FP Logo Your portal to global politics, economics, and ideas
FP Logo
Article Index
Search Site
FP Archive article
free registration required
back issue only
Home
Search Site
FP Archive
Article Index
FP e-Alert
Breaking Global News
Worldwide Links
Idea Feed
Country Intelligence
Free FP e-Alert
Submit Free FP e-Alert
More Info
Academic Program
Current Article

The article you requested is only available to FP subscribers. A short excerpt is provided here for your reference. Log on or purchase Archive access below to read the full story.

Union Jacked
By David Goodhart
May/June 2006
  • Fabian Review, Winter 2005, London

Gordon Brown, Britain’s finance minister and likely next prime minister, has always been the left-wing conscience of Tony Blair’s centrist New Labour project. But in the past few months, he has been wrapping himself in the British flag. In January, the Fabian Society, the oldest think tank of the British left, sponsored a conference a month after it published a special issue of its quarterly journal, Fabian Review, devoted to the issue of British national identity. In a speech at the conference, Brown asked: “What is the British equivalent of the 4th of July, or even the French 14th of July for that matter?… [W]hat is our equivalent of the national symbolism of a flag in every garden?” The terse response two weeks later from David Cameron, the young, new leader of the Conservative Party, was: “We don’t do flags.”

On the face of it, this is an odd political role reversal. Europe’s political left has traditionally had an ambivalent relationship with national identity and nationalism. Rah-rah patriotism was at odds with the left’s class-based view of society, pitting “instinct” against the left’s “reason.” The horrors of aggressive nationalism in Europe in the first half of the 20th century, followed by a combination of European integration and the arrival of more multiethnic societies in the 1970s and 1980s, seemed to confirm the intellectual and political redundancy of the nation.

The British left has felt this ambivalence more acutely than most, as Britain seemed to evolve from an imperial to a postnational sense of itself without passing through the popular national revolution to align the nation and the state, as classically exemplified by France. Until...



Read the Full Story!


Free and unlimited access is available to all active FP subscribers. Non-subscribers can gain instant access by subscribing to FP or by purchasing a 24-hour or 7-day pass.

If you are a current subscriber or an FP passholder, please log in here:

Username:

Password:
Remember my login information on this computer.

If you are a subscriber, but don't have login information, click here to register now.

Forgot your username or password? Enter your e-mail address below and we'll send you your login information.

E-mail:

Subscribe Now

Not a subscriber? SUBSCRIBE NOW for instant access to all FP content! You'll get 6 insightful issues of FP and complete archive access for $19.95!

Passes

Buy this article for $0.00 USD

Buy a 24-hour Pass for just $7.95 USD.

Buy a 7-day Pass for just $24.95 USD.


 

Shop at FP
Subscribe to FP
Login
Username
Password


| Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Contact Us | Site Map | Subscribe |

 
 
FP Logo
1899 L Street NW, Suite 550 | Washington, DC 20036 | Phone: 202-728-7300 | Fax: 202-728-7342
FOREIGN POLICY is published by the Slate Group, a division of Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive, LLC
All contents ©2009 Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive, LLC. All rights reserved.
Site design by bevia.com; Programming by Enovational Design