Every day, millions of online diarists, or “bloggers,” share their opinions with a global audience. Drawing upon the content of the international media and the World Wide Web, they weave together an elaborate network with agenda-setting power on issues ranging from human rights in China to the U.S. occupation of Iraq. What began as a hobby is evolving into a new medium that is changing the landscape for journalists and policymakers alike.
It was March 21, 2003—two days after the United States began its “shock
and awe” campaign against Iraq—and the story dominating TV networks
was the rumor (later proven false) that Saddam Hussein’s infamous cousin,
Ali Hassan al-Majid (“Chemical Ali”), had been killed in an airstrike.
But, for thousands of other people around the world who switched on their computers
rather than their television sets, the lead story was the sudden and worrisome
disappearance of Salam Pax.
Otherwise known as the “Baghdad
Blogger,” Salam Pax was the pseudonym for a 29-year-old Iraqi architect
whose online diary, featuring wry and candid observations about life in wartime,
transformed him into a cult figure. It turned out that technical difficulties,
not U.S. cruise missiles or Baathist Party thugs, were responsible for the three-day
Salam Pax blackout. In the months that followed, his readership grew to millions,
as his accounts were quoted in the New York Times, BBC, and Britain’s
Guardian newspaper. If the first Gulf War introduced the world to the
“CNN effect,” then the second Gulf War was blogging’s coming
out party. Salam Pax was the most famous blogger during that conflict (he later
signed a book and movie deal), but myriad other online diarists, including U.S.
military personnel, emerged to offer real-time analysis and commentary.
Blogs (short for “weblogs”) are periodically updated journals,
providing online commentary with minimal or no external editing. They are usually
presented as a set of “posts,” individual entries of news or commentary,
in reverse chronological order. The posts often include hyperlinks to other
sites, enabling commentators to draw upon the content of the entire World Wide
Web. Blogs can function as personal diaries, political analysis, advice columns
on romance, computers, money, or all of the above. Their number has grown at
an astronomical rate. In 1999, the total number of blogs was estimated to be
around 50; five years later, the estimates range from 2.4 million to 4.1 million.
The Perseus Development Corporation, a consulting firm that studies Internet
trends, estimates that by 2005 more than 10 million blogs will have been created.
Media institutions have adopted the form as well, with many television networks,
newspapers, and opinion journals now hosting blogs on their Web sites, sometimes
featuring dispatches from their own correspondents, other times hiring full-time
online columnists.
Blogs are already influencing U.S. politics. The top five political blogs together
attract over half a million visitors per day. Jimmy Orr, the White House Internet
director, recently characterized the “blogosphere” (the all-encompassing
term to describe the universe of weblogs) as instrumental, important, and underestimated
in its influence. Nobody knows that better than Trent Lott, who in December
2002 resigned as U.S. Senate majority leader in the wake of inflammatory comments
he made at Sen. Strom Thurmond’s 100th birthday party. Initially, Lott’s
remarks received little attention in the mainstream media. But the incident
was the subject of intense online commentary, prodding renewed media attention
that converted Lott’s gaffe into a full-blown scandal.
Political scandals are one thing, but can the blogosphere influence global
politics as well? Compared to other actors in world affairs—governments,
international organizations, multinational corporations, and even nongovernmental
organizations (NGOs)—blogs do not appear to be very powerful or visible.
Even the most popular blog garners only a fraction of the Web traffic that major
media outlets attract. According to the 2003 Pew Research Center for the People
and the Press Internet Survey, only 4 percent of online Americans refer to blogs
for information and opinions. The blogosphere has no central organization, and
its participants have little ideological consensus. Indeed, an October 2003
survey of the blogosphere conducted by Perseus concluded that “the typical
blog is written by a teenage girl who uses it twice a month to update her friends
and classmates on happenings in her life.” Blogging is almost exclusively
a part-time, voluntary activity. The median income generated by a weblog is
zero dollars. How then can a collection of decentralized, contrarian, and nonprofit
Web sites possibly influence world politics?
Blogs are becoming more influential because they affect the content of international
media coverage. Journalism professor Todd Gitlin once noted that media frame
reality through “principles of selection, emphasis, and presentation composed
of little tacit theories about what exists, what happens, and what matters.”
Increasingly, journalists and pundits take their cues about “what matters”
in the world from weblogs. For salient topics in global affairs, the blogosphere
functions as a rare combination of distributed expertise, real-time collective
response to breaking news, and public-opinion barometer. What’s more,
a hierarchical structure has taken shape within the primordial chaos of cyberspace.
A few elite blogs have emerged as aggregators of information and analysis, enabling
media commentators to extract meaningful analysis and rely on blogs to help
them interpret and predict political developments.