National Security

FP's Situation Report: Militants in Syria raise Western fears

Hagel hires an ethics officer; Sub exercises in the Arctic; The North goes ballistic; Snowden scores; Taliban victories overrated; and a bit more.

What keeps them up at night: Dozens of militant fighters have travelled from Pakistan to Syria and could be planning attacks on the U.S. or Europe. The NYT's Eric Schmitt on Page One: "...The extremists who concern [CIA Director John Brennan] are part of a group of Qaeda operatives in Pakistan that has been severely depleted in recent years by a decade of American drone strikes. But the fighters still bring a wide range of skills to the battlefield, such as bomb-building, small-arms tactics, logistics, religious indoctrination and planning, though they are not believed to have experience in launching attacks in the West.

"Syria is an appealing base for these operatives because it offers them the relative sanctuary of extremist-held havens - away from drone strikes in Afghanistan and Pakistan - as well as ready access to about 1,200 American and European Muslims who have gone there to fight and could be potential recruits to carry out attacks when they return home. Senior counterterrorism officials have voiced fears in recent months that these Western fighters could be radicalized by the country's civil war."

"New classified intelligence assessments based on information from electronic intercepts, informers and social media posts conclude that Al Qaeda's senior leadership in Pakistan, including Ayman al-Zawahri, is developing a much more systematic, long-term plan than was previously known to create specific cells in Syria that would identify, recruit and train these Westerners."

"...Most of the operatives identified by intelligence officials are now focused on attacking Syrian government troops and occasionally rival rebel factions. But the fact that these kinds of operatives are showing up in Syria indicates to American officials that Mr. Zawahri is also playing a long game - counting on easy access to Iraq and Qaeda support networks there, as well as on the United States' reluctance to carry out drone strikes or other military operations against targets in Syria."

"...The new assessment is not likely to change American policy toward Syria any time soon, but it puts pressure on the Obama administration and its allies because it raises the possibility that Syria could become the next Afghanistan." More here.

Welcome to Wednesday's edition of Situation Report. If you'd like to sign up to receive Situation Report, send us a note at gordon.lubold@foreignpolicy.com and we'll just stick you on. Like what you see? Tell a friend.  And if you have a report you want teased, a piece of news, or a good tidbit, send it to us early for maximum tease, because if you see something, we hope you'll say something -- to Situation Report. And one more thing: please do follow us @glubold.

Missing SitRep? Please note: If you regularly receive Situation Report but then miss it here and there on some days and wonder why, do please check your junk or spam filters, as that is typically the cause when readers suddenly don't receive it as usual. And thank you much for reading SitRep.

More sabre rattling from the North: Obama brokers Japan, South Korea talks as Pyongyang fires missiles. Reuters' Thomas Escritt and Linda Sieg:  "U.S. President Barack Obama brought together the leaders of Japan and South Korea for their first face-to-face talks as a North Korean ballistic missile launch underscored the need for Washington's two key Asian allies to repair their strained ties. Washington hopes the three-way summit will improve relations between Seoul and Tokyo, which are clouded by the legacy of Japan's 1910-1945 colonial rule of the Korean peninsula and Seoul's concerns that Prime Minister Shinzo Abe wants to rewrite Japan's wartime past with a less apologetic tone.

"...In what appeared to be a show of defiance, North Korea fired two medium-range Rodong ballistic missiles into the sea at 2:35 a.m. Japan and Korea time, both Tokyo and Seoul said. That was precisely when Abe and South Korean President Park Geun-hye were sitting down with Obama in The Hague for their first meeting since Abe took office in December 2012." Read the rest here.

Snowden dances in the end zone. FP's Shane Harris: "Score one for Edward Snowden -- and for the NSA. On Monday, the Obama administration began unveiling its plan to end the spy agency's collection of millions of Americans' phone records. That will effectively close out the most controversial NSA spying program that Snowden had exposed, and the former contractor wasted little time claiming credit.

Snowden, in a statement issued through the ACLU: "I believed that if the NSA's unconstitutional mass surveillance of Americans was known, it would not survive the scrutiny of the courts, the Congress, and the people...This is a turning point, and it marks the beginning of a new effort to reclaim our rights from the NSA and restore the public's seat at the table of government."

Harris: "Had Snowden not disclosed the program's existence, it would almost certainly be going strong today. The plan to end the collection of telephone metadata "is yet further vindication for Edward Snowden in particular, and for transparency more generally," David Cole, a professor at the Georgetown University Law Center, wrote on the blog Just Security. 'The only reason the president is proposing this change is because, once the program became public, it was unsustainable in its current form.' More here.

Back to the future: U.S. holds submarine exercises in the Arctic Ocean in a show of force amid tensions with Russia over Ukraine. The WSJ's Julian Barnes: "Five hundred feet below the Arctic ice cap, the USS New Mexico's crew filled two torpedo tubes. "Match sonar bearings and shoot," ordered the skipper, Cmdr. Todd Moore. The air pressure rose sharply as a simulated torpedo headed toward its simulated target: a Russian Akula-class submarine.

"The Arctic exercise, one of two over this past weekend, was intended as a show of U.S. force for the benefit of America's allies, defense officials said. The drills were arranged before Russia's annexation of Ukraine's Crimea province, these people said, but have taken on new geopolitical significance as tensions soar between East and West. The simulated attack came amid a new era of increasingly cold U.S. relations with Moscow. U.S.-Russian cooperation in the Arctic came to a sudden halt after the U.S. recently canceled a joint naval exercise in the northern waters and a bilateral meeting on Coast Guard Arctic operations. The U.S. also put on hold work on an Arctic submarine rescue ship."

Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Jon Greenert, to Barnes: "If our allies and friends are reassured, that is a deterrent... It is about being able to get to any area of the world and people understanding that we can." Read the story here.

Read In the Loop's Al Kamen's take on the Navy's trip to the Arctic, which included Sen. Angus King, Rep. Steve Pearce, Interior Secretary Sally Jewell and Undersecretary of Defense Frank Kendall, here.

Harry Reid drops IMF reform from Ukraine bill. FP's John Harris: "In the face of staunch Republican opposition in the House of Representatives, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid dropped a provision to reform the International Monetary Fund as part of an urgent rescue package to Ukraine's cash-strapped government. Dropping the contentious IMF language clears the way for swift passage of legislation giving Kiev $1 billion in loan guarantees and hundreds of millions of dollars in assistance for election monitoring, civil society and security. Beyond the money itself, lawmakers believe the aid influx would provide a morale boost of sorts for Ukraine's beleaguered new leaders in the wake of Russia's conquest and annexation of Crimea." More here.

Move it or Lose it: If Putin wants to make another move, he needs to do it soon, argues Pavel Felgenhauer on FP. Read that here.

Hagel just hired a new ethics officer to work directly for him. It seemed to take several weeks to find just the right one, but Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel announced by e-mail yesterday that he had tapped Rear Adm. Margaret "Peg" Klein to serve as his "senior advisor for Military Professionalism." Klein will not be assigned to the Joint Staff, but report directly to Hagel on all issues relating to military ethics, character, and leadership.

Hagel: "I appreciate Rear Admiral Klein's willingness to take on this new assignment. She brings to the position a wealth of operational and leadership experience, including command responsibilities at various levels throughout the Navy community. Having served as the 82nd Commandant of Midshipmen at the U.S. Naval Academy, she knows that ethics and character are absolute values that must be constantly reinforced.

"Rear Admiral Klein will coordinate the actions of the Joint Staff, the Combatant Commands, and each of the military services - working directly with the Service Secretaries and the Service Chiefs - on DoD's focus on ethics, character, and competence in all activities at every level of command with an uncompromising culture of accountability. This will continue to be a top priority for DoD's senior leadership," Hagel's statement said. The Defense Department has been rocked by a combination of ethical scandals involving senior officers as well as lower-ranking service members. At the same time, Hagel is grappling with how best to address sexual assault across the military - a reminder of which came in the last week with the poster boy for the sexual assault problem in the military, Brig. Gen. Jeffrey Sinclair, getting a plea deal with no jail time, an outcome that is raising the likelihood that Congress will act to blunt the military's own authority on sexual assault cases.

Actually, (Senate hopeful) Shane Osborn did "exactly the right thing" as commander of the EP3 plane in 2001, writes a retired Navy admiral in Lincoln (Nebraska) Journal Star, here.

The U.K.'s Hammond is in town this week and meeting with Hagel. The United Kingdom's Secretary of State for Defence, Philip Hammond will speak at the Heritage Foundation today at 1:30. While he's in town, he will meet with Hagel and with senior members from the House and Senate Armed Services Committees before travelling Thursday to Kings Bay and Jacksonville, according to the British embassy here in D.C. From an embassy statement previewing the Heritage speech today: " He will also reflect on British defence reforms that have already been enacted and how these policies are complementary to those of the U.S. - a strong and like-minded partner.  As the United States re-balances to focus on the Asia-Pacific region, Secretary Hammond will examine the need for Europe to realize its responsibilities in its own backyard - including the crisis in the Ukraine - and how these and future events do, and will, require deeper and closer collaboration between close allies."

Hammond and Hagel will brief reporters at the Pentagon today at 11:30 a.m.

More objects spotted in search of Flight 370, in the NYT, here.

Going all in: If you're one of the people who think CNN went a little heavy on Flight 370 coverage (maybe just a little?) click here for FP's cartoonist Matt Bors' take, CNN In the Age of MH370: how to report on nothing, with graphics.

U.S. Special Ops planning for action in the globe's 'dark areas.' Time's Mark Thompson: "The U.S. military is always busy planning for war pretty much everywhere, but some places are tougher nuts to crack than others. That's why the U.S. Special Operations Command is seeking 'Geospatial Data on Countries of Interest for Which There is a Critical Need But Non-Existent Data.' Just who might those countries be? According to a USSCOM announcement posted Monday, the 'initial dataset' consists of 'Jordan, Djibouti, Burma, Honduras, Iran, Morocco, Nigeria, Trinidad & Tobago, Burkina Faso, S. Sudan, N. Korea, and China (Guangdong).'"

Attacks by the Taliban are raising security concerns ahead of next month's election in Afghanistan. The NYT's Azem Ahmed: With security concerns already mounting before the Afghan presidential vote next week, a Taliban assault team on Tuesday turned election offices in eastern Kabul into a scene of carnage, in a new and brutal statement of the group's intent to derail the voting. Bombers' body parts and victims' blood covered the street and courtyard where five Taliban militants blasted their way into the regional offices of the Independent Election Commission and waged a four-hour battle with Afghan security forces. Afterward, five victims lay dead and the Afghan capital had again been proved vulnerable.

"The front of the elections building was a bombed-out shell, with bullets pockmarking the facade and the doors and windows blown off their hinges. Election workers who survived described hiding in empty rooms and the building's basement as gunfire and explosions rocked the compound, which is just a stone's throw from the home of a leading presidential candidate." Read the rest here.

Let's not be so quick to assume the Taliban will win post 2014 argues the AAN's Borhan Osman. Despite the doomsday scenarios, there's less evidence to suggest a Taliban win argues the Afghanistan Analyst's Network Osman: "Obviously, the withdrawal of foreign forces are already leading to major changes in the war, but are the Taleban really strong enough to pose an existential threat to the Afghan state or force the Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF) to crumble? As AAN recently wrote, with more casualties among members of the ANSF, Afghan civilians and, it seems, the Taleban, (1) the statistics certainly mark out 2013 as a particularly violent year. However, although body counts tell us much about the nature of the conflict (it is now overwhelmingly Afghan versus Afghan), they do not, necessarily, say much about how strong the insurgency is." Read the rest here.

Duncan Hunter: take a look at all the Marines who jumped on grenades. The Marine Corps Times' Hope Hodge Seck: "In light of the news that Marine veteran Kyle Carpenter will receive the Medal of Honor for shielding his friend from a live grenade in Afghanistan, a California congressman is petitioning Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel to take a closer look at the awards for two Marines who reportedly committed similar acts of heroism. Republican Rep. Duncan Hunter sent a letter to Hagel Tuesday asking that he reconsider the awards for Marine Sgt. Maj. Bradley Kasal and the late Sgt. Rafael Peralta, both of whom received the Navy Cross for maneuvering to absorb the brunt of a grenade blast to shield a comrade. Hunter has waged an aggressive multiyear campaign seeking a medal upgrade for Peralta, whose family resides in his district. In February, Hagel became the third defense secretary to decline to seek the higher award in Peralta's case, citing a lack of conclusive evidence of the action to meet the medal's 'beyond a reasonable doubt' standard." More here.

 

 

 

National Security

FP's Situation Report: U.S. to open spigot of assistance to Syria

A shooting in Norfolk; Why the malware market is thriving; The challenge of finding the black box; Will Sinclair retire as a one-star?; and a bit more.

Overnight: there was a shooting at Naval Station Norfolk aboard the USS Mahan at Pier 1, in which two died, including the civilian suspect. CBS News: "A base spokeswoman says a sailor was shot and killed at Naval Station Norfolk in Virginia and security forces killed the male civilian suspect. Terri Davis says the shooting happened around 11:20 p.m. Monday aboard the USS Mahan, a destroyer. Davis would not describe the circumstances of the shooting but said the scene is secure. Davis says the two killed were both males but she didn't have any other information on them. She could not say if the civilian had permission to be aboard the ship or not. No other injuries were reported."

Meantime, the U.S. is about to open a big spigot of non-lethal assistance to rebel forces in Syria. Our story: "The State Department is about to begin delivering tens of millions of dollars worth of new assistance into Syria, including ambulances, communications gear and Toyota pickup trucks for the country's beleaguered rebels... despite the violence and fighting across large swaths of the country, State Department officials say that opposition forces have managed to open the supply route into Aleppo from the Syrian-Turkish border that will allow Washington to send in more aid. In January, rebel forces began a more concerted campaign against al Qaeda militias that managed to push the extremists out of strategically important areas. Now, even as the city of Aleppo itself remains under siege by the Assad regime, the route into the city is for the first time in many weeks free of militants.

As a result, U.S. assistance for rebel forces and the Free Syrian Army can get into Aleppo once again, American officials said...The shipments are part of an $80 million non-lethal assistance package to the FSA, underway since 2012, that has largely come to a halt in recent months because of the country's poor security situation. About one-third of that total aid package has already been delivered to rebel forces; that leaves the remainder of the existing U.S. commitment, more than $53 million of equipment and supplies, that is expected to begin to flow into the country in coming days, weeks, and months, according to a State Department official.

"This will be one of the largest shipments we've ever put across," Mark Ward, the State Department's senior advisor for non-lethal assistance in the region, told FP.

...Some of the shipments now in trucks in the queue along the Syrian border include ambulances, forklifts, trucks, communications gear, mattresses and blankets for the Free Syrian Army. It also includes a few of the Toyota Hilux pickups that Oubai Shahbandar, a senior adviser to the Syrian Opposition Coalition in Washington, described as one of the most critical types of equipment the rebels could have. "We need them in the hundreds, not in the onesies and twosies," he said.

...one congressional staffer believes that Americans are in the dark about the true nature of the Syrian rebels, many of whom are moderates that the administration knows and quietly trusts. "[The administration] doesn't want people to know that because if the public finds out, they may say, why aren't you doing more to help them? And there is no good answer to that question," the staffer said. Read our whole story here.

Welcome to Tuesday's edition of Situation Report. If you'd like to sign up to receive Situation Report, send us a note at gordon.lubold@foreignpolicy.com and we'll just stick you on. Like what you see? Tell a friend.  And if you have a report you want teased, a piece of news, or a good tidbit, send it to us early for maximum tease, because if you see something, we hope you'll say something -- to Situation Report. And one more thing: please do follow us @glubold.

Missing SitRep? Please note: If you regularly receive Situation Report but then miss it here and there on some days and wonder why, do please check your junk or spam filters, as that is typically the cause when readers suddenly don't receive it as usual. And thank you much for reading SitRep.

G-8 minus one: Russia is cast out. The NYT's Alison Smale and Michael Shear: "The United States and its closest allies on Monday cast Russia out of the Group of 8 industrialized democracies, their most exclusive club, to punish President Vladimir V. Putin for his lightning annexation of Crimea, while threatening tougher sanctions if he escalates aggression against Ukraine. President Obama and the leaders of Canada, Japan and Europe's four strongest economies gathered for the first time since the Ukraine crisis erupted last month, using a closed two-hour meeting on the sidelines of a summit meeting about nuclear security to project a united front against Moscow. But they stopped short, at least for now, of imposing sanctions against what a senior Obama administration official called vital sectors of the Russian economy: energy, banking and finance, engineering and the arms industry." More here.

How groundbreaking number-crunching found the path of Flight 370. CNN's Thom Patterson: "Monday's announcement by Malaysia's Prime Minister acknowledging that missing Flight 370 ended in the southern Indian Ocean opens the door to a big question: How did new number crunching confirm the Boeing 777's path? Now we know for sure "there's no way it went north," said Inmarsat Senior Vice President Chris McLaughlin. Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak said Monday that the plane was last tracked over the middle of the Indian Ocean, west of Perth, Australia. Malaysian Airlines has informed passengers' relatives that "all lives are lost," a relative told CNN." More here.

Why the effort to find Flight 370's black box will face hurdles. FP's Dan Lamothe: "The U.S. Navy announced plans Monday to move a "black box locator" to Perth, Australia, in case debris from Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 is found in the southern Indian Ocean. The statement was covered breathlessly, with some media outlets calling it a potential game-changer. But a word of caution: the black box locator faces logistical nightmares that prevented it from being effective in other similar searches in the past. Authorities, in other words, may learn where the flight went down -- but they'll have a harder time finding the device capable of explaining why. 

"The high-tech system on the way to Perth is known, in military-speak, as the Towed Ping Locator 25. Like its predecessors, the system uses a high-powered underwater microphone known as a hydrophone to search for acoustic 'pings' coming from beacons mounted on the flight data recorder and cockpit voice recorder in a downed aircraft. They're commonly known as "black boxes," although they're usually orange. The ping locator, made by Phoenix International of Largo, Md., is about 30 inches long and weighs 70 pounds. It closely resembles a miniature torpedo, complete with fins, and is pulled on a long underwater cable behind a ship. It can detect pings from up to 20,000 feet under the sea. More here.

Or read the International Business Times' bit on "Why the U.S. Navy's Black Box Locator is a Game Changer," here.

McCain won't block Work's nomination over the LCS. Bloomberg's Tony Capaccio, here.

The Navy may ban tobacco sales on all ships. Military Times' Karen Jowers: "The Navy is on the verge of eliminating tobacco sales on all its bases and ships, according to sources inside and outside the Defense Department. Officials are reportedly considering removing tobacco from all sales venues, to include any exchange-operated retail outlets, as well as MWR-operated retail outlets where cigarettes may be sold. Commissaries on Navy bases currently do not sell tobacco products. The decision would be made at the service's highest levels. Navy officials have been gathering information on the impacts of such a decision, one source said, to include the inevitable drop in profits for the Navy Exchange Service Command - which would reduce the flow of dividends that help fund morale, welfare and recreation programs on installations." More here.

Obama will call for an end to NSA's bulk data collection. The NYT's Charlie Savage: "The Obama administration is preparing to unveil a legislative proposal for a far-reaching overhaul of the National Security Agency's once-secret bulk phone records program in a way that - if approved by Congress - would end the aspect that has most alarmed privacy advocates since its existence was leaked last year, according to senior administration officials. Under the proposal, they said, the N.S.A. would end its systematic collection of data about Americans' calling habits. The bulk records would stay in the hands of phone companies, which would not be required to retain the data for any longer than they normally would. And the N.S.A. could obtain specific records only with permission from a judge, using a new kind of court order." More here.

Are you curious about the black market for malware and cyber weapons? FYI, it's thriving. Our own Shane Harris: "The world of computer hackers who sell stolen credit card numbers, spyware, and cyber weapons is often likened to an 'underground,' a word that implies the existence of a place cut off from most Internet users and existing in a corner of the Web that most people never see. But a new report concludes that the markets actually function more like thriving bazaars subject to the same economic forces as legitimate stores. And just like those legitimate stores, the bazaars aren't that hard to find.

"A simple YouTube search can unearth dozens of videos describing how to use hacker kits to break into Web sites or steal bank account login credentials. Google "buy stolen credit cards" and you'll eventually get directions to dozens of storefronts that offer up pilfered account data. The cyber black market "has emerged as a playground of financially driven, highly organized and sophisticated groups," conclude the authors of a new report from the Rand Corp., the independent research group that often provides analysis to the Defense Department and U.S. intelligence agencies." More here.

Journalists doing journalism: Some in the military challenge Nebraska Senate candidate Shane Osborn's decisions in the EP-3 incident in 2001. The Omaha World-Herald Steve Liewer: "Shane Osborn takes pride in his popular image as a Navy hero, the cool-as-ice aviator who pulled his crippled reconnaissance plane out of a fatal dive and landed it safely in China, saving the lives of his 23 crew members. He's ridden a wave of public acclaim to a term as Nebraska state treasurer, success in business, and a strong position in his bid this year for the Republican nomination for U.S. Senate. Yet questions have followed Osborn ever since the April 2001 incident - especially from others who have served in the military. Some veterans say, in strong terms, that Osborn should have ditched his four- engine EP-3E ARIES II propeller craft in the South China Sea instead of handing over a highly sensitive electronics platform to Chinese authorities - even if it meant killing himself and much of his crew." Read the rest here.

And here, a sidebar on how Osborn's buddy in the Navy wrote a memo endorsing Osborn's actions during the incident - and how it was distributed by the campaign without clearance from the Navy. Read that here.

Speaking of which: Read this piece about how to avoid a naval war with China, on FP by William Parker and Micah Zenko, here.

Swimming upstream: Pete Hegseth in the WSJ yesterday on the need for military pension reform; an important read ICYMI: "... The system is inequitable as well as expensive. Only members who serve 20 years of active duty are eligible for lifetime retirement pensions and military health care-known as Tricare. The vast majority of enlistees leave the armed forces earlier. That means a U.S. Marine could serve three tours of duty in Iraq or Afghanistan, under combat conditions, and not qualify. Meanwhile, another member of the military who never experiences direct combat or repeated deployment can qualify for full retirement benefits after 20 years. All military service is honorable, but there's something amiss when the majority of combat veterans leave the service with no long-term benefits." Read the whole bit here.

Naturally: Sinclair may get to retire at his current rank. USAToday's Jim Michaels: "The attorney for Army Brig. Gen. Jeffrey Sinclair, who pleaded guilty last week to adultery and having inappropriate relationships with several women, said it is possible that his client could still retire as a general. In a highly charged case, Sinclair was fined $20,000 and reprimanded, but he avoided prison time. Critics, such as Rep. Jackie Speier, D-Calif., called the sentence a 'mockery.'

The sentence left open an important question. At what rank will Sinclair, 51, be allowed to retire? At stake is a lot of money. Sinclair's attorney calculated that the difference between his retiring as a lieutenant colonel and a brigadier general would amount to $832,000 if he would retire today and live to age 82." More here.

Peter Bergen takes the NYT's Carlotta Gall to task for her piece on Pakistan and OBL. Bergen: "...Gall makes two astonishing claims in her Times magazine piece. The first claim: An unnamed Pakistani official told her, based on what he had in turn heard from an unnamed senior U.S. official that "the United States had direct evidence that the ISI chief, Lt. Gen. Ahmed Shuja Pasha, knew of bin Laden's presence in Abbottabad." ISI is Pakistan's powerful military intelligence agency.

The second claim: "The ISI actually ran a special desk assigned to handle bin Laden. It was operated independently, led by an officer who made his own decisions and did not report to a superior. He handled only one person: bin Laden...the top military bosses knew about it, I was told."

It is, of course, hard to prove negatives, but having spent around a year reporting intensively on the hunt for al Qaeda's leader for my 2012 book 'Manhunt: The Ten-Year Search for bin Laden From 9/11 to Abbottabad,' I am convinced that there is no evidence that anyone in the Pakistani government, military or intelligence agencies knowingly sheltered bin Laden."

On three reporting trips to Pakistan I spoke to senior officials in Pakistan's military and intelligence service. They all denied that they had secretly harbored bin Laden. OK, you are thinking: "But they would say that, wouldn't they?"

Well, what about the dozens of officials I spoke to in the U.S. intelligence community, Pentagon, State Department and the White House who also told me versions of "the Pakistanis had no idea that bin Laden was hiding in Abbottabad"?

During the course of reporting for my book I spoke on the record to, among others, John Brennan, now the CIA director and then President Obama's top counterterrorism adviser; then CIA Director Leon Panetta and his chief of staff, Jeremy Bash; then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton; then Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Adm. Mike Mullen; then Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Gen. James Cartwright; then director of the National Counterterrorism Center, Michael Leiter; then senior director for counterterrorism at the National Security Council, Nick Rasmussen; then head of policy at the Pentagon, Michele Flournoy; Michael Vickers, who was then the civilian overseer of Special Operations at the Pentagon; Tony Blinken, who is now the deputy national security adviser; and Denis McDonough, who held that position before Blinken.

These officials have collectively spent many decades working to destroy al Qaeda, and many are deeply suspicious of Pakistan for its continuing support for elements of the Taliban. But all of them told me in one form or another that Pakistani officials had no clue that bin Laden was living in Abbottabad." Read the rest of Bergen's piece here.