Japan's Nuclear Cabal

Japan's public is squarely against going back to nuclear power. So why is the government pushing so hard to get the country's nuclear plants back online?

BY NOBUO FUKUDA | MARCH 9, 2012

Regulators and members of the Diet, Japan's parliament, are still investigating the true cause of one of the severest nuclear accidents in human history. Some experts -- including Mitsuhiko Tanaka, a former nuclear technician -- suspect the reactors had been destroyed by strong tremors from the 9.0 quake and were out of control even before the tsunami swept away the backup diesel power generators needed to cool the plant's fissile material. A large question mark remains over the wisdom of continuing to run dozens of nuclear plants across the quake-prone archipelago.

So why the rush to re-embrace a nuclear future? The answers are money and the lack of any better option. Japan's government and industries have heavily invested in nuclear power since the mid-1960s, and as the 1970s oil crisis hit an economy dependent on energy imports, construction of nuclear power plants was accelerated in rural and coastal areas like Fukushima and Fukui.

Before the Fukushima accident, Japan's power companies operated 54 nuclear reactors, which provided about 30 percent of the country's electricity needs. Renewable energy accounts for only 1 percent, reflecting the government's and the utilities' reluctance -- in light of such a "successful" nuclear industry -- to develop solar, biomass, micro-hydro, wind, and geothermal power. This preference for nuclear power led to a 2010 government plan to add 14 reactors to meet the country's projected energy needs in 2030, which would have brought the proportion of nuclear power up to 50 percent of Japan's energy mix.

During the summer of 2011, when the Fukushima plant was still smoldering, the power companies scaled back operations, reducing the number of functioning nuclear reactors to fewer than 18. To replace idle reactors, they brought back online half-retired coal and natural gas plants. A feared major power shortage did not materialize, partly because the government required factories and offices to cut 15 percent of energy use and urged people to save as much as possible.

In the following months, another dozen reactors were stopped, many for regular checkup and maintenance mandated every 13 months. Today, only two of Japan's 54 reactors are still functioning, and it is expected that by late April, no reactor will be operational as concerned local communities block restarts. The government warns that the country will soon face a dire power shortage this summer, a view echoed by utility companies.

Energy economics is not the only rationale for the push to restart the nuclear plants. There are powerful political forces at work, determined to keep the nuclear fire burning in Japan. They form a formidable complex often referred to as the "nuclear power village," representing utilities, bureaucrats, politicians, and academics.

Japan's 10 regional power companies have enjoyed a cozy and lucrative relationship with the powerful Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) and have been granted monopolies over generation and distribution of electricity in their designated turfs. Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO), operator of the crippled Fukushima nuclear plants, is the largest among them. In return, these power companies, their spinoffs, and the industry's organizations have hired hundreds of government officials upon their retirement from METI and other ministries. Currently, TEPCO employs the former chief of the Natural Resources and Energy Agency (a METI arm in charge of selecting locations for nuclear plants) and a former METI director as top advisors.

The industry has also made generous donations to politicians and nuclear scientists who have functioned as their cheerleaders. In 2009, roughly 60 TEPCO executives, from the chairman to nuclear power plant chiefs, collectively donated 6.5 million yen (approximately $80,000) in total to the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) that governed the country for nearly 55 consecutive years and promoted nuclear power. It was a drop in the bucket for one of the world's largest utility giants. Politicians, however, say what they really appreciate is not the executives' donations, but the company's bountiful purchase of their fundraising party tickets. On Jan. 1, the major national daily newspaper Asahi Shimbun reported that the power industry provided 85 million yen (approximately $1 million) in research assistance over the past five years to two dozen nuclear scientists who served as members of the Nuclear Safety Commission, a supervising panel for government regulators.

YOSHIKAZU TSUNO/AFP/Getty Images

 

Nobuo Fukuda is a public policy scholar at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. He is a former Jakarta bureau chief and London correspondent for the Asahi Shimbun newspaper.

SPOOD

5:10 PM ET

March 9, 2012

This is not the first nuclear power plant accident in Japan

Its just the worst one.

Some things to bear in mind with Japan:

-They have few to any energy resources of their own outside of limited coal deposits. Nuclear is still the most expedient choice for electricity

-There is a long standing very weak regulatory environment. Its common for companies to run roughshod over communities on environmental issues

-The litigatatory environment is harsh as well. Its very difficult to maintain a civil lawsuit in the country. It gives companies less reason to be careful.

-There isn't much of a protest culture in Japan. [Compared with South Korea which used to make public protest into a fine art]

Japan is going to stick with nuclear, despite public qualms because they don't take the concerns seriously and have little impetus to do so. There is little accountability to the public on such matters.

 

AMERICAN_FOREIGNER

7:48 PM ET

March 9, 2012

"and an underdeveloped renewable-energy sector"

it's a shame that the renewable energy sector is so underdeveloped, especially when you consider where turbines for wind power generators used on wind farms in the US are built. that's right, they're built in japan by japanese companies, and yet there are no wind farms in japan. blame the politicians, the bureaucrats, and the big corporations for this mess.

 

SPOOD

9:16 PM ET

March 9, 2012

Well there are some reasons for it

Wind farms require a good deal of space, which is a tough thing to find in Japan. We are talking about a country which is fairly mountainous and a very high population density. (half the population of the US in an area the size of California) Agriculture is squeezed into whatever spots they can use for it

Outside of Hokkaido and Northern Honshu, there are few areas where this doesn't become a nuisance.

 

MKAMIYACHO

11:32 AM ET

March 12, 2012

and yet there are no wind farms in japan--Really?

your overall point about renewable energy in Japan being underdeveloped is accurate but to say there are no wind farms is completely wrong. What about the Nunobiki Plateau Wind Farm in Fukushima, or the Aoyama Plateau Wind Farm, or the Seto Windhill?

 

AMERICAN_FOREIGNER

7:59 PM ET

March 9, 2012

with a little research

i dug up the following stats. mitsubishi corp, toshiba corp, and fuji electric provide nearly 70% of all steam turbines and power gear at geothermal plants worldwide. tepco really needs to be brought down.

 

BNDSLF890A

8:14 PM ET

March 9, 2012

very good web: ===

very good web: === http://www.plzzshop.com

The website wholesale for many kinds of fashion shoes, like the nike, jordan, prada, also including the jeans, shirts, bags, hat and the decorations.

All the products are free shipping, and the the price is competitive, and also can accept the paypal payment., After the payment, can ship within short time.

We will give you a discount

WE ACCEPT PYAPAL PAYMENT

YOU MUST NOT MISS IT!!!

=== http://www.plzzshop.com

thank you!!!

Believe you will love it.

We have good reputation, fashion products,

come here quickly== http://www.plzzshop.com

Opportunity knocks but once

 

FILMINIIZLE

7:05 PM ET

March 11, 2012

If past protests were

If past protests were organized around the vague demand of fair elections -- or new parliamentary elections -- and to chant the charged but useless slogan "Russia without Putin," Saturday's rally was centered on thanking election monitors. Tens of thousands of previously politically inactive people, riding the wave of the winter's giddiness, had signed up to monitor elections. More than 80,000 people in Moscow, and more than 130,000 nationwide volunteered for the tedious work of breathing down the necks of members of local election committees -- the cogs in the great machine that would keep falsifying the vote, even when Putin's press secretary declared that it was Putin, first and foremost, who was interested in a clean election. (When I traveled to Irkutsk in the weeks before the election, local party leaders told me the puzzling command from Moscow was victory for Putin in the first round -- that is, over 51 percent -- but no violations.)
www.filmifullhdizle.com da istedi?iniz filmlerinizi izleyebilirsiniz. Ücretsiz türkçe filmler filmini izle

 

LITTLEMANTATE

8:54 PM ET

March 11, 2012

Japan should abandon nuclear power so it can be beholden

to the Oil Cabal?

The Japanese government and the company in question are guilty for lying and coverups, but this recent anti-nuclear pusch has oil futures, U.S. M.I.C., and OPEC written all over it.

What Japan needs is a serious discussion about the pros and cons of nuclear power. Unfortunately, at present, renewable energy is as big a con as ethanol. This poster wishes it wasn't so. Nothing would make the world a better place than if we could use wind power to keep our civilizations going. The aforementioned parasites wouldn't like it, but it would end billions wasted on the sandpit-M.I.C. playground.

Japan would be well-positioned to benefit from such energy, they actually have a feasible transp. grid, unlike the US, which will be in a lot more immediate cultural and economic pain if a switch from cars to mass transit would be necessary.

 

KARRIE BURGAMY

3:02 AM ET

April 7, 2012

Japanese must be forced to pay reparations for nuclear disaster

I think that the Japanese must be forced to pay reparations for this disaster, and the way they run reactors they must be held accountable...one thing I will say about the US, when we had that earthquake on the east coast last year, our reactors up and down the eastern seaboard went into emergency shut down and cooled themselves the way they are supposed to....