My Drone War

American drones have changed everything for al Qaeda and its local allies in Pakistan, becoming a fact of life in a secret war that is far from over.

BY PIR ZUBAIR SHAH | MARCH/APRIL 2012

"We don't even sit together to chat anymore," the Taliban fighter told me, his voice hoarse as he combed his beard with his fingers. We were talking in a safe house in Peshawar as the fighter and one of his comrades sketched a picture of life on the run in the borderlands of Waziristan. The deadly American drones buzzing overhead, the two men said, had changed everything for al Qaeda and its local allies.

The whitewashed two-story villa bristled with activity. Down the hall from my Taliban sources sat an aggrieved tribal elder and his son in one room and two officers from Pakistan's powerful Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) Directorate in another. I had gathered them all there to make sense of what had become the signature incident of the war in Afghanistan and Pakistan: an American drone strike, one of the first ordered on the watch of the new U.S. president, Barack Obama. The early 2009 strike had killed a local elder, along with his son, two nephews, and a guest in the South Waziristan town of Wana. Several sources had told me the family was innocent, with no connections to the Taliban or al Qaeda. But traveling to Waziristan had become too dangerous even for me, a reporter who had grown up there. So instead I had brought Waziristan to Peshawar, renting rooms for my sources in the guesthouse. I had just one night to try to figure out what had happened.

I spent the night running from room to room, assembling the story in pieces. On the first floor sat the dead elder's brother and nephew, who told me what little they knew of the incident. On the second floor, the ISI officers, over whiskey and lamb tikka, described their work helping U.S. intelligence agents sort out targets from among the images relayed back from the drones. Then there were the two Taliban fighters, whom I had first met in Waziristan in 2007. One had been a fixer for the Haqqani network, skilled at smuggling men and materiel from Pakistan into Afghanistan. The other drew a government salary as an employee of Pakistan's agriculture department but worked across the border as an explosives expert; he had lost a finger fighting the allied forces in Afghanistan. None of the men in the house knew the others were there.

The two fighters described how the militants were adapting to this new kind of warfare. The Taliban and al Qaeda had stopped using electronic devices, they told me. They would no longer gather in huge numbers, even in mosques to pray, and spent their nights outside for safety, a life that was wearing thin. "We can't sleep in the jungle the whole of our lives," one told me. Gradually, a picture of a rare incident came into focus: a deadly strike that had mistakenly taken out a man with no connection to al Qaeda or the Taliban.

This is how it has gone with the drone war, a beat I have covered for six years, first for Newsday and then the New York Times. By the time I left Pakistan in the summer of 2010, the job had become nearly impossible, though it had always been a dauntingly difficult story to tell. The drone campaign is one of the U.S. government's most secret programs. Although the most authoritative study on the subject, by the New America Foundation last year, calculated that 283 drone strikes had occurred in the Afghanistan-Pakistan border region since 2004, Obama never even publicly acknowledged them until this past January. Making matters still more difficult, the targets are in one of the world's most inaccessible areas, one that has traditionally been out of bounds for outsiders and where the state of Pakistan has nominal or no governing authority. It is an environment in which accurate reporting is an often unattainable goal, where confusion, controversies, and myths proliferate.

Although the drone campaign has become the linchpin of the bama administration's counterterrorism strategy in Central Asia -- and one it is increasingly exporting to places such as Yemen and the Horn of Africa -- we know virtually nothing about it. I spent more than half a decade tracking this most secret of wars across northern Pakistan, taking late-night calls from intelligence agents, sorting through missile fragments at attack sites, counting bodies and graves, interviewing militants and victims. I dodged bullets and, once, an improvised explosive device. At various times I found myself imprisoned by the Taliban and detained by the Pakistani military. Yet even I can say very little for certain about what has happened.

Deb Smith/U.S. Air Force/Getty Images
Map by Gene Thorp for FP
Illustration by Jeffrey Smith for FP
EPA (photo); official Pakistani government figures, 2011

 

Pir Zubair Shah is a fellow at the Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard University.

SYED ARBAB AHMED

2:51 AM ET

February 27, 2012

Drone attacks & what Pakistan has got from "War on terror"?

Drone attacks & what Pakistan has got from "War on terror"?
http://bit.ly/nTHdBF

 

KBC

8:48 PM ET

February 28, 2012

Drone Attacks Guilt Question

For any reason in the world, no one can condone drone attacks nor deny their strategic importance in the war on terror. If we look at the drone war fare, the first drone attack started 3 years after Taliban was vanquished in Afghanistan.

Pervez Musharraf, with his personal liberal image has never been accused of Islamizing Pakistan. In reality it was Musharraf's policy of hunting with hair and running with hound that prolonged the war on terror and Islamized Pakistan.

http://thepoliticalopportunist.blogspot.in/

 

REALREALIST

11:18 PM ET

March 5, 2012

 

KHANJEE

11:48 PM ET

March 5, 2012

Good Fiction Story!

I wonder why Pir Zubair Shah has not written a novel so far, which could easily be adopted as a Hollywood Blockbuster by now. This story amply proves that he has the skills to write one, with potential to win an Oscar.

The way he has tried to stretch the imagination of the readers by giving accounts of his personal bravado (albeit experience) and twisting of facts in the story, is incredible, yet very intereting (if true!).
Sitting in US and attempting to write an analytical story on the subject, which is sellable to the outside world is indded challenging. be truthful to your soil! You know the realities well - the number of innocent victims of drones is much more thatn what you have tried to depict. writer should not mislead the readers, exploiting the credible forum of FP.
By any standards of international norms and rules, even the killing of lesser number of innocent people as quoted by Pir is unacceptable and illegitimate to say the least.

 

KUNINO

2:43 PM ET

March 6, 2012

Knowledgable, yes. Reliable? Less so.

There's no controversy about whether drone attacks kill enemies. The controversy is about whether they kill innocent civilians, lots of them, and I challenge the reliability of what this article represents. The author tells us that Pakistan residents he talks to prefer having a house "vaporized" (presumably vaporizing everybody alive in it -- people unseen by the drone operator) to other forms of aerial bombing. How these anonymous people feel about any form of bombing at all seems outside the author's interest.

He also relies to an extraordinary degree on a briefing by a Pakistani military chief who offers a guess about how many insurgents drones vaporize, while in the currently fashionable military way adding a soothing generality about how very few civilians are being killed -- in lieu of any guess about how many of those violently dead used to be innocent civilians.

This nonsense the author describes as unusually candid, which also is nonsense.

Here's the relevant stuff: "Pakistani Maj. Gen. Ghayur Mehmood, the commander in North Waziristan, appeared before reporters in Miram Shah and told them, "Myths and rumors about U.S. Predator strikes and the casualty figures are many, but it's a reality that many of those being killed in these strikes are hard-core elements, a sizable number of them foreigners. Yes, there are a few civilian casualties in such precision strikes, but a majority of those eliminated are terrorists, including foreign terrorist elements." It was an unusually candid public statement on the drone strikes from a high-ranking Pakistani official.

Candid? Really?

 

STRIVER

6:32 AM ET

March 7, 2012

YOUR DRONE WAR

My anger
My sorrow
My Grief
My despair

YOUR DRONE WAR

My injury
My mental anguish
My ovewhelming pain
My loss

 

MALDONADOCHARITY

2:03 PM ET

March 7, 2012

Make Money working from you Home

my classmate's step-aunt makes $73 every hour on the computer. She has been unemployed for six months but last month her pay check was $12870 just working on the computer for a few hours. Here's the site to read more ....... http://LazyCash9.com

 

MARTY MARTEL

8:29 AM ET

March 10, 2012

Pakistani State safeguards Al Qaeda/Taliban fighters

The fact that Taliban fighter was safely able to talk to Mr. Zubair Shah in Peshawar points to why America’s drone war is and will fail.

Pakistani ISI has moved Mullah Omar’s QST to Karachi to protect them from drone attacks as well. Haqqanis live comfortably in Islamabad/Rawalpindi area under ISI protection.

American drones can not attack can not and do not attack populated areas like Karachi or Peshawar for fear of civilian casualties as Pakistan State knows too well and so has been able to protect them from drone attacks.

As former Pentagon official Gen (rtd) Jack Keane said at a discussion on Afghanistan organized by the Institute for the Study of War, a Washington-based think-tank on June 30, 2011: "The truth is, the (Pakistani) ISI aids and abets the sanctuaries in Pakistan that the Afghan (Taliban) operate out of. They provide training for them, they provide resources for them and they provide intelligence for them. From those sanctuaries, every single day Afghan fighters come into Afghanistan and kill and maim us (US/NATO troops)". General Keane also added that “There are two ammonium nitrate factories in Pakistan. 80 per cent of the explosive devices that are used to kill our soldiers, kill Afghan security forces and kill Afghan people come from Pakistan."

With an ally like Pakistan, America’s Afghan war was doomed from the very beginning.

 

KHANJEE

7:12 AM ET

March 12, 2012

Marty Martel - The Great Indian Strategist (at th cost of USA)

DR. KUCHBHI and marty martel are the strategic assets of RAW - no one can doubt this fact.
To me it appears as if the author of the story is Marty; Pir Zubair Shah's name has been misquoted as a cover-up, in an attempt to render credence to their propaganda.
There are over Potasium Nitrate factories in India, which are supplying the commodity free to Taliban for hitting two birds with one stone. Firstly, provide this devastating material to TTP elements for causing havoc inside Pakistan; aim is to destailize Pakistan; the country vanguard against GWOT. Secondly, provide the same material to Afghan Taliban to create problems for ISAF and ANSF inside Afghanistan - ensuring The ISAF troops are not withdrawn, since it could compromise their authority and hold in Afghanistan which enables them to create troubles in Balochistan and FATA fro Pakistan.
India is the so -called largest democracy in the World, so it should be champion of the human rights. Unfortunately, our Indian friends like Marty and Dr Kubachi ignore to condemn the drones, involved in killing of innocent civilians.

 

KHANJEE

7:12 AM ET

March 12, 2012

Marty Martel - The Great Indian Strategist (at th cost of USA)

DR. KUCHBHI and marty martel are the strategic assets of RAW - no one can doubt this fact.
To me it appears as if the author of the story is Marty; Pir Zubair Shah's name has been misquoted as a cover-up, in an attempt to render credence to their propaganda.
There are over Potasium Nitrate factories in India, which are supplying the commodity free to Taliban for hitting two birds with one stone. Firstly, provide this devastating material to TTP elements for causing havoc inside Pakistan; aim is to destailize Pakistan; the country vanguard against GWOT. Secondly, provide the same material to Afghan Taliban to create problems for ISAF and ANSF inside Afghanistan - ensuring The ISAF troops are not withdrawn, since it could compromise their authority and hold in Afghanistan which enables them to create troubles in Balochistan and FATA fro Pakistan.
India is the so -called largest democracy in the World, so it should be champion of the human rights. Unfortunately, our Indian friends like Marty and Dr Kubachi ignore to condemn the drones, involved in killing of innocent civilians.

 

PENYAKIT DIABETES

3:19 AM ET

March 11, 2012

Hard war against Al Qaeda

the main purpose of war against Al Qaeda is already accomplished with the assanation of Taliban leader Osama. In America want to continue the war then they must have strong purpose. If not. Leave it to UN.
Cara membuat blog

 

THUSALWAYSTOGENIUS

12:09 AM ET

March 12, 2012

Ambassador of Death: Attack of the Drones

In our world and our time, Drones (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles), which were experimentally manufactured in 1916, were first armed in order to attempt to kill Osama bin Laden.

They were and still are proven to be unreliable due to the fact that their target abilities are far from surgical precision, they are unstable when flying in less than perfect weather and they crash very often. In addition, loss of communication with these drones is one of the many technical issues that lead to their sub par performance. After consideration, President Clinton decided to shut down the project.

Later on, Bush reopened the project, refinanced it and made used of these drones 44 times, despite the acknowledgement of the performance reports. The attacks evidently lead to casualties; bodies were often hidden and buried by troops on the ground.

However, for now, most drones aren’t exploited for military purpose. They are mostly used for surveillance, reconnaissance, news reporting, border patrolling, intelligence and inspection.

As such, most industrialized countries such as China, France, United Kingdom, Germany, Russia, India, Canada, Australia, Pakistan, Japan and Brazil do “harvest” drones. Some of the super drones have even been baptized. Israel named theirs Heron; the United States upgraded their Predator with the Avenger; and, last but not least, Iran named theirs Karrar, which is Farsi for Striker. President Ahmadinejad infamously nicknamed his Persian Menace: the Ambassador of Death.

Episode X : The Persian Menace

Do not let the Ambassador of Death mislead you into being alarmed. The Ambassador of Death is not Darth Vader’s vehicle of choice. This drone is intended for, and I quote: “Peace and Friendship“. Logically, why should we be nervous over Iran since they have not initiated any attack towards any other country in over 200 years? And yes, the Persian Gulf War has been taken in consideration when making that statement.

That being said, it evidently is not the case when shifting our attention towards the previously mentioned pro-drone countries. Over 239 drone strikes were ordered under the Obama administration. Many of these attacks were carried out against the advice of U.S. Officials and Diplomats. In fact, that tendency has led the Obama Administration of being responsible for at least 85% of drone strikes around the world, particularly in Pakistan.

This is the same Obama that won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009. Even then, his addition seems unsuited and undeserved, when one remembers past laureates.

As mentioned in a previous article of mine, the five countries (United Kingdom, United States, France, Russia and China) that have secured permanent United Nation seats are also the top global arm dealers. These same countries have been accusing Iran of secretly building nuclear weapons and pressuring them to halt their nuclear program.

It is important to understand or remember that the U.S. did not only assist but also coordinated the launch of the Iranian Nuclear Program in the 50s. This program was maintained for decades, until the 1979 revolution.

This support was even symbolized and categorized as the “Atoms for Peace” Program, implemented in 1953 by Eisenhower. Let’s acknowledge that a program would not be complete without an appropriate inaugural speech. And where else but at the United Nation General Assembly can a prestigious one take place? In this case, the cleverly named “Atoms for Peace” speech quickly followed Eisenhower’s “Chance for Peace” speech.

All this backing did result in the inception of Iran’s first nuclear power plant, which was completed and activated thanks to Russian assistance, in 2011.
The irony! The Atoms for Peace Program’s main principle was to reassure the world during the Cold War (between 1945 and 1991). Sarcastically, the Russians presided over its closing ceremony.

As a counter attack, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) board, nations and multinational entities officially reprimanded and sanctioned Iran. This judgment was internationally supported by detailed tangible and evidence. The Iranian authorities, or should I say THE Iranian Authority, Ayatollah Seyed Ali Hosseini khamenei, has not yet been successfully coerced by the international pressure. The U.N. inspectors can come and go as often as necessary, it’s all in good faith, from both parties. Remember, it’s a ll about Peace and Friendship.

“Look up in the sky, it’s a bird, it’s a plane… No, it’s a drone!”

The Empire Will Strike Back. It is just a question on which Empire will strike first.

Guess who’s building nuclear power plants now?

READ MORE AT : THUSALWAYSTOGENIUS

 

LODYANN

8:52 PM ET

March 27, 2012

online jobs $40/hour

my neighbor's sister-in-law made $14228 the prior week. she gets paid on the laptop and got a $398600 house. All she did was get blessed and put in action the advice written on this web site
MakeCash10.com

|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||\\\