Iran's War in Gaza

This time, it's not Hamas firing rockets into Israel -- it's Iranian proxies seeking to create havoc.

BY JONATHAN SCHANZER | MARCH 13, 2012

Israeli jets pounded the Gaza Strip on March 12 in the latest volley of fire since violence broke out late last week. But they were not fighting Hamas, Israel's traditional bête noire in Gaza. Though radical factions have now fired more than 200 rockets into Israel, the self-described Islamic Resistance Movement has yet to claim responsibility for a single attack. It may be the first time the organization has refused to lead the charge to battle against Israel.

Hamas has a different fight on its hands. Iran, through the use of its proxies, is fomenting instability in Gaza that it is ill-equipped to handle. Indeed, Tehran is punishing Gaza's de facto rulers for leaving their long-standing alliance.

Rocket fire out of Gaza is rather common, of course. Before the current spasm of violence, the Israelis had reported more than 50 attacks this year. This latest round began on March 9 after an Israeli airstrike killed Zuhair al-Qaissi, the head of the Popular Resistance Committees (PRC), a group with deep ties to the Iran-backed Hezbollah. Israeli sources commonly report that the two groups share a financial and logistical relationship. Tellingly, the PRC's logo -- featuring an arm brandishing an automatic weapon -- borrows liberally from the Hezbollah flag (which in turns borrows from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps). Qaissi, according to the IDF, was on his way into Israel to carry out a terrorist attack.

Hezbollah condemned the attack from Lebanon, while Iran-backed factions in Gaza fired rockets in retribution. The PRC launched at least 85, by their own (perhaps inflated) count. Palestinian Islamic Jihad -- whose primary patron is also Iran, according to the U.S. intelligence committee -- reportedly launched more than 185. Groups without ties to Iran accounted for a measly eight rockets fired on Israel, according to Israeli government sources.

One Israeli outlet reported that Hamas has allowed other jihadi groups to fire rockets with a wink and a nod. This is difficult to confirm. Meanwhile, Maan News Agency, an independent Palestinian news source, reported that Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh engaged in intense talks brokered by Egypt to bring a halt to the violence. Those negotiations resulted in a cease-fire that went into effect Monday night, although several rockets have already reportedly been fired since.

In fact, the last thing Hamas needs is a war. The militant faction faces its greatest challenge since its creation in 1987: While it has the hardware necessary to fight Israel, it lacks the foreign backing to mount a sustained campaign.

Years of financial sanctions have hammered Tehran for pursuing its illicit nuclear program, denying Iran the cash that it has long provided to Hamas. And after a year of violence in Syria, Hamas's external leaders had no choice but to leave its longtime safe haven, while Haniyeh denounced the regime of President Bashar al-Assad. After all, it's hard to present yourself as a group fighting for justice while your patron slaughters thousands of civilians in the streets.

Numerous reports now indicate that Hamas is drifting from the Iran-Syria axis. While Hamas has not ruptured its relations with Tehran in the same manner that it abandoned Damascus, Iranian leaders are clearly irked that the Palestinian faction has refused to stand by Assad, a key strategic figure for Tehran in the region.

Uriel Sinai/Getty Images

 

Jonathan Schanzer is vice president for research at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and author of Hamas vs Fatah: The Struggle for Palestine.

GRANT

1:48 AM ET

March 14, 2012

Even before now Hamas has

Even before now Hamas has reacted to rocket attacks on Israel not by joining in but by going after the groups responsible. Remember that Hamas is trying to establish its legitimacy as the government and so it has to at least occasionally engage in policing the territory it controls.

 

JOHNBOY4546

3:10 AM ET

March 14, 2012

"it's Iranian proxies seeking to create havoc."

I'm curious how you believe that those Iranian proxies managed to make the IDF fire a missile at two Palestinians, killing them both and therefore sparking this latest escalation.

Did they use some weird-o Martian Mind Control Wand to make that IDF fighter jock press the "Fire" button without him fully understanding what he was doing?

Or was it an Islamic Jihad Apache helicopter gunship decked out in a bogus Star of David that really fired that first shot in a stunningly effective False Flag Operation?

Because that's the problem with your thesis i.e. n.o.b.o.d.y. was firing a.n.y.t.h.i.n.g. at a.n.y.b.o.d.y. until after the IDF decided to go BANG!! on some Palestinians.

Maybe the secret to all this is for the IDF not to go BANG!! on anyone.

Radical, I know......

 

F1FAN

8:15 AM ET

March 14, 2012

I was going to say the same thing

Israel kills Palestinians, Palestinians retaliate, Israel retaliates massively = Iran's fault. The 'logic' in this article is mind boggling. I've started to call people like this 'Israeli Truthers' because much like many '9/11 Truthers' they seem to make 'facts' up as it's convenient.

 

JACOB BLUES

9:49 AM ET

March 14, 2012

Of course that argument holds just as long as you limit your

equation by leaving out the step where the PRC leader was involved in another terrorist attack.

Sorry to burst the bubble, but Israel is still allowed the right to defend its citizens in the face of such violence.

Since HAMAS did not consider the leader of the PRC to be a criminal, then its up to Israel to take whathever measures necessary to prevent violence against its own.

 

FREETHINKER12

9:57 AM ET

March 14, 2012

?

any proof this guy was about to commit a terror attack in isreal??? How would isreal know what one man is doing in gaza? They are blind and deaf on the ground there. Do drones read minds?

 

MOHAMEDABED

10:06 AM ET

March 14, 2012

Israel is hardly blind and deaf in Gaza

it maintains intelligence networks there from sigint to humint.

Moreover, the attack against the two PRC terrorists came AFTER the PRC fired two rockets into Israel from Gaza. The man killed, Zuhair al-Qissi, was also responsible for the attack in Southern Israel that killed 8 Israelis a few months ago, which emanated from Sinai. It's too bad idiots like Johnboy can't read the NY Times or other news sources.

 

SPOOD

11:06 AM ET

March 14, 2012

As usual...

The cheerleaders of Palestinian violence never met a fact that it couldn't ignore in order to make their point.

Though I doubt Jonnyboy ever met a fact, period.

So now the Palestinians have a civil war within their civil war!
First it was Hamas v. Fatah, which is currently in cease fire mode since both parties carved out feudal states for themselves and have a buffer zone called Israel.

Now its Hamas v. splinter factions also in the employ of Iran.

 

JOHNBOY4546

4:12 PM ET

March 14, 2012

An accusation is not evidence, Jacob

JB: "equation by leaving out the step where the PRC leader was involved in another terrorist attack. "

Which terrorist attack was that, Jacob?
The attack on Eilat that was carried out by Egyptians?
Or the attack from Gaza that hasn't, you know, happened?

"Sorry to burst the bubble, but Israel is still allowed the right to defend its citizens in the face of such violence. "

What "violence" are you referring to, Jacob?
The violence that was perpetrated by Egyptians?
Or the violence from Gaza that hasn't actually, you know, happened?

Because that's the problem with your argument: "They woz' comin' right at me!!!" might work in South Park, but in the real world you are supposed to supply some e.v.i.d.e.n.c.e. to back up such an accusation, and the IDF never, ever, ever backs up that claim.

 

JOHNBOY4546

4:16 PM ET

March 14, 2012

"The man killed, Zuhair al-Qissi, was also responsible".....

...."The man killed, Zuhair al-Qissi, was also responsible for the attack in Southern Israel that killed 8 Israelis a few months ago, which emanated from Sinai."

Gosh!!!

Except.... not only did that attack emanate from Sinia, it was also carried out **by** Egyptians.

So are you suggesting that Zuhair al-Qissi had his own private Egyptian Army?

Or are you, instead, being played for a sucker by the IDF spokesmodel?

 

JOHNBOY4546

4:17 PM ET

March 14, 2012

As usual, SPOOD posts a content-free rant

Let's see....

Ad-hom? Check.
Straw Man? Check.

Anything to do with violence between Israel and the Palestinians in Gaza?
Naaaaaah, not a thing....

 

SPOOD

7:49 AM ET

March 15, 2012

Johnny preferrs rants to actual arguments

Johnny it wasn't an ad hominem it was an insult. There is a difference. No strawman either.

You are telling me the civil war between the Palestinians and now between Iran backed Palestinians is not part of the problem between Israel and Gaza? Who the hell are you kidding?

Your whole argument is some wild unsubstantiated conspiracy theory claim. Yet you demand proof of assertions to the contrary. "Nobody was firing anything until the IDF decided?" Were you there? What do you have to go on for that? Anything people might consider credible besides your word?

You are full of crap as usual.

 

REALREALIST

3:39 PM ET

March 14, 2012

so obama uses drones to kill afghanis thousands of miles away

and that's legal? thas ok? they're not an imminent threat to the american homeland...

but israel acts against leaders who are planning terrorist attacks that are imminent threats to its sovereign territory, and that's not allowed. So tell me, what should israel do? Should they just allow this commander who is planning attacks to just go about his merry business?

and trust me, israel knows exactly who is doing what inside the strip...they get most of their info from informants, and other means...for you idiots on here this is a game, but for israelis, this is anything but.

If obama can use drones on afghanis thousands of miles away, so can israel use drones from a few kilometers away.

if hamas of islamic jihad or any other terrorist group was not planning these heinous acts, there would be no need for israel to wax them. Because hamas and its wink wink other factions do use terror, israel has every right to hit them hard.

you ought to be THANKFUL that israel is as MERCIFUL as they are.

 

JOHNBOY4546

4:20 PM ET

March 14, 2012

"and that's legal?"

No, I don't happen to think that those drone attacks are legal.

I happen to think that those drone attacks violate International Humanitarian Law.

Wadda you think, RR?

 

MICHAELGERALDPDEALINO

10:20 PM ET

March 14, 2012

Bluff

Iran is just bluffing to make itself appear that it is ever important to the world.