Is Nawaz Sharif, Pakistan's once and
likely future leader, really a born-again liberal?
John Moore/Getty Images
A hard swallow: The U.S. and Nawaz Sharif are unlikely friends. But they may become just that.
As
U.S. officials meet with Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari this week in
Washington, there is someone missing from the discussions: Zardari's archrival,
Nawaz Sharif. The two-time prime minister is back with a vengeance -- and an
approval rating more than three times that of the president. Now he is hoping
for another chance at power. He has the political winds at his back. But can he
be trusted to govern?
Head
of his own wing of the Pakistan Muslim League party, Sharif is marketing
himself at home and in Washington as a bulwark of democracy against the rising tide
of Talibanization. In an April interview with USA
Today, for example, he criticized Taliban militants for advocating a
harsh version of sharia and vowed to
roll back their territorial gains.
Sharif's
timing has never been better. Taliban insurgents were within 60 miles of the
capital last week; a government peace deal with pro-Taliban clerics in the Swat
Valley has fallen apart; and despite recent upticks in effort, the Pakistani
military seems unable (or unwilling) to truly engage in the fight.
Some
improvements in the situation -- of the kind Sharif promises -- would be music
to American ears. And unlike the Bush team, which preferred to work through former
Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf, the Obama administration is willing to
hedge its bets. U.S. officials are actively courting opposition leaders, and
especially Sharif.
So
who is Nawaz Sharif? The politician has come a long way since his controversial
start as a firebrand protégé of Islamist general and former Pakistani President
Mohammad Zia ul-Haq. Like most ambitious politicians, he developed strong ties
with the Pakistani military and intelligence officers and gave full support to
the Afghan jihad against the Soviets in the 1980s.
Since
then, Nawaz has reinvented himself as a constitutional liberal, an audacious if
not entirely persuasive feat of political shrewdness. His two stints as prime
minister in the early and late 1990s were marked by weak economic growth,
widespread corruption, and ineffective governance. Still, he is remembered less
for his failures than for authorizing the 1998 nuclear tests that made Pakistan
the first, and so far only, Muslim country with a nuclear bomb.
More
recently, Sharif owes his popularity to savvy moves such as his unbridled
support for Pakistan's recently reinstated chief justice, Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry,
who was twice removed unconstitutionally by Musharraf. Bold street protests led
by Sharif forced the judge's reinstatement this year. He is a staunch supporter
of constitutional reform including granting the rustic Baluchistan province more
economic autonomy to keep a cap on a dormant insurgency there. Even Sharif's
anti-American rhetoric has mellowed from fighting imperialism to asking for
respect for Pakistani sovereignty.
Could
Sharif use his popularity, and his Islamist credentials, to tame the Taliban?
He does have a long and intimate relationship with Pakistan's premier
intelligence agency, Inter-Services Intelligence, which he has often put to use
in swallowing up Islamist parties into his larger political structure and base.
Moreover, Sharif has encouraging experience with urban counterinsurgency. In
the early 1990s, he used effective (albeit unaccountable) policing to quell an uprising
in Karachi -- an 18 million-strong tinderbox of ethnic, criminal, and religiopolitical
forces. Today, with Pakistan's cities threatened by even deadlier forces, such
as al Qaeda and the Taliban, it might help that Sharif is no novice.
Of
course, there are caveats. Sharif was successful in Karachi during his term but
later capitulated to Islamists in the Swat Valley. He acquiesced to a pact with
the Islamist parties in the late 1980s for political expediency. Then in the
late 1990s, he showed little resistance to Islamists as they called for laws to
reduce religious freedom and gender equality throughout Pakistan. Sharif
introduced a 1998 bill intended to impose strict sharia nationwide and make him
the supreme leader, Iran style -- able to challenge any legislation that he
deemed inconsistent with the Koran and the country's Islamic Constitution.
Sharif's
supporters in the United States -- and he has some -- contest that this
Islamist-leaning prime minister is now "dead." Today he is a
patriotic demagogue, they say, willing and ready to defend his country from
either Taliban or U.S. dictates. One might even argue that Sharif's previous
experience taught him the perils of cutting deals with Islamists in Pakistan's
northern frontier -- as the government of Zardari has just done.
Whether
the White House believes that story or not, President Barack Obama is likely to
keep his options open. The stakes in Pakistan are too great for the U.S.
president to rely solely on one leader. If in the next 12 to 18 months the
Taliban's gains are not reversed, don't be surprised if Washington pushes for
political change in Islamabad, starting with Nawaz Sharif as prime minister.
(Many expect the newly reinstated chief justice to help clear the charges of
corruption currently preventing him from running.) From there, Zardari could be
coerced to step down with the help of the military, notably Army chief Gen.
Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, and new parliamentary elections could be organized.
Presently,
Zardari and Sharif will undoubtedly try to make political gains from the
country's reigning instability. They would do well to realize that this time
around, there will be no blank checks -- from the United States or the Taliban.
Haider Ali Hussein Mullick is
senior fellow at the U.S. Joint Special Operations University and author of a forthcoming
paper, "Pakistan's Security Paradox: Countering and Fomenting Insurgencies."
FOREIGN POLICY welcomes letters to the editor. Readers should address their comments to Letters@ForeignPolicy.com.