The Odd Couple

Iran and al Qaeda might seem like strange bedfellows. But their relationship goes back years.

BY DANIEL BYMAN | FEBRUARY 21, 2012

The U.S. Treasury Department's designation last week of Iran's Ministry of Intelligence and Security (MOIS) as a terrorist supporter is only the latest ratcheting up of pressure against Tehran, and it seems like background noise compared with all the talk of oil boycotts and military strikes. But the designation also highlights one of the most important -- and one of the most mysterious -- partnerships of our time: Iran's relationship with al Qaeda.

It is easy to caricature Tehran's ties to Ayman al-Zawahiri's organization. Believers in the relationship point out that they are natural friends because both endorse an extreme anti-U.S. agenda and seek to spread radical Islam. Skeptics contend that Iran's Shiite regime is anathema for Sunni jihadists, making cooperation prohibitive. Both sides have a point: Shared enemies drive Iran and al Qaeda together, but mutual suspicion keeps the partnership tactical and gives both sides reasons to play it down.

Unclassified data on Iran's relationship with al Qaeda are scarce, but enough can be gleaned or inferred from open-source material to get a sense of the scope of and reasons for the relationship. Last week's designation accuses the MOIS of "facilitat[ing] the movement of al Qa'ida operatives in Iran and provid[ing] them with documents, identification cards, and passports." It continues: "MOIS also provided money and weapons to al Qa'ida in Iraq (AQI), a terrorist group designated under E.O. 13224, and negotiated prisoner releases of AQI operatives." Earlier designations have highlighted specific tactical links between al Qaeda and Iran, but the connection goes back years.

Iran's ties to terrorists are undisputed, but its closest relationships are with groups, like the Lebanese Hezbollah, that are composed of Shiite Muslims who embrace Iran's revolutionary Shiism and feel an affinity toward Tehran as the leader of the Shiite world. Al Qaeda, of course, rejects both. Yet while Iran's heated rhetoric leads many analysts to focus on its revolutionary ideology, strategic thinking often dominates the clerical regime's policies toward terrorist groups.

Iran is often more pragmatic than many think. It backed terrorist and militant groups against Saddam Hussein's Iraq, the pro-Soviet regime in Afghanistan, and other enemies even though it had little in common with some of its proxies. In the 1990s, Iran began to forge strong relationships to Palestinian Islamist groups, particularly Palestinian Islamic Jihad but also, to a lesser degree, Hamas. Such relationships weakened Iran's adversary, Israel, and undermined the U.S.-led effort to isolate Iran. They also served the broader Iranian goal of bridging the Shiite-Sunni divide to build a pan-Islamic, anti-American front. (In a recent Friday sermon, Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei hinted at this ecumenical approach. "We will continue to support any nation or group that fights or confronts the Zionist regime, and we are not afraid of saying this," he said.

BEHROUZ MEHRI/AFP/Getty Images

 

Daniel Byman is a professor in the Security Studies Program at Georgetown University's School of Foreign Service and research director of the Saban Center for Middle East Policy at the Brookings Institution. His latest book is A High Price: The Triumphs and Failures of Israeli Counterterrorism.

CHARLESFRITH

7:59 PM ET

February 21, 2012

Another Jewish Psychopath Stirring Up War?

We've heard this script before.

The real danger in the Middle East is Israel.

Let's have some Iranians on Foreign Policy for a change instead of the unholy bias for Brookings, CFR Georgetown Jews spouting their nonsense.

 

UANSARI1

11:00 AM ET

February 22, 2012

No kidding...

This story is both laughable and a neocon's fantasy. Sadly, it's also something I can see most of my fellow American's accepting unconditionally.

 

LEONIDASLEONIDAS

1:03 PM ET

February 22, 2012

Another Jew-hater making ignorant comments

Charles,
Take off your tinfoil hat, and get out of your mom's basement.
There's a real world outside, full of objective facts for you to discover.

 

LOZER123

11:46 PM ET

March 1, 2012

There is no obvious plan for

There is no obvious plan for nuclear bomb nor Iranians would dare to cause a war in the region. The country is already isolated, their only insurance, the oil, would be all gone if they start a war. No other country would be on their side, not even their long term insurance, Russia & China. Having said that, we do not have money to fight another war either. Rather than trying to fix the economy, I cannot believe that the politicians are competing to see who can scare people into voting them to bomb Iran. This is the insurance we need for us? This is the insurance we need for our families? no.

 

CHIEFSURFER

10:24 AM ET

February 22, 2012

It sounds familiar....

Before the invasion of Iraq, we're flooded with reports of purported links between Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda, from DIA, CIA, British and Israeli intelligence services, and etc. The 9/11 hijacker Mohamed Atta was reportedly seen in Prague meeting with an Iraqi diplomat in 2001. All these turned out to be nothing more than a mirage.

Now, with the war drum starts to beat louder for Iran, we begin to witness the same trick all over again. As an Italian proverb goes, "To forgive the first time shows me a good Catholic, the second time a Fool." People all over the world are watching, the Obama Administration should take heed.

 

HVENNY

11:37 AM ET

February 22, 2012

Iran and Al-Qaida

Read
Iran’s Increasingly Dangerous Liaison with Al-Qaeda by J. Choksy
http://www.realclearworld.com/blog/2009/12/iran_al-qaeda.html

 

JFAIR

12:53 PM ET

February 22, 2012

One only has to look next

One only has to look next door to Iraq to notice that Iranian and AQ interest are diametrically opposed and the two are most likely not working together. Are you suggesting that Iran supports Shiite militias and AQ in Iraq, two militant groups know for killing each other in mass? That assertion makes no political or strategic military sense. I would like to read an article that looks into the relationship between the MEK and the USA.

 

LEONIDASLEONIDAS

1:04 PM ET

February 22, 2012

Read the article

He addresses their relationship in Iraq.

 

JFAIR

1:16 PM ET

February 22, 2012

I reject his analysis. The

I reject his analysis. The relationship was not analyzed to my satisfaction and does not mention the significance of sectarian violence as a strong point against his argument (Sunnis vs Shiites). Furthermore, the US has either been complicit or supportive of the MEK, a terrorist organization wrecking havoc in Iran. State support of terrorism is wrong, no matter what side is supporting what organization. To suggest that the US should go to war with Iran on the weak assertion that it is working with AQ is foolish and indicates that Iran would be justified in attacking American interest for the same exact reason.

 

DONALDFRANCOEUR

1:42 PM ET

February 22, 2012

Who are the terrorists?

I'm Canadian and I've been living in the Middle East for the past four years, including the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia, where there is a significant number of Shiites. The Sunnis have such a deep-seated hatred of Shiites that I find it hard to believe that Al-Qaeda and Iran could team up, especially since Al-Qaeda is a major part of the insurgency against the Shiites in Iraq. Much of the terrorism around the world comes from the Sunnis, not Iran, and not the Shiites. By the way, assassinating nuclear scientists in Iran is terrorism. The question is not whether Iran will become nuclear. It has. If I were Iran, surrounded by Sunny countries, including a nuclear Pakistan and a nuclear Israel around the corner, I would want to have nuclear capability. Diplomacy is not only about talking to your friends, but also about talking to your "perceived" enemies. Anyone talking about going to war against Iran should have his head examined, to paraphrase Robert Gates.

 

JAC323

2:58 PM ET

February 22, 2012

Machiavelli is alive and well.

If you want to conquer Iran so badly Al Qaeda should have been set up as a Shitte organization instead of a Sunni sect organization. Who set up Al-Qaeda in the first place?

 

LECHEB

7:14 PM ET

March 12, 2012

Mutual Dislike

While it is stated in the article that both Iran and al Qaeda have deep rooted religious differences, it's easy to understand why they can sort of be grouped on the same side. They are both very anit-US and West in general. It's not so much the enemy or my enemy is my friend, but more like a easy target to use to rally people/followers against. If sometime in the future though, as I wrote on my blog via my iphone5, that the West is not part of the middle east anymore, these to entities will engage in a very brutal struggle. They are not friends at all once the common enemy is gone.