Zimbabwe's former opposition leader explains what it's like to share power with Robert Mugabe -- the man who (probably) tried to have him killed.
DESMOND KWANDE/AFP/Getty Images
Unlikely bedfellows: Zimbabwe's hopes rest on the uneasy relationship of two bitter enemies, Tsvangirai and Mugabe.
Imagine
yourself working side by side each day with a man who -- for the last decade --
has repeatedly arrested you, charged you with treason, detained and beaten your
friends, and may have plotted your assassination just a year earlier. You are
prime minister and he is president, even though your party won elections to
oust him from power last year. The fates of an entire country and 11 million
people depend on your having a good working relationship. And now imagine that the country has multi-million-percent inflation, hundreds dying from cholera,
and a pattern of political violence that has chased thousands out of the
country in recent years.
Welcome
to the life of Morgan Tsvangirai, prime minister of Zimbabwe and leader of the
opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC). Since September, Tsvangirai
has endured grueling negotiations to set up a power-sharing government with President
Robert Mugabe and his party, ZANU-PF. Three months into its operation, the pace
of progress is slow, Tsvangirai told Foreign
Policy's Elizabeth Dickinson. Remaining disagreements over the appointment
of ministers, the ongoing arrest of activists and journalists, and basic day to
day operations have plagued the arrangement. Donors in the West have refused to
send aid to the broke Zimbabwean government so long as Mugabe is still at the
reins. Still, Tsvangirai is thinking big about how to get the country back on
track. An economic plan will aim to get the country functioning again over the
next 100 days -- tackling even the contentious issue of land redistribution. In
short, Tsvangirai says, "Ours is the transformative challenge: to transform old
habits and introduce a new governance culture, and you know it's difficult in a
coalition government."
Foreign Policy: How
did it feel on day one, walking into the position of prime minister knowing all
the challenges before you? What did it feel like?
Morgan
Tsvangirai: It is obvious the level of economic degeneration that just hit
us in the face when we went into government. There was a sense of euphoria, which
was very short-lived because the decision to go in was influenced by a number
of factors, one of which was that we could not be authors of chaos, and that if
there was chaos in the country the outcome would be unpredictable; it would
engulf us all. So, yes, there was a sense that we have made the right decision,
but we didn't know what we were going into.
FP: You said
yesterday that elements of ZANU-PF are holding up the progress of the unity
government. Can you update us on the status of talks to resolve these remaining
issues -- for example, the position of the Central Bank governor?
MT: The
discussions amongst the principles are going very well; we certainly hope that
tomorrow we'll be making an announcement on the outstanding issues. You must be
conscious that this is a coalition government. There are sensitivities and
emotions that need to be navigated and negotiated. One would be a bit
overambitious to expect everything we're grappling with to be resolved within
three months.
It's frustratingly slow, in our assessment, that we
have gone this far without at least indicating how the outstanding issues will
be resolved. But I'm glad to say that we have made progress. The issues that we
have agreed upon -- and those we are still in disagreement about -- will be
announced to the nation so that the nation is able to make an assessment as to
if there has been progress or not.
FP: You have
shown an incredible spirit of reconciliation -- saying
on Friday, "Robert Mugabe was part of the problem but he is also part of
the solution, whether you like it or not." But are Zimbabweans ready
for that kind of reconciliation?
MT: There
is a sense of cautious optimism that this inclusive government will be a
successful experiment because no one wants to go back to the November,
December, January, situation. So therefore, when you present national union as
one of the democratic challenges, people accept that there is need for national
healing for progress. But of course, there has to be a process of that national
healing, otherwise people will continue to [have] that frustration.
FP: President
Robert Mugabe has a sinister reputation in the United States and elsewhere. But
are there things that the West is failing to understand about Mugabe?
MT: I'm
sure this perception is what has been built up over the years -- some of which
is a reality. But one of the underlying things is that I am prepared to work
with President Robert Mugabe -- not because he's right but because of the
national interest: We would work with anybody who wants to push the national
agenda forward. But instead of [the international community] taking a cue from
us as to how to proceed, it would appear that people have made this judgment [not
to help], and they have thrown out the baby with the bath water.