Democracy Lab Democracy Lab Democracy Lab Democracy Lab Democracy Lab Democracy Lab

Rude Awakening

Promoting democracy in places like Egypt or Iraq is about changing the status quo. So why are we so surprised when it turns out that not everyone is in favor?

BY CHRISTIAN CARYL | FEBRUARY 22, 2012

Imagine this: You're a member of the post-revolutionary Egyptian cabinet, one of the very last holdovers from the Mubarak era. You also happen to be a civilian, so you can't depend on your buddies in the officers' club to protect you. And on top of everything else you're a woman, in a society that doesn't exactly have a rich history of high-ranking female politicians. What do you do to shore up your career?

Why, you go after the Americans, of course.

Faiza Abul-Naga, Egypt's somewhat ironically titled Minister of International Cooperation, has vastly boosted her notoriety by placing herself at the center of a scandal involving U.S. democracy assistance. On December 29, Egyptian security forces raided the offices of 17 local and foreign non-government organizations around the country, accusing them of the illegal use of funds and various other crimes. (The photo above shows Egyptian security forces  guarding the Cairo office of the U.S. National Democratic Instititue, one of the U.S. groups raided.) Several observers, including U.S. Senator John McCain, have pointed the finger at Abul-Naga, who is said to have orchestrated the crackdown on NGOs as a way of diverting attention from the poor performance of the military-led government. The minister is not making any effort dispel that impression: "Every country has pressure cards in the political field," she apparently told an Egyptian newspaper. "Egypt is no exception."

The U.S. reaction veered between indignation and disbelief. "We are very concerned because this is not appropriate in the current environment," said U.S. State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland. The raids put Egypt's ruling military junta and the U.S. "on an unprecedented collision course," puffed Newsweek. Analysts dutifully pointed out that the raids could jeopardize the $1.3 billion in direct aid the U.S. pays to the Egyptian military each year. Now the Egyptians say they're preparing to put the 43 civil society workers they've arrested (including 16 Americans) on trial for their presumed offenses.

Amid all the fuss linger several unanswered questions: Why would the generals do such a stupid thing? Are they thinking straight? Are they really in control? After all, the organizations under attack are simply trying to promote democracy and help build institutions in the wake of Egypt's chaotic revolution. Surely even the generals ought to be able to understand that such efforts are in the interest of all Egyptians.

In fact, though, the commentators should have been asking a different question about Abul-Naga -- namely, what took her so long. After all, the Americans have been deeply unpopular in Egypt for years. Washington supported Mubarak for decades. Washington is a close friend of Israel. Washington has been invading and occupying Muslim countries. A recent Gallup Poll showed that 70 percent of Egyptians were opposed to further U.S. funding to their country, which they view (without knowing much about the details) as interference in their internal affairs. It shouldn't really come as a surprise that some enterprising Egyptian politician decided to capitalize on such sentiments.

To understand Egypt's NGO scandal, it might help to look at another Arab country where the U.S. has spent billions trying to promote democratic institutions: Iraq. Earlier this month The New York Times reported that Washington is planning to slash the civilian presence at its massive embassy in Baghdad. Though the State Department pushed back against the paper's claim that the plans could mean a 50 percent reduction in the staff there, it still looks likely that the cuts will be substantial.

FILIPPO MONTEFORTE/AFP/Getty Images

 

Christian Caryl, a senior fellow at the Legatum Institute and a contributing editor of Foreign Policy, is the editor of Democracy Lab.

ZORRO

12:38 PM ET

February 22, 2012

What Is Democracy?

To work for US interests. Maybe the US would have more success promoting democracy if it was actually doing it.
As long as the US remains allied to convenient dictators to expect us to believe a word you say.
As long as Guantanamo remains open don't expect us to believe a word you say.
As long as US war criminals (George II, Cheney et al) does not face justice don't expect us to believe a word you say.
As long as the US murders civilians in Pakistan don't expect us to believe a word you say.

Hypocrites.

 

VOXOCEANUS

2:08 PM ET

February 22, 2012

Good one . . .

Desecration of Quran in open at hands of pink pigs in Afghanistan is deplorable . . . why do these fatherless morons turn to such acts when they fall in love with defeat and humiliation? These unholy pieces of scum i.e., Americans, keep poisoning every corner of the globe thinking they are on a 'sacred' mission . . . They truly are on a mission of polluting the world with hate, death, pain and suffering !

 

APOTHECARY364

5:42 PM ET

February 22, 2012

Your dictators are there

Your dictators are there because you allow them to be. The Syrians, Tunisians and Egyptians have demonstrated that they are no longer willing to abide them... the rest either lack the will to change them or are happy with the status quo. To curse Americans for dealing with them when you do not remove them is hypocrisy as well.
As for Guantanamo, we've tried sending them back to their respective countries. Your dictators don't want them.
As for the "war criminals", we wouldn't be in your business if you were capable of handling said business. Translation: Take more responsibility for your own form of government.
And as for the Pakistanis (which I suspect especially riles you), perhaps if your ISI stopped hiding their Taliban bretheren among civilians, then those civillian deaths may not have occurred. The word of a Pakistani ISI or government agent means less than nothing.

 

APOTHECARY364

5:59 PM ET

February 22, 2012

And as for you, Voxoceanus:

And as for you, Voxoceanus: You want to talk about barbarism? Ask virtually any woman, or any person of faith other than Islam about what passes for "justice" in Afghanistan when NATO or the Americans aren't around. I watched a grown man try to prevent his wife and daughter from getting on a MEDEVAC helicopter after all were injured by an improvised explosive (set, by the way, by one of their "countrymen")... all because he was the man and thus was the only one who deserved care.
"Pink pigs", indeed. Perhaps you should go look for real cases of honor to study instead of hurting the very people you should be protecting. And perhaps at the same time strengthen your faith through study and practice instead of raging and rioting (which seems to only serve to try to distract others from the obvious frailty yours displays. "Look at me yell at people for burning my holy book instead of applying what I learned from it to my life! I am SOOOO pious!!!"

 

REKLAMOLOGY

12:45 PM ET

February 22, 2012

Democracy ?

As long as Guantanamo remains open don't expect us to believe a word you say.
As long as US war criminals (George II, Cheney et al) does not face justice don't expect us to believe google reklam a word you say.

 

KIRKOMRIK

1:17 PM ET

February 22, 2012

The rest of the story

Thanks for the informative article.

It isn't clear to me whether or not this author is truly ignorant of the story behind the story or is being disingenuous. In fact, it is this kind of reporting that makes the U.S. propaganda machine so amazingly sophisticated and clever.

Nowhere is it mentioned that U.S. and other western intelligence agencies use and abuse NGOs to such an extreme that it should be obvious why the Egyptian ruling military cabal has cracked down on them: They don't want to get the same treatment that the last government got.

If this is not self evident someone please tell me to be quiet.

Thanks

kirkomrik.wordpress.com

 

BING520

3:56 PM ET

February 22, 2012

American NGO in Egypt

I have this feeling that we have not heard the complete story behind the arrests of NGO people in Cairo. Our politicians and news media are portraying that the Egyptian government is completely insane to have mad such a careless maneuver to gain some elusive domestic political advantage at a cost of losing the concrete US military and economic cold cash. One lone Egyptian woman is responsible for all this insanity. Possible? There is a slim likehood that what we hear from our government is the only and whole truth. Slim.

When Soviet shot down a Korea Airline plane during Reagan Administration, I truly believed that Soviet were simply brutal and cold-blooded. Only two years ago when the White House and Pentagon information was declassified, did I realize it is a complicated story. The vast majority of Americans don't care what actually happened 30 years ago. I did and it has become difficult to me to be that naive any longer.

 

DR. SARDONICUS

9:03 PM ET

February 22, 2012

How could your intentions possibly be honest?

Let me get this straight.

We live in a country where one of its State Legislatures (Virginia) just voted a law legislating mass rape for religious reasons, and the State Police did not bother to immediately arrest every one of those ratifiers for conspiracy to commit same.

We live in a country where there has been a decades-long conspiracy to assassinate doctors on religious grounds; the only members prosecuted were successful trigger men. If you are rabid enough a Christ-faker, you can literally get away with murder in this country.

We live in a country where a political party supposed to represent a majority of the population from time to time (hopefully never again from now on) does not “believe” in global warming, climate science, science in general including evolution, science education and/or public education, mostly for “come to Jesus” reasons, among a host of other issues a Nineteenth Century illiterate would have been ashamed to admit to.

We live in a country where the Presidency has been stolen once and likely more often, with full approval from the highest levels of government, where a corporation has been legally declared a person with personal rights in the highest court, and pizza is a vegetable by Act of Congress.

And you have the nerve to require democratic transparency from countries whose majority religion (s Sunni and Shia) have not even had their Reformation yet?

I believe the correct expression is: “Remove the beam from your own eye” with any preceding and following comments -- scatological, disbelieving, blasphemous, insulting, distrustful or otherwise -- your imagination would care to append.

 

LAILA ZADRA

4:37 AM ET

March 19, 2012

promoting the democracy

Markets and Democracy Briefs are published by CFR’s Civil Society, Markets, and Democracy initiative. They are designed to offer readers a concise snapshot of current thinking on critical issues surrounding democracy and economic development in the world today.

Stakes in Democracy

Furthering democracy is often dismissed as moralism distinct from U.S. interests or mere lip service to build support for strategic policies. Yet there are tangible stakes for the United States and indeed the world in the spread of democracy—namely, greater peace, prosperity, and pluralism. Controversial means for promoting democracy and frequent mismatches between deeds and words have clouded appreciation of this truth.

Democracies often have conflicting priorities, and democracy promotion is not a panacea. Yet one of the few truly robust findings in international relations is that established democracies never go to war with one another. Foreign policy “realists” advocate working with other governments on the basis of interests, irrespective of character, and suggest that this approach best preserves stability in the world. However, durable stability flows from a domestic politics built on consensus and peaceful competition, which more often than not promotes similar international conduct for governments.