By Gordon Lubold
Head-scratcher: The Air Force officer at the center of the sexual assault storm seemed like the right man for the job. As odd as it seems, the Air Force found no red flags that would indicate that Lt. Col. Jeffrey Krusinski would be the wrong man to head the Air Force's sexual assault office. Yet the sexual battery charges against him -- and the now ubiquitous image of a downcast Krusinski, his face cut from the alleged attack -- have turned him into a poster boy for what the Pentagon is doing wrong on sexual assault. An Air Force official told Situation Report that Krusinski was selected as the chief of the service's sexual assault prevention and response branch based on a solid record of performance and command experience. "There's nothing in Lt. Col. Krusinski's record that would have foretold his recent alleged behavior," an Air Force spokesman told Situation Report. "Before being selected, he had other assignments within AF/A1 where he excelled. Records of several eligible officers were reviewed and leadership felt Lt Col Krusinski's credentials made him a good choice for the branch chief job."
Krusinski was a regular at the Tortoise & Hare. The NYT did some phone sleuthing and found that Krusinki was a regular at a Crystal City bar not far from the Pentagon where the alleged attack occurred. He stopped by about once a week. But a co-owner of the bar, Brian Montgomery, said there was "nothing that we could point a finger at" that would suggest Krusinski would do such a thing.
Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Welsh, at yesterday's hearing: "His record is very good...there is no indication in his professional record of performance or in his current workplace that there is any type of a problem like this."
Welsh did not handpick Krusinski, Situation Report is told; the officer was chosen "within the leadership" of the Air Force personnel office, which has been led by Air Force Lt. Gen. Darrell Jones since December 2010.
This story will have the uniforms buzzing today: A WaPo bit about a pattern of redundancy. The most interesting story today is a piece by David Fahrenthold on how the military's digital camouflage uniforms, or cammies, became a symbol of military redundancy and excess, and how two sets of cammies turned into 10 separate uniforms. Service rivalry drove the train on this one, and the DOD has spent billions. The lede: "In 2002, the U.S. military had just two kinds of camouflage uniforms. One was green, for the woods. The other was brown, for the desert. Then things got strange." And: "In just 11 years, two kinds of camouflage have turned into 10. And a simple aspect of the U.S. government has emerged as a complicated and expensive case study in federal duplication."
Welcome to Thursday's edition of Situation Report, where we try never to repeat ourselves, digitally or otherwise. Sign up for Situation Report here or just e-mail us. And always, if you have a report, piece of news, or a tidbit you want teased, send it to us early for maximum tease. If we can get it in, we will. And help us fill our candy dish: news of the military weird, strange trends, personnel comings-and-goings, and military stories of success or excess. And please follow us @glubold -- it would make our day.
Kath Hicks will leave on or about July 1. In a move that most Pentagon insiders have known for some time, the Pentagon's number two policy person, Principal Deputy Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Kathleen Hicks, is moving on. Hicks has been working policy issues in and outside of the building for 17 years, and this job for one, and has decided to begin a new chapter - as yet undisclosed. We now know that she will head out by July 1. Her bio, here.
The U.S. wants nine bases in Afghanistan post 2014, Karzai says. An AFP report says that Afghan President Hamid Karzai and the U.S. have begun serious talks and that the U.S. wants to see nine bases across Afghanistan after the security transition at the end of next year. A senior defense official tells Situation Report this morning, simply: "No decisions have been made." Read that piece here.
Gregory Hicks says his questions on Benghazi led to a demotion. During an engrossing hearing yesterday in the House, Gregory Hicks, who had served as a deputy chief of mission in Tripoli, Libya during the attack on Benghazi in September, said he challenged his superiors about the way the events unfolded that night and was later relegated to a desk job. "The sense I got was that I needed to stop the line of questioning," Hicks told members of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform yesterday as part of a hearing that was at least effective in raising some new questions on an old issue with strong political overtones. The NYT: "If the testimony did not fundamentally challenge the facts and timeline of the Benghazi attack and the administration's response to it, it vividly illustrated the anxiety of top State Department officials about how the events would be publicly portrayed."
From an American diplomat, e-mailing Situation Report this morning: "Hicks is classic case of underachiever who whines when big breaks don't come his way. 22 years as an FSO and he is still an FS-1 (COL equivalent). His uninformed comments about F-16s validates why he is still a mid-ranked officer. Where was his testimony on his role in trying to talk his ambassador out of making an overnight visit to a place he knew was dangerous? Very few DCMs who lose an ambassador can expect greater responsibilities...and there are dozens of talented FS-1 ranked ‘desk officers' working honorably at the State Department. Also of interest is that he is running for a senior leadership position in the State Dept. union/professional association, [American Foreign Service Association]. He didn't get my vote."
Read The Cable's John Hudson's piece on "Six New Things We Learned Today about Benghazi," here. (and welcome to John, who joined The Cable just this week after Josh Rogin left us for The Daily Beast.)
Hagel used the Pentagon's bat phone to China. The E-Ring's Kevin Baron sat down with David Helvey, the DOD's top China official, yesterday for a far-ranging exchange on the U.S., China, the mil-to-mil relationship and the inevitability of friction. But he learned this about Hagel's use of the special direct dial line to China's PLA. "In March, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel used a "hotline" phone to call China's new minister of national defense, Gen. Chang Wanquan, for a 45-minute introductory conversation in which they discussed a range of issues. Hagel, according to Pentagon press secretary George Little, encouraged they keep an open dialogue about North Korea's nuclear ambitions. Helvey said they also discussed other issues. Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey also used the hotline to call China's chief of the General Staff, Gen. Fang Fenghui, prior to his own visit. ‘We're really looking to expand the use of this hotline just as a mechanism for direct communication between our senior leaders,' Helvey said."
Heard in the P-way: The shorthand for Hagel's Strategic Choices and Management Review, the big look at the U.S. military, around the Pentagon's corridors is SCMR -- pronounced "SKIMMER." But the word we've heard the services use repeatedly because they know it can't be good: "SCAMMER." Unclear if this was coined by the press and picked up by Pentagon operators - or the other way around. But either way.
Despite Kerry's talks with Putin, Russia might sell Syria new air defenses. Israel warned the U.S. that Russia is poised to sell an advanced ground-to-air missile system that could be a boon to the Syria regime's ability to cling to power, according to a WSJ report. The WSJ: "U.S. officials said on Wednesday that they are analyzing the information Israel provided about the suspected sale of S-300 missile batteries to Syria, but wouldn't comment on whether they believed such a transfer was near. Russian officials didn't immediately return requests to comment. The Russian Embassy in Washington has said its policy is not to comment on arms sales or transfers between Russia and other countries. The government of President Bashar al-Assad has been seeking to purchase S-300 missile batteries -- which can intercept both manned aircraft and guided missiles -- from Moscow going back to the George W. Bush administration, U.S. officials said. Western nations have lobbied President Vladimir Putin's government not to go ahead with the sale. If Syria were to acquire and deploy the systems, it would make any international intervention in Syria far more complicated, according to U.S. and Middle East-based officials."
Read ISW's "Syrian Air Force and Air Defense Capabilities," just updated, here.
Five myths you have about the military (thanks, Hollywood). From Cracked.com: 5. Boot camp is like Full Metal Jacket. 4. War = combat. 3. War vets are burned-out ticking time bombs. 2. Everyone in the military is proud and has unshakeable camaraderie. And number one? You go to war, then you come home. Read that good bit, here.
From the "You Know it's Government with a Name Like This" Department: The Pentagon named a new sexual assault advisory committee the "Response Systems to Adult Sexual Assault Crimes Panel," but we'll just call it the RSASACP. The RSASACP is an advisory committee that will conduct an independent review and assessment of the systems used to "investigate, prosecute and adjudicate sexual assault crimes and related offenses." The committee will develop recommendations on how to improve the effectiveness of those systems, we're told. (The name comes directly from the 2013 National Defense Authorization Act, by the way.) Hagel appointed five members to serve on the panel, who will join four members appointed by the chairmen and ranking members of both the Senate and House Armed Services Committees. The panel will convene for the first time by July 1. Hagel appointed: Elizabeth Holtzman, James Houck, Barbara Jones, David Lisak and Colleen McGuire. Congress appointed: Melinda Dunn (Sen. Carl Levin); Harvey Bryant (Sen. James Inhofe); Holly O'Grady Cook, (Rep. Buck McKeon); Elizabeth Hillman (Rep. Adam Smith).
Spencer for hire: "Attackerman" goes to the Guardian. Danger Room's own Spencer Ackerman is moving to the Guardian newspaper as a national security editor starting June 2 after more than two years at DR. We'll quote from the press release mostly because we like the word "patch:" "Spencer is a must-read reporter with extraordinary knowledge of his patch. His passion and determination to break stories chimes perfectly with the Guardian's long-held commitment to accountability and transparency." And Ackerman, to Situation Report: "Super-psyched to join an amazing team at the Guardian that's committed to hardcore reporting, presented in innovative, web- and social-native ways. Also, relieved for my good friend Noah Shachtman's blood pressure now that he no longer has to put up with my shenanigans."
SIGAR John Sopko on the future of Afghanistan. The Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, John Sopko, told a depressing story during a speech Wednesday: He said $50 million in stolen American funds investigators had found in an Afghan bank account last year has gone missing -- on the Afghan government's watch. Sopko said the case was one of many examples of why it was time for the U.S. to consider withholding vital aid to pressure Kabul into adopting stronger financial protections. Sopko, whose unvarnished pronouncements have angered some in government as they attempt to coax the Afghans into economic stability, also called the Afghan government a "criminal patronage network." The E-Ring's Baron writes: "Sopko, warning of an inept oversight of American taxpayer funds, claimed on Wednesday that the millions went missing after his office served the Afghan government an order to freeze the account. Sopko, in prepared remarks at the New America Foundation: "Briefly put, we identified roughly $50 million stolen from the U.S. government which was sitting in an Afghan bank account." And: "We obtained a court order here in the United States and served it on the Afghan government to get them to seize the money. For months we pressed the Afghan attorney general's office to freeze the account and begin the legal process to allow us to seize the cash. At first, we were told the bank account was frozen and the money protected. Unfortunately, as is too many times the case, a few weeks ago we learned that the money was mysteriously unfrozen by some powerful bureaucrat in Kabul. Now, most of it is gone." Sopko had first revealed the missing funds April 10, but the case wasn't reported on by the national news media, a spokesman for SIGAR told Baron. Sopko summed up the case: "This, I fear, is the future in Afghanistan."