Feature

Lost in America

How America's favorite Chinese dissident burned bridges at NYU and ended up at a pro-life, anti-gay think tank.

Nearly two years after arriving in the United States, Washington, D.C.'s favorite dissident Chen Guangcheng remains certain that the Chinese Communist Party is out to get him. "There are so many people in the United States, it can't only be me" who feels the pressure from the party, Chen said, in his first major interview since June 2013. That month, he accused New York University, where he was serving as a visiting scholar, of bowing to pressure from Beijing; his departure from the university was acrimonious, and he has mostly shied away from media since then. But he still wants to make his point. "Why isn't anyone saying anything?" he said. "Is the Communist Party really that scary?"

A self-taught legal activist who fought to protect the poor from government abuses, Chen catapulted to international fame in April 2012 when he fled extralegal house arrest in central China and sought asylum in the U.S. Embassy in Beijing. Just days before a Beijing visit by then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, his thrilling, Shawshank Redemption-like escape (Chen, who is blind, broke his foot while scaling the wall surrounding his house under the cover of darkness, and fell at least 200 times as he stumbled to meet an activist who drove him to safety) made him an international star and sparked a diplomatic firestorm between the United States and China. As part of a face-saving arrangement Clinton negotiated to allow him to leave the U.S. Embassy, New York University (NYU) offered Chen a one-year legal position as a visiting scholar; he flew there with his family days later.

Chen, who's writing a book about his escape, hasn't spoken much about what happened. But something clearly rankles. In response to a question about Clinton and U.S. Ambassador to China Gary Locke's role in the situation, he said that if people thought carefully about what happened back then "they would possibly feel that they were again cheated by the Communist Party." It is not uncommon, he said, "to see that the Chinese government lies to their people, but now they're lying to the United States and even the world." But truth is a fragile thing.

I first met Chen in October 2012, in his calm and empty NYU office, off a quiet city block, five months after he left China. He was calm, his voice confident, his posture straight. He had a tendency to interrupt my questions, propelled forward by the strength of his convictions. But it was clear the ordeal was not behind him. "It's hard for someone who's not been in prison to understand," he said. "It's not too easy to recover from persecution. It's not like you go hungry for three days and then you satiate yourself and suddenly everything is back to normal." And yet, Chen seemed poised for iconic status as a critic of the Chinese state. As Jerome Cohen, a NYU University law professor who acted as a Chen confidant, described him, Chen was "calm, highly intelligent, with an underlying determination and steeliness. He seemed a potential Gandhi figure for Chinese society."

But in June 2013, Chen announced he was being forced to leave NYU. As early as August and September of 2012, Chen wrote in a statement, the Chinese Communists had started applying "great unrelenting pressure" to the university. This move baffled many of his supporters. "I think he may have misunderstood things," said Kelley Currie, a senior fellow at the Project 2049 Institute who has worked on Chinese human rights issues, and who calls herself a huge admirer of Chen. Chen said he made the statement because "I feel I have the responsibility to let the American understand that the dictators are exerting great influence on the free world. If you are not aware of it, it will be dangerous." (In an emailed statement, NYU spokesman John Beckman said, "it remains a regrettable puzzle to us why he claimed that the winding down of his fellowship was a result of pressure from the Chinese government. It wasn't true.")

Both Beckman and Cohen make a point of stressing just how much money the school spent on Chen. In his statement, Beckman wrote "we provided costly and enormous support to him and his family," while Cohen said that while has never seen Chen produce any evidence to support his claim that NYU bowed to Chinese pressure, he has seen "evidence of strong NYU financial support for Chen's new housing after his fellowship ended." As Cohen told Foreign Policy in June 2013, "You shouldn't bite the hand that feeds you. NYU has been extraordinarily generous to the Chens."

Chen still declines to explain how exactly NYU bowed to Chinese pressure. Instead, he coyly notes, "I know the Communist Party desires to divert the conflicts between dictatorship and democracy to the conflicts within the democratic society itself."

In the months since Chen left NYU, his appearance has changed little -- his hair is slightly greyer, his suit better-fitting -- but his image in the United States has grown far more complicated. Cohen, who had acted as a mentor, had a falling out with Chen. In an email, Cohen said the two remain good friends, "despite our disagreement about whether his one-year NYU fellowship was not renewed because of supposed PRC influence."

Chen agreed that the two were still friends. "But there's this phrase: I love my teacher but I love truth more," he said. "That is my principle."

Principle aside, some China watchers feel that a bit more guidance and interaction from the State Department would have helped Chen after he moved to the United States. A State Department official, speaking on background, said that since Chen arrived, officials met with him on several occasions, but that Clinton did not meet or appear publicly in America with Chen during her tenure as secretary. When asked why, Chen replied with a smile, "language barrier." He didn't seem to remember the State Department meetings. The Chen negotiation had been a diplomatic success for Clinton, but it paled in comparison to the importance of the U.S.-China relationship as a whole. "The State Department was forced to deal with Chen's situation; they did not want to deal with it, so they tried to turn it into a public relations victory," Currie said. But as soon as Chen found a home at NYU, "their headache [was] over, and they [felt] like they [could] move on. And now, they are nowhere to be found."

In October 2013, Chen announced he would be accepting a three-year fellowship at the Witherspoon Institute, a conservative, pro-life think tank. The move drew criticism for Chen's perceived inability to navigate his life in America. "After Epic Escape from China, Exile is Mired in Partisan U.S.," read a New York Times headline. The story quoted prominent Chinese activist Hu Jia, who has been in touch with Chen over Skype, saying "I think that maybe he got in over his head."

Others feel that Chen erred in aligning himself with figures like the far-right firebrand Bob Fu, a pastor and president of China Aid, a nonprofit Christian human rights organization. Like Cohen, Fu had advised Chen during the tense weeks following his escape. In an interview in mid-December 2013, Fu rejected any claim that he had swayed Chen. "That's totally false information," he said. "He's his own man!"

* * *

On Dec. 5, Chen attended a House Committee on Foreign Affairs subcommittee hearing in Washington, called, "Their Daughters Appeal to Beijing:  'Let Our Fathers Go.'" Five young Chinese women, the daughters of imprisoned Chinese dissidents, sat on a panel facing the assembled congressmen. "As a source of some hope, immediately behind you sits Chen," said Rep. Christopher H. Smith (R-N.J.), who had long championed Chen's cause. "He made a Herculean journey to the U.S. Embassy, and by the grace of God he is a free man." Chen sat behind the daughters, directly in the center of the room, occasionally nodding his head at the conversation. "I pray that someday you'll be united with" your fathers, Robert Pittenger (R-N.C.), said to the girls, slowly, with a giant smile.

Fu sat on the next panel, and spoke of the loss of "God-given, self-evident, fundamental ideals" in the United States that was hurting the campaign for human rights in China. He asked the congressmen if they wanted to stand with the "Nazi" state church of the Communist Party, which would betray God and leave a mark of shame. Two of the congressmen left abruptly, after roughly the fifth time Fu said "Nazi." 

At dinner at a Middle Eastern restaurant in downtown Washington that evening, Chen spoke about his perceived affiliation with reactionary Christianity. "I don't believe in any religion," he said firmly, in between bites of kebab, and sips of tea. His wife, Yuan Weijing, who joined him for dinner -- along with Chen's brother, who sat alone at a nearby table and looked pleased just to be in the United States -- added: "He only believes in truth and facts."

Chen pointed out that, beyond his ties to the Witherspoon Institute, he's also affiliated with the Catholic University of America, and the Lantos Foundation for Human Rights and Justice. Anyone who pays attention to human rights in China, who supports Chinese constitutional democracy, he said, is a friend. "Who's right-wing or left-wing might be important to Americans," his wife said. "Chen really doesn't care."

He told a horrific story about a pregnant woman who was almost buried alive for violating the one-child policy. "Is this about abortion or women's rights?" he asked. That it's barbaric and should be prevented is what matters, he implied, not whether or not it fits into a Democratic or Republican framework.

But it's hard to argue that Chen hasn't lost some of his early luster. He's not alone, however: nearly all prominent Chinese human rights dissidents lose influence after they leave mainland China. Wei Jingsheng, arguably the first major dissident to leave China in the post-Mao era, was soon forgotten. Chai Ling, a major student leader during the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests who later got a Harvard MBA, is now probably best known in the dissident community for lawsuits - she sued the makers of a film about the protests, and was sued in 2012 for allegedly forcing an employee of hers to pray on the job. Wu'er Kaixi, a student leader who fled China after the protests, hasn't been able to return to the mainland. In November 2013, he tried to turn himself over to Beijing for the fourth time -- and again was refused.

"As soon as dissidents leave China they lose their influence," Han Dongfang, a Chinese dissident who has spent the last two decades in Hong Kong, where he runs the labor rights organization China Labour Bulletin, said in April. "It's like cutting off your legs and putting you in a wheelchair."

When asked if he feared his own obsolescence in America, Chen responded that, in this era of hyper-connectedness, "you can get things done wherever you are.... Promoting democracy is not to say everyone needs to stand in the front of the stage."

And yet, there's a celebrity unique to the United States that the low-key Chen clearly enjoys. He praised Christian Bale, the Batman star who in December 2011 tried to visit Chen when he was under house arrest in China, but who was forcibly turned away by security personnel before the two could meet. I asked him if other people like Bale had tried to see him. "Yes," he said. "But I can say with certainty that Obama wasn't one of them." Bale "dared to lose the Chinese market," Chen said. "That's not something just anyone would do."

In October 2012, Chen finally met Bale in New York; soon after, the Batman star invited him to go to Disneyland with his family; they went in January 2013. "Bale really likes the roller coasters," Chen said. "I asked him if there was a more exciting ride than the one we went on together, and Bale said 'No, this is it!'" (At that point, Chen, a man who had been rolled into a carpet and beaten by thugs, spontaneously broke into a giggle.)                 

Does he worry about the long arm of the Communist Party? Since he left China, Chen says he hasn't had any contact with Chinese officials. "Maybe you need to help show them the way!" he said, laughing. "They say they can't find me!"

Gloria Wang contributed reporting to this story.

Isaac Stone Fish

Feature

Longform's Picks of the Week

The best stories from around the world.

Every weekend, Longform highlights its favorite international articles of the week. For daily picks of new and classic nonfiction, check out Longform or follow @longform on Twitter. Have an iPad? Download Longform's new app and read all of the latest in-depth stories from dozens of magazines, including Foreign Policy.

 

How the NSA Almost Killed the Internet, by Steven Levy, Wired

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, and the other tech titans have had to fight for their lives against their own government. An exclusive look inside their year from hell -- and why the Internet will never be the same.

Gellman wanted to be the first to expose a top-secret NSA program called Prism. Snowden's files indicated that some of the biggest companies on the web had granted the NSA and FBI direct access to their servers, giving the agencies the ability to grab a person's audio, video, photos, emails, and documents. The government urged Gellman not to identify the firms involved, but Gellman thought it was important. "Naming those companies is what would make it real to Americans," he says. Now a team of Post reporters was reaching out to those companies for comment.

It would be the start of a chain reaction that threatened the foundations of the industry. The subject would dominate headlines for months and become the prime topic of conversation in tech circles. For years, the tech companies' key policy issue had been negotiating the delicate balance between maintaining customers' privacy and providing them benefits based on their personal data. It was new and contro­versial territory, sometimes eclipsing the substance of current law, but over time the companies had achieved a rough equilibrium that allowed them to push forward. The instant those phone calls from reporters came in, that balance was destabilized, as the tech world found itself ensnared in a fight far bigger than the ones involving oversharing on Facebook or ads on Gmail. Over the coming months, they would find themselves at war with their own government, in a fight for the very future of the Internet.

 

Afro-Europe in the World Cup, by Laurent DuBois, Roads and Kingdoms

How the children of African immigrants came to control the destiny of teams in France and Belgium and what it says about European identity.

Though France's teams had been multi-ethnic ever since they had existed as such-already in the 1920s and 1930s the teams had North and West African players, such as the Moroccan star Larbi Ben Barek-that fact had never been infused with major political symbolism. But Le Pen's attacks on the team politicized its players, many of whom responded passionately and angrily to his statements, and also amounted to an invitation to politicians and journalists to embrace the team precisely as a way of rejecting Le Pen. Then, unfortunately the for the Far Right politician, a team he had condemned for being made up of "foreigners" and "mercenaries" who didn't know the national anthem made history, by winning France's it's first World Cup -- on home soil -- in 1998. Thanks in no small part to Le Pen, the celebration of that victory doubled for many people as a celebration of the dawning of a new, multi-cultural, France.

 

The Geel Question, by Mike Jay, Aeon

For centuries, a little town in Belgium has been treating the mentally ill. Why are its medieval methods so successful?

Among the people of Geel, the term 'mentally ill' is never heard: even words such as 'psychiatric' and 'patient' are carefully hedged with finger-waggling and scare quotes. The family care system, as it's known, is resolutely non-medical. When boarders meet their new families, they do so, as they always have, without a backstory or clinical diagnosis. If a word is needed to describe them, it's often a positive one such as 'special', or at worst, 'different'. This might in fact be more accurate than 'mentally ill', since the boarders have always included some who would today be diagnosed with learning difficulties or special needs. But the most common collective term is simply 'boarders', which defines them at the most pragmatic level by their social, not mental, condition. These are people who, whatever their diagnosis, have come here because they're unable to cope on their own, and because they have no family or friends who can look after them.

 

The Wikileaks Mole, by David Kushner, Rolling Stone

How a teenage misfit became the keeper of Julian Assange's deepest secrets -- only to betray him.

Siggi has provided Rolling Stone with more than a terabyte of secret files he claims to have taken from WikiLeaks before he left in November 2011 and gave to the FBI: thousands of pages of chat logs, videos, tapped phone calls, government documents and more than a few bombshells from the organization's most heated years. They're either the real thing, or the most elaborate lie of the digital age.

Assange himself validated the importance of Siggi's documents when he filed an affidavit late this past summer asserting that "the FBI illegally acquired stolen organisational and personal data belonging to WikiLeaks, me and other third parties in Denmark in March 2012" and that the FBI "was attempting to entrap me through Sigurdur Thordarson."

Whatever their origins, the SiggiLeaks are a deep and revealing portal into one of the most guarded and influential organizations of the 21st century - and the extreme measures its embattled leader is willing to take.

 

Vanished, Nik Steinberg, Foreign Policy

In 2011, Israel Arenas Durán disappeared in northern Mexico. Why can't the government find him -- and the thousands of others who've gone missing in the country's drug war?

"Disappearing" people, which involves abducting them and then concealing their whereabouts, was one of the most sinister tactics used by governments in Latin America's "dirty wars," beginning in the 1960s. At that time, disappearances were aimed at eradicating guerrilla movements and their suspected sympathizers -- leftist intellectuals, trade unionists, student leaders. Augusto Pinochet's government in Chile disappeared more than 3,000 people; Argentina's military junta disappeared 10,000, by official count. During Mexico's dirty war from the late 1960s to the early 1980s, the PRI government disappeared an estimated 500 people -- some of whom were thrown alive from Air Force planes over the Pacific Ocean. If even half of the cases on the leaked 2012 list were real, they would constitute one of the worst waves of disappearances in the Americas in decades.

But unlike the dirty-war disappearances, which followed a sinister logic in targeting specific sectors of the population, there is no single explanation for why so many people have gone missing in Mexico's drug war, or for what has happened to them. I have spent over three years investigating more than 300 disappearances across 11 Mexican states for Human Rights Watch. I've found that, if these disappearances share anything in common, it is that the government has done almost nothing to try to find the missing. And it has consistently failed to pursue the obvious lines of evidence that, in case after case -- including Israel Arenas Durán's -- point to collusion between the cartels and the very soldiers and police sent to combat them.

JIM WATSON/AFP/Getty Images; PATRIK STOLLARZ/AFP/Getty Images; ArcheoNet Vlaanderen/flickr; Anthony Devlin/AFP/Getty Images; Ronaldo Schemidt/AFP/Getty Images