A Shot Across the Bo

The Chinese Communist Party's takedown of party boss Bo Xilai shows just exactly how much talk about "democracy" it's willing to listen to.

BY A. MCLAREN | MARCH 15, 2012

BEIJING – China is a democracy. Just ask the Communist Party secretary of Chongqing, Bo Xilai, who was abruptly removed from office on Thursday, March 15. "Multiparty cooperation is an important symbol of democracy," he said in February in the lead-up to the National People's Congress (NPC) annual meeting, the pageant where delegates pass laws and revel in Communist Party rule. Last week, during his first public statements about a brewing corruption scandal involving his former police chief, he told reporters, "We need to take the road of democratic rule."

Saying the word "democracy" in China isn't necessarily a crime, and many high-ranking officials pay lip service to the term. But perhaps Bo said it a bit too loudly. Nowhere is the gulf between propaganda and reality so wide as in the Communist Party's view of its own democracy. Despite curbs on freedom of speech and expression, persistent crackdowns, and the lack of universal suffrage, the Communist Party portrays the country it rules as a multiparty democracy, brandishing its eight "democratic" parties as proof. Bo's comments held no subversive irony for the censors; in fact, the second comment headlined Bo's political obituary published March 14 in the state-controlled media. Bo was a good Communist, but also a bit too much of a populist for China's tightly controlled system. He made the mistake of trying to rally public opinion in favor of his now-defunct bid to join the Politburo Standing Committee -- behaving almost like China was the democracy he said it was -- instead of leaving the decision entirely up to the party. And the party always wins.

Communist cadres can praise democracy, as long as it's China's. Fang Ning, who runs the Political Science Institute at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, has argued that China's democratic system is superior to that of the West; he thinks capitalist democracy is merely a tool to "gain legitimacy for a regime," something he probably learned to recognize after studying his own country's model. Indeed, China, which boasts eight "democratic parties," puts the United States' duopolistic system to shame, numerically. So does the sheer size of the NPC, which stands at close to 3,000 members, with some 800 coming from the "democratic parties" that are permitted to exist -- as enshrined in the Chinese Constitution -- "under the leadership of the Communist Party of China." A 2007 white paper describes this arrangement as an "inevitable choice" -- an oxymoron much like the "people's democratic dictatorship," also mentioned in the Constitution. The democratic parties cooperate with the regime, not oppose it. "They supposedly give advice," says Willy Lam, an expert on Chinese politics at the Chinese University of Hong Kong. "However, their real purpose is for PR reasons: to put together a facade of unity. And they have made it clear they follow the instructions of the party."

The NPC and its sister conference, the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, where delegates tackle various pressing social issues -- from the alarming lack of civil liberties to the alarming lack of breast-feeding -- are meant to proudly advertise China's brand of democracy in action. This year's pomp was slightly undercut by Bo's fall from grace; it's not often that a party secretary gets summarily dismissed at the end of a normally bland legislative session. Despite the drama, the democratic parties dutifully played their role. The China Democratic National Construction Association diligently raised concerns over wage arrears for migrant workers, while the Chinese Peasants and Workers Democratic Party conscientiously brought up soil pollution.

The eight junior parties, whose membership ranges from 2,000 to 200,000, have no reason to challenge the 80 million members of the Communist Party, not only because they have no effective power, but also because they depend on the Communist Party for their existence. They fall under the purview of the United Front, a government department that is also responsible for galvanizing overseas Chinese support for the People's Republic. "They are adjuncts or subordinate units" of the Communist Party, says Lam, the functional equivalent of a toothless corporate board from the Enron era. For the average Chinese person, they're just decoration: huaping, or "flower vases."

Perhaps the biggest display of those huaping is in Chongqing, Bo's seat of power (until recently), at the Democratic Parties History Museum of China. The museum, which opened in March 2011, is attached to a site of historic significance for the democratic parties: a villa where the China Democratic League (CDL) -- currently the largest democratic party -- was founded in 1941. Mao Zedong visited several times during the war against the Japanese, when Chongqing was the Nationalist capital and Mao was embroiled in unsuccessful negotiations with Chiang Kai-shek to unite against the invaders. He dubbed the place the "home of democracy."

The irony of Bo's five-year reign over the birthplace of Chinese democracy is that it has been anything but democratic. His "Chongqing model" involved cracking down on the mafia and resurrecting the Communist Party's red roots through patriotic singing campaigns, while hounding defense lawyers and threatening newspapers with lawsuits. Last year, when the Chongqing Municipal Committee voted in favor of a list of items intended to increase the democratic rule of law, Bo explained what it actually meant: that "leaders of all levels … shouldn't make rash decisions." Democracy, for the Communist Party, is a sort of code for wider consultation and greater accountability -- but changing the system is not an option.

Feng Li/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS: CHINA, SOUTHEAST ASIA
 

A. McLaren is a freelance writer based in China.

MANDREWSF

9:13 PM ET

March 15, 2012

Really?

China's not a democracy behind its United Front façade?
No shit sherlock.

 

WEI LING CHUA

6:41 AM ET

March 19, 2012

China - 21 century political model for the world to follow

There are serious flaws in the Western system of government. Western voters are constantly frustrated by the inability of the system to produce quality leaderships.
(Detail in this article: Democracy Needs Reform - We are the Unsatisfied lead by the Unqualified: http://outcastjournalist.com/index_files/Democracy_needs_reform_lead_by_the_unqualified.htm);

One of the GOP Presidential candidate, Newt Gingrich recently complaint that it is a "stupid political system" (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/election-2012/post/at-illinois-gop-dinner-a-gloomy-gingrich-bemoans-methodically-and-deliberately-stupid-political-system/2012/03/14/gIQAeSc6CS_blog.html?wpisrc=nl_pmpolitics); this is what he said: "our political system is so methodically and deliberately stupid... The thing I find most disheartening about this campaign is the difficulty of talking about positive ideas on a large scale because the news media can’t cover it, and the other candidates, my opponents, can’t comprehend it..."

Over the last few years, every public opinion survey persistently showing very low satisfaction with the performance of the Congress (http://pewresearch.org/databank/dailynumber/?NumberID=1312); whereas the annual surveys by PEW on people satisfaction with government direction consistently ranked China as world number one with 85 to 87% of public satisfaction (http://www.pewglobal.org/database/?indicator=3&country=45);

The West should perfect its own political system before trying to selectively wholesales to the rest of the world.

 

AFGHANGOOD

8:52 AM ET

March 16, 2012

Never said it was one...

China is no democracy, and it doesn’t have any aspirations of becoming one. I think if you ask the BULK of the Chinese people what they want…democratic freedoms or economic development, they will take the latter. Let’s look at the US from 1850 to 1950…and the working environment of the average American…how fair, open, and healthy was THAT environment? So if you want to judge China, or any of these other manufacturing countries, make sure you are using the correct lenses. China will change over time, but the key is over time, and they will settle on something that makes sense for them. Unlike with the “Arab spring”, China isn’t going to allow those cracks. I find it fascinating the amazing reduced amount of western news coverage of the massive human rights violations currently taking place in Libya, or the complete double standard by the Arab League in addressing the human rights violations in Bahrain or the other gulf states, so what is the TRUE role and responsibility of the media?

 

KEYBASHER

10:26 AM ET

March 16, 2012

Change is coming to China, the C. C. P. notwithstanding

No one-party state survives the ten years after hosting an Olympics as the residents of Berlin, Moscow and Sarajevo will attest. Let’s hope the powers-that-be in Beijing manage a smooth regime change – for once in their history!

 

TECHNIPIRE

11:36 AM ET

March 16, 2012

I don't think the author knows what the issue is about

While the author says that Bo is a pro-democracy politician, actually he is just the opposite.

Bo has organized several big campaigns that resemble those in the Cultural Revolution, a totalitarian tragedy 40 years ago in China.He put his own authority on top of law,making himself a dictator.

That's the main reason that motivated Chinese government to remove him of his position.

 

DABLUEKEY

9:17 PM ET

March 16, 2012

Maybe the author should know more about Chinese politics

Bo does not stand for pro-democracy. I really have to doubt if the author actually really know anything about Chinese politics or have followed news in the last couple years.
This is such a bad piece of writing that it makes me question FP's ability to get quality people to write for them.

 

BING520

2:43 PM ET

March 16, 2012

?

I have no idea what McLaren wanted to tell us. The author just mumbled through what we have already known about China and did not even bother to dwell into the impact of Bo's ousting. Now I am afraid of reading more writing from McLaren.

 

REDOCT

2:44 PM ET

March 16, 2012

Totally out of the point

As a Chinese, I would say the author doesn't even know a thing about the political battle behind this event...

Mr. Bo is not the anti communist hero, like author imagined, who called for "democracy", instead, he has been called "Maoist" because he asked his citizens to sing Mao era songs and prohibit local television channel to broadcast "pulp contents"(even commercial).

The key point is, Bo has earned a lot support because most Chinese people who actually did not benefit much from high speed development, and lots of them began to appreciate Bo's efforts to rebuild low efficient bureaucracy and suppress corruption. This trend is a potential threat to next generation leaders. Anyone who familiar with Chinese political issue will know what a "maverick" label means to a party comrade...

 

JAN Z. VOLENS

10:21 PM ET

March 18, 2012

Correct analysis !

The view expressed by REDOCT, coincides with the analysis published by left newspapers in Europe. It seems the top is afraid of a neo-Maoist tendencies among the disenfranchised workers and peasants.

 

SEOSEMLT

3:48 PM ET

March 16, 2012

theres

Theres can't be any doubts that China could be a democratic country in a near future. The komunizm is deep in there... Advokatas

 

GREATPET

12:19 AM ET

March 18, 2012

The author is misled

"Multiparty cooperation is an important symbol of democracy," said Bo?

Why did he say this? Because Chinese leaders since Chairman Mao have been saying this all the time. That's why China allows 8 non-Communist political parties to exist, and even created a puppet congress for them. It's called "Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference".

In reality, all these 8 parties are "allied" with the CCP, and as the name suggests, they have no power except "consultative" power.

That's why in China it's perfectly politically correct to praise "multiparty cooperation", as long as the leadership belongs to the CCP.

In short, the author fell for some Chinese lie, and wrote a long article out of nothing.

 

GREATPET

12:20 AM ET

March 18, 2012

correction

It should be a period rather than a question mark after "said Bo".

 

TRUTH85

1:03 AM ET

March 18, 2012

Did any of the people commenting actually read the article?

It mentions in the article that Bo was engaged in undemocratic actions and suppressing freedoms in the area where he had control while paying lip service to being 'democratic'.

What the article points out is that when Bo tried to climb up the ladder by appealing to lower ranked party members instead of the higher ups he was destroyed. This action in fact was a form of democratic maneuvering on a small scale.

 

XTIANGODLOKI

3:06 AM ET

March 18, 2012

Why not let the Chinese handle this themselves?

Democracy or autocracy, it's not Americans' say on how Chinese should run their own country. Spending tens of millions of dollars of US taxpayers money to "promote freedom" in China via biased media reporting and cherry picking news items does not help. If there is anything the US should do with China, it would be to have a serious talk about how to level the trade imbalance.

 

JOHNBRAGG

6:03 PM ET

March 18, 2012

The Bo Described--

--ambitious to the point of breaking rules
--populist
--cast out by the ossified establishment

Could also be a description of Boris Yeltsin in the late 1980s. I don't expect a competitive Chinese election, but elections are not the only route to power.

Picture an economic slowdown leading to real instability in China. There is a former Party leader, imprisoned by the ossified, corrupt, ineffective authorities for fighting corruption and bringing back old Communist values.

Bo Xilai would not be the first Chinese Party figure to be disgraced and imprisoned, then rehabilitated and given higher office than before.

 

JOHNBRAGG

6:03 PM ET

March 18, 2012

The Bo Described--

--ambitious to the point of breaking rules
--populist
--cast out by the ossified establishment

Could also be a description of Boris Yeltsin in the late 1980s. I don't expect a competitive Chinese election, but elections are not the only route to power.

Picture an economic slowdown leading to real instability in China. There is a former Party leader, imprisoned by the ossified, corrupt, ineffective authorities for fighting corruption and bringing back old Communist values.

Bo Xilai would not be the first Chinese Party figure to be disgraced and imprisoned, then rehabilitated and given higher office than before.

 

NICOLAS19

4:04 AM ET

March 19, 2012

wishful thinking

The word 'democracy' is a code for 'US policy' nowadays for US politicians - just read any George W. Bush or Obama speech: "we have to bring democracy to X country to make their policy complement ours". Now the author automatically assumes Bo used the word as the same term - while democracy for a Chinese does not necessary mean the same as democracy for an American.

That said, you have to love the rhetoric for this kind or article. Labeling the "multiparty cooperation" as a facade of parliamentarism (which it may be), while in the US you have only two parties whose candidates are exactly the same - hawkish, militaristic, reckless warmongers.

 

MALIYA SAM

8:50 AM ET

March 27, 2012

Chinese Democracy

Democracy (translated into Chinese as " minzhu ," or "people-as-masters") is not a concept inherent in Chinese culture or political philosophy. In fact, it is in complete opposition to Confucian ideology, which stresses harmony and obedience. But neither is democracy a concept that has just recently taken hold in the minds of Chinese youth who have seen the wonders of democracy in Western-style discos and fast-food. Chinese have less drug rehab center and they still follow their culture.

 

ZULA ROSHER

2:38 AM ET

April 14, 2012

The Constitution of the Republic of China

As for me, The National Constituent Assembly of the Republic of China, by virtue of the mandate received from the whole body of citizens, in accordance with the teachings bequeathed by Dr. Sun Yat-sen in founding the Republic China, and in order to consolidate the authority of the State, safeguard the rights of the people, ensure social tranquillity, and promote the welfare of the people, do hereby adopt this Constitution to be promulgated throughout the land for faithful and perpetual observance by one and all.