MISSING LINKS:
COLUMNS ON THE SURPRISES OF GLOBALIZATION
The 'Axis of Lula' vs. the 'Axis of Hugo'
By Moisés Naím
Page 1 of 1
Posted March 2009
Latin American leaders face a choice between provocation and progress.
JUAN BARRETO/AFP/Getty Images
Best enemies: Lula consistently supports Chávez's most grandiose plans while quietly working to undermine them.
The
same weekend that Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez celebrated Mauricio
Funes's election as El Salvador's new president, his Brazilian
counterpart, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, was meeting with U.S. President
Barack Obama. The election in El Salvador and the meeting at the White
House are manifestations one of the most important trends that will shape Latin
American politics in coming years.
Funes was the candidate of
the former guerrilla movement, Farabundo Martí National Liberation
Front, and his election marked the peaceful transition from two decades
of government by its archrival, the Arena party. Thus a right-wing
government closely allied with the United States handed power to a
leftist party whose most prominent leaders have a long history of
confrontation with Washington. As significantly, Obama's invitation to
da Silva marks the end of a long period of estrangement between the
United States and Latin America and opens new possibilities for
rebuilding tattered relations between Washington and the region.
According
to Chávez, Funes's victory "consolidates the historical current that
has been rising in Latin America in this first decade of the 21st
century," referring to the left's ascent to power in several countries
of the hemisphere.
Does this mean that El Salvador is the newest
member of the "Axis of Hugo"? In addition to Venezuela and Cuba, the
core of that axis is formed by Bolivia, Ecuador, and Nicaragua.
Honduras and Paraguay are also part of this alliance, though their
governments have an internal opposition that prevents their leaders
from becoming full-fledged members.
While the axis countries
build their anti-Yankee alliance and try to implement what the
Venezuelan president calls "21st-century socialism," the Brazilian
government is successfully developing a very different geopolitical
project: ensuring Brazil's presence at the table when the world's most
important decisions are negotiated. Brazil has thus become an
indispensable voice in the debates concerning the rules governing
international trade, energy, the environment, and the redesign of the
international financial system.
So, while Hugo Chávez spends his
time and oil revenues trying to influence countries such as Bolivia,
Nicaragua, and Paraguay, da Silva hangs out with leaders in India,
South Africa, and Europe.
The Brazilian government does not
carry out this strategy in direct competition with Chávez's axis. It
maintains close and friendly relations with the axis governments and
goes out of its way to praise Venezeula's president. It has also been
very effective in containing Chávez's more extreme international
gambits, such as his enthusiastic support for Colombia's FARC
guerrillas, and moderating his propensity for conflict. Brazil has
enthusiastically supported his grandiose plans (the transcontinental
gas pipeline, the Bank of the South, the merging of the Venezuelan and
Brazilian oil companies, Venezuela's entry into Mercosur) while subtly
sabotaging them and ensuring that none of them come to fruition. (None
have.)
This frictionless coexistence between the Axis of Lula
and the Axis of Hugo is going to become harder to sustain as the
Brazilian president deepens his ties with Obama's White House.
Hopefully, Obama's overture to Brazil signals a change in the long-held
propensity of the United States to spend all of its time on Latin
America's smallest countries and issues while neglecting the
continent-size country in the middle. If the Obama administration were
to give Brazil the time and political capital usually spent by the U.S.
government on Cuba, it would find much higher rates of return.
And
here is where El Salvador's election becomes such an interesting gauge
of larger trends. Sooner rather than later, countries like El Salvador
will have to choose. Do they want to join an alliance predicated on the
willingness of the Venezuelan president to give away large chunks of
his country's (declining) oil income, and constant confrontations with
the United States? Or would they rather get as close as possible to
Brazil -- a giant continental ally that has good and improving
relations with the United States and a real influence in the global
forums where decisions that affect Latin America are made?
The
new president of El Salvador now faces this dilemma. Although he claims
to be a moderate, his party's leadership is to his left and strongly
pro-Chávez. They will push hard to tilt the new government toward the
Axis of Hugo. Moreover, despite the fall in oil revenues, Chávez still
has enough money to influence the internal politics of a small country
like El Salvador, and there is no doubt that he will try. President
Funes surely knows this and is also likely to understand that his best
bet is to be as friendly as possible with Chávez without becoming
another of his satellites.
To pull off this difficult balancing
act, he can count on the Axis of Lula. And perhaps because he knows
this, his first decision as president-elect was to travel to Brazil.
"For me, President Lula and his government are my reference of a
leftist, democratic government that can instill confidence in foreign
investors," Funes said in Brazil. Let's see what he says when he visits
Hugo.
Moisés Naím is editor in chief of Foreign Policy. A version of this article appeared in Spanish in El País.
FOREIGN POLICY welcomes letters to the editor. Readers should address their comments to Letters@ForeignPolicy.com.