FP Logo Your portal to global politics, economics, and ideas
FP Logo
Article Index
Search Site
FP Archive article
free registration required
back issue only
Home
Search Site
FP Archive
Article Index
FP e-Alert
Breaking Global News
Worldwide Links
Idea Feed
Country Intelligence
Free FP e-Alert
Submit Free FP e-Alert
More Info
Academic Program
Current Article

The article you requested is only available to FP subscribers. A short excerpt is provided here for your reference. Log on or purchase Archive access below to read the full story.

Anonymity
By Esther Dyson
September/October 2005

A world where everyone knows everything about everyone else has been a common dystopia. The villain in these frightening worlds has often been a shadowy government, thirsting for information and control. And that remains a frightening possibility in many parts of the world. But there are other, less gloomy outcomes. A world without secrets might actually yield a more forgiving culture with stronger, more informed individuals.

Citizens of the developed world now give off information about themselves at unprecedented rates. Authorities demand information from us when we fly, pass through tollgates, cross borders, and enter public buildings. As the investigation of the July London bombings has revealed, dozens of cameras may capture a city stroll. The cyber trails that people leave are now well known. As many have discovered to their chagrin, records of e-mails sent and Web sites visited rarely disappear—and they often pop up at the most inconvenient moments.

It’s ironic that the Web once seemed to promise individuals new opportunities to explore the world without showing their face. Instead, it is turning out to be a powerful force against anonymity. Most information about people’s online actions is traceable—if someone with resources cares to go to the trouble. But there will be much more to this trend than the familiar fear of governments spying on innocent victims, or even they-asked-for-it dissidents. The bigger questions revolve around the tolerance of societies for diversity and recognition of the human capacity for change.

The technologically adept and dedicated may be able to preserve some form of anonymity—for a time. Some people, for example, will create multiple identities online for the various sites they visit, the social networks they enter, and the...



Read the Full Story!


Free and unlimited access is available to all active FP subscribers. Non-subscribers can gain instant access by subscribing to FP or by purchasing a 24-hour or 7-day pass.

If you are a current subscriber or an FP passholder, please log in here:

Username:

Password:
Remember my login information on this computer.

If you are a subscriber, but don't have login information, click here to register now.

Forgot your username or password? Enter your e-mail address below and we'll send you your login information.

E-mail:

Subscribe Now

Not a subscriber? SUBSCRIBE NOW for instant access to all FP content! You'll get 6 insightful issues of FP and complete archive access for $19.95!

Passes

Buy this article for $0.00 USD

Buy a 24-hour Pass for just $7.95 USD.

Buy a 7-day Pass for just $24.95 USD.


 

Shop at FP
Subscribe to FP
Login
Username
Password


| Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Contact Us | Site Map | Subscribe |

 
 
FP Logo
1899 L Street NW, Suite 550 | Washington, DC 20036 | Phone: 202-728-7300 | Fax: 202-728-7342
FOREIGN POLICY is published by the Slate Group, a division of Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive, LLC
All contents ©2009 Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive, LLC. All rights reserved.
Site design by bevia.com; Programming by Enovational Design