FP Logo Your portal to global politics, economics, and ideas
FP Logo
Article Index
Search Site
FP Archive article
free registration required
back issue only
Home
Search Site
FP Archive
Article Index
FP e-Alert
Breaking Global News
Worldwide Links
Idea Feed
Country Intelligence
Free FP e-Alert
Submit Free FP e-Alert
More Info
Academic Program
Current Article

The article you requested is only available to FP subscribers. A short excerpt is provided here for your reference. Log on or purchase Archive access below to read the full story.

Think Again: Neocons
By Max Boot
January/February 2004
“The Bush Administration Is Pursuing a Neoconservative Foreign Policy”

If only it were true! The influence of the neoconservative movement (with which I am often associated) supposedly comes from its agents embedded within the U.S. government. The usual suspects are Paul Wolfowitz, deputy secretary of defense; Douglas Feith, under secretary of defense for policy; Lewis “Scooter” Libby, the vice president’s chief of staff; Elliott Abrams, the National Security Council staffer for Near East, Southwest Asian, and North African Affairs; and Richard Perle, a member of the Defense Policy Board. Each of these policymakers has been an outspoken advocate for aggressive and, if necessary, unilateral action by the United States to promote democracy, human rights, and free markets and to maintain U.S. primacy around the world.

While this list seems impressive, it also reveals that the neocons have no representatives in the administration’s top tier. President George W. Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of State Colin Powell, and National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice: Not a neocon among them. Powell might be best described as a liberal internationalist; the others are traditional national-interest conservatives who, during Bush’s 2000 presidential campaign, derided the Clinton administration for its focus on nation building and human rights. Most of them were highly skeptical of the interventions in the Balkans that neocons championed.

The contention that the neocon faction gained the upper hand in the White House has a superficial plausibility because the Bush administration toppled Saddam Hussein and embraced democracy promotion in the Middle East—both policies long urged by neocons (though not only...



Read the Full Story!


Free and unlimited access is available to all active FP subscribers. Non-subscribers can gain instant access by subscribing to FP or by purchasing a 24-hour or 7-day pass.

If you are a current subscriber or an FP passholder, please log in here:

Username:

Password:
Remember my login information on this computer.

If you are a subscriber, but don't have login information, click here to register now.

Forgot your username or password? Enter your e-mail address below and we'll send you your login information.

E-mail:

Subscribe Now

Not a subscriber? SUBSCRIBE NOW for instant access to all FP content! You'll get 6 insightful issues of FP and complete archive access for $19.95!

Passes

Buy this article for $0.00 USD

Buy a 24-hour Pass for just $7.95 USD.

Buy a 7-day Pass for just $24.95 USD.


 

Shop at FP
Subscribe to FP
Login
Username
Password


| Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Contact Us | Site Map | Subscribe |

 
 
FP Logo
1899 L Street NW, Suite 550 | Washington, DC 20036 | Phone: 202-728-7300 | Fax: 202-728-7342
FOREIGN POLICY is published by the Slate Group, a division of Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive, LLC
All contents ©2009 Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive, LLC. All rights reserved.
Site design by bevia.com; Programming by Enovational Design