California's Green Energy Drought

The water shortage hammering California is bad news for power prices - and for the state's emissions goals.

Among all the terrible things that California's historic drought promises to bring this year - fallow farm land, dead livestock, more wildfires - there are a couple more nasty treats in store: higher electricity prices and rising greenhouse-gas emissions.

That's because the drought is hammering California's ability to generate electricity from hydroelectric power, which will push the famously green state to burn even more natural gas, which is both pricier and dirtier. It underscores yet again just how vulnerable green energy sources such as hydropower can be to the vagaries of the weather, an issue that will vex not just the U.S., but also Brazil, China and other countries that have bet heavily on hydropower to run their growing economies.

California's drought is unrelenting. The latest information from the United States Drought Monitor shows more than 98% of the state facing some degree of drought; for the first time, nearly 10% of the state is deemed to be suffering "exceptional drought," the worst category. Since mid-January, California has been in an official drought emergency, with Gov. Jerry Brown calling for voluntary reductions in water use. But the biggest impacts are yet to be felt.

In a normal year, with average rainfall, California relies quite heavily on electricity generated from hydroelectric dams; hydropower can provide anywhere from one-tenth to one-quarter of the electricity generated in the state. But when the rain and snow stops falling during the relatively short wet season, it doesn't just affect California's ski industry or the rich farmlands of the Central Valley. It chokes the entire water system that underpins the state's dams.

Federal monitors show nearly that all of California's water resources are essentially half-empty. Usually, melting snowpack from the Sierra Nevada provides a shot in the arm for hydropower in the spring and summer, but California's sparse snowpack is currently only 16% as deep as it normally is this time of year.

But wait - it gets worse. Since California uses more electricity than it generates, it relies on imports from nearby states, including hydroelectric power from the normally rainy Pacific Northwest. But the drought is also hammering Washington, Oregon, and Idaho, where precipitation is in many cases about half the normal level. And that will limit California's ability to fix its own shortfalls. The only easy answer is to use more natural gas, which costs more and is significantly dirtier.

"There will be rate impacts, because we'll be using more expensive fuel, and there will be air-quality impacts in terms of greenhouse-gas emissions," Robert Weisenmiller, the chairman of the California Energy Commission, told Foreign Policy.

California knows what happens when it has to turn to more natural gas. In 2012 and 2013, thanks to dry years (and the shutdown of one nuclear power station) hydroelectricity's contribution to the electricity mix fell sharply. Gas came to the rescue.

In 2011, California generated about 42 million megawatt-hours of electricity from hydropower, and about 89 million megawatt hours of electricity from natural gas. The next year, hydroelectric generation plummeted to less than 26 million mWh, while gas-fired generation soared to 121 million mWh.

Through November 2013, the latest statistics available, hydroelectric generation fell even further, though natural-gas generation also slipped.

The outlook for 2014 in California, then, could be one where the state increasingly turns to natural gas to supplement the lack of both in-state and out-of-state hydroelectricity. Weisenmiller said that in particularly dry years, like 2014, hydroelectricity generation could plummet a further 40 percent.

That would be bad news in two ways: Higher power prices, and rising greenhouse gas emissions.

It's actually a delicate moment for natural-gas markets right now. The polar vortex drove record levels of natural-gas demand across much of the country. The prices at Henry Hub, the main physical pricing point for U.S. natural gas, prices spiked 50% in the last week, to levels not seen since 2008. Higher demand has drained U.S. natural-gas storage, which is currently well below average levels, which means that even as winter temperatures retreat in coming months, that storage will have to be replenished. That promises stubborn gas prices. Hedge funds are already betting on gas prices going higher.

The situation is so dire, in fact, that California's electric system operator asked customers across the state on Thursday to turn off lights and shut down big appliances in order to save scarce supplies of gas.

As California relies more on natural gas to keep the electricity running, it will mean higher average wholesale power prices, which means residential electricity bills will likely rise this year. Add that to the list of other economic woes from the drought, from lost farm jobs to shrinking herds of cattle and other livestock.

But for California, which famously leads the nation in aggressive environmental rules and regulations, that's not the worst of it. Replacing clean electricity from hydroelectric dams with electricity from natural gas means more greenhouse-gas emissions, exactly what the state has spent years trying to avoid.

This already happened to a dramatic degree in 2012, when a weak year for hydropower and the loss of some nuclear energy pushed California into the arms of natural-gas fired power plants in a big way. For most states, and for the United States as a whole, relying more on natural gas is good for the environment. Since it normally displaces coal-fired electricity, natural gas actually helps reduce emissions.

But California already had a clean power sector. So relying more on natural gas has had the opposite impact there. That year, California's greenhouse-gas emissions from the electric power sector jumped 50%, making it the biggest laggard nationwide in reducing greenhouse-gas emissions, as The Rhodium Group documented. A hydropower deficit this year won't help matters any.

"In terms of reducing emissions at the rate they need to meet their target over time, just holding steady and not getting worse than last year is going to be a challenge," Kate Larsen, the director of climate change at Rhodium, told FP.

California's cautionary tale has echoes overseas, too. Brazil and China have bet big on hydroelectric power to provide large amounts of clean electricity. Indeed, both countries feature mega hydro projects - Belo Monte in Brazil and the Three Gorges Dam in China- that are at once the backbone of future power supplies and un ugly source of social strife in the present. And in both countries, droughts in recent years have hammered hydroelectricity's ability to contribute a reliable amount of power to the national grid.

For China in particular, which faces worries about a structural shift in rainfall patterns due to climate change, the potential loss of a big source of clean energy represents a huge headache for Beijing. The Chinese regime is desperately trying to clean up the coal-dependent electricity sector, because air pollution is becoming both an environmental burden and a threat to regime stability.

For now, California officials believe they've got enough options to weather a tough year. But a fourth year of extreme drought, with the severe impacts it is having on the power system, would be a different story.

"If this drought were to continue as bad into next year, then I would get nervous," Weisenmiller said.

Justin Sullivan - Getty


Egypt's Sea of Troubles

Why an upsurge in terrorism in the Sinai Peninsula raises fears for the Suez Canal.

The growing and sophisticated insurgency in the Sinai Peninsula, along with its declared emphasis on attacking the Egyptian regime's economic lifeblood, has raised fears over the security of the Suez Canal, one of the world's principal arteries for trade, and especially for moving oil and gas between Asia and Europe.

Late last summer, after militants filmed themselves launching a rocket attack on a cargo ship that was making its way through the canal, worries over the channel's vulnerability to a terrorist attack began to proliferate. In January, West Point's Combating Terrorism Center published an article on the Sinai insurgency and possible threats to the canal. The Suez Canal serves as the main transit point for the U.S. Navy to move ships between the Eastern Mediterranean and the Red Sea.

The group behind the rocket strikes, the al-Furqan Brigades, threatened further attacks on the canal, but most analysts dismiss the group as a ragtag group of jihadists. However, in the months since, the sophistication of terrorism in the Sinai has only grown. Ansar Bait al-Maqdis, an al Qaeda-inspired jihadi group based in the region, has taken credit for deadly bomb attacks at Egyptian police stations, blowing up several gas pipelines on the peninsula, shooting down an Egyptian Army helicopter, and other acts of terrorism.

While many of Ansar Bait al-Maqdis's attacks have focused on parts of the Egyptian security apparatus -- the Army and the police -- the group has made clear in its statements that it seeks to impose the greatest possible economic pain on a regime it sees as apostate. The group justified a January attack on a pipeline that exported gas to Jordan as part of a campaign to "target the regime's economic interests." Another attack on a pipeline, one that fueled a cement factory owned by the Egyptian military, was justified in similar terms.

"If they're really serious about targeting the economic interests of the Egyptian government, the Suez Canal would be near the top, if not at the top of the list," David Barnett, a research associate at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies who specializes in Sinai insurgent groups, told Foreign Policy.

Almost 150 years after it was dug out of the Egyptian desert, the Suez Canal matters more than ever to both Egyptian state coffers and the global economy. Egyptian revenues from the canal total about $5 billion a year, dwarfing the annual aid provided by the United States and amounting to about 2 percent of Egypt's GDP. That's one reason that Egyptian authorities, under Hosni Mubarak's government, then under President Mohamed Morsi, and today again under military tutelage, have spared no expense to secure the canal against threats in the Sinai.

But the canal's importance to global trade is also huge. In 2012, the last full year for which traffic statistics are available, nearly 3 million barrels of oil per day passed through the canal -- or roughly 7 percent of all the crude oil traded by ship, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. The boom in liquefied natural gas (LNG) trade in recent years has given the canal even more importance for the global energy economy: About 13 percent of the global LNG trade passes through the canal.

The canal's importance as an energy corridor is especially noteworthy for Europe and the Mediterranean basin. In the first nine months of 2013, oil and petroleum products made up about one-quarter of all northbound tonnage passing through the canal. Northbound crude oil shipments rose 25 percent through September compared with the first three quarters of 2012. Southbound energy shipments, which carry goods from Europe and the Mediterranean to the Red Sea and on to Asia, declined in 2013, due in large part to oil-supply disruptions in Libya and Egypt's own difficulties in exporting natural gas.

Here's the problem: The canal itself is flat, dug out of the desert at sea level, and seemingly accessible to evildoers. The al-Furqan video from September, for instance, shows a couple of jihadists simply walking from behind a low shrub and taking potshots at a cargo ship with a rocket-propelled grenade. But those kinds of small-scale attacks, while visibly arresting, aren't the real threat to canal traffic.

"An RPG isn't going to shut down the canal. They'd need to do a bombing, something along the lines of the USS Cole," said Barnett, referring to the 2000 suicide bombing of a U.S. warship docked in Yemen.

Ships transiting the canal move at a slow but steady pace, though there are a couple of places they pause to let other vessels pass. Ships on either end of the canal, though, are stationary as they wait their turn to convoy through the largely one-way transit. Disabling a ship inside the canal would essentially block traffic in both directions, given how narrow the channel is.

And while maritime terrorism isn't as widespread as or easy to carry out as attacks on land, they have been part of jihadi playbooks in the past. In addition to the Cole, the Limburg, an oil tanker, was attacked by suicide bombers in 2002, and a Japanese cargo ship was attacked in the Strait of Hormuz in 2010.

"The fact remains that the canal is vulnerable -- and due to its symbolic and high impact event potential, it will remain a desirable target for extremist elements," the Soufan Group, a security consultancy, wrote in December.

The economic implications of an attack would likely be severe -- and not just for Egypt. Rerouting ships around Africa would add thousands of miles to the voyage, increasing costs and also requiring ships to transit more pirate-infested waters. The last time the Suez Canal was closed for any length of time -- between 1967 and 1975 -- global trade was less, canal traffic was less, the shipping container revolution had barely yet begun, and global seaborne LNG trade was anecdotal.

"You would see a huge spike in transportation costs, in rerouting, if there was a serious closure issue," Douglas Burnett, a lawyer with Squire Sanders who specializes in maritime and energy issues, told FP.

To be sure, other than those late-summer rocket attacks, there have been no actual attacks on shipping in the canal despite the big uptick in Sinai insurgency. The Egyptian military has bolstered the perimeter security of the canal, even as it has intensified counterinsurgency operations in other parts of the Sinai Peninsula.

Steven Cook, an Egypt specialist at the Council on Foreign Relations, said that Egyptians have increased security for the canal by using a lot of different elements of their armed forces, but "they admit it is hard to be 100 percent when you are playing defense."

Khaled Desouki - AFP - Getty