More Than BRICS in the Wall

What do all those acronyms stand for?

BY JOSHUA E. KEATING | MARCH/APRIL 2012

When Goldman Sachs economist Jim O'Neill named the emerging economies of Brazil, Russia, India, and China "BRICs" in 2001, he didn't realize he was creating a major new geopolitical term, one that would even be turned into a formal alliance by the countries themselves. (They capitalized the "S" when South Africa joined in 2010.) He also probably didn't realize he was creating a new cottage industry of acronyms. Here's a guide to today's post-BRIC alphabet soup of global economics.

BASIC

Stands for: Brazil, South Africa, India, China

Created by: The countries themselves

Why: The BASIC group emerged at the 2009 Copenhagen climate-change conference to present a counterproposal putting more obligations on rich countries to cut carbon emissions. Cooperation continued into subsequent rounds of climate talks in Mexico and South Africa.

MIKT

Stands for: Mexico, Indonesia, South Korea, Turkey

Created by: Jim O'Neill

Why: O'Neill didn't rest on his laurels following the hugely successful BRICs branding. In early 2011, he unveiled MIKT, arguing that the term "emerging markets" to describe these countries was simply no longer useful. It hasn't stuck quite as well.

SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images
SAJJAD HUSSAIN/AFP/Getty Images
OMAR TORRES/AFP/Getty Images
MIKHAIL KLIMENTYEV/AFP/Getty Images
MIGUEL RIOPA/AFP/Getty Images

 

Joshua E. Keating is an associate editor at Foreign Policy.

GRANT

7:39 AM ET

February 27, 2012

Until they can show that they

Until they can show that they are actually serious about working together and setting policies I will continue to see them as separate nations with some similarities rather than any organization worthy an acronym.

 

MIKEJEB

12:40 PM ET

March 2, 2012

RE: More Bricks in the walls

Yeah I saw this on my new iphone 5 and had to laugh about this back in 2001 already "named the emerging economies of Brazil, Russia, India, and China "BRICs" in 2001, he didn't realize he was creating a major new geopolitical term".

 

KINGFISHER

11:52 AM ET

March 26, 2012

MORE THAN BRICS IN THE WALLl

Having gone through the synopsis of formations of groups having no or meager contribution of any mentionable success as group, Similarly BRICS was formed with the intent to serve the global entity with a hidden mission to compete with group led by US. It is no doubt the formation of BRICS has a world rising economical powers but it would require firm commitment to achieve target for any group. Just to find out what is the firm commitment of BRICS I yet not known clearly nor it has shown its activities visible to roughly contemplate is set objective and progress.

China’s association with India is not matching though it has its long lasting ties with Russia. Similar like-mindedness is very important for such groups. The more competitors on world forum is good for the well being of the world but should we have to wait and see the last or is it already all over and nothing left to see. Then it is true What do all those acronyms stand for?