National Security

Where did $230 million in parts go?; Iran inches toward a deal, Afghans make inroads; Welsh cancels a media visit; Swenson gets a medal, Arlington makes an exception; Tea Party Baby: no peas; and a bit more.

By Gordon Lubold

Iran outlines a possible deal in PowerPoint - which could amount to a big deal. The NYT's Michael Gordon and Thomas Erdbrink: "Speaking in English and using PowerPoint, Iran's foreign minister outlined a proposal to representatives of the big powers on Tuesday that would constrain his country's nuclear program in return for a right to enrich uranium and an easing of the sanctions that have been battering the Iranian economy. After the discussions, Iran's deputy foreign minister, Abbas Araqchi, and his team met for about an hour at the United Nations headquarters here with the American delegation, led by Wendy Sherman, a senior State Department official. The substance was not disclosed, but the meeting itself was unusual. The proposal presented by the foreign minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, at negotiations on Iran's disputed nuclear program, called for "an end to an unnecessary crisis and a start for new horizons," according to Iranian officials. In a possible sign that the negotiations have turned serious after years of delay and obfuscations, a senior State Department official suggested that the discussions had been workmanlike. A State Department official, to the NYT: "For the first time, we had very detailed technical discussions, which carried on this afternoon... We will continue the discussions tomorrow." The rest of the Times story here.

But Dems at home may be a stumbling block to lifting sanctions on Iran. FP's Yochi Dreazen and John Hudson: "The White House has already signaled a potential openness to that kind of deal, but a wide array of powerful Democrats -- including the top members of both the Senate and House foreign affairs committees -- strongly oppose lifting any of the existing sanctions on Iran unless Tehran offers concessions that go far beyond anything Zarif has talked about in Geneva. 'If the president were to ask for a lifting of existing sanctions it would be extremely difficult in the House and Senate to support that,' Rep. Steve Israel (D-NY), chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, told FP. 'I'm willing to listen but I think that asking Congress to weaken and diminish current sanctions is not hospitable on Capitol Hill.'" The rest here.

How much are sanctions really hurting? The Christian Science Monitor's Ariel Zirulnick: "Most observers say that the punishing sanctions have brought the Iranian economy to its knees, and that dire conditions were the catalyst for Iran's rapid push for a nuclear agreement since the June election of moderate cleric Hassan Rouhani as president. But there are others who argue that Iran is coming from a much stronger economic position than world powers are acknowledging, and scoff at the growing chorus warning of a collapse. The new leadership sees much to gain from making concessions to regain access to the global financial system - something that will play well among Iranians who want to return to business as usual." More here.

But, is America's prestige diminishing because of its current dysfunction? Writing for the WSJ today, Thomas Catan: "...observers say that prestige may have been badly dented by Washington's latest display of fiscal dysfunction, limiting the U.S.'s ability to get things done abroad." The CEO of the world's largest asset manager said a few days ago that he detected ‘a pronounced sadness from our trading partners and our friends' as he tried to explain the fiscal impasse during his recent travels abroad," according to the Catan. Laurence Fink, CEO of the New York-based asset manager BlackRock at a conference of banker recently: "It is embarrassing for me to have these conversations."

Wednesday's edition of Situation Report. Sign up for Situation Report here or just e-mail us at gordon.lubold@foreignpolicy.com and we'll stick you on. And if you have a report you want teased, a piece of news, or a good tidbit, send it to us early for maximum tease, because if you see something, say something -- to Situation Report. That and please follow us @glubold on the Tweeter machine.

Is it over yet? Fox News this morning, on the deal to re-open government and figure out the debt ceiling. Fox: "Senate leaders scrambled to restart talks on a plan to raise the U.S. debt ceiling and end the partial government shutdown after efforts by House Republicans to advance their own proposal dramatically fell apart late Tuesday. House GOP leaders, after initially planning to vote on their plan sometime before midnight, shelved the proposal Tuesday evening after leaders struggled to round up the votes. ‘It is over,' one GOP aide told Fox News late Tuesday. With that decision, focus shifted back to the Senate and talks between Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid and his Republican counterpart, Sen. Mitch McConnell. A spokesman for Reid issued a statement late Tuesday saying, ‘Senator Reid and Senator McConnell have re-engaged in negotiations and are optimistic that an agreement is within reach.'" More here.

There's no such thing as a (Marine) runner scorned. If the government doesn't re-open by Saturday, Marine Corps Marathon organizers say they may have to shut down the Marathon, scheduled for Oct. 27.  A statement from organizers: "Since the government shutdown occurred, the Marine Corps Marathon continues its coordination with hopes of a conclusion in time to host the event without impact. Without a resolution to the government shutdown this week, the MCM as planned is in jeopardy of being canceled," officials said in a statement on his Facebook page. Saturday, the organizers said, is their go/no-go decision time, at which point they'll notify runners.

Why did the Air Force's Mark Welsh cancel tomorrow's DeeDubyaGee? Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Welsh was supposed to appear tomorrow morning at a breakfast meeting with reporters, part of a long-running media-and-the-military breakfast forum in Washington known as the Defense Writers Group, or DWG. But Welsh cancelled due to the government shutdown. We wondered why the shutdown would stop a service chief from eating breakfast with a bunch of scribblers. Air Force officials tell Situation Report that shutdown-related guidance dictates that the general should not appear. Indeed, some public affairs activities are not covered under the Pay Our Military Act and therefore some PA-supported events may be cancelled. But Col. Steve Warren of the Pentagon's Office of the Secretary of Defense's public affairs office tells us that "there's no specific guidance that tells military officers and/or civilian leaders not to appear in media forums or events during the shutdown.  That said, public affairs is not an excepted activity so leaders make their own judgment calls on what to participate in and what to cancel." The Pentagon's guidance on #governmentshutdown, here.

ICYMI: Leon Panetta rebuked Obama. The former Defense Secretary, Leon Panetta, did not spare President Barack Obama in his assessment of the current crisis, calling him out for not reaching out. He told a group at an event sponsored by the WSJ: "We govern either by leadership or crisis. .?.?. If leadership is not there, then we govern by crisis... Clearly, this town has been governing by crisis after crisis after crisis." The rest of Ruth Marcus' piece today in the WaPo, here.

The Tea Party, peas, carrots and getting your way or the highway. A video short of negotiations that we would call "There's a Fire in the House," on Upworthy, here. (thanks, Doctrine Man.)

Afghan forces are fighting a hard fight - and maybe they're winning. The NYT's Page Oner today, by Rod Nordland, Thom Shanker and Matthew Rosenberg: "When the Taliban announced the beginning of their spring offensive, they saw few limits to their ambitions: to kill top Afghan officials across every major ministry, to plot even more infiltration attacks against Americans and to bloody, break and drive off the Afghan security forces who were newly in charge across the country. Now, Afghan and American officials are cautiously celebrating a deflation of the Taliban's propaganda bubble, the militants' goals largely unmet. With this year's fighting season nearly over, the officials say the good news is that the Afghan forces mostly held their own, responding to attacks well and cutting down on assassinations. But at the same time, the Afghans were unable to make significant gains and, worse, suffered such heavy casualties that some officials called the rate unsustainable." Read the rest here. 

A whole new set of Pentagon hammers, Afghanistan version. The Center for Public Integrity reports on what Pentagon auditors have found but what many folks already suspected: when it comes to buying spare parts, the Defense Department buys more than what they need. And guess what? They also pay too much for them. Writing on FP, the Center for Public Integrity's R. Jeffrey Smith: "A partly-plastic roller wheel for an aircraft ramp worth a bit more than $7 is billed to the Pentagon at $1678. "Commander" seats for Stryker armored vehicles are purchased long after they became obsolete. A 38-year supply of parts is stocked for an aircraft with a much shorter lifespan. ‘Do we have enormous warehouses sitting around with stuff that no one is going to use?; asked a senior defense official who briefed reporters over breakfast on these and other episodes earlier this year. ‘Yes.'

"Now, in an act of generosity, the Pentagon has successfully exported its spare parts mismanagement to Afghanistan. It seems that a multinational, U.S.-led military office called the Combined Security Transition Command-Afghanistan (CSTC-A) spent $370 million from 2004 through the middle of this year on spare parts for vehicles operated by the Afghan National Army. But last year, it confirmed that it could not account for $230 million worth of the spare parts, according to an Oct. 16 report by the Special Inspector for Afghanistan Reconstruction." Read the rest of his bit here.

The link to a story we referenced on ProPublica yesterday was broken - here it is again. The story by Cora Currier, "In Big Win for Defense Industry, Obama Rolls Back Limits on Arms Exports," can be found here.

Validation in Section 60: Arlington reverses itself on its cleaning procedures after a WaPo story. A few weeks ago, the WaPo's Greg Jaffe wrote about how maintenance crews at Arlington National Cemetery had abruptly removed pictures, worry rocks, love letters and other mementos left by the loved ones by the headstones of fallen service members in the area of the cemetery where the recently fallen - from Iraq and Afghanistan - are buried. Despite a notice on the cemetery's Web site, few people saw it until they arrived to visit their service members' gravesite to see, to their horror, that everything had been removed and most of it discarded. Seems like someone could have imagined the inevitable headlines. Now they've reversed course, sort of. Jaffe: "Arlington National Cemetery officials, responding to complaints from upset families, will allow small photos and other mementos to be left next to headstones in Section 60, where the Iraq and Afghanistan war dead are buried... Cemetery officials apologized to the family members for throwing out their mementos at a three-hour meeting held recently on the Arlington grounds. The cemetery's executive director also offered to temporarily suspend Arlington's cleanup policy in the section. For the next seven months, when the cemetery's grass is cut less frequently, family members will be permitted to leave small photos and other handmade mementos as long as they are not taped to the headstones." Scrambling to find "flexibility:" "We are looking for flexibility within Arlington's current policies to meet their needs," Jennifer Lynch, a spokeswoman for the cemetery, told Jaffe.  Read the rest of the story here.

Will Swenson was the first Army officer since Vietnam to receive the Medal of Honor yesterday. He is the sixth living person from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan to receive it. ICYMI: The backstory of the controversial MOH for Swenson, in the WaPo, here. An excerpt, from the WaPo's David Nakamura: "But for Swenson, the award stands for more than his personal bravery during the seven-hour battle in the Ganjgal valley, near the Pakistan border, on Sept. 8, 2009. It is also a measure of vindication. After returning from the battlefield, Swenson engaged in a lengthy and bitter dispute with the military over the narrative of one of the Afghan war's most notorious firefights. The questions he raised resulted in reprimands for two other officers and what he and others say was an effort by the Army to discredit him. His account also cast doubt on the exploits of another Medal of Honor recipient from the same battle, Dakota Meyer of the Marine Corps. United in war, the two men have taken far different paths since. Meyer has found celebrity and success, with a book and a personal assistant, boosted by a story that Swenson considers an inflated and misleading account of that harrowing day."

Meet the NSA's new Codebreakers: they're hackers, break-in artists, corporate liaisons and shadow salesmen, as Matthew Aid writes on FP. Aid: "Even so-called "hacktivists" play an unwitting role in helping the NSA gain access to computer networks -- both hostile and friendly. Just about the only place that's somewhat immune to the NSA's new style of codebreaking attacks? North Korea, because it's so disconnected from the rest of the world's networks. Former U.S. intelligence officials confirm that the more than 1,500 cryptanalysts, mathematicians, scientists, engineers, and computer technicians who comprise NSA's elite cryptanalytic unit, the Office of Cryptanalysis and Exploitation Services, have had a remarkably large number of codebreaking successes against foreign targets since the 9/11 attacks. But these wins were largely dependent on clandestine intelligence activities for much of their success in penetrating foreign communications networks and encryption systems, and not the more traditional cryptanalytic attacks on encrypted messages that were the norm during the Cold War era." Read the rest here.

Hill to Penty: Please don't take away the Office of Net Assessment. It's a perennial issue. Congress hates to see the Pentagon's Office of Net Assessment, essentially the Pentagon's internal think tank, messed with; the Pentagon, now in a particular budget crunch, must find ways to cut costs. Defense News' Marcus Weisgerber: "The Pentagon is considering reorganizing its internal think tank, an organization credited with helping the US win the Cold War, according to defense sources. The office has been around since 1973, and is the ultimate rarity in Washington, where senior officials come and go like the seasons. Andrew Marshall, who is over 90 years old, was its boss on Day 1 and continues to be its boss. But now as the Pentagon looks to build itself for the decade ahead, a period with fewer spending cash, the revered office could be reorganized or, as some have suggested, eliminated. Defense officials stress that no final decision has been made, however DoD is in the midst of reducing its headquarters staffs by 20 percent over the next five years, a move intended to save the Pentagon billions of dollars. Any change in the office's status has prompted concern on both sides of the political aisle."

For example... "Forbes told Hagel that the Marshall-led office "has been at the forefront of the most innovative defense strategies of the last two generations." Forbes:  "Given the critical contributions to U.S. national security made by the office during its forty-year history and its role as a central repository for long-range strategic thinking, we believe it would be a serious error to further consider its abolition." Defense News' article here. The letter written to Hagel from Reps. Forbes, Courtney, Wittman and Hanabusa, here.

National Security

Talking nukes today; Wendy Sherman’s March; A potential deal? #shutdown; A military coalition, angry; Uniform waste: the Army’s universal cami; What’s up with European mil spending?; and a bit more.

By Gordon Lubold

New this hour: The death toll in the earthquake in the Philippines is reaching 100; 7.2 magnitude. More, with videos and stills, here.

Talks begin today in Geneva on Iran and nukes.  The NYT's Michael Gordon and Thomas Erdbrink, reporting from Geneva: "Iran is expected to make an offer on Tuesday to scale back its effort to enrich uranium, a move that a year ago would have been a significant concession to the West. But Iran's nuclear abilities have advanced so far since then that experts say it will take far more than that to assure the West that Tehran does not have the capacity to quickly produce a nuclear weapon. With thousands of advanced centrifuges spinning and Iranian engineers working on a plant that will produce plutonium, which also can be used in a weapon, Iran's program presents a daunting challenge for negotiators determined to roll back its nuclear activities.

Both sides enter the nuclear talks that began here on Tuesday morning with inherent strengths and weaknesses. Iran walks in with a nuclear program that cannot easily be turned back, while the West has imposed sanctions that have crippled the Iranian economy."

And: "And if Iran is going to maintain the right to enrich uranium to even low levels, as it continues to insist it must, the West will surely demand highly intrusive inspections - far more than Iran has tolerated in the past. How these matters are resolved will go far in deciding the success or failure of the talks." Read the rest here.

U.S. diplomats wary on Iranian talks. Joby Warrick and Jason Rezaian: "U.S. and Iranian officials both sought to lower expectations for the talks while also warning that time for diplomacy could be short. Rouhani faces pressure at home to quickly win relief from economic sanctions that have crippled Iran's economy, while Israeli officials have threatened a military strike to stop what they see as a steady march to a nuclear weapons capability." The rest of that bit here.

Meet State's Wendy Sherman, who is central to those nuke talks. FP's Yochi Dreazen: "Wendy Sherman, the U.S. State Department's chief nuclear negotiator, held talks 13 years ago with the leaders of one opaque, mercurial country prone to deception and rabidly anti-American rhetoric. Those talks were ultimately a bust. This week she'll hold talks with the leaders of another opaque, mercurial country prone to deception and rabidly anti-American rhetoric. The success of those new negotiations could spell the difference between a long-term peace and a perilous showdown -- and give Sherman a rare second chance to prevent a U.S. adversary from getting a nuclear weapon.

Sherman, a highly regarded diplomat known for her steely demeanor and attention to detail, travels to Switzerland holding both a carrot and a stick. In Senate testimony this month, she said Barack Obama's administration is prepared to offer Iran some short-term sanctions relief if Tehran takes "verifiable, concrete actions" to delay its nuclear program. Sherman also urged lawmakers to hold off on imposing new sanctions on Iran until she can gauge how seriously the Iranians are prepared to negotiate. If they don't appear genuinely willing to accept far-reaching limits on their nuclear program, she said the administration would support a congressional push to put hard-hitting new restrictions on Iran's mining and construction sectors." Sherman, on what her team expects today from its Iranian counterparts: "Come on the 15th of October with concrete, substantive actions that you will take, commitments you will make in a verifiable way, monitoring and verification that you will sign up to, to create some faith that there is reality to this, and our Congress will listen." Read the rest here.

Welcome to Tuesday's edition of Situation Report. Sign up for Situation Report here or just e-mail us at gordon.lubold@foreignpolicy.com and we'll stick you on. And if you have a report you want teased, a piece of news, or a good tidbit, send it to us early for maximum tease, because if you see something, say something -- to Situation Report. That and please follow us @glubold on the Tweeter machine.

By the way, are you missing the Early Bird? We are, too. The shutdown has kept the Bird from its daily chirp. We won't pretend to be as comprehensive as the Pentagon's morning compendium of defense stories, but if you know of someone going through information withdrawals each morning - tell that friend to sign up for Situation Report - or let us know and we'll stick them on.

Today a military coalition marches on Washington to demonstrate the absurdity of the government shutdown. The Washington Times' Susan Ruth: "Less than 24 hours after one group of veteran's marched on Washington D.C. to protest the effect the federal government shutdown has had on them in terms of war memorials being closed, another group of retired military personnel is preparing for their arrival on the nation's capital. The military coalition rally to end the government shutdown is scheduled to take place on Tuesday October 15, 2013 from 9:45 a.m. until 11 a.m., originating at the National World War II memorial." More here. The Eventbrite link to today's event, here.

The Senate, reportedly on the verge of a budget deal. The WSJ's Kristina Peterson and Janet Hook: "Top Senate leaders said they were within striking distance of an agreement Monday to reopen the federal government and defuse a looming debt crisis just days before the U.S. could run out of money to pay its bills. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D., Nev.) said on the Senate floor that the leaders had made "tremendous progress" toward a deal and that he was hopeful Tuesday would be a ‘bright day.' The Senate's Republican leader, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, seconded Mr. Reid's optimism. ‘We've had a good day,' he said.

"The White House postponed a planned afternoon meeting of congressional leaders with President Barack Obama, saying the schedule change would give Senate leaders time to hash out a deal. The latest proposal would reopen the government at current spending levels until Jan. 15 and extend the federal borrowing limit until early February, according to aides familiar with the talks. Lawmakers also would begin longer-term negotiations on the budget, with the task of reaching an agreement by Dec. 13." Read the rest of that bit here.

Leave it to the (New England) women. The NYT's Jonathan Weisman and Jennifer Steinhauer: "As the government shutdown dragged on, Senator Susan Collins of Maine was spending another weekend on Capitol Hill, staring at C-Span on her Senate office television as one colleague after another came to the floor to rail about the shuttered government. Frustrated with the lack of progress, Ms. Collins, a Republican, two Saturdays ago quickly zipped out a three-point plan that she thought both parties could live with, marched to the Senate floor and dared her colleagues to come up with something better. A few days later, two other Republican female senators eagerly signed on - Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, who overcame the Tea Party to win re-election in 2010, and Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire, who benefited from the Tea Party wave." More here.

A governor in Afghanistan is assassinated. LAT: "A bomb placed in a mosque that detonated during morning prayers Tuesday killed the governor of eastern Logar province, Afghan officials said. No one immediately claimed responsibility for the assassination of the governor, Arsallah Jamal, but suspicion fell on the Taliban. The group has been targeting Afghan officials, police, military and NATO troops in the run up to late 2014, when foreign combat troops are scheduled to leave the country. The bombing took place at around 9 a.m. as Jamal gave a speech to hundreds of people attending prayers for Eid al-Adha -- one of the year's most important Islamic holidays marking the end of the Hajj pilgrimage -- said Hasibullah Stanikzai, Jamal's secretary." More here.

Votes in Afghanistan sell for about $5 per. Reuters: "Sayed Gul walked into a small mud brick room in eastern Afghanistan, a bundle wrapped in a shawl on his back. With a flick, he plonked the package onto a threadbare carpet and hundreds of voter cards spilled out. ‘How many do you want to buy?' he asked with a grin. Like many others, Gul left a routine job - in his case, repairing cars in Marco, a small town in the east - to join a thriving industry selling the outcome of next year's presidential elections. Gul, who had a long, black beard and was dressed in the traditional loose salwar kameez, said he was able to buy voter cards for 200  Pakistani rupees ($1.89) each from villagers and sell them on for 500 rupees ($4.73) to campaign managers, who can use them in connivance with poll officials to cast seemingly legitimate votes. From each card, Gul said, he made enough money to pay for a hearty meal like kebabs with rice, and maybe even a soda." More here.

The NSA is totally harvesting hundreds of millions of contact lists from personal e-mail and instant messaging - many of which are American. The WaPo's Barton Gellman and Ashkan Soltani, on Page One today: "The collection program, which has not been disclosed before, intercepts e-mail address books and "buddy lists" from instant messaging services as they move across global data links. Online services often transmit those contacts when a user logs on, composes a message, or synchronizes a computer or mobile device with information stored on remote servers. Rather than targeting individual users, the NSA is gathering contact lists in large numbers that amount to a sizable fraction of the world's e-mail and instant messaging accounts. Analysis of that data enables the agency to search for hidden connections and to map relationships within a much smaller universe of foreign intelligence targets." More of that bit here.

Turns out, Abu Anas didn't spend a long time on the USS San Antonio. There was reason to believe that Abu Anas, the IT and surveillance guru of al-Qaida accused of plotting attacks against Western targets in Saudi Arabia, Yemen and Somalia - as well being linked to the 1998 U.S. embassy bombings in Africa - didn't spend a lot of time on that ship in the Med. He's been transferred to New York already only after about a week or so after he was picked up in Libya by U.S. commandos. His chronic health problems contributed to the transfer over the weekend. The NYT's Benjamin Weiser, Charlie Savage and Eric Schmitt: "Officials said that Mr. Ruqai, known as Abu Anas al-Libi, had been cooperating with the interrogation since his capture on Oct. 5. The decision to move him into the criminal justice system would not prevent prosecutors from seeking additional cooperation. But when he appears in Federal District Court on Tuesday, he will be appointed a lawyer, through whom the government will have to work if it wants to communicate further with him. Preet Bharara, the United States attorney for the Southern District of New York, announced Mr. Ruqai's arrival in a brief statement on Monday. Mr. Bharara's office also wrote to Judge Lewis A. Kaplan, who has been overseeing the conspiracy cases in which Mr. Ruqai and other terrorism defendants have been charged, notifying him of the arrest and of Mr. Ruqai's coming court appearance." More here.

Will YOU get an invite to the "Defense One Summit" Nov. 14? Story by Defense One's Kevin Baron, here.

What can't the Brits do or do well anymore? War is Boring's Robert Beckhusen tells us what ails the Brits these days. Beckhusen: "In late September, the Royal Navy unveiled its latest nuclear-powered Astute-class submarine, HMS Artful, and also "christened" the hefty but sleek Daring-class destroyer HMS Duncan -- the sixth and last of its class. Aside from the United Kingdom's aircraft carrier program, these represent the two most significant naval shipbuilding programs happening in Britain at the moment. And two of the most controversial. The vessels are impressive on the surface, but each ship originates from troubled development programs which -- although coming with creature comforts and advanced technology -- turned out to be less than impressive when put to the test. New submarines running aground, older subs breaking down and destroyers put into service without adequate defenses against enemy submarines. It's not completely surprising.

"The Ministry of Defence's budget is half that of 30 years ago. [italics ours.] Perhaps more troubling for the Royal Navy: the vessels tasked with carrying Britain's military into the 21st century have sacrificed key systems needed to defend against attacks, while suffering limitations in their ability to strike back at enemy planes and missiles. Meanwhile, Royal Air Force ocean patrol planes that once buzzed the ocean scooping every signal they could detect have been cut altogether, meaning the surface ships are sailing blind -- and Britain's nuclear-missile force is sailing without escorts. Here's what Britain's military can't do. Or if it does do it, it doesn't do it well. Click for that, here.

Meanwhile, here are a few headlines coming out of Europe in recent months: "Britannia's 19 Ships Can't Rule a Single Wave" (London's Sunday Times); "France To Cut 34,000 Military Personnel Under A Proposed Six-Year Defence Budget" (Reuters); "UK Armed Forces Smallest Since the Napoleonic Wars" (London's Daily Telegraph). Andrew Roberts, writing for the Hoover Institution: "...Meanwhile the NATO ‘rule' that every member country spends at least 2% of its GDP on defence is now recognized more in the breach than the observance, with Germany running at roughly 1.5%, Italy at 1.2%, and Spain less than 1%. Yet taken as a whole, the European Union has a GDP that outstrips either China or the United States. Never in the field of human conflict avoidance has so little been given by so many for so much. With the United States spending over 4.2% of her GDP on defence-there are any amount of ways the numbers can be presented, so it's not impossible to get the figure up to nearly 5%-what becomes very clear is that NATO is something of a European racket. President Obama has rightly said-and it's very rare I ever start a sentence with those five words-that it's high time that Europe becomes an overall ‘provider' rather than just a ‘consumer' of security." Read the rest here.

Changes to the controls that govern U.S. military exports could increase the flow of American-made military parts to the world's conflicts. It could also make it harder to enforce arms sanctions, argues a piece by Cora Currier in ProPublica. Currier: "Come tomorrow, thousands of parts of military aircraft, such as propeller blades, brake pads and tires will be able to be sent to almost any country in the world, with minimal oversight - even to some countries subject to U.S. arms embargos. U.S. companies will also face fewer checks than in the past when selling some military aircraft to dozens of countries. Critics, including some who've worked on enforcing arms export laws, say the changes could undermine efforts to prevent arms smuggling to Iran and others. Brake pads may sound innocuous, but "the Iranians are constantly looking for spare parts for old U.S. jets," said Steven Pelak, who recently left the Department of Justice after six years overseeing investigations and prosecutions of export violations."

William Hartung, author of a recent report on the topic: "It's going to be easier for these military items to flow, harder to get a heads-up on their movements, and, in theory, easier for a smuggling ring to move weapons." Read the rest here.

From the Department of Comically-Wasteful-Spending-on-Military-Uniforms: The Daily Beast does this bit about the Army's $5 billion program to build a new universal cami that didn't turn out so well. Caitlin Dickson: "In 2004, the Army decided to scrap the two traditional camouflage uniforms that had long been used by the military-one meant for woodland environments, another for the desert-and claimed to have come up with a universal pattern that could be worn anywhere and blend in with any environment. The $5 billion dollar experiment with the universal pattern is over as the Army is phasing out the uniform after less than a decade of use. But many soldiers and observers are wondering why it took this long and cost this much to replace an item that performed poorly from the start during a period when the money could have been spent on other critical needs, like potentially life saving improvements to military vehicles and body armor. Less than a decade after the so-called Universal Camouflage Pattern, or UCP, was introduced the Army is back to the drawing board, set to announce a new camouflage pattern and standard uniform to be worn by the more than million members of the active duty and reserve forces.

"Evidence of the UCPs inadequacy as a combat uniform is easy to find-just look at pictures of soldiers currently serving in Afghanistan, they're not wearing the UCP, which was deemed unsuitable for operations there, but a different uniform known as the MultiCam." The rest of that piece here.