The Ritz-Carlton of Failed States

Welcome to the Serena Hotels, outposts of multi-star luxury in countries with zero-star conditions.

BY MICHAEL Z. WISE | MARCH/APRIL 2012

But doing business in problematic states brings, well, problems. In Syria, where the Aga Khan has signed agreements with the government of President Bashar al-Assad to open hotels in Damascus and Aleppo, Serena is vowing to complete plans made before the brutal crackdown by Assad's regime that began in March 2011. Under the 2008 agreements, the properties will be state-owned but operated by the Aga Khan Development Network. "My interest in working in Syria," the Aga Khan said in Aleppo when the deal was inked, "is to take the various lead countries of the ummah [the global Muslim community] and say, 'Let's start. Let's move together. Let's revive our cultures so that modernity is not only seen in the terminology of the West, but in the intelligent use of our past.'"

Now, with Syria facing international sanctions over Assad's violent suppression of dissent that the United Nations says has already killed more than 6,000 people, hotels are nearly empty, and the decision to continue work with the bloodstained and internationally isolated Assad could hurt the Aga Khan's reputation.

Still, Serena's Syria construction is moving forward. The chain is restoring three landmark houses built in the 18th and 19th centuries in the Old City of Damascus and refurbishing former government offices in Aleppo built during the French colonial period.

It's hard to predict what Syria might look like when the facilities are slated to open in a few years. Even if Assad succeeds in clinging to power, luxury tourists are unlikely to rush to Syria to see the country's famous ruins. But if nothing else, there will at least be a hot shower and a plush bed for the journalists covering the chaos -- and the businessmen seeking to profit from it.

 SUBJECTS:
 

Michael Z. Wise has covered Central Europe for Reuters and the Washington Post.

TRUTHBETOLD

11:30 AM ET

February 28, 2012

Interesting Read

I have been to Pakistan's Hotels in Islamabad (very Beautiful city) and in Gilgit and even Swat (Breathtaking beauty all around) Now while I agree that Pakistan has it's issues, I don't agree with calling it a Failed State. Especially noting that almost everyone that utters that comment about Pakistan, has probably never even been.

In the photo series of this article, it compares an Afghan boy walking amidst trash to a Pakistani Luxury hotel, then images from Pakistani Forces battle with Insurgents to another Hotel.

I can sit here and take photos of poor areas, violent areas, Gang infested areas of Chicago to it's Amazing places (some of which are a few feet from the worse areas that are not safe for Tourists! or even locals!)

I don't understand the Point.

Every place has its beauty, has its faults, but one thing that irritates me more than anything is the fact that when they (Pakistanis) are pictured Fighting the insurgents (who ran in there because we pushed them there via our not so well thought out invasion of Afghanistan, you know where we invaded and decided controlling the border region was not needed) we call Pakistan a Failed state.

Failed states dont have Boating Shows, Literary Festivals, Massive Music Industry (did you know that almost all Major Bollywood film has at least one Pakistani musical element?) Thriving Media (free to tell as many lies as FOX NEWS) and the people? they carry on. they keep working, working hard, living life.

Stop calling their sacrifices into question, stop calling them a failed state. it's a Democracy trying to settle in, the last thing it needs is people like us (educated, apparently) making comparisons to AFGHANISTAN and War torn african countries with Pakistan.

Isn't it odd that we loved them more when they actually had a Military Dictator in charge than our so called loved form of Government ?