austria in Extremis"," New York Times (12 May 1860), p. 4. The article is freely available. For an intriguing effort to link the misuse of this phrase to Turkey's efforts to join the EU, see Dimitris Livanios, “The ‘sick man’ paradox: history, rhetoric and the ‘European character’ of Turkey,” Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans vol. 8, no. 3 (December 2006): 299-311.
? The American Forum for Global Education, "The Ottoman Empire". Accessed 2009.09.10.
? 10.0 10.1 "The real sick man of Europe" The Economist, May 19, 2005.
? "A new sick man of Europe", The Economist, 2007-04-14.
? http://www.euractiv.com/en/socialeurope/greece-appear-sick-man-eu-summit/article-177971
? "Addio, dolce vita". Economist. 24 November 2005.
? "Italy: The sick man of Europe", Telegraph, 2008-04-15.
? Chaney, Eric. "The New Sick Man of Europe". Morgan Stanley, 2007-03-02.

thanks
Travel agency

 

DENNIS VANHAITSMA

10:11 PM ET

March 16, 2012

European

In my opinion, European have had many contribution and invention for this world in policies, economic, technologies...But i think, There a lot of Asian people is very smart and well known. In Asia: China, Japan...have had many big contribution for this world.