FP Logo Your portal to global politics, economics, and ideas
FP Logo
Article Index
Search Site
FP Archive article
free registration required
back issue only
Home
Free FP e-Alert
Submit Free FP e-Alert
More Info
Worldwide Links
FP Forum
FP in the News
FP e-Alert Archives
Surprises of Globlization
Press Room

Current Article
Seven Questions: The Silent Tsunami
Page 1 of 1
Posted April 2008
You’ve heard the frightening statistics, seen the riots, and watched the food lines grow across the world. Have we entered some kind of permanent Malthusian trap? Or is there a way out of the global food crisis? Josette Sheeran, executive director of the U.N. World Food Program, says the situation is dire, but eminently solvable.

Daniel Berehulak/Getty Images
Josette Sheeran: “This is a silent tsunami, and one that’s virtually hitting every developing nation on the earth.”

Foreign Policy: It seems like attention to the global food crisis hadn’t really reached critical mass until the past few weeks and months. Why is that?

Josette Sheeran: The World Food Program is like the canary in the coal mine. Because we’re dealing with food supply for the world’s most vulnerable, we felt it earlier on. Some institutions, like the International Food Policy Research Institute, have been warning that the dynamics of world food supply were getting very precarious. But I don’t think it was until June, when prices went into an aggressive pattern of increase, that it started to get the world’s attention. And food riots that have broken out in 34 countries have certainly helped raise political awareness. Agriculture has not been a high priority for the top political leadership of the world, and these events are ensuring that leaders give agriculture the attention that it needs. But it’s taken some fairly dramatic events to do so.

FP: Do you feel like you’ve been getting the response that you wanted from policymakers, or is there still not enough realization of how bad the problem is?

JS: People understand that we may have a growing humanitarian crisis, but I’m not sure that there’s been a full realization of the kind of energy and investment we need in supply-side solutions. We’re just beginning to see the realization that these solutions need to be combined with the emergency-needs issues. What is key is that this issue has to be taken up by political leadership. It has to be something that finance ministers pay attention to, as well as agricultural or social welfare ministers. The food crisis will affect economies, growth, poverty alleviation, and future generations in these countries. And we need both short-term and long-term solutions.

FP: Are you able to predict which countries are going to have severe shortages and where to concentrate aid, or is it anybody’s guess?

JS: We do very extensive food and crop monitoring with the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization and, in addition, we look at all the projections from the United States, Europe, and elsewhere. Global food production has actually gone through a couple of years of decrease, although not by much. But even under the most optimal circumstances, it cannot increase by more than single digits in a particular year, even if harvests and weather are good. So we’re not expecting to see a big surge in supply. We’re hoping to stay even or see some increase. The problem is, farmers in the developing world are not planting in the way that they did before because they can’t afford the inputs. This could compound the crisis and requires very quick attention from the global community.

FP: Where do you see the greatest potential for massive unrest, suffering, or starvation?

JS: The key indicators we look at are import-dependent countries, because we’re seeing a strain on their capabilities to obtain enough food to meet their needs. Those who have an additional stress like a conflict or a severe weather situation—such as the countries in West Africa, southern Africa, Afghanistan, Bangladesh and others—we see as particularly vulnerable to disaster as they try to manage soaring food prices.

FP: Your organization has announced a $755 million shortfall because of these rising food prices. Where’s that money going to come from?

JS: We have a base budget of $2.9 billion. That’s all voluntarily funded, so we have to raise that money. That $2.9 billion now requires [an additional] $755 million just to meet our existing program of work, which includes Darfur, northern Uganda, Afghanistan, Iraq refugees, etc. So, we have put out an extraordinary emergency appeal. I have been on the road for four months, working with governments to try to meet that appeal. I’ve testified twice before the European Parliament; I’m going to testify before the British Parliament on Monday; I’ve been up to the U.S. Congress numerous times; I’m meeting with the Bush administration; I’ll head to Japan and then the Gulf countries in mid-May. This is really a global appeal that we think requires an extraordinary allocation, a special supplemental allocation as the world would do in a tsunami or an earthquake. This is a silent tsunami, and one that’s virtually hitting every developing nation on the earth.

FP: This situation seems to be about as bad as anyone could have imagined, or worse. Is there any cause for optimism?

JS: I’m optimistic because the world knows how to beat the cycle of hunger and the world knows how to produce enough food for the global population. A lot of global hunger is an infrastructure and distribution problem—maybe half. We see up to half the food lost in developing countries simply because there’s no way to get it from farm gates to markets. We see virtually nonexistent agricultural markets, so there’s no place for buyer and seller to meet. These are things that can be solved. They don’t require a new scientific breakthrough or a Nobel Prize-winning team to find out how to produce enough food for the world. So, we need to focus our attention on a green revolution in Africa that will help break this cycle. In a way, the higher food prices may inspire more people to stay in farming as they see that it’s a good investment. But there will be a lag between what I hope will be a pretty robust response to world demand, and what I know will be a pretty difficult three to four years.

FP: And after that, then what?

JS: [Columbia University economist] Jeffrey Sachs points out that Malawi, for instance, massively increased production in a single year, with investment. It cost many millions of dollars, but the return immediately exceeded those amounts. Investment in agriculture, as the World Bank has noted, will yield the greatest returns for economic growth of any other investment. The farmers I meet are ready to get a little help and to produce more— whether it’s in Latin America or Africa or Asia. We have many tens of millions of farmers in the world who—with a little bit of a boost, a little more technology, and access to the kind of information that has become standard for American, European, Japanese, and other farmers around the world—can get those yields up. Today in Africa, the average yield is one tenth of what it is elsewhere in the world. There’s a lot of room for growth there.

Josette Sheeran is executive director of the World Food Program at the United Nations.


FOREIGN POLICY welcomes letters to the editor.
Readers should address their comments to Letters@ForeignPolicy.com.

Shop at FP
Subscribe to FP
Login
Username
Password


| Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Contact Us | Site Map | Subscribe |

 
FP Logo
1779 Massachusetts Avenue, NW | Washington, DC 20036 | Phone: 202-939-2230 | Fax: 202-483-4430
FOREIGN POLICY is published by the Slate Group, a division of Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive, LLC
All contents ©2008 Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive, LLC. All rights reserved.
Site design by bevia.com; Programming by Enovational Design