Kill the Messenger

What Russia taught Syria: When you destroy a city, make sure no one -- not even the story -- gets out alive.

BY ROBERT YOUNG PELTON | MARCH 2, 2012

It was a star-filled night in Chechnya's besieged capital of Grozny. The snow crunched under my feet as I walked with the Chechen rebel commander away from the warmth of our safe house. When we entered a bombed-out neighborhood 15 minutes away, I put the battery in my Iridium satellite phone and waited for the glowing screen to signal that I had locked on to the satellites.

I made my call. It was short. Then the commander made a call; he quickly hung up and handed me back the phone. "Enough," he said, motioning for me to remove the battery.

As we walked briskly back to the safe house, it was exactly 10 minutes before the cascade of double wa-whumps announced the Grad rocket batteries pounding the vacant neighborhood we had just left.

It was December 1999, and the Russian assault on Grozny was unfolding in all its gruesome detail. After the dissolution of so much of the former Soviet empire, Chechnya was one country that the newly minted prime minister, Vladimir Putin, refused to let go of. His boss, Boris Yeltsin, and the Russian army had been defeated and then humiliated in the media by Chechen forces in the first war. Five years later, Russia was back. And Putin's new strategy was unbending: silence, encircle, pulverize, and "cleanse." It was a combination of brutal tactics -- a Stalinist purge of fighting-age males plus Orwellian propaganda that fed Russians a narrative wherein Chechen freedom fighters were transformed into Islamist mercenaries and terrorists. More than 200,000 civilians were to die in this war, the echoes of which continue to this day.

This time, journalists were specifically targeted to prevent sympathetic or embarrassing reports from escaping the killing zone. As such, you can't find a lot of stories about the second Chechen war. One of the few and best accounts was written by Marie Colvin, who described her terrifying escape from Grozny for the Sunday Times. Last month, Colvin thought she could roll the dice and enter the besieged Syrian city of Homs to defy yet another brutal war of oppression. This time she lost.

It's impossible to know whether Syrian President Bashar al-Assad -- a longtime ally of Russia -- studied the success of the last Chechen war before launching his own assault on the restive city of Homs. However, his Russian military advisors surely know the tactics well. The crackdown in Homs carries a grim echo of Grozny, both in its use of signals intelligence to track down and silence the regime's enemies and in its bloody determination to obliterate any opposition, including Western journalists.

Assad's ability to lethally target journalists using satellite-phone uplinks could well have cost Colvin her life. Multiple reports have suggested that Syrian forces used phone signals to pinpoint her location and then launched a rocket barrage that resulted in her death on Feb. 22, along with that of French photographer Remi Ochlik and multiple Syrian civilians.

The use of satellite and cellular transmissions to determine a subject's location was relatively new a decade ago, when I was in Grozny. Tracking phone transmissions to hunt down targets began in earnest with a covert unit of U.S. intelligence officers from the National Security Agency (NSA), CIA, Navy, Air Force, and special operations called "The Activity." This snooping unit was also called the Army of Northern Virginia, Grey Fox, and even Task Force Orange. We see much of this technology used to inform modern drone and U.S. Joint Special Operations Command strikes. My decade covering U.S. spec ops, intelligence gathering, and their contractors highlighted the impressive ability of various countries to monitor, locate, network, and act on what is called SIGINT, or signals intelligence.

The Russians have their own version of this capability, which fell under the command of the Federal Agency of Government Communications and Information, now part of the Federal Protective Service. In the United States, it would be equivalent to the NSA and FBI combined, and the agency provides sophisticated eavesdropping support to Russia's military, intelligence, and counterterrorism units -- and to Russia's allies, including Syria.

Russia has spent a long time perfecting these techniques. On April 21, 1996, Chechnya's breakaway president, Dzhokhar Dudayev, was speaking on a satellite phone with Russian envoy Konstantin Borovoi about setting peace talks with Yeltsin. During the phone call, he was killed by a signal-guided missile fired from a Russian jet fighter. The warplane had received Dudayev's coordinates from a Russian ELINT (electronic intelligence) plane that had picked up and locked on to the signal emitted by the satellite phone. It was Russian deception and brutality at its finest.

It should have been clear even back then that there was a benefit and a distinct penalty to modern communications on the battlefield.

Flash forward to Syria today. The opposition Free Syrian Army is officially run by a former air force colonel who commands a barely organized group of army defectors supported by energetic youth. They rely almost entirely on cell-phone service, satellite phones, the Internet, and social media to organize and communicate. Early in February, according to a Fox News report, Qatar provided 3,000 satellite phones, which the Syrian rebels have used to upload numerous impactful videos and stories.

These past few weeks, under a barrage of mortar, tank, and artillery shells, their plaintive calls for help from inside the besieged Baba Amr neighborhood of Homs sparked international outrage. But without Western journalists filing for newspapers and television outlets, these videos -- mostly shaky, low-resolution footage of corpses and artillery strikes -- wouldn't have had the impact they deserve.

In a welcome resurgence of non-embedded journalism, brave reporters like Colvin and many others risked their lives to enter Homs and report from the ground. What they showed us was moving, horrific, and embarrassing. Once again, Western governments were caught doing nothing -- while women, children, and innocents were murdered by their own government. It's a playbook the Syrians are good at: The shelling of Homs began on Feb. 3, 2012 -- exactly 30 years after the Hama massacre, in which Hafez al-Assad, Bashar's father, killed up to 15,000 civilians over three weeks in a similar program of wanton destruction.

What we haven't seen as clearly is the extent to which the Syrian regime (thanks to its Russian advisors) now has the tools of electronic warfare to crush this popular uprising -- and anything that happens to get in the way. Syria is one of Russia's biggest clients for weapons, training, and intelligence. In return for such largesse, it has offered the Russian Navy use of Tartus, a new deep-water military port in the Mediterranean. Moscow sold Damascus nearly $1 billion worth of weapons in 2011, despite growing sanctions against the oppressive Assad regime. With these high-tech weapons comes the less visible Russian-supplied training on technologies, tactics, and strategies.

The sounds of rockets pulverizing civilians should have brought back memories and warnings to Colvin. She would have recognized all the signs from her previous reporting in Chechnya, where she and her escorts were hunted relentlessly by Russian domestic security agents who sought to arrest, silence, or kill any journalist attempting to report on the slaughter of civilians.

My time in Grozny included being surrounded three times by the Russian army, numerous direct bombardments, and frequent close calls. I paid attention to the safety warnings of the Chechen rebel commanders who kept me alive. These rebels were once part of the Soviet military and intelligence apparatus and were fully schooled in Russia's dirty tricks. They taught me much. Chief among them was not communicating electronically while in country, not trusting "media guides," and never telling people where I was going. If captured by Russian troops, they urged me -- for my own safety -- to say that I had been kidnapped by Chechen forces.

Just as I exited Chechnya, I met Colvin, who was heading in. She wanted to know as much as she could. I warned her of the duplicity and violent intent of the Russian military and their Chechen proxies. Despite my warnings, she bravely entered Chechnya and wrote riveting, award-winning stories that now sound almost identical to her coverage from Syria.

I was distressed to read of Colvin's death in Syria, and even more distressed to think she might still be alive now if she had remembered some basic warnings. Her first error was that she stayed inside the rebel "media center" -- in reality, a four-story family home converted to this use as it was one of the few places that had a generator.

The second was communication. The Syrian army had shut down the cell-phone system and much of the power in Baba Amr -- and when journalists sent up signals it made them a clear target. After CNN's Arwa Damon broadcast live from the "media center" for a week, the house was bombarded until the top floor collapsed. Colvin may have been trapped, but she chose to make multiple phone reports and even went live on CNN and other media channels, clearly mentioning that she was staying in the bombed building.

The third mistake was one of tone. She made her sympathies in the besieged city clearly known as she emotionally described the horrors and documented the crimes of the Syrian government.

Unsurprisingly, the next day at 9 a.m., a barrage of rockets was launched at the "media center." She was killed -- along her cameraman, Remi Ochlik, and at least 80 Syrian civilians across the city -- targeted with precision rocket barrages, bombs, and the full violence of the Syrian army.

In Grozny, Russian forces decided that they would eliminate everything, everybody, and every voice that stood up to the state -- including journalists who tried to enter. Syria has clearly made the same determination in Homs. This military action is intended to be a massacre, a Stalinist-style lesson to those who dare defy the rulers of Syria.

The United Nations estimates that more than 7,500 Syrians have so far been killed in the yearlong spasm of violence there. Perhaps this ghastly toll would be even higher now if brave reporters like Colvin had not entered. With the recent news that the rebels have retreated from the bombardment of Baba Amr to safer territory, Assad's forces, as well as their Russian advisors, are claiming victory. According to official news reports from the Syrian Information Ministry, "the foreign-backed mercenaries and armed terrorist groups" have fled, the corpses of three Western journalists have been "discovered," and Homs is now "peaceful."

Despite what Damascus claims, this fight is not yet over. And we need more brave and bright journalists who will shine a light in places like Syria, where a regime works diligently to plunge its people into darkness. But let's not forget whose callous playbook they're using.

LOUAI BESHARA/AFP/Getty Images

 

California-based Robert Young Pelton wrote The Hunter, the Hammer, and Heaven about his experiences in Chechnya in 1999 to 2000. He is currently publisher of Somalia Report, a 24/7 news source that works with over 100 Somali reporters. His book The World's Most Dangerous Places contains survival tips from what he has learned in over a dozen conflicts.

TOUFU

11:34 AM ET

March 3, 2012

"Orwellian propaganda that

"Orwellian propaganda that fed Russians a narrative wherein Chechen freedom fighters were transformed into Islamist mercenaries and terrorists. "

You mean like how US media transformed Taliban freedom fighters into islamic terrorists?

 

BUBBLE BURSTER

3:26 PM ET

March 3, 2012

Seriously

I understand that many oppose the US mission in Afghanistan, but the Taliban as "freedom fighters"..really? What freedom are they fighting for? The freedom to murder women for seeking education? The freedom to shoot men if they do not grow a beard? The freedom to destroy centuries old cultural treasures because of their narrow violent religious views? Th freedom to murder human beings because a hunk of paper was accidentally burned?

If that is your idea of freedom I sincerely hope you migrate to this free society sometime soon to enjoy your life among these noble warriors.

This story is about how the Russians murdered 200,000 civilians and are now teaching the technique to the Syrians (as if they needed teaching). Your snarky little comment is an insult to the gravity of this situation.

 

HURRICANEWARNING

5:57 PM ET

March 3, 2012

Toufu

Brother, you are not that well read on the history of Afghanistan, are you. You see, the Taliban are a Pashtun political/ religious movement that took over in the 90's and were one of the most oppressive, fundamentalist, brutal regimes in the history of the world. If you lived in A-stan, and you were non-Pashtun, non-fundamentalist, or god forbid, non-Muslim; the Taliban would be your worst nightmare. I'm not saying that the people of Afghanistan really LIKE the USA for what it is currently doing, but they hardly want the Taliban to take over again. you see, most parents actually want their children to go to school, and not have to worry about their daughters getting acid thrown in their faces for doing so. Oh, and while we're on the topic of the Russians, it was their fault that the Taliban came into existence in the first place. Once again, further proof that the Soviet Union was really one of the greatest "evils" ever to snake its way into human history.

 

WINDY1

8:31 PM ET

March 3, 2012

I believe toufu is referring

I believe toufu is referring to Charlie Wilson's support for the Afghans against the Russians, he probably confuses them with the Taliban, which arose with some members from those ranks..but is a distinctive political entity of the 90's.

However the responses to him are also filled with nonsense: folks not willing to admit their little debacle in Afghanistan was run to ruin by Military-Industrial thieves, the outcome of which is a country run by warlords with no coherent future and a still functioning Taliban.

 

BVDJSKIF8DS9

7:33 PM ET

March 4, 2012

very good web: ===

very good web: === http://www.plzzshop.com

The website wholesale for many kinds of fashion shoes, like the nike, jordan, prada, also including the jeans, shirts, bags, hat and the decorations.

All the products are free shipping, and the the price is competitive, and also can accept the paypal payment., After the payment, can ship within short time.

We will give you a discount

WE ACCEPT PYAPAL PAYMENT

YOU MUST NOT MISS IT!!!

=== http://www.plzzshop.com

thank you!!!

Believe you will love it.

We have good reputation, fashion products,

come here quickly== http://www.plzzshop.com

Opportunity knocks but once

 

ROB G

9:29 AM ET

March 6, 2012

Oh Misha

Let me quote the very revelant 1999 BBC article that also cites RYP (the author of this article):

Aid workers have described how up to 50,000 civilians are trapped in horrifying conditions in the Chechen capital Grozny - unable to leave the ''inferno'' their city has become.

Russia has given residents until Saturday to get out or face annihilation in an all out assault on the city.

But UN officials said most of those left behind were too old, too sick or too poor to make it to safety. Others have been injured by Russian shelling and cannot walk.

The UN also queried how civilians were expected to leave when Russia was continuing to bombard the city and surrounding area.

One refugee, who had recently fled her home, described how roads outside the capital were covered with bodies of people caught in the shelling.

Author Robert Young-Pelton, who has just left Grozny, painted a grim picture of the city.

''The entire centre of Grozny is destroyed, there are massive craters, the windows have all been blown out, the buildings are sagging,'' he said.

Mr Young-Pelton, author of The World's Most Dangerous Places, said many civilians were too scared to leave because of the shelling.

He said he had witnessed a rocket attack on a market near a flat full of blind people and had counted 18 rocket barrages a minute during one recent bombardment.

''The Chechens are terrified of leaving the city because the [Russians] have been attacking [civilian] convoys in safe areas.

''Most people are destitute. They do not have the means or money to travel. There are no vehicles to get out,'' he added.

No one knows how many people are left in Grozny, but Lyndall Sachs of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees said estimates varied between 15,000 and 50,000.

She said they were living in ''horrific conditions'' with no water, no electricity and limited food.

''If we do not get in there soon we're going to start seeing major problems for these people. They are very traumatised,'' she added.

The Russians have promised to open a safe corridor out of Grozny through which civilians can leave.

But Ms Sachs said: ''The bottom line is many of these people who are trapped cannot leave because they're too old, too sick, too young or they simply do not have the financial capacity to pay the bribes [or] pay the bus trip to get to safety.

''The Russian foreign ministry said it was a two hour walk, for many people that's two hours too long - many of those people simply cannot walk.''

(and then also hundreds of people were killed while even trying to leave the city, when their convoys were bombed, shelled and machinegunned)

 

ROB G

9:50 AM ET

March 6, 2012

And here's an example of extermination attacks on these refugees

As proven in the international court of justice:

Umayeva v. Russia, (1200/03)

Judgment: 2008-12-04
Admissible: 2007-12-11
Date of violation: 2000-01-23
Violation: Indiscriminate bombing
Location: Chechnya
Representative: EHRAC/Memorial

In October 1999 hostilities resumed between Russian forces and Chechen armed groups. Grozny came under heavy bombardment. On 22 January 2000 the remaining residents were informed, via an amplifier installed in a helicopter and dropped leaflets, that the following day would be their last opportunity to leave the city through a humanitarian corridor. On 23 January 2000 at 9 a.m. Lipatu Umayeva and her family left the house. They walked in a group of about a hundred other civilians, many wearing white armbands. As the group passed a house where the Russian military was stationed artillery fire and shelling started. A helicopter appeared, from which a sniper fired. Lipatu received several shell and fire wounds and lost consciousness. She could not be taken to a hospital as the shelling continued and did not reach a hospital until a week later. To date she continues to suffer from the consequences of her injuries.

And here's about the fate of many of those who stayed there trapped, for a variety of reasons, and survived the bombardment, but not what Putin called their "liberation":

Musayev and Others v. Russia, (57941/00, 58699/00, and 60403/00)

Judgment: 2007-07-26
Admissible: 2005-12-13
Date of violation: 2000-02-05
Violation: Extra-judicial execution
Location: Chechnya
Representative: EHRAC/Memorial

On 5 February 2000 Russian forces began a "mopping-up" operation in the district of Novye Aldy in Grozny. In the course of the operation dozens of civilians were killed and numerous houses were burnt down. The three applications, which the Court joined into one case, concern the killing of 11 people that day: Yusup Musayev witnessed seven of his relatives being killed in Novye Aldy. Suleyman Magomadov and Tamara Magomodova who had fled the hostilities later found out that Magodev's two brothers, one of them married to Magomodova, had both been shot to death. Khasan Abdulmazhidov and Malika Labazanova, husband and wife, witnessed the execution of Abdulmazhidov's sister and brother. The servicemen set their house and barn on fire before they left. The criminal investigation into the extra-judicial excecutions has not produced any tangible results.

On 12 October 2006, the European Court of Human Rights delivered its judgment in the case Estamirov and Others v. Russia, holding the Russian government reponsible for the extra-judicial execution of five family members of the Estamirov family in Novy Aldy on the same day.

As cited from http://www.srji.org/en/legal/cases where you can get links to the court documents and read more if you want. The case of the Estamirov family included the OMON "police" murdering a baby of 1 year old and a pregnant woman, nearby they also killed an ethnic Russian woman, and so on, they were systematically killing all the survivors they came by.

 

LYNDSAY

3:48 PM ET

March 3, 2012

blah blah blah

I'm sorry my Pelton,

The reason 'the [true] story' of what's going on in Syria is not being broadcast to the masses is not due to the 'story not getting out alive', it due to the fact Reuters, BBC, CNN etc all seem hell bent on feeding us rubbish like like Foie gras....

Unfortunately for you, some of actually acquire our information from media sources that are not owned by the global media Oligopoly and can see that what is going on is just the bastard child of the same Banana Republic policies adopted in Central & South America during the cold war..

The neocons have had a hard for this part of the world for years .... http://www.salon.com/2011/11/26/wes_clark_and_the_neocon_dream/singleton/

And no amount of alternative information, even if it comes from an officially sanctioned Arab League report, will be allowed to let people opinions of the situation in Syria digress from what the neocons want... http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/NB04Ak01.html

I find what's going on in Syria as abhorrent as the next person, but I for one are sceptical that who the neocons will put in power if given the chance will in fact be good for the people of Sryia...

 

BUBBLE BURSTER

2:51 AM ET

March 4, 2012

Do you know what a neocon is?

I am wondering just what neocons you are referring to when you think "they " will install a Syrian leader. Is President Obama a neocon? Hillary Clinton? Leon Panetta?

I suspect that for some folks anyoen pursuing a policy int he Middle Eats that they oppose is labeled a "neocon"

Quick history lesson. The first neoconservatives were Democrats disilllusioned by their party's dovish turn towards anti-anti-communism in the post-Vietnam era. Jeanne Kirkpatrick is the most prominent example. Their commitment is a goal of democratization and a willingness to sometimes use US power to achieve that end.

Just because you are willing to use military force does not make you a neocon. That makes you a primacist and perhaps a unilateralist. Couple that with the democratization and you have a neocon.

So neocon = willing to use unilateral force to democratize (and geostrategic interests as well).
Wilsonian liberals = willing to use multilateral force to democratize.
Primacists = willing to use unilateral force for geostrategic interests

There are other groups as well, but I am really curious who you think these "neocons" are in the current administration.

 

LITTLEMANTATE

6:23 PM ET

March 3, 2012

Savages

Don't they know that when serious, responsible nations blow up the press they follow by saying it was a regrettable mistake and how sorry they are, won't happen again, fog of war and all that.

 

ROSS TAYLOR

6:41 AM ET

March 5, 2012

Deplorable

It is deplorable the human right abuses and atrocities that are occuring in Syria. And then they specifically target the press to stop the truth getting out. I hope that at the end of the day Assad meets a similar grisly death as Gaddafi did - he deserves to feel the sort of terror that many of his victims felt. Ross What Men Want

 

PAMDEYABU640

7:43 PM ET

March 3, 2012

Quite and interesting

Very informative article. I think I love the comments better thought.

 

XTIANGODLOKI

8:26 PM ET

March 3, 2012

Chenchen "Freedom Fighters", really?

The article states: "It was a combination of brutal tactics -- a Stalinist purge of fighting-age males plus Orwellian propaganda that fed Russians a narrative wherein Chechen freedom fighters were transformed into Islamist mercenaries and terrorists. "

You mean the same Chechen "freedom fighters" who held up schools and theaters and who ended up killing hundreds of kills and civilians? Exactly, why aren't they terrorists? If Al Qaeda were against Putin as opposed to the US, would the author claim Al Qaeda to be "freedom fighters" as well?

Of course, Russia committed atrocities on Chechens as well. However painting the other side as angels when the situation isn't really black and white, by the media and propagandists is exactly the reason why Americans' world views are distorted.

 

ROB G

10:13 AM ET

March 6, 2012

It'srather your views that are "distorted"

"Ended up killing"? It was "the federals" FSB that killed the great most of the dead hostages. They filled the theater with poison gas, and shelled and burned down the school, using such indiscriminate weapons as tanks and flamethrowers.

And this was not different then their prior murders of many thousands of civilians, Chechen and Russian (and other), men, women and children, in Grozny and elsewhere, many of them also burned alive. Including with use of such inhumane weapons as the vacuum bombs.

Or buried alive, in their collapsed buildings and basements they tried to survive this frozen hell on earth, where their decaying bodies and then skeletons would lay for years to come until they got finally exhumed during the reconstruction of the city in the late 2000s.

If a few years from now some radicalized survivors of Homs, who will maybe even join the real al-Qaeda or whatever, will take a bunch of civilians hostage, only to get them killed by the Baathist forces "liberating" them, just as they had "liberated" Homs by destroying it, I'll blame the Baathists too.

And yes, you're also a victim of what the author called the "Orwellian propaganda".

 

BVDJSKIF8DS9

7:30 PM ET

March 4, 2012

very good web: ===

very good web: === http://www.plzzshop.com

The website wholesale for many kinds of fashion shoes, like the nike, jordan, prada, also including the jeans, shirts, bags, hat and the decorations.

All the products are free shipping, and the the price is competitive, and also can accept the paypal payment., After the payment, can ship within short time.

We will give you a discount

WE ACCEPT PYAPAL PAYMENT

YOU MUST NOT MISS IT!!!

=== http://www.plzzshop.com

thank you!!!

Believe you will love it.

We have good reputation, fashion products,

come here quickly== http://www.plzzshop.com

Opportunity knocks but once

 

MICHAELGERALDPDEALINO

1:32 AM ET

March 5, 2012

Russia and the Chechen rebels

Russia and the Chechen rebels are two sides of the same coin in terms of brutality. And they are also at par with the Taliban "freedom fighters" that the first critic was referring. They are not freedom fighters; they are creatures from the gutter who want to subjugate Afghan men and women into virtual slavery with their draconian policies, like treating women as second-class citizens by denying them education and opportunity for livelihood. To hell with the Taliban and Assad! Genuine freedom for Afghans and Syrians!

 

DAVIDDALY5

5:24 AM ET

March 5, 2012

People like Asad shouldn't be in power.

Very sad. Firstly, that people in Syria allowed someone like Asad's father in power and then his son. And secondly that other countries have allowed it. God willing things will improve for everyone. spirulina

 

DENNIS VANHAITSMA

11:16 PM ET

March 29, 2012

Russiann and Grozny

I think that, when i read this topic, it make me remember everything happened in that day. It is so bad, there are a lot of people who died. Russia was back. And Putin's new strategy was unbending: silence, encircle, pulverize, and "cleanse." It was a combination of brutal tactics -- a Stalinist purge of fighting-age males plus Orwellian propaganda that fed Russians a narrative wherein Chechen freedom fighters were transformed into Islamist mercenaries and terrorists. More than 200,000 civilians were to die in this war, the echoes of which continue to this day. It is a slaughter.