The Egypt Backlash

Is it a fantasy to believe that the United States can still promote democracy in non-democratic states?

BY JAMES TRAUB | MARCH 2, 2012

Mitchell thinks that the problem is inherently insoluble, and thus that the democracy promotion moment has come and gone. Another way of looking at it, though, is that the United States and other outside actors will have to decide how much they care about helping democratic forces in non-democratic states, and thus how much pressure they will impose on regimes to let those forces work. The Obama administration has gone to the mat in Egypt, where the regime was foolish enough to threaten American citizens, but not in Ethiopia. But the SCAF is still free to repress domestic groups -- a far greater threat to their continuing rule -- even though they've released the Americans. Larry Diamond argues that the United States must not let a disingenuous argument over sovereignty "trump a more basic international principle that people have a right to peacefully organize a civil society." He would like to see the Obama administration "push back very, very hard" against regimes that try to throttle democracy assistance, and do so in collaboration with other Western states and with the United Nations. International actors must be prepared at times to withhold goodies that matter to such rulers, whether in the form of aid or a diplomatic embrace.

There's no satisfying answer to this problem. Like it or not, the United States needs autocratic or semi-democratic  allies like Egypt and Ethiopia, not to mention Saudi Arabia or Uzbekistan. It will not, and should not, put the right of NDI and IRI to operate freely at the top of the agenda with those states. With the worst of them, it's probably a waste of breath. And it's important to remain modest about what outsiders can accomplish even in ambiguous settings like today's Egypt and Azerbaijan. But the Arab Spring has decisively proved that people who have spent their whole lives under repressive rule are prepared to take risks, sometimes very grave ones, in order to gain a measure of dignity. And the United States has to be on the right side of that struggle. The Obama administration should take the crisis in Egypt as a wake-up call on the democracy backlash.

Carsten Koall/Getty Images

 

James Traub is a fellow of the Center on International Cooperation. "Terms of Engagement," his column for Foreign Policy, runs weekly.

SQUEEK

7:18 PM ET

March 2, 2012

You forgot one thing

What exactly do these groups do?

 

JOEDANIELS

8:56 AM ET

March 3, 2012

that's the whole point...they

that's the whole point...they do nothing lol. feel like i am getting a sinus infection just reading the same thing over and over again!

 

GORRAFAMD

9:10 AM ET

March 3, 2012

reply

nothing

 

HAULROAD

12:14 AM ET

March 3, 2012

One more thing...

What good is exporting democracy to countries who will by and large use their freedom to vote in leaders that will establish sharia? "Arab Spring" hasn't exactly turned out to be a bunch of Jeffersonian Democrats running for office.

 

JIVATMANX

9:45 PM ET

March 4, 2012

You do realize that the

You do realize that the Muslim brotherhood is more religiously moderate than Rick Santorum?

 

HAULROAD

11:03 AM ET

March 5, 2012

Did Reza Aslan tell you that??

Laughable if it wasn't so sad. You are however entitled to your uninformed opinion...

Do you read the news about Egypt? Have you been and seen the persecution of Christians under the wonderful moderation of Islamists?

 

NOC

5:09 AM ET

March 3, 2012

it is a time of revolution

Now egypt are facing the problem of revolution. Simply world are changing.

Windows Server Support

 

XTIANGODLOKI

8:44 AM ET

March 3, 2012

A lot of these NGOs are funded by foreign governments

The goal of these "Democracy advocate" NGOs are to influence foreign voting decisions rather than letting the people to naturally decide what is the best for them. Moreover many of these NGOs are clearly associated with foreign governments. Freedom House for example gets 80% of its budget from the US government.

The US would not tolerate foreign money from swaying voters' decisions for good reasons. John Huang for example, donated money to Clinton which originally came from one wealthy Indonesian family. As the result of this Clinton had to return the money and Huang was convicted of felony. Should foreign NGOs bring money into the US political system like the US NGOs are trying to do with Egypt, the US would have persecuted the foreign NGOs just like Egypt is resisting US NGOs.

 

MARKANGELO

1:24 PM ET

March 3, 2012

Manipulation

Your first example is laughable : Chile ?
It was not a democratic organization
that overthrew Pinochet but a violent
coupe by the CIA.
that established his rule in the first place
by assassinating a democratically elected Allende.
No wonder Egypt & others do not trust these pushy institutions.
Didn't they promote secular Sadem in Iraq
then hang him when they were tired of him ?

 

ROMEO.BASHIR@GMAIL.COM

11:14 PM ET

March 3, 2012

Democracy by the people for the people

Democracy is only as good as the people who feel it exist till such time shall we call it something different.

 

BVDJSKIF8DS9

7:32 PM ET

March 4, 2012

very good web: ===

very good web: === http://www.plzzshop.com

The website wholesale for many kinds of fashion shoes, like the nike, jordan, prada, also including the jeans, shirts, bags, hat and the decorations.

All the products are free shipping, and the the price is competitive, and also can accept the paypal payment., After the payment, can ship within short time.

We will give you a discount

WE ACCEPT PYAPAL PAYMENT

YOU MUST NOT MISS IT!!!

=== http://www.plzzshop.com

thank you!!!

Believe you will love it.

We have good reputation, fashion products,

come here quickly== http://www.plzzshop.com

Opportunity knocks but once

 

BASHY QURAISHY

9:33 AM ET

March 5, 2012

The Egypt Backlash

"Is it a fantasy to believe that the United States can still promote democracy in non-democratic states?" asks JAMES TRAUB in FP, MARCH 2, 2012.
The right question would be; Is USA really interested to let the Islamic world decide their own fate and be owner of their own destiny?

Looking at the record of US interference, plots and covert operations to kill and eliminate democratic leaders and movements in the developing world, one should not wonder that youth do not trust the West. Even the caption under the photo of a young Egyptian girl: “It’s a Whole Lot Harder to Export Democracy Than It Used to Be.” tell us that FP and USA still consider democracy an exportable commodity as burgers and coca cola. Has it occurred to the people in Washington that democracy should evolve and cannot be pushed down the throat of people, especially when USA is always in cohort with the oppressors of the same very people.

 

KUNINO

11:22 AM ET

March 5, 2012

Neither improbable nor impossible

It's neither improbable nor impossible that people who arrive in a foreign country proclaiming that their only interest is democracy; who start tampering with the foreigners' understandings of how their government should be voted in and administered; could really be spies acting on behalf of the nation they came from.

There have been many examples in earlier years of "businessmen" and "journalists" being found guilty of espionage and handed lengthy prison sentences; of their government's having vigorously defended their "innocence" of "trumped-up charges"; and of our learning in later decades that yes, they were really spies and they had been properly tried and found guilty of espionage by their foreign hosts.

There is abdundant evidence that people with legitimate business or professional interests in foreign countries who have been approached and seduced by espionage agencies of their own governments to add spying against their foreign hosts to their original reasons for being in those nations. Members of such things as "democracy organizations" would be natural targets for such seductions.

No need to think back more than 14 months when Raymond Alan Davis shot dead two men in a public street in Lahore. The US government later bought him out of a Pakistani jail with a $2.4 million payment to the grieving families of the men. The next generation might at some time get to the bottom of what happened that day in Lahore, but few people think today that official protestation that Davis was acting in legitimate self-defense and was in Lahore on legitimate business when he fired. It wasn't the Pakistani government alone that noticed those events.

 

ADAN SIGNORILE

2:55 AM ET

March 30, 2012

Colour revolution

I know that, Color revolutions is a term that was widely used by the media to describe related movements that developed in several societies in the CIS (former USSR) and Balkan states during the early 2000s. The term has also been applied to a number of revolutions elsewhere, including in the Middle East. Some observers[who?] have called the events a revolutionary wave, the origins of which can be traced back to the 1986 People Power Revolution (also known as the "Yellow Revolution") in the Philippines.
Participants in the color revolutions have mostly used nonviolent resistance, also called civil resistance. Such methods as demonstrations, strikes and interventions have been intended protest against governments seen as corrupt and/or authoritarian, and to advocate democracy; and they have also created strong pressure for change. These movements generally adopted a specific color or flower as their symbol. The color revolutions are notable for the important role of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and particularly student activists in organizing creative non-violent resistance.

Such movements have had a measure of success, as for example in Serbia's Bulldozer Revolution (2000); in Georgia's Rose Revolution (2003); and in Ukraine's Orange Revolution (2004). In most but not all cases, massive street protests followed disputed elections, or requests for fair elections, and led to the resignation or overthrow of leaders considered by their opponents to be authoritarian. Some events have been called "colour revolutions" but are different from the above cases in certain basic characteristics. Examples include Lebanon's Cedar Revolution (2005); and Kuwait's Blue Revolution (2005).