FP Logo Your portal to global politics, economics, and ideas
FP Logo
Article Index
Search Site
FP Archive article
free registration required
back issue only
Home
Free FP e-Alert
Submit Free FP e-Alert
More Info
Worldwide Links
FP Forum
FP in the News
FP e-Alert Archives
Surprises of Globlization
Press Room

Current Article
What Does the End of the Recession Look Like?
By Annie Lowrey
Page 1 of 9
Posted June 2009
Regional economic experts agree: The end of the recession just means the end of the beginning of bad times.


Flickr user Rich Anderson
But what does it mean? Economic experts describe the end of the beginning of bad times.

Find the interviews linked here:

The worldwide recession may be nearing bottom or lifting, some data suggests. The rate of job losses has slowed. Financial and credit markets have eased. Ambitious stimulus plans seem to be working.

But these metrics hardly provide a qualitative understanding of what the world faces in the short to medium term -- the next six to 24 months. What does the end of the recession really look like? And how will we know when we get there?

Foreign Policy surveyed the latest thinking and contacted top economic experts to get a better picture of the shape of things to come. We asked them to take out their crystal balls, assess whether the recession is lifting, and discuss what's too often left out in the sometimes Pollyannaish press stories on "green shoots."

Their consensus? The end of the recession looks much like the recession itself. We are at the end of the beginning of bad times.

On this page, you'll find condensed versions of their assessments and warnings. Read on to find the interviews, which were lightly edited for clarity and slightly condensed.

China

The winner of the crisis. Beijing faces challenges in ensuring the correct type of growth. But China looks to be the world economy's only real bright spot for some time in the future.

"I think China's had an extremely good crisis. It's been good for China. It was very obvious to a few people, including some important policy people in Beijing, that the massive export growth of the past decade or so was just not sustainable on a permanent basis; it was heading for a collision anyhow. And in that case, something needed to change, so in some strange way the crisis has been convenient because it's allowed them to make dramatic monetary and fiscal policy changes." -- Jim O'Neill, head of global economic research for Goldman Sachs

"The World Bank is not all that optimistic, over two years. China is a large economy, but quite integrated in terms of trade and inward FDI. So, what has happened now is: exports are still the main drag on growth. They're very important for China, in terms of the importance of growth, more important than in India or Brazil...exports are important and will continue to be mediocre. What's kept growth up is stimulus.

"But you cannot undertake this large a stimulus for too many years in a row. Even China can't undertake a stimulus next year. In terms of momentum, when we look at next year, we don't really expect it to accelerate. It will grow respectably." -- Louis Kuijs, senior economist for the World Bank in China

Japan

The situation in Japan -- which has an aging population, a gutted pension program, and specialization in unwanted high-tech exports -- seems especially fragile.

"Japan's recession started because of a sharp decline in Japanese exports. But the decline of exports has slowed down and the manufacturing sector activity has declined sharply, as did imports. That has a positive effect on GDP. Because of these factors, the negative growth has slowed down. That's why the Bank of Japan says we're at the bottom.

"But our GDP is much lower, 10 percent lower, than what we can produce. So, still our situation is very bad. And, the problem is, what will be the engine of recovery? I don't know." -- Kyoji Fukao, professor at the Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University

Africa

With aid, investment, and commodity prices set to fall, the fallout of the global recession may be particularly harmful on the world's poorest continent, rolling back years of development successes.

"Basically, the African financial sectors were spared the initial round of bank failures and financial sector turmoil because African banks weren't that integrated and weren't dealing in derivatives and CDS and those sort of things. But when it turned into a real world economic crisis, when there was recession in developed countries, that immediately had a major impact on African countries on four main channels -- FDI, remittances, commodity prices, and aid. In each of these channels, the effect on Africa was particularly devastating." -- Shanta Devarajan, chief economist for the World Bank's Africa region

The United States

The recession appears to be ending and recovery could start as early as the fall, economists concur. But, the recovery, described variously as "a curved L," a "Q," and a "U" -- not a real "V" -- may be a hesitant one.


1                                                                        next

FOREIGN POLICY welcomes letters to the editor.
Readers should address their comments to Letters@ForeignPolicy.com.

Shop at FP
Subscribe to FP
Login
Username
Password


| Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Contact Us | Site Map | Subscribe |

 
FP Logo
1899 L Street NW, Suite 550 | Washington, DC 20036 | Phone: 202-728-7300 | Fax: 202-728-7342
FOREIGN POLICY is published by the Slate Group, a division of Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive, LLC
All contents ©2009 Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive, LLC. All rights reserved.
Site design by bevia.com; Programming by Enovational Design