Trouble in Paradise

The deposed president of the Maldives on the coup that tossed him from power.

BY MOHAMED NASHEED | MARCH 1, 2012

Even after its democratic revolution in 2008, few saw the Maldives as a political trend-setter. Yet, in retrospect, the ousting of a 30-year dictatorship in a Muslim country was a precursor to the Arab Spring revolts that swept across the Middle East two years later. As in Libya, Egypt, Syria, and Tunisia, the Maldivians who took to the streets, confronting the regime's riot police, and demanding change in 2008 were youthful, full of aspirations for a better economic future, and tired of the iron-fisted autocratic rule of a dictator -- Maumoon Abdul Gayoom. I was elected president in the first-ever multi-party polls in the Maldives' 2,500-year history, on a ticket of civil liberties, freedom of the press, and democratic change.

Fast-forward to this month, when the forces of autocracy in the Maldives staged a sudden and brutal coup d'etat. Rogue elements in the police and military joined together to seize the main television station, ransack the offices of the ruling Maldivian Democratic Party, and force my own resignation with threats of bloodshed. In the days that followed I, and many of my fellow democrats, were beaten and imprisoned, and the young democracy we have worked so hard to nurture has been left in mortal danger.

If the Maldives was a precursor to the Arab Spring, let us hope that it is not now a foretaste of a new Arab Winter. There is still time for democracy to recover in my country, but only if the wider world insists that a forceful coup against an elected government cannot be allowed to stand.

My predecessor, Maumoon Abdul Gayoom, ruled the Maldives with an iron fist for 30 years. During his long reign (at one point, he was the longest-ruling head of government in Asia), political parties were banned, freedom of expression was severely curtailed, and hundreds of Maldivians were tortured -- some murdered -- in his jails. Amnesty International frequently condemned Gayoom's brutal rule and Reporters Without Borders labeled him a "predator of press freedom." Political prisoners were dealt with particularly harshly: I spent six years in jail, including 18 months in solitary confinement.

After the killing of a young boy, Evan Naseem, in police custody in 2003, Maldivians rose up against Gayoom and demanded change. My party, the Maldivian Democratic Party (MDP), was then established and we led a non-violent campaign of civil disobedience, calling for democracy. Facing growing domestic and international pressure, Gayoom was forced to release his grip, and allowed the constitution to be changed for and free and fair elections to be held in 2008, in which he was swept from office.

For the past three years, despite setbacks and sustained opposition from remnants of the old regime in the judiciary and parliament, things had been getting gradually better. My government inherited what the World Bank described as "the worst economic conditions of any country undergoing democratic reform since the 1950s," yet with the help of the International Monetary Fund we managed to slash the budget deficit from 22 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) in 2009 to 9 percent last year.

Moreover, we were on track to deliver on nearly all of our election pledges: a public transport ferry system connecting all of our disparate islands was set up; a pension system for the elderly along with universal health insurance was put in place; the country's first university was established; import duties on staple goods were removed; and drug addicts, of which the Maldives regrettably has many, were no longer treated as criminals but as victims in need of care and rehabilitation.

S.KODIKARA/AFP/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS:
 

Mohamed Nasheed was the president of the Republic of Maldives from November 2008 to February 2012.

LOZER123

10:32 PM ET

March 1, 2012

This is funny. This country

This is funny. This country was a center for tourism, the insurance for not starving was tourism. I cannot believe they throw away this insurance by doing all this stuff. Having said that, I guess economical insurance is not as sweet as the insurance of freedom.

 

ANDY80

5:18 AM ET

March 2, 2012

The Dictator of the 21st Century

Indeed, tourism is significant to our country. However, to thrive a country it needs an environment that has no threat to prevail its rule of law and fair human right entitlements to all its citizens. To act as an epitome of triumphant Islamic liberal democracy to the rest of the world, Nasheed is a perilous barricade to this nation. And this is the reason why US, UN, China, India have recognized the incumbent government of Dr Mohamed Waheed Hassan Manik. Let me present you some false information Nasheed has presented in this article;

1. The Maldives National University and the social security allowance scheme to the elderly is not an initiative of Nasheed's administration. The reward for this accomplishment goes to the people behind previous administration as it was an end result of so many years. Its disgusting and he is so immature to claim such false claims, which is typical of him, as these false claims could be used by his opposition greatly to their gain.

2. Nasheed has tried to disrupt and endangered the Judiciary in many instances. He had barred the country's Supreme Court deploying the army and in a plot to oppress the Judges in the Maldives, Nasheed had ordered the military to arrest one of the senior judges and isolated him in a military base, disregarding the calls from the UN, Human Rights Commission of the Maldives and Supreme Court of the Maldives to release him and this was unconstitutional. In addition, International Commission of Jurist deplored this barbaric act of hijacking and called on Nasheed to release him, which he gave no ear.

3. Nasheed had deployed the police and the army to pursue many of unconstitutional acts and as a result they've gone beyond their conscience and finally defied to obey any of his orders unless Nasheed give assurance to them that he would not give anymore unconstitutional orders. The whole police force gathered in front of their head quarters and waited for two long days insisting for this assurance, however; Nasheed conceitedly denied this request which had caused him to announce his resignation.

Nasheed is the real Mughabe here in the Maldives and he his dare enough to do anything to gain what he think is right, be it to compromise the national security of the state.

 

MALDIVES2030

1:12 AM ET

March 2, 2012

Facts on ground from the Maldives

I am writing from the Maldives.

Pls read my small text here. I just want to describe you the facts on ground about Mohamaed Nasheed (the former president),

(1) has no respect for the law, the constitution, and enforcement authorities of the this country

(2) has no respect for (a) parliament (b) the judiciary. pls see headlines before 7th September for details

(3) his party is not even democratic. none of the senior leaders are elected. are being called for violence. put

fire on public properties including a dozen police stations and a dozen court houses. Nasheed made no public

condemnation on these illicit and barbaric acts of his supporters.

Nasheeed in past has been jailed on a number of occasion while calling for democracy, and for which he got a lot of support.

in the first round of presidential elections Nasheed got only 25% of voting. in the second round he formed coalition with most of the member in the current government including Waheed, and he got 52 percent in this round [source: Elections Commission of the Maldives]

soon after, due to extremist elements within Nasheed's party MDP [e.g. Reeko Moosa, Maria, Zaki, Sarangu,

Musthafa...] he slowly became autocratic removing almost all members from the said coalition, while Waheed remained still as the VP.

While in power had given many unlawful and unconstitutional acts, such as the lock down of the supreme courts, disobeying to court rulings, employing corrupt people around his, not obeying guidance from independent institutions .. such as Anti Corruption Commission, Human Rights Commission, Auditor general, continued to go on this...

then, mass protests went on street for a 22 day period [till 7th February], due to kidnapping of supreme court judge

by the police and keeping him in isolation in a military island, not allowing him to meet his family...police were given orders to forcefully to disperse protests in this 22 day protests.. gave orders to allow MDP activists to

attack the protesters protesting against Nasheed. the police were upset for this, they joined the protesters. btw the constitution allows, the police just like any other individual to peacefully protest, and not obey unlawful orders from any one under any circumstance.. all of this lead to the fall of Nasheed, and his regime...

importantly Waheed has more respect and interest for democracy to work in the Maldives. For decades he had been working in the UN system, prioritizes on mitigation in times of conflicts, he holds a a Master's and Doctorate degree in Political Science, plus there are almost none, of questions of integrity before the said coup, and these facts are incomparable to that of Nasheed.

So i here by urge to verify all of this, from the relevant authories, such Elections commission, human rights

commission, the parliment president, judicial service commission, auditor general, anti corruption commssion... just by listening to Nasheed cannot bring out a report.. we need to know there's always two sides to a coin. so pls pls, times of india, the guardian, Sunday times, Forbes, the economist, AP, Reuters, or any other international media...

see these facts before writing up your reports...

Thank You!

 

MALDIVES2030

1:20 AM ET

March 2, 2012

Facts on ground from the Maldives

Former president Mr. Mohamed Nasheed gave 6 reasons for his resignation so far. They are:
1. To prevent the Country from chaos and avoid pressure from the International community. ( 07.02.2012)
2. He was forced to resign at gun point. (08.02.2012)
3. In order to have a mid term election which he promised the country before he came to power. (09.02.2012)
4. Government was overthrown by a coup organised by Yameen and Gasim (10.02.2012).
5. Because of his calls for drastically cutting greenhouse gas emissions, was forced to resign—at gunpoint - NGC (09.02.2012).
6. Sheikh Ilyas gave a religious speech turned police and MNDF to an Angry Mob, forcing him to resign (27.02.2012).
waiting for more.................

 

MALDIVES2030

1:23 AM ET

March 2, 2012

Facts on ground from the Maldives

I remember why the supreme court was locked by Former President Mr. Nasheed in the first place.

Thank god we are having justice now. To stop kind illicit acts, corruption and bribery in the society we need to respect and abide by the law and follow court orders accordingly. In the same instance, we need to ask ourselves:

(1) who is more corrupt?
(2) who has broken the legal institutions framework of this nation?
(3) who lies more?
(4) who has better capacity? current or former?

undoubtedly Mr. Nasheed has been popular in the past for being jailed on numerous occasions for which he got a lot of public support. later when he got into power he slowly changed. removed all members who helped him to gain power. broke the constitution multiple times including kidnapping of the supreme court chief judge.

surely, Nasheed is no longer democratic. and he no doubt needs to pace for better changes.

 

MALDIVES2030

1:26 AM ET

March 2, 2012

Facts on ground from the Maldives

i believe it is time for the Independent institutions in the country to work closely in investigating and releasing accurate reports on the current only context and work towards strengthening democracy and democratic values in the country, not in a domestic approach, but equally internationally.

also thanks to Commonwealth, the United States Government, and the Government of India, for giving us a helping hand in this difficult and troubled time.

i hope we can all work together to get to get solutions through democratic and transparent means. Good luck again!!!

 

SHAMMA

6:04 AM ET

March 2, 2012

Maldives Ex-President Nasheed - A tyrant with a democratic label

What Nasheed has proved to the Maldives and to the rest of the countries fighting for democracy is to be aware of leaders who use democracy as a mere tool to come to power. Arab spring nations ought to be aware of leaders like Nasheed who comes to power 'championing democracy' while he has maintained the dictator status quo of previous leader Gayoom who ruled Maldives for 30 yrs ! Nasheed's 3 year govt was characterised by high profile corruption (including 21m$ reclamation project given to one of his MPs, distributing islands for resort development to his party members without bidding), thousands of political appointees (considering only 350,000 population), intimidation of opposition media including setting fire on a local tv station by his party mob while broadcasting live, arbitrary arrests of opposition leaders (2 were arrested in july 2010, many more soon after the new yr in Jan 2012), detaining a chief judge in an undisclosed location indefinitely since Jan 2012! His overthrow was the limit the people of the country were to take to keep fighting for democracy. Maldives is yet to see democracy so the real message to those countries fighting for democracy is to BE AWARE OF TYRANTS WITH THE DEMOCRACY LABEL OR MASK!

 

DHIVEHI

9:32 AM ET

March 2, 2012

Nasheed is a darling of the foreign media

For the moment the former President Nasheed is supported by 3 distinct groups. A very hardcore loyal gang of drug addicts (less than 500), and a few thousand of his cronies, who are given given top government posts and contracts are his permanent supporters. In total these people would not amount to more than 5000 people.

The rest or the large majority of people who are aligned with Nasheed amounts to about 50,000 people. These are people who suffered under the previous Maumoon regime and those who are a scared of the prospect of Maumoon returning again. Although they comprise of the majority of Nasheeds supporter for the moment, they do not necessarily support Nasheed. They do not want to return to Gayooms's rule at any cost.

Nasheed's party knows that he has no popular standing among people. So they have used larger scale bribery. Free health and dental care (although everyone nows it beyond the affordability of the Government), mega contracts without any bid process (some 400 islands were given away among his art offcials to build tourist resorts) and at least 5 well known cases buying of parliamentarians.

The large scale bribary coupled with cleverly tapping into the any Gayoom sentiments was the formulae used by Nasheed. To cover up all, Nasheed crafted himself as a global environmentalist and a human rights campaigner, while for the home audience he had a different drama.

It will take some time for the international community to realize what this man really is. What ever he is, he is not the man that the foreigner media portrays.

 

JUNAID HASSAN

7:10 PM ET

March 2, 2012

Truth Will Always Be True ...

It’s a shame that whoever has lied and commented against The President Mr. Mohamed Nasheed. You are not only insulting the President but the whole Maldivians. Because he is the one who fought for you for the freedom of expression, the freedom of writing and the freedom of media in Maldives. Because of President Mr. Mohamed Nasheed you have the courage to write anything you want; as all know before (in the time of dictator Maumoon Abdul Gayoom) no one can express or write a word against the government or him without spending a long term in jail. Still Mohamed Nasheed is the President of Maldives because we elected him for a five year term and because of a police mutiny he is being ousted from the position. So majority of Maldivians want an early election in the year 2012 so that once again we can proof the dictator and his family that Maldivians are not with him and once again the democracy will win!

Some Examples that Maldivians are not in favor of dictators:

- Maldives Population Over 300,000.
- Parliament has 77 seats.
- Maldivian Democratic Party (MDP) has 34 seats.
- Other 43 seats are shared by six parties and by some independent members.
- One seat represents 5000 Maldivians.
- 34 seats of MDP represents 170,000 Maldivians.
- Balance is 130,000 Maldivians and it includes Children’s less than 18 years who cannot vote.
- The first democratic presidential election was on 2008 and MDP won it by more than 97 thousand votes at the very beginning of democracy in Maldives ….
I wonder what you will achieve by lying about the President Mr. Mohamed Nasheed and about Maldives… Just think before you lie! President Mohamed Nasheed is a true hero and the only person who thinks about the country before himself. He is not like the other politicians in Maldives who thinks only about their benefits, money and positions. I could name all the politicians who are now with the 30 years of dictator with the accuses but not here because I believe some day justice will be served and then everyone will know the truth about them…

Thank You.

 

ANDY80

1:50 AM ET

March 3, 2012

The real truth will always be true

Junaid, you have twisted the reality in your comments and this is very typical with you MDP-ians . It is not just only Nasheed that had fought for the democracy in this country. This is a disregard for the people who had sacrificed for the democracy. Nasheed would have been in history books, if Gasim and Dr Hassan Saeed had endorsed Maumoon in last election's second round and this is the reason why I have lost faith in Nasheed. He make blatant lies in the open public and takes credit for all accomplishment that he does not deserve. You really believe that the University, Social security scheme, media freedom are initiatives of Nasheed. You know very clearly how he obstructed to independence of state media and how he used it to propagate his party politics.

About the parliament seats you even distorted the truth about it. You and all Maldivians know how many MP's Nasheed had bribed and how he compelled them to swap their party to MDP.

Although Nasheed ostensibly wears a benign democratic face, he has demonstrated how dangerous and ruthless he could be to flourish a democracy, especially in a fledgling democracy like the Maldives, that has a high proportion of citizens with just elementary and secondary education and Nasheed is duping these Maldivians out there.

Nasheed had really endangered the harmony of this country. He has;
1. Barred the Supreme Court using military
2. Abducted two senior MPs against the constitution of the Maldives
3. Kidnapped the senior judge of the criminal court of the Maldives using military unlawfully and denied his release although the Supreme Court, UN and International Commission of jurists called for his release
4. had openly said in public speeches he would show how nasty and ruthlessness to Maldivians except his party members.
5. Alleged that we have leading Maldivian terrorist

You tell me how you'd justify this.

 

GARBODOM

11:18 PM ET

March 2, 2012

Nasheed must take some blame

Credit is due to Nasheed and others for having struggled against M. A. Gayyoom's regime and bringing democracy to the Maldives. However, after becoming president some of his actions were not democratic at all; in fact some of his actions were no different from Gayyoom.
Gayyoom was rightly accused of nepotism as he always ensured that only his loyalists held key positions in the government and its institutions. His relatives and in-laws were given ministerial portfolios and if anyone of them became a threat they would be removed as was the case of Ilyas and Abbas in the early ninetees.
Nasheed's MDP did not win the election of 2008 outright; it was a coalition that brought him to power. The coaltion was based not on a set of principles but on the basis of their determination to remove Gayyoom from power. As soon as this was achieved and after establishing himself as president, Nasheed also resorted to the same old tactics of Gayyoom. He removed the other coalition members from his government and allocated key government postion to his loyalists (someitmes seemingly as instructed by senior members of his family and in-laws) and his relatives (e.g. the education and foreign ministry portfolios).
President Nasheed accused Gayyoom of corruption and misuse of government funds. However President Nasheed convieniently ignored how corrupt some of his party leaders (eg; Mr Reeko M Manik) were. It was highly questionable when Mr Manik's company was granted a million dollar government project even though there were other bidders who were to do the same work at a lesser cost to the government. In addition when Mr Manik's company bid to obtain a similar project at Hulhule airport, a key member of the airport company objected. Mr Manik himself contacted this person and threatened him that his objection would cost him his job. Mr Manik also wanted a senior job to be created for an ally of his which the airport official did not oblige. And within a week he was removed from office and repalced by an MDP member. In addition President Nasheed appointed numerous state minters (in some ministries as many as four) in addition to minsiters. All these positions with its huge salaries and allowances went to MDP loyalist.
This in addition to questionable decisions regarding handing over of key state assests to foreign companies and unlawful arrests of individuals made President Nasheed increasingly unpopular among the general public.
Gayyoom may have ruled with an iron fist and many of his actions were unlawful. However, being democratically elected does not give President Nasheed the ownership of the country and do things as he pleases.

 

JUNAID HASSAN

6:16 AM ET

March 4, 2012

Truth Will Always Be True ...

Andy80... I didn’t write my view to argue to anyone. I just shared my view of things happened here in Maldives. And as you have asked me to justify your points let me tell you what I think about it and as I’m sure lot of people would agree with me if they really believe in truth…

(1.Barred the Supreme Court using military)

TRUTH: Because some judges took oath against the law... Etc... I’m sure you the whole story…

(2.Abducted two senior MPs against the constitution of the Maldives)

TRUTH: As we all know one is the 30 years dictators’ brother and the other is finance minister in the time of dictator... At that time we all know what the situation of the country was and what they were planning…

(3.Kidnapped the senior judge of the criminal court of the Maldives using military unlawfully and denied his release although the Supreme Court, UN and International Commission of jurists called for his release)

TRUTH: 11 cases were filed against him at judicial service commission and he was found guilty about one case and still judicial service commission kept him as a judge… Because he was a puppet of the dictator and loyal to the dictator and majority of the judicial service commission members are loyal to the 30 year dictator…
(JUDICIAL SERVISE COMMISION – To handle complaints of the Chief Justice, Judge, Magistrates and the advisors of the President of the Maldives on judicial matters and to advice the concerned authorities or parties on the remedies available.)

4. Had openly said in public speeches he would show how nasty and ruthlessness to Maldivians except his party members.

TRUTH: This is three words of a public speech. Think about the whole speech. I’m sure you heard it…and some people are using this against the President Mr. Mohamed Nasheed because they don’t have much to talk against him because he has done much more than the 30 year dictator than in THREE years time.

5. Alleged that we have leading Maldivian terrorist

TRUTH: I’m sorry I didn’t hear anything Mr. President Mohamed Nasheed saying about terrorists. And I don’t believe or know any terrorist in Maldives I’m sure there is none and hope there never will be any… I don’t want anyone to spoil our country’s name. I hope others will think about Maldives before writing...

This is my justification about your points…

For your kind in formation Sir, I’m not a MDP member but I support President Mr. Mohamed Nasheed from my heart because I believe no matter what he will always think about Maldives before himself. No matter what others say about him facts will be the facts. I believe in democracy not in dictatorship and no matter what President Mr. Mohamed Nasheed is the main reason we got even a little taste of democracy. And I thank the others who helped and worked to bring democracy in Maldives behind the MONDALA OF MALDIVES.
Anyone can say or write whatever they want but still the facts will remain as facts.

Trust me there is no one who love Maldives more than President Mr. Mohamed Nasheed.

Have a good day Sir…

Thank you,
Junaid

 

JACK DUSEK

3:18 AM ET

March 29, 2012

Maldivians condemn 'coup'

I have some new information bout Maldivians. Thousands of supporters of Mohamed Nasheed, who says he was forced to resign as the president of Maldives, have taken to the streets to protest over what they are calling a coup. Al Jazeera's Steve Chao, reporting from the capital island of Male on Wednesday, said up to 3,000 people took part in the protests in support of Nasheed and calling for his return to power. He said police fired tear gas and clashed with protesters as they attempted to push the crowds backwards. In the hours following the protests, there were reports of Nasheed being manhandled by security forces. Nasheed was only "lightly" injured, according to his supporters, our correspondent reported via Twitter. Nasheed, the Indian Ocean island nation's first democratically elected leader, stepped down on Tuesday in the wake of a police mutiny and clashes on the streets after weeks of anti-government protests. In an interview to Al Jazeera's Chao at his family home earlier on Wednesday, Nasheed said he was compelled to resign to prevent bloodshed. "This is definitely a coup," he said. "By any definition anywhere, this was a coup. This was a bloodless coup because I did not take part in it. I did not want to defend [my position]; that is why there was no blood.”
Have a good day