Democracy Lab Democracy Lab Democracy Lab Democracy Lab Democracy Lab Democracy Lab

Hoping Against All Hope

Tibetans are setting themselves on fire to protest Chinese rule. So is there anything the leader of the Tibetan government-in-exile can do about it?

BY SUDIP MAZUMDAR | MARCH 5, 2012

In early January, a quarter million believers gathered at the sacred northern Indian site of Bodh Gaya, where the Buddha achieved enlightenment 2,500 years ago, to mark one of the most important events on the Buddhist calendar. Among the crowd were more than 8,000 Tibetans who had defied threats from the Chinese authorities to attend the Kalachakra ceremony, which would be conducted by the Dalai Lama. Spread over 10 days beginning on the first day of the year, the ceremony involved elaborate purification rituals, meditation, and special prayers for peace both within oneself and in the world. Among those attending was Lobsang Sangay, the first secular, democratically elected prime minister of the Tibetan government-in-exile, which is based in the Indian town of Dharamsala. It was his first appearance before such a large gathering since the Dalai Lama passed on his political authority to him in August last year.

Sangay, who is supposed to be a secular leader, is not especially religious. In some ways that is ironic, for these days he is finding that his options for action are limited mostly to prayers for peace. Over the past three years, distraught Tibetans inside China, many of them monks and nuns, have unleashed a desperate protest by setting themselves on fire to express their discontent with increasingly harsh Chinese rule. (To date 25 of them have succeeded in ending their lives in this way.) Sangay, for his part, has never set foot on Tibetan soil; he has seen his homeland only in pictures. So the Kalachakra ceremony gave him a unique opportunity to mingle with his compatriots, many of whom had risked their personal safety to get there, and who were sure to be detained by the suspicious Chinese security forces at several new checkpoints on their long way back home.

On a cold, rainy day, brushing aside warnings by his aides that Chinese spies had infiltrated the pilgrims, Sangay plunged into the crowd. He was mobbed. Hordes rushed forward to greet him, some reaching for his hand while others broke down and cried. Elderly people prayed for him and blessed him, asking him to deliver them from Chinese rule. "It was a deeply emotional experience for me," says Sangay. "I feel fortunate to have their blessings." He will need all the goodwill that he can get, and more, if he is to keep the hope of freedom alive for his people.

For now, that goal appears to be a long way off. Beijing's unrelenting stance toward dissent in Tibet remains firmly in place. The spate of self-immolations and other protests in Tibet and its neighboring provinces has triggered a predictably harsh response, as the government has flooded many parts of the region with armored vehicles and heavily armed troops (many equipped with fire extinguishers to be deployed against would-be human torches). The whole area is under a virtual lockdown in the run-up to March 10, the anniversary of the Tibetans' 1959 uprising against the Chinese authorities. China's increasing economic might has forced crisis-ridden Western nations to fall in line with Beijing. Even the United States, which has traditionally advocated a negotiated settlement in Tibet and often called upon China to respect Tibetans' rights, did its best to humor Xi Jinping, soon to be the next Chinese president, on his recent visit to America. China's crackdown on Tibet was hardly mentioned as U.S. politicians and business leaders rolled out the red carpet for Xi in Washington.

Compare the Chinese leader's stature with that of Sangay. He is a prime minister without a country. He commands no military. He runs his administration on a shoestring budget, most of which comes from donations. No country recognizes his government. His main opponent, the Chinese communist leadership, dismisses him as illegal and unrepresentative. And yet his confidence appears undented. Last year the 43-year-old former Harvard scholar was elected Kalon Tripa (prime minister) by Tibetan exiles scattered in some 30 countries around the world. "This position gives me a megaphone and louder volume," Sangay said recently in Dharamsala. "I use it for Tibet and the Tibetan people as much as I can."

There are hardly any other options at present. As grim tidings of new self-immolations reach his modest office in the Himalayan foothills in Dharamsala, Sangay finds himself with little means for defending his people other than his voice. But even it is failing to stir up governments around the world against the Chinese crackdown.

DIPTENDU DUTTA/AFP/Getty Images

 

Sudip Mazumdar is a New Delhi-based correspondent. He has reported from the Indian subcontinent for nearly thirty years and his stories have appeared in Foreign Policy, Newsweek, Scientific American, and many other publications.

MICHAELGERALDPDEALINO

10:42 PM ET

March 5, 2012

Genuine Freedom for Tibet

Chinese communist imperialists, get your dirtty hands and ass from Tibet! They don't have legitimacy to be there! Independence and freedom for Tibet!

 

MICHAELGERALDPDEALINO

10:47 PM ET

March 5, 2012

Genuine Freedom for Tibet

Chinese communist imperialists, get your dirty hands and ass from Tibet and stop trying to bully other Southeast Asian countries! We will never be bullied! You don't have legitimate right to Tibet as well as the entire South China Sea! Respect for other countries' sovereignty and exclusive economic zones! Independence and freedom for Tibet!

 

MARTY MARTEL

3:47 PM ET

March 6, 2012

Hope is a mirage

When it comes to Hong Kong or Macao style status for Tibet, it is just a mirage.

As it stands now, Tibetan identity is destined to go the way of the American Indians.

Peaceful resolution sought by Dalai Lama and his followers will never materialize against raw power practiced by China.

It is only a matter of time before Han Chinese will be a majority in Tibet, bringing with them the Han culture that will in turn overwhelm Tibetan culture and ultimately replace it just as Christian culture has replaced American Indian culture wholesale.

Nonviolent movement can NOT work against a dictatorship like China’s or even a democracy like America’s if so-called democratic leaders were determined to vanquish the opponents.

 

BETALOVER

5:30 PM ET

March 22, 2012

Tibetans are not Indians in the USA.

"As it stands now, Tibetan identity is destined to go the way of the American Indians."

Tibetans are not Indians in the USA.

Tibetans in China are more like Slavic Whites in the USA, such as Natalie Wood.

To what extent Natalie Wood keeps her Russian roots is speculative but the very act of her changing her name and her marrying a Wagner indicate that she did not lament the loss of her ethnic ID, or their children with Wagner lament theirs.

The USA has struggled far more on race based on external physical appearance, as in physiognomy, than ethnicity.

I don't grieve for the Tibetans; they will do just fine becoming Hans seamlessly.

The racial minorities in the USA, no matter how much freedom or democracy they enjoy, want to have the same chance as any white man to make love to a white woman. Will they have such equal opportunity of bedroom activity with a member of the opposite of sex of the majority? Such will define social satisfaction, a great part of happiness.

The Tibetans will likely have more equal opportunity of bedroom activity with a Han, I tend to think.

Ethnic identity? Who really needs it? Much more thrilling is the joy of committing cultural suicide with a blonde or a Han. Ask OJ Simpson or Tiger Woods or Natalie Wood if they want ethnic ID.

There is this prevailing zoo visitor mentality in the socially clueless white champions for Tibet. The Tibetans are the drollery of spirituality or curiosity. Tibetans: gestation period same as humans. I think what the Tibetans in China need is to be loved and to be the object of passionate cultural genocide.

Cultural genocide! Do whites in the USA have the openness to commit real cultural genocide by allowing minorities into their bedroom with the ensuing passionate activities?

More Americans of Obama’s racial mix are the products of cultural genocide.

 

BETALOVER

12:00 PM ET

March 23, 2012

Freedom and democracy sustains racism

Would China ever have a professional sports team called the "Tibetan Lamas", say the Lhasa Tibetan Lamas basketball team? Or may be the "Mongolian Hordes"? Never. The Chinese government will simply step in to say this is ethnic baiting. It does not need to justify such prohibition with legal terms.

During the Year of the Pigs the Chinese government warned the Han majority to be very careful about not insulting the Muslim minorities about pigs and pork.

Yet, the USA has the "Washington Redskins" as the denigrating mascot; there is also the Atlanta Braves and Cleveland Indians with grotesque caricatures of the natives.

One the ground of freedom of expression, the US legitimatizes such hateful expressions. The natives have no voice in this because they are outside the American society; they suffer from the trap of autonomy called the Indian Nations.

Try the “Cleveland Nig*ers” and you will see protests because blacks are within the American society. They no longer suffer from any autonomy trap called segregation.

Do not allow any true autonomy for any ethnic minorities in China. Be kind and include them in the Chinese society; promote assimilation , the only just social goal.

 

BETALOVER

3:08 PM ET

March 23, 2012

Monica Lewinsky and the Tibetan cause

Has one ever read any article from the perspective of ethnicity or cultural genocide from the Clinton-Lewinsky connection?

If the Tibetan cause is so universal, then there ought to have been such a perspective. Ostensibly, what we have here is an ethnic minority, a Slavic American, being used as a sex toy to perform oral sex for an Anglo-Saxon white man in power.

Even with racial similarity with the Anglo-Saxon whites, the Slavic people should be an ethnic minority. Someone by the name of Clinton must be quite Anglo-Saxon; someone by the name of Lewinsky must be quite Slavic. Don’t mind that Slavic people look white. That that are Slavic must mean they are a minority yearning to preserve their culture; thus, a Lewinsky must still consider herself Slavic.

In reality, who knows how Clinton a Clinton really is; how Lewinsky a Lewinsky really is. Why would even a real Lewinsky want to remain Slavic?

We don’t know how Han or Tibetan a Chen is in China; may be 100% Tibetan by lineage. It can be projected that many Tibetans will have done a Natalie Wood to enter the coveted Han mainstream. May be 50% Tibetan and 50% Han due to love between a man and a woman. Who knows unless one investigates.

The case also is that the Chinese public warmly accepts China’s ethnic minorities as celebrities. These ethnic stars flaunt their ethnicity in the right way; of course, they must be loyal to China. The theme generally is “diverse and united” with ethnic songs and dresses, in front of ardently applauding Han and other audiences. Primitive! Superficial! Un-free! Yes, but how nice it is!

Freedom is not everything. Freedom is not effective against ingrained bigotry. Elitist initiative will be necessary to overcome ethnic bigotry.

Many Western white folks are really very politically obsessed and quite socially clueless or oblivious when considering China’s ethnic issues.

I think China has good ethnic minority policy.

 

BONG GILLIGAN

5:18 AM ET

April 2, 2012

Buddhist calendar

One of the most important events on the Buddhist calendar. I hope that, in the future the Buddhism will develop quickly all over the world. I think that, Buddhism is so good, It make people become better, Buddhism targets make this world become more beautiful, significant. It advices people live well and get along with others, no violence, no wars, no crimes....