Not-So-Super Tuesday

The real winner of the Republican primary is Barack Obama.

BY RUY TEIXEIRA | MARCH 6, 2012

"No one ever gains votes in a national election by going through the presidential primaries," Bill Clinton remarked ruefully in 1992. "They're designed to chew you up and spit you out."

That maxim has never been more apt than during this Republican primary season. As Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum do battle this Super Tuesday, March 6, they have dug themselves ever farther into the mire of a hard-line conservatism that is woefully out of step with America's changing electorate. No matter who wins on Super Tuesday, the Republican Party will have a huge problem expanding beyond its base and forging a winning coalition.

Start with Hispanics -- who accounted for 55 percent of population growth in the last decade -- and the immigration issue. Romney, who is typically viewed as the "moderate" in the race, has been aggressively conservative in this area in an effort to outflank his more ideological opponents. He has promised to veto the DREAM Act, which would provide a path to citizenship for illegal aliens who came to the United States as minors with their parents, opposes in-state college tuition for illegal immigrants, and raised a much-mocked scheme for their "self-deportation." More generally, he has consistently sneered at any sign of softness among his primary opponents on these issues, raising the specter of an increasing flood of illegal immigrants coddled by the law and provided with benefits they don't deserve.

No wonder Hispanics, despite the bad economy and concerns about the level of deportations on President Barack Obama's watch, are supporting the president at levels above those he received in 2008, when 67 percent voted for him, compared with 31 percent for John McCain. Indeed, a just-released Fox News poll -- not usually considered a Democrat-friendly source -- has Obama garnering 70 percent of the Latino vote, compared with just 14 percent for his closest Republican opponent, an incredible 5-1 ratio.

Given Obama's expected high support from African-American voters, this suggests that the president could certainly match his 80 percent overall support from minority voters in 2008. If that comes true, he has huge leeway to lose white votes. Amazingly, he could approach the levels at which congressional Democrats lost the white working class (30 points) and white college graduates (19 points) in the wipeout 2010 midterm election and still win the popular vote.

That's not a high bar, and right now it looks like Obama will clear it with ease. In fact, it looks like the president could approach, and perhaps exceed, his 2008 performance among these voters.

Part of the reason for this is the virulent strand of social conservatism, on issues ranging from same-sex marriage to abortion to contraception, on display in the Republican primaries. The differences among the Republican candidates, with the sole exception of Ron Paul, are minor -- and well to the right of the American public. The latest manifestation is the candidates' uniform backing for the Blunt amendment, which would have allowed any employer to opt out of providing birth control coverage for "moral" reasons. That has been accompanied, of course, by the embarrassing spectacle of conservative commentator Rush Limbaugh denouncing a Georgetown University law student as a "slut" for testifying in favor of birth control coverage.

Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

 

Ruy Teixeira is a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress Action Fund and editor of America's New Swing Region: Changing Politics and Demographics in the Mountain West.

THUSALWAYSTOGENIUS

12:11 AM ET

March 7, 2012

Mardi Gras: Super “Fat” Tuesday

Election Carnival Season has arrived.

On Mardi Gras (French for “Fat Tuesday”), Christians would eat rich fatty foods before the beginning of Lent season, which begins on Ash Wednesday. Lent season is a reminder of one’s religion obligation, mainly penitence. Hence, the reason why the traditional Christians refer to Mardis Gras as “Shrove Tuesday”. This period of abstinence lasts 47 days, until Easter Sunday, which represents the Christ’s resurrection.

The agnostics tend to take part of popular practices associated with celebrations, which includes dancing, wearing masks and costumes and participating in parades.

Speaking of celebrations, I still remember 2009 as it was yesterday, when President Barack Obama assumed office. The spirit of the American people resurrected with hope and optimism in these dark times as if they were witnessing the second coming of Christ: “Yes, We Can”. Four years passed by and it is a whole new day filled with the same old …

Things got better? Not sure. Things got worse? Not sure either. All we know is that most of us are left feeling strangely torn between sustaining hope in the Obama administration and just giving up on the whole political system. The rest of us might just be in plain old denial; still wearing our now faded and washed out “Obama for President” t-shirt that now reads “bama side”. Yes, as in “by my side”. That’s right, every step of the way, that is where we were: by his side.

This dilemma is familiar to believers of any religion as we tend to be torn between our holy scriptures and the actual existence of any divine being. As we wait for the Second Advent of Jesus of Nazareth, which could coincide with the presidential election in the United States, provided that Obama wins, we wear our rosaries on our necks and keep our bible close by.

We will patiently wait 245 days for Tuesday November 6, 2012, to come around. Obama of Honolulu could rise again. But rise from where? Rise towards where? … Not sure either.

As the idealists debate with the pragmatists, let’s pause for a moment and pay attention to what currently matters. Who will win this primary election on this Super Tuesday?

This term has been used for at almost four decades, referring to Tuesday in February or March of a presidential election year, when the greatest number of states hold primary elections to select delegates to national conventions at which each party’s presidential candidates are officially nominated. These candidates seeking the presidency must do well on this day to secure their party’s nomination.

This year, these republicans; Ron Paul, Rick Santorum, Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich, campaign to get as close as they can to the Promise Land.

As election season begins, let’s allow them to put their masks on, and off, before initiating their penitence, while awaiting their canonization.

While we are left under the impression that we are taking actual sides, voting for one party over another, believing in certain promises and shutting down other ideologies, we fail to remember the essence of belief. There is only one fundamental core, which is concentrated in Washington, and it is sedentary: Republican or Democrat; aristocrat or working class, Black or White, Catholic or Protestant … Evil or Good.

The Devil is after all considered to be an angel who was condemned to the Lake of Fire after rebelling against God.

How art thou fallen from heaven,
O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down
to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!

- Isaiah 14:12 (Holy Bible, King James Version)

“Yes We Can! ”

- Barack Hussein Obama II

READ MORE AT : THUSALWAYSTOGENIUS

 

VICTORPANAK

1:40 PM ET

March 7, 2012

wow,

you're a serious quack

 

JFAIR

3:02 PM ET

March 7, 2012

You have effectively

You have effectively demonstrated why the Republicans are becoming more and more insignificant. In their move to the right they have abandoned all moderates.

 

RENEMF

4:20 AM ET

March 10, 2012

oh really

cute piece containing some astute observations like "most of us are left feeling strangely torn between sustaining hope in the Obama administration and just giving up on the whole political system". But no, "we" don't "wait for the Second Advent" or "wear our rosaries on our necks". Confounding the real struggle for sanity in u.s. and world politics with the "prophecies" of the insane and the insincere is futile.

 

SZORE

7:15 AM ET

March 7, 2012

Don't Bet on It, Liberal puppet Boy...

(THESE NUMBERS MUST BE UPDATED, THEY HAVE GOTTEN WORSE SINCE I WROTE THIS.)

The problem with Obama isn't the near $6 trillion in borrowing in just three years, the radical growth in the size of the federal government and its regulatory zeal, ObamaCare, the Boeing plant closure threat, the green jobs sweet-heart deals and Van Jones-like “Millions of Green Jobs” nonsense, the vast expansion in food stamps and unemployment pay-outs, the reversal of the Chrysler creditors, politically driven interference in the car industry, the failed efforts to get card check and cap and trade, the moratoria on new drilling in the Gulf, the general antipathy to new fossil fuel exploitation coupled with new finds of vast new reserves, the new financial regulations, an aggressive EPA oblivious to the effects of its advocacy on jobs, the threatened close-down of energy plants, the support for idling thousands of acres of irrigated farmland due to environmental regulations, the constant talk of higher taxes, the needlessly provocative rhetoric of “fat cat”, “millionaires and billionaires,” “corporate jet owners,” etc. juxtaposed, in hypocritical fashion, to Martha’s Vineyard, Costa del Sol, and Vail First Family getaways, the 17 day Hawaiin vacation, not to mention gun running, oil spill paralysis, black panther scandals, suing Arizona, on and on and on.

It was just announced that last month’s unemployment is still above 9% — despite the nearly five trillion dollars in Keynesian pump-priming, the near zero interest rates, the expanded unemployment and food stamp support, and the government takeovers and subsidies of businesses. There is a scary sort of deer-in-the-headlights look about Obama and Biden that is quite disturbing, as if they are thinking, “This was not supposed to happened to us. Geithner, Goolsbee, Orszag, Romer, Summers assured us that all this borrowing would turn things around — but they are all gone or leaving, so now we are alone? What to do? Hmmm. More them/us class warfare rhetoric? Embrace more of the California/Illinois/New York blue-state model? More European Union emulation? A national high-speed rail jobs program? Bring back Van Jones and “millions of green jobs”? Borrow another $5 trillion? Maybe negative interest rates? Seventy-five million on food stamps? Four years of unemployment insurance? A new Department of Jobs? Call in Jimmy Carter for advice about 1979? $100 billion more in green subsidies to progressive caring companies? Take over Ford? Another speech from Buffett? Unleash the Congressional Black Caucus?”

We have all heard ad nauseam that an eight-month-old Republican-controlled Congress has stopped Obama’s legislative agenda for three years.

No worries, all is well. Just keep whistling past the grave yard.

Ignore the polls, they are all wrong.
Ignore the weekly unemployment numbers and the jobs numbers, they lie too.
Ignore the repeated revisions, for the worse, to the weeks previous numbers. They are even bigger lies.
Ignore the inflation numbers. Prices have not gone up.
Ignore the despair you see around you. Those are jut upside down smiles.
Ignore the constant vacations, on our dime, Barry indulges in.
Ignore how he plays the average American, read the working stiff, as the fool.
Ignore the trillions he has urinated away with no benefit at all to anyone but his pals.
Ignore the blatant arrogance.

And...

Ignore the last two special elections.

They are not warning alarms. His ship is not sinking.
Nov 6th 2012 will be a landslide, You can bet the farm on that.
And we will soon after be rid of this nightmare of incompetence and destruction.
All will be well soon as he's long gone.

Obama’s problem is it’s not 2007 anymore. Obama is a known quantity now. Obama was elected based on a manufactured persona, a lie, put forward by the DNC and the fawning media. And who is Barack Hussein Obama?

Obama is the 1st president in the history of the USA who is not a cultural American, and it shows. No other president, except Jimmy Carter, has ever run down his country to the world as Obama has. Obama has denigrated the people of America shamelessly, and he has no idea of who we are because he is not one of us.

Obama was raised far outside of mainstream American culture. His upbringing was by socialists who indoctrinated him from day one to be a hardcore marxist ideologue. Obama was taught to loath the middle class and to use radical rules to attack it. Since before he was elected Obama has been tearing down the USA and the middle class which he fooled into voting for him.

Obama was billed to be all things to all people. A pseudo-mythical messiah-like figure that rose mysteriously with no background yet was a towering intellect who could solve all our problems. Obama is a man of slogans, and was "going to hit the ground running", and "ready to lead on day one". He was going to be the post racial president who would unite the USA and lead us into a new era of enlightenment and renewed respect in the world of nations. Only now we know this all to be a farce.

To those of us who took the time to investigate Obama while the fawning media failed to vette him it comes as no surprise that Obama is a failure. Anyone who tried to point out his radicalism, his criminal associates, terrorist friends, his racist church where he sat for 20 years listening to hatred of America and Americans was branded as a racist. It turns out that everything Sean Hannity reported about Obama's past was true.

And now we know that Obama is a shallow self-serving man of little experience who constantly resorts to demagoguery of those who oppose his radical agenda. He makes denigrating generalizations of broad swathes of the population and makes it clear he is only the president of those who voted for him and support him. We are much worse off as a nation than we were before Obama and have more than a year of this arrogant fool to endure. The best thing we can do is to vote out every democrat and take away any political power this "president" has. Let's all watch this impostor vacation and golf and travel the world in Air Force One at our expense while we continue without an inspirational leader and scratch our heads in wonder at the absurd Political Correctness that got us such a ludicrous president.

 

VICTORPANAK

1:34 PM ET

March 7, 2012

LOLOL,

Obama, a hardcore marxist ideologue? he hates the middle class? wtf are you smoking? Clearly you've never read or heard anything about Marx or his theories, and you have a very tenuous grasp of what socialism is, because socialism is all about empowering the lower and middle classes through government ownership and control. Soooo, is obama socialist or does he hate the middle class, cuz it aint both. Although the truth is, neither of those are true.
People like you are so delusional, it actually takes a considerable mental effort to convince myself that you live on this planet, let alone a respectable country like the united states. Why don't you shut yourself up in a monastery somewhere and handwrite your blithering nonsense in a tome that you can then go ahead and burn.

 

JFAIR

3:05 PM ET

March 7, 2012

I think you have summed up

I think you have summed up the Republican position pretty well. Good Job.

 

ALFREDYWONG

3:16 AM ET

March 8, 2012

A partial rebuttal; partial by necessity

I don't have the patience or frankly, the peace of mind to respond to every one of your claims; to do that is kind of like having to watch and write rebuttals to six hours of Fox News stories.

But in regards to your numbers on unemployment.

"It was just announced that last month’s unemployment is still above 9%"

It's actually at about 8.2% now. And the economy is adding jobs. http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/07/us-usa-economy-idUSTRE7BM0AB20120307

"The private sector added 216,000 jobs last month."

But maybe you actually do follow your own analysis of what Obama is doing and refuse to believe the media's numbers or any economic data. Or, alternatively, you just haven't read the news for two months. The worst-case scenario is, of course, that you rely on Rush Limbaugh and Fox News to get numbers on the economy.

 

SIEGGY

9:26 AM ET

March 7, 2012

If I may quote

Ronald Reagan, who as a small child once said "Waaaaahhhhhhh!!!!".

I see you have all your regulation Fox issue talking points all lined up neatly in a row . . . have fun convincing anyone that your ravings are true, though. Oh, and you forgot to mention his birth certificate and how Sheriff Joe thinks it's a fake . . .

 

REALREALIST

9:54 AM ET

March 7, 2012

but there just might be enough angry people period....

what a disgusting article...

angry white people? how about angry black people? are there enough of those for you to re elect obama? does that sound proper to you rudy? Is that what you like to write about? racial politics that the left doesnt engage in?? lol....uh huh...suuuuuuuuuuuure rudy.

 

JKJK

10:35 AM ET

March 7, 2012

Nice Try Ruy

Ruy: I understand this is a blog, and as such, you toss your red meat to your congnitively consistent audience.

The spin, however, just doesn't wash. For all of your focus on statistics, you neatly leave out the all-important basis of electoral votes, not popular votes, in your review.

Nice try also, in trying to reorient the electoral discussion away from the economy and growth and to contrived social issues and straw-man arguments about issues that aren't issues on the R side (like contraception). An increasingly large percentage of the population see through that. It telegraphs where you are weak.

Keep up your anti-white vitriol, however. Sure, Republicans and many Independents may not love whomever will win the R nominiation, but they won't stand for the constant barrage of racist, intolerant, blaming-oriented diatribes you and fellow libs keep pushing on the public for consumption.

 

SHOPPEGIRL

11:28 AM ET

March 7, 2012

Great post

Yes, JKJK. I believe we conservatives will stand behind whoever wins the GOP contest. We have to, or else we all lose, and America loses.

One Term... BHO, ummm ummm ummmmm

 

THE_SLASHER14

4:10 PM ET

March 7, 2012

Electoral vs. Popular

Another blogger argues that Teixeira doesn't address the electoral votes, just the popular. It's an interesting concession that the writer -- who includes a blast at Obama so we know which side he's on -- expects the GOP may have to repeat 2000 and win in spite of losing the popular vote. However:

The 2010 census redistricting has made the road harder for Obama but not by much. He is still a heavy favorite to win the same states John Kerry won in 2004. The Rust Belt states, which Republicans hope to take away because of white working class disillusionment (like Romney is really going to attract white workers) do not hold out much hope for them. In Real Clear Politics latest polls, Obama leads Romney by double digits in WI, MI, and OH. There hasn't been a recent PA poll but the last one had him winning there, too. The only Kerry state that seems in serious doubt is NH (the last poll I saw had him up there by 10 points, but was something of an outlier). Let's say he loses it. That's 244 electoral votes.

The latest VA and OH polls have him up by double digits -- that's 275. And the NM polls have been at the same 15 points he won by in 2008, so that's 280. CO voted in a Democratic governor and senator in 2010 while the Republicans were winning everywhere. Why? Latino voters, my friend. The best campaigners for Obama in 2012 will be Jan Brewer and Joe Arpaio, and if you think Marco Rubio will change that you're guilty of thinking that all Latinos are the same. Cuban-Americans NEVER had to face the prospect of deportation; Mexican-Americans have. Rubio may hold FL for the GOP but nothing west of the Mississippi. NV will probably go blue as well, for the same reason. That's 295.

I haven't even mentioned MO, IN, FL, IA and NC -- all of which were very close last time. But if Obama wins the popular vote, there is almost no way he will lose the electoral college.

 

SHOPPEGIRL

11:26 AM ET

March 7, 2012

Loser Barack

No, I don't think Tuesday Super Tuesday primary was a win for Obama. Any of the GOP candidates are better suited to be president than BHO. He is clueless.

He is bringing our country so far into the Debt Hole we will never get out.

Thats not a leader.... we need a new president.

 

DRLAKE777

12:44 PM ET

March 7, 2012

Nice to see Obama Derangement

Nice to see Obama Derangement Syndrome is on full display in the comments! These guys are so freaked out by a black president that they are completely unable to perceive the reality of his domestic political moderation or largely effective foreign policy. Oh well, maybe four more years of Obama will persuade some of them to get their heads out of their arses.

 

VICTORPANAK

1:26 PM ET

March 7, 2012

yea,

seriously though. These people straight-up scare me. it's like they've been completely brainwashed. Where do these nuts come from? I know I haven't met any quack americans like these guys

 

HAT4RACK

3:43 PM ET

March 7, 2012

Not about race!

"freaked out by a black president"???? Who cares what color the president is?! Stop trying to make race a factor. There will always be morons that don't like a candidate because of race, but by and far - the job done and potential ability is what matters most. A potential second term should be based on what the president done in the first term. Obama has certainly had some accomplishments, but America can't afford a second round to 'give him a little more time'. I'm not impressed with the GOP options at this point, but second term of Pres. O concerns me even more...

 

RENEMF

4:40 AM ET

March 10, 2012

you're right HAT4RACK

The fact that he's black may make it even scarier for some, but what really freaks them out is that he's articulate and intelligent at a level way beyond their grasp. They don't understand what he's saying or doing, which makes them suspicious, and it highlights their only dimly perceived mental limitations, a danger not posed by the incoherent utterings of a Romney or Santorum.

 

MALDONADOCHARITY

2:00 PM ET

March 7, 2012

my classmate's step-aunt

my classmate's step-aunt makes $73 every hour on the computer. She has been unemployed for six months but last month her pay check was $12870 just working on the computer for a few hours. Here's the site to read more ....... http://LazyCash9.com

 

MAIRSTUDENT

4:55 PM ET

March 7, 2012

I wonder...

I wonder what would happen in a different situation had you said "there just aren't enough angry black people..."

Perhaps you are extremely ignorant of any tasteful manner of journalism.

 

GRANT

7:39 PM ET

March 7, 2012

The question is what the

The question is what the level of enthusiasm is among Democrats and among Hispanic American* and African American voters.

Democrats are known for having high levels of support for candidates but having trouble converting that into election day turnout. Minority voters usually don't much working class white voters in turnout. Of course Romney isn't very popular among those working class white voters but they still could quite possibly come anyway just to make sure that a Republican is in office.

* I still think that's an odd phrase and we need a better one.

 

REALREALIST

12:09 AM ET

March 8, 2012

a must read for all real liberals

http://blogs.jpost.com/content/dangerous-alliance-faux-liberals-and-islamists

 

KIMCHI

5:48 PM ET

March 8, 2012

Hope

When I saw the headline to this article, I thought, thank god. I hope you're right.

 

GAYNELL VECCHIONE

5:28 AM ET

April 5, 2012

Obama-DREAM Act

The real winner of the Republican primary is Barack Obama. I hope that, Obama will have good policies to develop American both economy and military. DREAM Act is an American legislative proposal first introduced in the Senate on August 1, 2001[1] by Dick Durbin and Orrin Hatch. The act was most recently reintroduced to the senate on May 11, 2011. This bill would provide conditional permanent residency to certain illegal aliens of good moral character who graduate from U.S. high schools, arrived in the United States as minors, and lived in the country continuously for at least five years prior to the bill's enactment. If they were to complete two years in the military or two years at a four-year institution of higher learning, they would obtain temporary residency for a six-year period. Within the six-year period, they may qualify for permanent residency if they have "acquired a degree from an institution of higher education in the United States or has completed at least 2 years, in good standing, in a program for a bachelor's degree or higher degree in the United States" or have "served in the armed services for at least 2 years and, if discharged, has received an honorable discharge". Military enlistment contracts require an eight-year commitment, with active duty commitments typically between four and six years, but as low as two years.